Predicting Outcomes of Intermediate Term Complications and Revisional Surgery Following Laparoscopic Adjustable Gastric Banding: Utility of the CORE Classification and Melbourne Motility Criteria

Long-term Outcomes of Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy as a Revisional Procedure Following Adjustable Gastric Banding: Variations in Outcomes Based on Indication

BACKGROUND

Significant controversy exists regarding the indications and outcomes after laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding (LAGB) conversions to laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG).

AIM

To comprehensively determine the long-term outcomes of sleeve gastrectomy as a revisional procedure after LAGB across a range of measures and determine predictors of outcomes.

METHODS

Six hundred revision LSG (RLSG) and 1200 controls (primary LSG (PLSG)) were included. Patient demographics, complications, follow-up, and patient-completed questionnaires were collected.

RESULTS

RLSG vs controls; females 87% vs 78.8%, age 45 ± 19.4 vs 40.6 ± 10.6 years, p = 0.561; baseline weight 119.7 ± 26.2 vs 120.6 ± 26.5 kg p = 0.961). Follow-up was 87% vs 89.3%. Weight loss in RLSG at 5 years, 22.9% vs 29.6% TBWL, p = 0.001, 10 years: 19.5% vs 27% TBWL, p = 0.001. RLSG had more complications (4.8 vs 2.0% RR 2.4, p = 0.001), re-admissions (4.3 vs 2.4% RR 1.8, p = 0.012), staple line leaks (2.5 vs 0.9%, p = 0.003). Eroded bands and baseline weight were independent predictors of complications after RLSG. Long-term re-operation rate was 7.3% for RLSG compared to 3.2% in controls. Severe oesophageal dysmotility predicted poor weight loss. RLSG reported lower quality of life scores (SF-12 physical component scores 75.9 vs 88%, p = 0.001), satisfaction (69 vs 93%, p = 0.001) and more frequent regurgitation (58% vs 42%, p = 0.034).

CONCLUSION

RLSG provides long-term weight loss, although peri-operative complications are significantly elevated compared to PLSG. Longer-term re-operation rates are elevated compared to PLSG. Four variables predicted worse outcomes: eroded band, multiple prior bands, severe oesophageal dysmotility and elevated baseline weight.

Hiatus Hernia as a Complication of Gastric Banding: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Worsening hiatus hernia (HH) symptoms have been well recognized as a complication of gastric banding, however, it has not yet been explored whether gastric banding plays a role in the development of HH de novo in patients undergoing gastric banding. From the 696 studies identified, five studies met the eligibility criteria and were included. Data was extracted from PubMed, Embase, Medline, HMIC, and Web of Science databases. The pooled complication rate was evaluated along with 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs). The meta-analysis was performed using the Cochrane RevMan tool (Cochrane, London, UK). Heterogeneity was tested using the I² index for each outcome. All the included studies assessed HH incidence among followed-up patients who needed a re-operation for upper gastrointestinal symptoms. Between-study variability was high (I² = 94%, Chi² = 68.92, df = 4, < 0.00001, Tau2=1.91). Complication rate ranged between 0.24% to 5.55%; pooled complication rate was 2.17% CI 95% (0.90 - 3.44%) P = 0.0008. The included studies show a comparable rate of post-operative HH; the fact that HHs can become symptomatic following the adjustable gastric banding (AGB) procedure indicates that AGB plays a role in creating symptomatic hiatal hernias at the very least. Further research is needed to underpin the mechanism and confirm causation. However, this complication should potentially be discussed with patients opting for this kind of operation as it can be a reason for re-operation.

The Effects of Bariatric Surgery and Endoscopic Bariatric Therapies on GERD: An Update

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Bariatric surgery and endoluminal bariatric therapies (EBTs) form an increasingly utilized therapeutic approach to treat obese patients but may worsen gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). In this updated article, we review the evidence on the effects of bariatric procedures on GERD.

FINDINGS

Recent evidence implicates sleeve gastrectomy with the highest rates of de novo GERD and Barrett's esophagus (BE), whereas malabsorptive-restrictive procedures such as Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) and one anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB) were shown to have significantly lower reported rates. The intragastric balloon (IGB) has been associated with increased likelihood of GERD, whereas insufficient evidence exists linking endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty (ESG) to GERD.

SUMMARY

Gastroesophageal reflux disease may be treated with some bariatric procedures but is often developed de novo as a result of the change in anatomy. Patients set to undergo bariatric surgery may benefit from pre-procedural endoscopy to choose the more suitable therapy. Further studies with objective measurements of GERD post procedure may provide more insight into the effects of bariatric therapies on reflux, especially more novel ones such as ESG.

The Physiology and Pathophysiology of Gastroesophageal Reflux in Patients with Laparoscopic Adjustable Gastric Band

INTRODUCTION

The effect of the laparoscopic adjustable gastric band (LAGB) on esophageal acid exposure and reflux is poorly understood. Optimal technique and normative values for acid exposure have not been established in this group.

METHODS

High-resolution manometry (HRM) and 24-h ambulatory esophageal pH monitoring were performed in three groups: asymptomatic LAGB, symptomatic LAGB, and pre-operative reflux patients. This technique utilized intraluminal pressure signatures during HRM to guide accurate pH sensor placement.

RESULTS

The LAGB groups were well matched: age 48 vs 51 years (p = 0.249), weight loss 27.3 vs 26.7 kg (p = 0.911). The symptomatic group had a larger gastric pouch (5.2 vs 3.3 cm, p = 0.012), with higher esophageal acid exposure (10.8 vs 0.9%, p < 0.001). Two acidification patterns were observed: irritant and volume acidification, associated with substantial supine acidification. Symptomatic LAGB had altered esophageal motility, with poorer lower esophageal sphincter basal tone (8.0 vs 17.7 mmHg, p = 0.022) and impaired contractility of the lower esophageal segment (90 vs 40%, p = 0.009). Compared to pre-operative reflux patients, symptomatic LAGB patients demonstrated higher total and supine esophageal acid exposure (10.8 vs 7.0%, p = 0.010; 14.9 vs 5.1%, p < 0.001), less symptoms (2 vs 6, p = 0.001) and lower symptom index (0.7 vs 0.9, p = 0.010).

CONCLUSIONS

Ambulatory pH monitoring is an effective technique if the pH sensor is positioned appropriately using HRM. The correctly positioned LAGB appears associated with low esophageal acidification. In contrast, patients with symptoms or pouch dilatation can have markedly elevated esophageal acidification, particularly when supine. This is a different pattern compared to pre-operative patients and importantly can be disproportionate to symptoms.

Laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding: efficacy and consequences over a 13-year period

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding (LAGB) is a common bariatric surgery. Although it is a safe and effective method of weight reduction in short term, it may result in some problems in long term. The purpose of this study was to investigate the consequences of LAGB in long term among morbid obese patients.

METHODS

In this prospective study, 80 patients underwent LAGB using pars flaccida technique from 2001 to 2006. Long-term postoperative consequences and complications of these patients were recorded.

RESULTS

The preoperative mean values of weight and body mass index were 125.5 ± 22.5 kg and 44.5 ± 6.5 kg/m(2), respectively. Over the 13-year follow-up period, 56 patients (84.8%) experienced at least one complication. The most common complications were band erosion (20 patients) and weight regains (13 patients). Fifty-one patients (78.5%) required reoperation. The band of 48 patients (72.7%) was removed; of these, twenty patients (30.3%) underwent other bariatric surgeries. Percent of excess weight loss was 47.1% ± 30.1%, and the success rate was 48.7%.

CONCLUSIONS

LAGB is a successful method with low complications in short term; however, over long term, it results in various complications.

Nonsurgical management of luminal dilatation after laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding

BACKGROUND

Proximal luminal dilatation (PLD) is one of the most significant challenges following laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding (LAGB). If PLD is identified at an early stage, there is potential to avoid reoperation or irreversible change by implementing nonsurgical measures. The success of these strategies is unknown. The aim of this study was to determine the outcome of how often PLD can be successfully treated nonsurgically.

METHODS

The records of patients who underwent primary LAGB insertion by a single surgeon from January 2005 to December 2006 were reviewed. Study participants were all patients who had subsequently undergone a postoperative liquid contrast swallow demonstrating a PLD. The severity of PLD, subsequent management, and outcomes were recorded and assessed.

RESULTS

There were 354 patients who underwent a primary LAGB insertion during the study period. Seventy-eight patients were found to have varying degrees of PLD and had an attempt at nonsurgical management. Thirty-four of these patients (43.6 %) were successfully managed nonsurgically at a mean follow-up of 2.8 years (33.2 months, CL ± 3.2). The success with nonsurgical management was lower if the symmetrical pouch dilatation was more severe or gastric prolapse was seen at presentation, and if no improvement in liquid contrast swallow was seen.

CONCLUSIONS

PLD can often be successfully managed with nonsurgical measures, maintaining good weight loss in the intermediate term. Patients with more significant dilatation are more likely to require revisional surgery. Early recognition may have a role in preventing surgery or more severe abnormalities.

Revisional bariatric surgery

With the increase in bariatric surgical procedures, an increase in revision operations is expected. A thorough preoperative work-up is essential to formulate an appropriate revision strategy. Outcomes vary according to the primary operation and chosen approach to revision. Recent studies have shown acceptably low complication rates and good weight loss with the associated health benefits. Although there is no direct evidence in the form of randomized studies indicating which patients with inadequate weight loss or weight regain will benefit most from revision, or to support one particular revision approach rather than another, it is possible to develop general, effective strategies.

The mechanism of weight loss with laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding: induction of satiety not restriction

Laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding (LAGB) has rapidly emerged as a popular bariatric procedure because of its safety, efficacy, durability and adjustability. Despite widespread use, there is limited understanding of how it induces weight loss. Previously, it has been classified as a restrictive procedure, physically limiting the patient to a small meal that subsequently slowly empties into the distal stomach. However, the tiny pouch of stomach created above the LAGB appears to be unable to accommodate even the smallest of meals. Therefore, the key mechanism has been hypothesized to be the induction of satiety via, as yet, undefined pathways. The critical question remains: what are the key physiological changes that lead to satiety and weight loss? In successful LAGB patients, a consistent intraluminal pressure at the level of the LAGB of 26.9 ± 19.8 mm Hg is observed. Studies using semi-solid swallows combined with intraluminal pressure recordings have demonstrated that semi-solid transit across the resistance of the LAGB is mediated by repeated esophageal peristaltic contractions (mean 4.5 ± 2.9) that produce episodic flow, interspersed by reflux events. Failed transit results in obstruction and regurgitation, whereas dilatation of the supraband stomach induces severe and intolerable reflux. Overall gastric emptying does not appear to be significantly altered following LAGB. Focused investigations have shown that the supraband stomach is empty of an ingested meal 1-2 min after intake ceases. Considerable progress has been made in understanding the mechanical physiological effects of the LAGB on esophageal and proximal gastric function. These have been correlated with patient outcomes and sensations. On the basis of recent data, it appears that the LAGB activates the peripheral satiety mechanism without physically restricting the meal size. Therefore, it should not be classified as a restrictive procedure. The precise mechanism of weight loss with the LAGB remains to be delineated.

Review article: the impact of bariatric surgery on gastrointestinal motility

BACKGROUND

Obesity is a major medical problem worldwide. Different treatment modalities have emerged to treat obese patients, but the best long-term results are achieved with bariatric surgery. Currently, the interventions most commonly performed are laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding (LAGB), Roux-en-Y- gastric bypass (RYGB) and sleeve gastrectomy.

AIM

To review the gastrointestinal motor complications associated with each of these types of bariatric interventions and the clinical implications of such complications.

METHODS

Search of medical database (PubMed) on English-language articles from January 1996 to March 2011. The search terms used were laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding (LAGB), sleeve gastrectomy (LSG), roux-en-Y-gastric bypass (RYGB), using the AND operator with the terms: complications, motility, GERD, reflux, gastric emptying, esophagitis, dysphagia.

RESULTS

Of the three bariatric interventions reviewed, LAGB was the most studied. Most studies reported short follow-up, of ≤ 1 year. Oesophageal motor dysfunction is the most common motility complication following the bariatric interventions that were reviewed and is mainly observed after LAGB. Some data suggest that oesophageal motor function testing predicts development of post-operative symptoms and oesophageal dilation. RYGB offers protection from gastro-oesophageal reflux. Sleeve gastrectomy was the least studied and was associated with an acceleration of gastric emptying.

CONCLUSIONS

The effects of these interventions on GI motility should be considered when selecting patients for bariatric surgery. There is scant information regarding the overall effect of sleeve gastrectomy on gastro-oesophageal reflux patterns and oesophageal motility.