Effectiveness of Online Aftercare Programs Following Intragastric Balloon Placement for Obesity Is Similar to Traditional Follow-up: a Large Propensity Matched US Multicenter Study

Does endoscopic mean safer? A comparison of the short-term safety of endoscopic versus laparoscopic bariatric therapies

Background and study aims  There is minimal research on real-world, large-volume data comparing endoscopic bariatric therapy (EBT) to laparoscopic bariatric therapy (LBT). This study aimed to compare 30-day postoperative morbidity and mortality outcomes of primary EBT vs LBT using the Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program. Patients and methods  Patients aged 18 to 80 with body mass index (BMI) 35 to 40 kg/m ² undergoing primary procedures were included. Propensity score matching 1:50 was performed for EBT versus LBT based on age, sex, and BMI. Results  We matched 211 EBTs with 9,059 LBTs. Operative length (63.9, 95 % confidence interval [CI]: 57.9, 69.8 versus 81.1, 95 % CI: 80.1, 82.1) and length of stay (0.49 days, 95 % CI: 0.29, 0.69 versus 1.43 days, 95 % CI: 1.41, 1.45) were significantly lower in the EBT group than the LBT group. There was no difference between EBT and LBT in the odds of readmission (odds ratio [OR] = 0.31, 95 % CI: 0.08, 1.25), reoperation (OR = 0.39, 95 % CI: 0.05, 2.84), or reintervention (OR = 0.98, 95 % CI: 0.24, 3.99). After controlling for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, sleep apnea, history of myocardial infarction, hypertension requiring medications, and diabetes, EBT continued to be associated with lower odds of having any adverse event (AE) than LBT, with an OR of 0.34 (95 % CI: 0.16, 0.69). Subgroup analysis comparing EBT to laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) showed that EBT was associated with a lower risk having any AE than LSG, with an OR of 0.39 (95 % CI: 0.19, 0.79). Conclusions  EBT is associated with a lower 30-day AE rate and shorter procedural length and length of stay than LBT, with similar rates of readmission, reintervention, and reoperation.

Benefits of multidisciplinary team management of obese patients with intragastric balloon placement: an analysis of 159 cases at a single center

BACKGROUND

Intragastric balloon placement is an ideal weight loss method for those unfit or unwilling to undergo surgery. It is not known if multidisciplinary team management helps these patients the way it does with those who enroll in bariatric surgery programs.

OBJECTIVES

The primary objective was to assess the efficacy of intragastric balloon on weight loss after a 6-month follow-up and the secondary objective was to assess the impact of multidisciplinary team intervention (psychological consultation, nutritional follow-up, and regular physical activity) on weight loss in the study patients.

SETTING

Referral military tertiary care center, Mexico.

METHODS

Retrospective study of 159 patients treated with intragastric balloon between June 2011 and December 2016 in a single institution with aims of assessing its efficacy and the impact of regular exercise, supervised diet, and psychological consultation during the intervention.

RESULTS

One hundred fifty-nine patients were enrolled. There were no drop-offs nor patients lost to follow-up. The mean initial weight was 92.6 ± 12.6 kg with a decrease to a mean of 80.7 ± 12.4 kg at 6 months with a mean reduction of 11.9 kg (P < .0001). The initial mean body mass index (BMI) of the population was 33.8 ± 2.8 kg/m², which decreased to a mean of 29.5 ± 3.3 kg/m² of BMI. The mean BMI units lost was 4.3 kg/m² (P < .0001). A 50.8 ± 33.8% excess weight loss was observed (P < .0001), and a mean 12.6 ± 7.6% of total weight loss was found (P < .0001). Significant interventions on BMI at 6 months were psychological consultation associated with a mean BMI reduction of 6.0 ± 3.0 kg/m² versus a mean BMI reduction of 4.1 ± 1.9 kg/m² of those who did not (P < .0001) and physical activity with a mean BMI reduction of 4.8 ± 2.3 kg/m² for those who did exercise versus a mean BMI reduction of 4.1 ± 2.0 kg/m² for those who did not (P = .041).

CONCLUSIONS

Intragastric balloon managed patients get additional benefit on weight loss with psychological follow-up and exercise during the intervention. Given the retrospective nature of the study, further studies are needed to definitive conclusions.