Patient-Reported Outcome Measures 2 Years After Standard and Distal Gastric Bypass-a Double-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial

Depression and Obesity-Do We Know Everything about It? A Narrative Review

INTRODUCTION

Due to similarities in their pathophysiology and common psychological background, depressive disorders and obesity often occur simultaneously. The treatment of obesity can reduce the symptoms of comorbid depression and, conversely, treating depression can improve weight reduction outcomes.

PURPOSE OF THIS STUDY

This review aimed to analyze the available literature on the subject of various methods of treating obesity and comorbid depression and to demonstrate the mutual correlation between the therapy of depressive disorders and the therapy of obesity.

METHOD

The Pubmed and Cochrane databases were searched for original articles on the subject of simultaneous depression and obesity that had been published between 2014 and 2024, using the key words "depression", "depressive symptoms", "obesity", and "behavioral therapy".

RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS

The successful treatment of depression can help in treating obesity, especially in motivating patients to adjust their lifestyle by changing dietary habits and increasing their physical activity, which contribute to both changes in body mass index scores and reductions in depressive symptoms. Changes in self-perception, reduced daily stress, and dietary changes, as well as increased physical activity, contribute to both weight loss and the reduction of depressive symptoms. Depression and obesity should be treated as one two-dimensional disorder to achieve better long-term treatment results.

Proximal Jejuno-Ileal Bypass as Revision of Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass

INTRODUCTION

Bariatric surgery is established as a possibility for the treatment of obesity, allowing weight reduction and remission of obesity comorbidities. Reported suboptimal clinical response rates are as high as 30-60% (insufficient weight loss or gain, defined as BMI greater than 35 kg/m2 or excess weight loss less than 50%). Proximal jejuno-ileal bypass (PJIBP) is a promising option when re-intervention is required.

OBJECTIVES

To describe the standardization of a proprietary technique of modified PJIBP as a management procedure in patients with post-gastric bypass recurrent weight gain or insufficient post-intervention weight loss.

METHODS

This study evaluated a case series of 10 Latin American patients requiring post-bariatric re-intervention, between February 2018 and 2023, in a single-metabolic surgery center in Cali-Colombia.

RESULTS

Median age was 45 years (26-70 RIC), 60% female, and 40% male. Mean BMI at conversion was 36.7 kg/m2 (6.4 SD). Median follow-up was 22 months (RIC 16-30). Mean percentage of excess weight lost was 78% (22.4 SD). One hundred percent achieved glycemia control, only one patient persisted with dyslipidemia, and no patient presented hypoalbuminemia. At the end of follow-up, 100% received vitamin supplementation.

CONCLUSION

PJIBP could be an effective procedure, associated with positive results in relation to weight loss and resolution of obesity comorbidities. Deficiencies of fat-soluble vitamins and protein malnutrition represent the main concern in the long term, so multidisciplinary management and continuous follow-up are required.

Distalization of Standard Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass: Indications, Technique, and Long-Term Results

INTRODUCTION

Weight loss failure or weight regain after primary Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) is a challenge for bariatric surgeons. Failure to achieve a body mass index (BMI) <35 kg/m2 after RYGB occurs in up to 40.0%. The aim of this study was to evaluate long-term results of a novel technique for distalization of Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (DRYGB) as a revisional procedure.

METHODS

Retrospective data were reviewed for 22 patients who had undergone RYGB and failed to achieve an excess weight loss (EWL) >50% or BMI <35 kg/m2 and underwent limb distalization between 2013 and 2022. For this DRYGB procedure, the length of the common channel was 100 cm, and the lengths of the biliopancreatic limb and the alimentary limb were 1/3 and 2/3 of the remaining bowel, respectively.

RESULTS

The mean BMI values before and after DRYGB were 43.7 kg/m2 and 33.5 kg/m2, respectively. Five years after DRYGB, mean % EWL was 74.3% and mean % total weight loss (TWL) was 28.8%. Mean % EWL and mean % TWL of the two procedures (RYGB and DRYGB) after 5 years were 80.9% and 44.7%, respectively. Three patients experienced protein calorie malnutrition. One was reproximalized and the others were treated with parenteral nutrition with no recurrence. There was a significant decrease in the incidence of diabetes type 2 and dyslipidemia after DRYGB.

CONCLUSION

The DRYGB procedure results in substantial and sustained long-term weight loss. Due to the risk of malnutrition, patients must be strictly followed for life after the procedure.

Quality of Life After Bariatric Surgery-a Systematic Review with Bayesian Network Meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

Comprehensive analysis and comparison of HRQoL following different bariatric interventions through systematic review with network meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND

Different types of bariatric surgeries have been developed throughout the years. Apart from weight loss and comorbidities remission, improvement of health-related quality of life (HRQoL) is an important outcome of metabolic surgery.

METHODS

MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Scopus databases have been searched up to April 2020. Inclusion criteria to the analysis were (1) study with at least 2 arms comparing bariatric surgeries; (2) reporting of HRQoL with a validated tool; (3) follow-up period of 1, 2, 3, or 5 years. Network meta-analysis was conducted using Bayesian statistics. The primary outcome was HRQoL.

RESULTS

Forty-seven studies were included in the analysis involving 26,629 patients and 11 different surgeries such as sleeve gastrectomy (LSG), gastric bypass (LRYGB), one anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB), and other. At 1 year, there was significant difference in HRQoL in favor of LSG, LRYGB, and OAG compared with lifestyle intervention (SMD: 0.44; 95% CrI 0.2 to 0.68 for LSG, SMD: 0.56; 95% CrI 0.31 to 0.8 for LRYGB; and SMD: 0.43; 95% CrI 0.06 to 0.8 for OAGB). At 5 years, LSG, LRYGB, and OAGB showed better HRQoL compared to control (SMD: 0.92; 95% CrI 0.58 to 1.26, SMD: 1.27; 95% CrI 0.94 to 1.61, and SMD: 1.01; 95% CrI 0.63 to 1.4, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

LSG and LRYGB may lead to better HRQoL across most follow-up time points. Long-term analysis shows that bariatric intervention results in better HRQoL than non-surgical interventions.

Factors associated with completion of patient surveys 1 year after bariatric surgery

BACKGROUND

Patient-reported outcomes (PRO) obtained from follow-up survey data are essential to understanding the longitudinal effects of bariatric surgery. However, capturing data among patients who are well beyond the recovery period of surgery remains a challenge, and little is known about what factors may influence follow-up rates for PRO.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effect of hospital practices and surgical outcomes on patient survey completion rates at 1 year after bariatric surgery.

SETTING

Prospective, statewide, bariatric-specific clinical registry.

METHODS

Patients at hospitals participating in the Michigan Bariatric Surgery Collaborative are surveyed annually to obtain information on weight loss, medication use, satisfaction, body image, and quality of life following bariatric surgery. Hospital program coordinators were surveyed in June 2017 about their practices for ensuring survey completion among their patients. Hospitals were ranked based on 1-year patient survey completion rates between 2011 and 2015. Multivariable regression analyses were used to identify associations between hospital practices, as well as 30-day outcomes, on hospital survey completion rankings.

RESULTS

Overall, patient survey completion rates at 1 year improved from 2011 (33.9% ± 14.5%) to 2015 (51.0% ± 13.0%), although there was wide variability between hospitals (21.1% versus 77.3% in 2015). Hospitals in the bottom quartile for survey completion rates had higher adjusted rates of 30-day severe complications (2.6% versus 1.7%, respectively; P = .0481), readmissions (5.0% versus 3.9%, respectively; P = .0157), and reoperations (1.5% versus .7%, respectively; P = .0216) than those in the top quartile. While most hospital practices did not significantly impact survey completion at 1 year, physically handing out surveys during clinic visits was independently associated with higher completion rates (odds ratio, 13.60; 95% confidence interval, 1.99-93.03; P =.0078).

CONCLUSIONS

Hospitals vary considerably in completion rates of patient surveys at 1 year after bariatric surgery, and lower rates were associated with hospitals that had higher complication rates. Hospitals with the highest completion rates were more likely to physically hand surveys to patients during clinic visits. Given the value of PRO on longitudinal outcomes of bariatric surgery, improving data collection across multiple hospital systems is imperative.

Early improvement in patient reported disability after bariatric surgery

BACKGROUND

Bariatric surgery is an effective intervention for managing morbid obesity. Little evidence has been reported regarding objective assessments of patient disability after surgery. The World Health Organization Disability Assessment Score 2.0 is a validated tool for assessing the level of disability after surgery, including assessment of difficulty with activities of daily living, social activities, and overall functioning.

OBJECTIVE

Evaluate patient disability after bariatric surgery at a tertiary care medical center.

SETTING

University hospital, United States.

METHODS

An institutional review board-approved prospective cohort study included patients undergoing primary bariatric surgery; patients undergoing a revisional procedure were excluded. Patient-reported disability was assessed using World Health Organization Disability Assessment Score 2.0, administered preoperatively and at 1 and 3 months after surgery. Disability scores (maximum of 48 reflecting extreme disability, minimum of 0) were analyzed for statistically significant trends.

RESULTS

One hundred ten patients enrolled in the study (76% female, 24% male) with 46% sleeve gastrectomy and 54% Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Preoperative body mass index was 47.08 ± 7.6 (n = 110). The preoperative World Health Organization Disability Assessment Score scores were 6.66 ± 6.10 (n = 110). For those who completed both preoperative and 1-month surveys (n = 53), the scores were 6.60 ± 5.76 and 4.04 ± 4.68, respectively (P < .001). Those completing both preoperative and 3-month surveys (n = 53) had scores of 6.08 ± 5.48 and 2.38 ± 3.74, respectively (P < .001).

CONCLUSION

We report early improvement in disability with a validated tool at 1 and 3 months after bariatric surgery. This equates to global disability in this cohort improving from the 75th percentile of the population norm preoperatively to the 50th percentile at 3 months. Further studies are needed to determine if this is sustained long-term.