What Is the Impact of Residual Obesity on the Risk for Postoperative Body-Contouring Surgery Complications in Postbariatric Patients?

Negative Pressure Wound Therapy After Abdominal Body Contouring: A Comparative Matched Analysis of Outcomes and Cost

Background: Studies that have previously validated the use of incisional negative pressure wound therapy (iNPWT) after body contouring procedures (BCP) have provided limited data regarding associated health care utilization and cost. We matched 2 cohorts of patients after BCP with and without iNPWT and compared utilization of health care resources and post-operative clinical outcomes. Methods: Adult patients who underwent abdominoplasty and/or panniculectomy between 2015 and 2020 by a single surgeon were identified. Patients were propensity score matched by body mass index (BMI), gender, smoking history, diabetes mellitus, hypertension, and incision type. Primary outcomes included time to final drain removal, outpatient visits, homecare visits, emergency department visits, and cost. Secondary outcomes included surgical site occurrences (SSO), surgical site infections, reoperations, and revisions. Results: One hundred sixty-six patients were eligible, and 40 were matched (20 with iNPWT and 20 without iNPWT) with a median age of 47 years and BMI of 32 kg/m2. There were no differences in demographics or intraoperative details (all P > .05). No significant differences were found between the cohorts in terms of health care utilization measures or clinical outcomes (all P > .05). Direct cost was significantly greater in the iNPWT cohort (P = .0498). Inpatient length of stay and procedure time were independently associated with increased cost on multivariate analysis (all P < .0001). Conclusion: Consensus guidelines recommend the use of iNPWT in high-risk patients, including abdominal BCP. Our results show that iNPWT is associated with equivalent health care utilization and clinical outcomes, with increased cost. Additional randomized controlled trials are needed to further elucidate the cost utility of this technique in this patient population.

The Impact of Obesity on Plastic Surgery Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Obesity is a potential risk factor for complications in plastic surgeries. However, the data presented by primary studies are contradictory.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to summarize and clarify the divergences in the literature to provide a better understanding of the impact of obesity in different plastic surgery procedures.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of the impact of obesity on plastic surgery outcomes. Searches were conducted in MEDLINE, LILACS, SciELO, Scopus, Embase, Web of Science, Opengrey.eu, and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. The primary outcomes assessed were surgical complications, medical complications, and reoperation rates. The secondary outcome assessed was patient satisfaction. Subgroup analysis was performed to investigate the impact of each BMI category on the outcomes.

RESULTS

Ninety-three articles were included in the qualitative synthesis, and 91 were used in the meta-analysis. Obese participants were 1.62 times more likely to present any of the primary outcomes (95% CI, 1.48-1.77; P < 0.00001). The highest increase in risk among plastic surgery types was observed in cosmetic procedures (risk ratio [RR], 1.80; 95% CI, 1.43-2.32; P < 0.00001). Compared with normal-weight participants, overweight participants presented a significantly increased RR for complications (RR, 1.16; 95% CI, 1.07-1.27; P = 0.0004). Most authors found no relation between BMI and overall patient satisfaction.

CONCLUSIONS

Obesity leads to more complications and greater incidence of reoperation compared with nonobese patients undergoing plastic surgeries. However, this effect is not evident in reconstructive surgeries in areas of the body other than the breast.

Complications of Body Contouring Surgery in Postbariatric Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Obesity is a major global health problem. With an increasing number of bariatric surgeries, the need for body-contouring procedures has grown. These procedures are associated with multiple complications because of various patient characteristics and risk factors.

OBJECTIVES

In this study, we performed a systematic literature review of all the complications of postbariatric body contouring surgeries, as well as a meta-analysis to estimate the effects of body mass index (BMI) and the weight of the tissue resected during body contouring on the development of complications.

METHODS

We conducted a literature search of the PubMed and Cochrane databases in September 2020, using the MeSH terms plastic surgery, weight loss, and complications. Studies were included if they involved more than 35 postbariatric patients and reported postoperative complication rates and types.

RESULTS

In total, 561 articles were initially identified, and 25 studies were included after the final review. The overall weighted rate of postbariatric body contouring surgical complications in all studies was 31.5%. The most frequent complication from all regions of body contouring was seroma (weighted rate 12.7-13.9%). Regarding risk factors, analysis indicated that a BMI < 30 kg/m² and low mean weight of resected tissue were associated with fewer complications.

CONCLUSION

Body contouring procedures are relatively safe. Although complications after contouring are common, most either resolve spontaneously or require minimal intervention. In body contouring after bariatric surgery, there is a 37% increased risk of developing complications if the BMI is ≥ 30 kg/[Formula: see text] before body contouring. A higher weight of resected tissue appears to be linked to a greater risk of complications.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE III

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Abdominal Body Contouring: Does Body Mass Index Affect Clinical and Patient Reported Outcomes?

BACKGROUND

Obese individuals are thought to be higher risk for complications after excisional abdominal body contouring (EAC) due to co-morbidities and significant tissue resection.

OBJECTIVES

We comparatively analyzed EAC patients with Body Mass Index (BMI) ≥35 kg/m² and BMI <35 kg/m² to highlight key differences in clinical and patient-reported-outcomes (PROs).

METHODS

Patients ≥18 years-old undergoing EAC by a single surgeon from 01/2018-01/2020 were identified and separated into cohorts based on BMI (<35 and ≥35 kg/m²). Patients were excluded if they had a cosmetic abdominoplasty without history of bariatric surgery or massive weight loss, or if they had <1000 gs of tissue resected. Clinical outcomes and PROs using the BODY-Q were comparatively analyzed.

RESULTS

70 total patients with median BMIs of 30[26-32] and 41[37-45] kg/m² in each cohort, were identified. Patients with BMI ≥35 kg/m² were more likely to have higher ASA (P<0.01) and use of incisional negative pressure wound devices (P = 0.042). Alternatively, they were less likely to have had concurrent liposuction (P = 0.05). There were no differences in development of an SSO, SSI or SSOpi (P>0.05) between cohorts. Multivariate logistic regression showed that BMI ≥35 kg/m², iNPWD and liposuction were not associated with the development of complications. PROs demonstrated improvement in multiple domains despite BMI.

CONCLUSION

There was no association with BMI ≥35 kg/m² and the development of complications within our cohort. We encourage preoperative weight loss when possible, however these procedures can be performed safely with acceptable outcomes even in individuals who are obese and/or require extensive tissue removal.