Attrition after Acceptance onto a Publicly Funded Bariatric Surgery Program

When insurance is not a barrier: psychological factors predicting whether bariatric candidates undergo surgery

BACKGROUND

Despite the effectiveness of bariatric surgery, utilization rates have increased only marginally over the last 2 decades; candidates who are eligible for bariatric surgery regularly fail to undergo surgery. The Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2 Restructured Form (MMPI-2-RF) has previously been used to assist in identification of those who will not move forward with surgery after being identified as eligible. However, medical insurance has been identified as a significant barrier to surgery; research in those who have universal healthcare may yield different results.

OBJECTIVES

Determine if MMPI-RF scales are associated with failure to undergo bariatric surgery in patients eligible to have the procedure.

SETTING

Large military hospital in the Northwestern U.S.

METHODS

This study used archival data for 279 patients psychologically screened for eligibility for bariatric surgery. All assessments took place between January 2017 and December 2019. T-tests and chi-square tests were used to compare groups of patients who did and did not have surgery on relevant medical and demographic variables. Profile analyses of patient MMPI-2-RF scores were conducted to examine scale associations with undergoing surgery.

RESULTS

A total of 86 bariatric surgery candidates (30.8%) did not undergo surgery. Results showed that sex, age, employment status, and arthritis were different between groups. Additionally, MMPI-2-RF scales were different between groups, including somatic complaints, neurological complaints, cynicism, and helplessness/hopelessness.

CONCLUSIONS

MMPI-2-RF scales were associated with not having bariatric surgery, although not all scales exceeded clinical cut-offs. Findings indicate psychological and psychosocial differences, rather than psychopathology per se, may play a role in who undergoes bariatric surgery.

Barriers for bariatric surgery in provincial New Zealand: a qualitative analysis

BACKGROUND

Bariatric surgery is the most effective treatment for people with obesity. It has been shown that there's is a complex psychosocial overlay in the pathophysiology and treatment, which requires specific consideration when delivering care. There is a significant drop out rate for patients accepted on to bariatric programmes in New Zealand, resulting in failure to progress to surgical intervention.

METHODS

We conducted individual, semi-structured interviews with patients who were accepted onto the bariatric surgery programme but did not complete the programme, or receive an operation between 2015 and 2020. Grounded theory methodology was used to create an exploratory framework to identify and describe the themes encountered. An iterative process of thematic analysis and comparison between participants experiences was used to consolidate the shared key barriers. This study aims to explore patients experiences of a bariatric surgery programme to understand barriers and enablers to complete a bariatric programme and receive an operation. Adding to previous qualitative work investigating patients experience of bariatric surgery programmes in New Zealand.

RESULTS

Five themes of barriers that patients face to receiving bariatric surgery were identified. These were preoperative weight loss requirement, experiencing the social stigma of obesity, communication, socioeconomic and geographic barriers, and community support. These five themes often co-exist in patients experiences and combine, to cause patients to disengage with the bariatric service.

CONCLUSION

Many factors contribute to eligible patients not receiving bariatric surgery once accepted onto the programme. Specified weight loss goals was the most significant barrier. Community support and online resources were significant enablers. This study should inform changes to bariatric programmes in New Zealand.

Improving Equity of Access to a Publicly Funded Bariatric Surgery Programme by Removal of Mandatory Weight Loss Targets

INTRODUCTION

Obesity disproportionately affects 50.8% of Māori and 71.3% of Pacific adults in New Zealand, and these groups also have reduced access to bariatric surgery. Mandatory preoperative weight loss targets are a requirement of many bariatric surgery programmes globally; however, the evidence supporting their efficacy is inconclusive. In 2017, mandatory preoperative weight loss targets were eliminated from the bariatric surgery programme at Auckland City Hospital in New Zealand, with the aim to improve equity of access to bariatric surgery. This study will review postoperative patient outcomes following the elimination of preoperative weight loss targets from the programme.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of 231 patients who underwent bariatric surgery at Auckland City Hospital from 2018 to 2021 was performed. Nineteen patients were lost to follow up and 12 were excluded (revision surgery or pregnancy). The comparison group of 100 consecutive patients, retrospective from 2017, had been required to lose 10% of excess body weight preoperatively to qualify for surgery. Outcomes assessed were weight loss and diabetes resolution at 12 months, and postoperative complications within 90 days.

RESULTS

Elimination of preoperative weight loss targets was associated with greater numbers of Māori and Pacific patients undergoing bariatric surgery. There was no significant difference in weight loss outcomes or postoperative complications.

CONCLUSION

Elimination of preoperative weight loss targets improves access to bariatric surgery for Māori and Pacific patients, inequitably affected by obesity. Removal of preoperative weight loss targets does not adversely affect weight loss outcomes, or postoperative complications, thus supporting their elimination.

Sacred Sharing Circles: Urban Indigenous Experience with Bariatric Surgery in Manitoba

INTRODUCTION

Obesity and type 2 diabetes (T2DM) are growing global health concerns. A disproportionate number of Indigenous Peoples live with obesity and its complications. Bariatric surgery offers superior weight loss and comorbidity resolution when compared to medical management. There is a paucity of literature regarding the experiences of Indigenous Peoples undergoing bariatric surgery. The aim of this study was to employ two-eyed seeing and a decolonizing approach to explore the experiences of urban Indigenous bariatric surgery patients.

METHODS

An Indigenous Advisory Committee guided the conception and design of the study. Four urban Indigenous bariatric surgery patients with T2DM participated in two sequential sharing circles and individual interviews facilitated by an Elder. Audio transcripts were analyzed for emerging themes using inductive thematic analysis.

RESULTS

Themes generated from shared participant experiences and knowledge included the following: (1) Experiencing hardship or challenges; (2) Reflecting on the importance of supports; (3) Understanding relationships with food; and (4) Healing and recovery. Overall, the participants described a generally positive experience with the bariatric pathway. Participants also described varied connectedness to their Indigenous identity but uniformly expressed interest in more culturally diverse supports such as sharing circles, access to an elder, and Indigenous peer mentorship.

CONCLUSIONS

Indigenous Peoples have strong motivators for pursuing bariatric surgery and desire access to culturally relevant supports. Suggestions for program improvement included offering sharing circles, providing access to an elder, and Indigenous peer mentorship. This study is the first to qualitatively explore the bariatric surgery experiences of Indigenous Peoples in Canada.

Empowering Pacific Patients on the Weight Loss Surgery Pathway: A Co-designed Evaluation Study

PURPOSE

Despite having the highest medical needs by population for weight loss treatment, Pacific patients in Aotearoa New Zealand face substantial levels of attrition in publicly funded weight loss surgery programs. In collaboration with the Auckland City Hospital bariatric surgery team, a Pacific-led preoperative weight loss surgery program was co-designed, delivered, and evaluated between 2020 and 2023.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This was a single-arm, prospective co-designed evaluation study that took place at Auckland City Hospital in Aotearoa New Zealand. Participants were Pacific patients (n = 14) referred to the weight loss surgery program. Survey and video diaries were analyzed to determine if the program had the potential to increase Pacific patient retention through the preoperative stage of weight loss surgery, increase surgery completion rates, and improve the quality of treatment experiences.

RESULTS

Nine out of 14 participants attended all preoperative sessions. Six participants subsequently underwent weight loss surgery. Program components that had positive impacts on patient success and satisfaction were accessibility, information quality, having Pacific role models, cultural safety, and the group support system. The patients found the program to be culturally anchored and there was support for the implementation of the program going forward.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrated how a culturally anchored intervention can increase patient retention for those patients who may not respond to mainstream treatment. Adjusting existing preoperative weight loss surgery programs to integrate Pacific-led models of healthcare has the potential to increase Pacific patient resiliency to follow through with surgery.

Preoperative medically supervised weight loss programs and weight loss outcomes following bariatric surgery - a prospective analysis

BACKGROUND

Prior to undergoing bariatric surgery, many insurance companies require patients to attend medically supervised weight management visits for 3-6 months to be eligible for surgery. There have been few studies that have looked specifically at the relationship between medically supervised weight management visit attendance and postoperative outcomes, and the current literature reports discrepant findings.

OBJECTIVES

This project aimed to better characterize the relationship between preoperative medically supervised weight management visit attendance and postoperative weight loss outcomes by examining weight loss up to 5 years postbariatric surgery, and by stratifying findings according to the type of surgery undergone.

SETTING

University Hospital.

METHODS

Participants were recruited during presurgical bariatric surgery clinic visits at a bariatric and metabolic weight loss center. As part of standard of care all participants were required to participate in monthly medically supervised weight management visits before surgery. Participants who completed bariatric surgical procedures participated in postsurgical follow-up at 3 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, and then annually for 5 years. Weight outcomes measured were percentage of total weight lost.

RESULTS

The results do not indicate a significant association between number of group visits attended and percent total weight loss at 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year, 2 years, 3 years, 4 years, or 5 years postbariatric surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

These data do not suggest a relationship between engagement in a medically supervised weight loss program prior to bariatric surgery and weight loss after surgery in either the short- or the long-term.

A machine learning framework for optimizing obesity care by simulating clinical trajectories and targeted interventions

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to determine the important clinical management bottlenecks that contribute to underuse of weight loss surgery (WLS) and assess risk factors for attrition at each of them.

METHODS

A multistate conceptual model of progression from primary care to WLS was developed and used to study all adults who were seen by a primary care provider (PCP) and eligible for WLS from 2016 to 2017 at a large institution. Outcomes were progression from each state to each subsequent state in the model: PCP visit, endocrine weight management referral, endocrine weight management visit, WLS referral, WLS visit, and WLS.

RESULTS

Beginning with an initial PCP visit, the respective 2-year Kaplan-Meier estimate for each outcome was 35% (n = 2063), 15.6% (n = 930), 6.3% (n = 400), 4.7% (n = 298), and 1.0% (n = 69) among 5876 eligible patients. Individual providers and clinics differed significantly in their referral practices. Female patients, younger patients, those with higher BMI, and those seen by trainees were more likely to progress. A simulated intervention to increase referrals among PCPs would generate about 49 additional WLS procedures over 3 years.

CONCLUSIONS

This study discovered novel insights into the specific dynamics underlying low WLS use rates. This methodology permits in silico testing of interventions designed to optimize obesity care prior to implementation.

Bariatric Patient Engagement in a Pre-surgery Virtual Patient Navigation Platform (VPNP)

BACKGROUND

This study analyzed patient engagement with a virtual patient navigation platform (VPNP) designed to help guide bariatric surgery candidates through the complex pre-operative workup for surgery.

METHODS

Data on baseline sociodemographic and medical history was collected on patients enrolled in the bariatric program at a single academic institution between March and May 2021. The System Usability Scale (SUS) survey was administered to assess VPNP usability. Two groups emerged: "engaged" (ENG; n = 30) who activated their accounts and completed the SUS, and "not-engaged" (NEG; n = 35) who did not activate their accounts (n = 13) or did not use the app (n = 22) and were therefore ineligible for the SUS survey.

RESULTS

Analyses demonstrated that only insurance status differed between groups (private insurance: 60% versus 34.3% for ENG versus NEG, respectively; p = 0.038). SUS survey analysis demonstrated high perceived usability (median score = 86.3), corresponding to the 97th percentile of usability. The top three reasons for disengagement included being too busy (22.9%), not being interested (20%), and being unsure about the purpose of the app (20%).

CONCLUSIONS

The VPNP scored in the 97th percentile of usability. However, given a majority of patients did not engage with the app, and engagement was associated with completing pre-surgery requirements faster (unpublished), future work will focus on mitigating identified reasons for patients not engaging.

Self-withdrawal from scheduled bariatric surgery: Qualitative study exploring patient and healthcare provider perspectives

The objective of the study was to explore the experience of patients who self-withdrew from their scheduled bariatric surgery (BS) after completing the lengthy multidisciplinary assessment and optimization process, and to examine how these withdrawals affect healthcare providers (HCPs) in a Bariatric Centre of Excellence (BCoE). Interviews were conducted with patients who self-withdrew, within 1 month, from scheduled BS. Additionally, a focus group with HCPs from the same BCoE was completed. The data were analysed using an inductive, emergent thematic approach with open coding in NVivo 12, with comparative analysis to identify common themes between groups. Eleven patients and 14 HCPs participated. HCPs identified several behavioural and logistical red flags among patients who self-withdrew from scheduled BS. Patients and HCPs felt the decision was appropriate, owing to a patient's lack of mental preparedness for change, social supports, or fears of postoperative complications. HCPs reported frustration and described negative impacts on clinic efficiency. Additional mental health resources for patients contemplating self-withdrawal, such as peer support, were suggested. In conclusion, a patient's decision to self-withdraw from a scheduled BS is often sudden, definite, and associated with anxiety, fear of surgical risks and post-operative complications. Additional mental health resources at a BCoE may be beneficial to support patients at risk of self-withdrawal from scheduled BS.

Reasons for Preoperative Patient Attrition among Bariatric Surgery Candidates: Patients' Point of View

PURPOSE

Obesity has become a global health concern, associated with decreased quality of life and life expectancy. Although bariatric surgery has many benefits (e.g., substantial and durable weight loss, amelioration of comorbidities, and improvement in functionality), its patient attrition rate is relatively high. Therefore, we aim to assess the causes of withdrawal from our program.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We interviewed patients who dropped out of our bariatric surgery program between January 2016 and December 2021. A total of 1999 patients were eligible for bariatric surgery during this period, and 255 patients withdrew from the program. We interviewed patients over the phone to find out the reason for withdrawal. We divided participants into two groups: dropouts before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. Several options explaining the reason for leaving the program were presented to the patients to choose from.

RESULTS

The number of patients who withdrew from the program before and during the COVID-19 pandemic was 135 (8.9%) and 120 (25.2%), respectively. Before the COVID-19 pandemic, most patients (49.1%) stated that the long waiting time was the cause of withdrawal. Even though during the COVID-19 pandemic, the main causes of attrition were the fear of contracting the disease and COVID-19 infection; the most common reason unrelated to COVID-19 was still the long preoperative preparation.

CONCLUSION

Long waiting time was the most common cause of patient attrition before bariatric surgery. To reduce the attrition rate, more studies should be conducted to find an optimized waiting time before bariatric surgery.

Patient perspectives on the usefulness of the MBSAQIP Bariatric Surgical Risk/Benefit Calculator: a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

The Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program (MBSAQIP) Bariatric Surgical Risk/Benefit Calculator uses procedure-specific prediction models to generate individualized surgical risk/outcome estimates. This tool helps guide informed consent and operative selection. We hypothesized that calculator use would influence patient procedure choice.

OBJECTIVE

To assess patient perspectives on the bariatric surgical calculator.

SETTING

A randomized controlled trial at an MBSAQIP-accredited center.

METHODS

During the preoperative bariatric surgical office consultation, patients were randomized into 2 groups: the control group received conventional surgeon-led counseling, whereas surgeons used the risk/benefit calculator to guide decision making for the calculator group. Surveys were completed by patients following consultations to evaluate satisfaction and perceived impact of the risk/benefit calculator on operative selection.

RESULTS

Between 2020 and 2022, 61 patients were randomized to the calculator group and 68 patients to the control group. The percentage of patients whose procedure of choice changed following consultation was similar in the calculator versus control group (44.3% versus 41.2%; P = .723). However, calculator group patients were less likely to perceive surgeon counseling as very important for their decision making (43.3% versus 76.5%; P < .001). Eighty-five percent of calculator group patients rated the calculator as useful or very useful, and only 1.7% found it not very important. The reasons patients changed procedure choice were similar between the groups (P = .091); the most common cause was to improve their anticipated outcome (48.7% versus 54.8%).

CONCLUSIONS

While the risk/benefit calculator was perceived as a helpful tool by most patients, its use did not influence their procedure choice. However, the patient-reported usefulness and importance of the calculator during surgeon counseling suggest that the information provided has weight in patient decision making.

The Factor Structure and Stability of the Beck Depression Inventory-II (BDI-II) in a Population Undergoing Bariatric Surgery

PURPOSE

Depression is a multifaceted psychiatric condition that has been associated with suboptimal weight loss following bariatric surgery. Previous variations of Beck Depression Inventory-Second Edition (BDI-II) subscales been proposed, including those identified within bariatric populations; however, it is unclear whether the BDI-II items contained within these subscales would remain consistent after the procedure considering the physical and lifestyle changes that occur following bariatric surgery.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A two-step analytic approach that comprised of exploratory (EFA) and confirmatory factor analyses (CFA) that aimed to identify a stable factor structure using pre- and 6-month post-surgical BDI-II responses. Baseline BDI-II responses of 149 patients (Group 1) were used to identify an initial EFA model. Five BDI-II models underwent CFA using BDI-II responses of a comparable pre-surgical group (Group 2; n = 142), and 6-month post-surgical data from Group 1.

RESULTS

EFA generated a two-factor solution. Of the five CFA models performed, the three-factor model that was initially identified by Hayes (2015) among patients undergoing bariatric surgery demonstrated superior fit across time and between groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Although the EFA initially identified a two-factor model, CFA determined that a previously defined three-factor model reliably fit both pre- and post-surgical BDI-II responses. This study supports using the Hayes (2015) subscales when monitoring pre- and post-bariatric surgery facets of depression specific to this population. Being able to accurately and reliably monitor depressive symptoms of patients that are undergoing bariatric surgery will allow for the provision and monitoring of targeted interventions aimed at improving their mental and physical health outcomes.

Proof of Concept for a Mindfulness-Informed Intervention for Eating Disorder Symptoms, Self-Efficacy, and Emotion Regulation among Bariatric Surgery Candidates

Up to 64% of patients seeking bariatric (weight-loss) surgery report eating disorder (ED) symptoms (addictive-like eating, binge eating, emotional eating, grazing) that can interfere with post-surgical weight loss. This prospective proof-of-concept study aimed to evaluate the impact of a pre-surgical mindfulness-informed intervention (MII) on ED symptoms and potential mechanisms-of-action to inform optimization of the intervention. Surgery-seeking adults attended four, 2-hour, MII sessions held weekly. Participants completed validated questionnaires assessing ED symptoms, eating self-efficacy, emotion regulation, and mindful eating pre-MII, post-MII, and at a 12-week follow-up. The MII consisted of mindfulness training, with cognitive, behavioral, and psychoeducational components. Fifty-six patients (M = 47.41 years old, 89.3% female) participated. Improvements in addictive-like eating, binge eating, emotional eating, and grazing were observed from pre- to post-MII. ED symptom treatment gains were either maintained or improved further at 12-week follow-up. Eating self-efficacy and emotion regulation improved from pre-MII to follow-up. Scores on the mindful eating questionnaire deteriorated from pre-MII to follow-up. In mediation analyses, there was a combined indirect effect of emotion regulation, eating self-efficacy, and mindful eating on grazing and binge eating, and an indirect effect of emotion regulation on emotional eating and addictive-like eating. Participation in the MII was associated with improvements in ED symptoms and some mechanisms-of-action, establishing proof-of-concept for the intervention. Future work to establish the MII's efficacy in a randomized controlled trial is warranted.

Impact of Bariatric Surgery on Unplanned Hospital Admissions for Infection

Purpose

Both obesity and type 2 diabetes are associated with an increased risk of skin and soft tissue (SSTI), urinary tract, and lower respiratory tract infections but it is not clear whether the incidence of such infections is reduced after bariatric surgery.

Materials and Methods

In people accepted onto our publicly funded bariatric program, we recorded unplanned admissions to public hospitals over a median follow-up of 4.5 years in those successfully undergoing surgery and in those who withdrew from the program. Rates of admission for the composite outcome (SSTI, urinary tract, or lower respiratory infection) were compared.

Results

Of 774 people accepted onto the program, 49% underwent surgery. Infections accounted for 27% of unplanned admissions in those not completing surgery and 13% of those who underwent surgery (p < 0.001). The rate of admission was 60% lower in people who underwent surgery than those who did not: 4.3 vs 12.2 per 100 patient-years (P < 0.002), a difference maintained across 8 years’ follow-up. The impact of surgery was independent of enrolment age, BMI, or diabetes and smoking status. Of the three types of infection in the composite outcome, SSTI were the most prevalent and showed the greatest reduction (p < 0.0001). The median day stay for infection was 0.5 day less in those who underwent surgery (p < 0.01).

Conclusions

Hospitalization for these three infectious diseases in people undergoing bariatric surgery was lower than that in people enrolled in the bariatric program but not completing surgery. The effect was greatest for SSTI, and sustained to at least 8 years.

Graphical abstract

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11695-022-05975-4.

Cardiorenal outcomes in eligible patients referred for bariatric surgery

OBJECTIVE

Bariatric surgery is associated with reduced atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (CVD) and heart failure hospitalization in people with type 2 diabetes (T2D) and those with prior CVD. Most patients undergoing bariatric surgery do not have T2D or CVD. Many otherwise eligible patients do not have surgery because of self-exclusion. Clinical outcomes in these groups are less established.

METHODS

This study retrospectively assessed cardiorenal outcomes in 8,568 patients after acceptance of referral for surgery.

RESULTS

A total of 63.8% patients did not undergo surgery. After multivariate adjustment for sex, age, BMI, income quintile, distance from hospital, hypertension, T2D, and CVD, hazard ratios (HR) for the primary (incident myocardial infarction, stroke, heart failure hospitalization, and death; HR = 0.52, 95% CI: 0.4-0.66) and secondary CVD outcomes (primary outcomes and coronary/carotid revascularization; HR = 0.53, 95% CI: 0.42-0.67) were lower in the surgery cohort. This reduction was seen in those with (primary: HR = 0.45, 95% CI: 0.32-0.63, secondary: HR = 0.47, 95% CI: 0.34-0.65) and without T2D (primary: HR = 0.61, 95% CI: 0.42-0.88, secondary: HR = 0.53, 95% CI: 0.42-0.67). Reduced kidney disease (HR = 0.46, 95% CI: 0.22-0.92) but increased liver disease hospitalization (HR = 2.5, 95% CI: 1.45-4.27) was observed with surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

Non-progression to surgery associates with increased CVD despite low baseline prevalence of CVD. The cardiorenal benefits of bariatric surgery warrant confirmation in a well-powered randomized clinical trial.

Variation in publicly funded bariatric surgery in New Zealand by ethnicity: cohort study of 328,739 patients

BACKGROUND

New Zealand health services are responsible for equitable health service delivery, particularly for Māori, the Indigenous peoples of New Zealand. Recent research has indicated the presence of inequities in publicly funded bariatric surgery in New Zealand by ethnicity, but it is unclear whether these inequities persist after adjustment for co-morbidities.

OBJECTIVES

To determine whether receipt of publicly funded bariatric surgery varies by ethnicity, after adjustment for co-morbidities.

SETTING

New Zealand primary care.

METHODS

A cohort study of New Zealanders aged 30-79 years who had cardiovascular risk assessment in primary care between January 1, 2010 and June 30, 2018. Data were collated and analyzed using an encrypted unique identifier with regional and national datasets. Cox proportional hazard modeling was performed to determine the likelihood of receipt of a primary publicly funded bariatric procedure up to December 31, 2018, after adjustment for sex, age, ethnicity, locality, socioeconomic deprivation, body mass index, diabetes status, smoking status, and co-morbidities.

RESULTS

A total of 328,739 participants (44% female, median age 54 yr [interquartile range, IQR, 46-62], 54% European, 13% Māori, 13% Pacific, 20% Asian) were included in the study and followed up for a median of 5.6 years (IQR 4.1-6.9). The likelihood of receipt of bariatric surgery was lower for Māori and Pacific compared with Europeans (adjusted hazard ratio .82 [95% CI .69-.96] and .24 [.20-.29], respectively). The likelihood of receiving bariatric surgery was also inversely related with increasing socioeconomic deprivation and rurality.

CONCLUSIONS

Consistent with data worldwide, there is evidence of unequal access to publicly funded bariatric surgery by ethnicity, locality as well as socioeconomic deprivation among New Zealanders who were cardiovascular risk assessed in primary care.

Convergent Mixed Methods Exploration of Telehealth in Bariatric Surgery: Maximizing Provider Resources and Access

BACKGROUND

Telehealth may be an important care delivery modality in reducing dropout from bariatric surgery programs which is reported globally at approximately 50%.

METHODS

In this convergent mixed methods case study of a large, US healthcare system, we examine the impact of telehealth implementation in 2020 on pre-operative bariatric surgery visits and provider perspectives of telehealth use.

RESULTS

We find that telehealth was significantly associated with a 38% reduction in no-show rate compared with the prior year. Additionally, providers had positive experiences with regard to the appropriateness and feasibility of using telehealth in the pre-operative bariatric surgery process.

CONCLUSIONS

Telehealth use in the pre-operative bariatric surgery process may lead to greater efficiency in healthcare resource utilization. Insurance providers and bariatric accreditation bodies globally should consider accepting telehealth visits and self-reported weights when determining coverage decisions to ensure access for patients.

Insulin use and new diabetes after acceptance for bariatric surgery: comparison of outcomes after completion of surgery or withdrawal from the program

INTRODUCTION

In people accepted onto a bariatric surgery program we compared diabetes-related outcomes in those who completed surgery with those who withdrew before having surgery-examining rates of insulin use in people with type 2 diabetes (T2D), and rates of incident diabetes in people without pre-existing T2D.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

771 people were accepted onto the program. 463 people (60%) had T2D at referral, of which 48% completed surgery and 52% withdrew. Of 308 people without T2D at referral, 49% completed surgery, and 51% withdrew. Rates of insulin use and incident diabetes were compared by Kaplan-Meier analyses. Among those with pre-existing T2D, we examined rates of remission and relapse after surgery.

RESULTS

People without T2D who withdrew from the program had higher mean body mass index and glycated hemoglobin levels than those completing surgery (p<0.005). The rate of incident diabetes at 5 years was 19% in those who withdrew versus 0% in those completing surgery (p<0.001). 30% of people with T2D were taking insulin at referral and all stopped insulin after surgery. During follow-up, the rate of insulin (re)introduction was lower in those who completed surgery (8% vs 26% at 5 years, p<0.001). Of those with T2D who completed surgery, 80% had remission, but 34% had relapsed by 5 years. Diabetes relapse was associated with less weight loss after surgery, a longer duration of T2D and previous insulin use.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite a high relapse rate, people with T2D who completed surgery had lower insulin use at 5 years than those withdrawing from the program. In people without T2D, bariatric surgery prevented incident diabetes. People without T2D who withdrew from the program were at greater risk of diabetes, suggesting those who could benefit the most in terms of T2D prevention are not completing bariatric surgery.

Disparities in Receipt of Bariatric Surgery in Canada: An Analysis of Data From an Ontario Bariatric Surgery Referral Center

BACKGROUND

Patients with lower socioeconomic status (SES) in the United States have reduced access to many health services including bariatric surgery. It is unclear whether disparities in bariatric surgery exist in countries with government-sponsored universal health benefits. The authors used data from a large regional Canadian bariatric surgery referral center to examine the relationship between SES and receipt of bariatric surgery.

METHODS

The Toronto Western Hospital bariatric surgery registry was used to identify all adults referred for bariatric surgery assessment from 2010 to 2017. The authors compared demographics, SES measures, and clinical measures among patients who did not and did undergo bariatric surgery (Roux-en-Y or sleeve gastrectomy). Multiple logistic regression was used to examine differences in receipt of bariatric surgery according to patient demographic characteristics and SES factors.

RESULTS

Among 2417 patients included in the study, 646 (26.7%) did not receive surgery and 1771 patients (73.2%) did. Patients who did not undergo surgery were more likely to be male individual (29.1% vs. 19.3%; P<0.001), black (12.1% vs. 8.3%; P=0.005), South Asian/Middle Eastern (8.2% vs. 4.5%; P<0.001), and less likely to be white (68.9% vs. 76.7%; P<0.001). In multiple logistic regression, factors associated with not receiving surgery were male sex, Black and South Asian/Middle Eastern ethnicity, being single, lack of employment, and history of psychiatric illness.

CONCLUSIONS

Among patients referred for bariatric surgery, those who were male individuals, nonwhite, single, and unemployed were less likely to undergo surgery. Our results suggest that even with equal insurance, there are disparities in receipt of bariatric surgery.

Enhancing responsiveness to Māori in a publicly funded bariatric service in Aotearoa New Zealand

BACKGROUND

Health equity is a fundamental right afforded to all regardless of ethnicity. However, in New Zealand (NZ), health inequities are most compelling for Indigenous Māori who experience inadequate access to services, poorer quality of care and poor health outcomes as a result. Bariatric surgery is the most effective intervention for weight loss and remission of obesity-related disease where all other interventions have been exhausted. This Kaupapa Māori qualitative study presents Māori perspectives of bariatric surgery from the largest public bariatric centre in NZ and offers solutions for enhancing bariatric service responsiveness to Māori.

METHODS

This qualitative study was informed by Kaupapa Māori methodology and involved a general inductive thematic analysis of 31 semi-structured interviews with Māori patients who had bariatric surgery at Counties Manukau Health in South Auckland, NZ.

RESULTS

Four key themes were identified following analysis: (i) Kaupapa Māori standards of health; (ii) bariatric mentors; (iii) bariatric psychologists; and (iv) community-integrated support. These themes offer four tangible solutions for optimizing bariatric pathways for Māori from the perspectives of Māori bariatric patients.

CONCLUSION

Kaupapa Māori, community-centred and greater non-surgeon aspects of bariatric supportive mechanisms comprise key areas of opportunity for public bariatric pathways in NZ. Surgical leadership is required to advance health equity and service responsiveness to Māori.

Preoperative bariatric surgery programme barriers facing Pacific patients in Auckland, New Zealand as perceived by health sector professionals: a qualitative study

Minority ethnic patient groups typically have the highest bariatric surgery preoperative attrition rates and lowest surgery utilisation worldwide. Eligible patients of Pacific Island ethnicity (Pacific patients) in New Zealand (NZ) follow this wider trend.

OBJECTIVES

The present study explored structural barriers contributing to Pacific patients' disproportionately high preoperative attrition rates from publicly-funded bariatric surgery in Auckland, NZ.

SETTING

Publicly-funded bariatric surgery programmes based in the wider Auckland area, NZ.

DESIGN

Semi-structured interviews with health sector professionals (n=21) were conducted.Data were analysed using an inductive thematic approach.

RESULTS

Two primary themes were identified: (1) Confidence negotiating the medical system, which included Emotional safety in clinical settings and Relating to non-Pacific health professionals and (2) Appropriate support to achieve preoperative goals, which included Cultural considerations, Practical support and Relating health information. Clinical environments and an under-representation of Pacific staff were considered to be barriers to developing emotional safety, trust and acceptance of the surgery process with patients and their families. Additionally, economic deprivation and lower health literacy impacted preoperative goals.

CONCLUSIONS

Health professionals' accounts indicated that Pacific patients face substantial levels of disconnection in bariatric surgery programmes. Increasing representation of Pacific ethnicity by employing more Pacific health professionals in bariatric teams and finding novel solutions to implement preoperative programme components have the potential to reduce this disconnect. Addressing cultural competency of staff, increasing consultancy times and working in community settings may enable staff to better support Pacific patients and their families. Programme structures could be more accommodating to practical barriers of attending appointments, managing patients' preoperative health goals and improving patients' health literacy. Given that Pacific populations, and other patients from minority ethnic backgrounds living globally, also face high rates of obesity and barriers accessing bariatric surgery, our findings are likely to have broader applicability.

Pre-operative Bariatric Clinic Attendance Is a Predictor of Post-operative Clinic Attendance and Weight Loss Outcomes

AIM

Our primary aim was to determine whether non-attendance at pre-operative clinics were associated with non-attendance at post-operative clinics and its influence on weight loss. We also sought to examine the relationship between gender, ethnicity and post-operative clinic attendance with respect to weight loss post-bariatric surgery.

METHODS

A retrospective audit was performed for patients undertaking the bariatric surgery program at the Auckland City Hospital between 2013 and 2016.

RESULTS

One hundred and eighty-four patients completed our program, with a mean age of 46.1 years. Mean weight at commencement was 133.3 kg, with a BMI of 47.4. At 2 years follow-up (n = 143), excess weight loss was 70.8% following RYGB and 68.0% following LSG (p = 0.5743). More patients attended all pre-operative than post-operative clinics (67.4% vs 37.5% p = < 0.001). One pre-operative clinic non-attendance was associated with less weight loss at 2 years and it increases the risk of missing at least 50% of post-operative clinics with a risk ratio of 2.73, p = 0.005. Non-attendance of at least 50% of post-operative clinics was also associated with less weight loss at 2 years (33.4 kg vs 44.3 kg, p = 0.040). Although Maori and Pacific Islanders more frequently missed > 50% of post-operative clinics, weight loss was similar between European, Maori and Pacific Islander populations (2-year weight loss 44.2 kg vs 40.74 kg vs 44.1 kg, respectively, p = 0.8192).

CONCLUSION

Pre-operative clinic non-attendance helps predict post-operative clinic non-attendance. Missing any pre-operative clinics and at least 50% of scheduled post-operative clinics is associated with poorer weight loss outcomes.

A narrative review of bariatric surgery in Indigenous peoples

INTRODUCTION

Indigenous peoples suffer high rates of obesity and obesity-related disease worldwide. Currently, bariatric surgery is the most effective intervention for severe obesity and obesity-related disease. The role bariatric surgery plays in alleviating the obesity burden amongst Indigenous peoples is unknown. We aimed to collate studies investigating bariatric surgery in Indigenous peoples and to provide a simple framework to use in future research surrounding this important issue.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We conducted a systematic review in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Studies that investigated outcomes for Indigenous peoples at any point along the bariatric surgery journey were included.

RESULTS

Six articles were included in this review. Three studies investigated access to bariatric surgery and the remaining three studies investigated short to long-term outcomes following bariatric surgery. A narrative review was performed given study heterogeneity and quality of included studies. Indigenous peoples had lower access to bariatric surgery and in one study had greater weight loss in comparison to non-Indigenous peoples.

CONCLUSION

Despite a paucity of studies, it appears that there is emerging interest in investigating bariatric surgery among Indigenous peoples. We encourage those who seek to investigate this important issue at any point along the bariatric surgery journey, to do so using an equity-based approach.

Factors associated with bariatric surgery utilization among eligible candidates: who drops out?

BACKGROUND

Bariatric surgery is underutilized.

OBJECTIVES

To identify factors associated with eligible patient dropout from bariatric surgery.

SETTING

University hospital, United States.

METHODS

Eligible candidates were identified after a multidisciplinary review committee (MRC) of all patients (n = 484) who attended a bariatric surgery informational session (BIS) at a single-center academic institution in 2015. We compared patients who underwent surgery within 2 years of BIS with those who did not (i.e., dropped out) by evaluating patient, insurance, and program-specific variables. Univariate analyses and multivariable regressions were performed to identify factors associated with patient dropout among eligible candidates.

RESULTS

We identified 307 (63%) patients who underwent MRC. Thirty-three (11%) patients were deemed poor candidates and surgery was not recommended. Among eligible candidates, 82 (30%) dropped out from the program. Factors independently associated with eligible patient dropout included coronary artery disease (odds ratio [OR] .13 [.02-.66]; P = .014), hypertension (OR .46 [.24-.87]; P = .017), time from BIS to MRC (OR .99 [.99-.99]; P = .002), 3 months of medically supervised weight loss documentation (OR .09 [.02-.51]; P = .007), endocrinology clearance (OR .26 [.09-.76]; P = .014), hematology clearance (OR .37 [.14-.95]; P = .039), urine drug screen testing (OR .31 [.13-.72]; P = .006), additional psychological evaluation (OR .43 [.20-.93]; P = .031), and required extra sessions with the dietician (OR .39 [.17-.92]; P = .032). Thirty-three (6.8%) patients underwent surgery at another institution, and 42% of these patients lived more than 50 miles from attended BIS site.

CONCLUSIONS

Twenty-seven percent of patients did not undergo bariatric surgery at their initial site of evaluation despite being considered eligible candidates after MRC. Dropout was independently associated with patient, insurance, and program-specific variables that may represent barriers to care amenable to improvement.