1
|
Gensthaler L, Stauffer M, Jedamzik J, Bichler C, Nixdorf L, Richwien P, Eichelter J, Langer FB, Prager G, Felsenreich DM. Endoluminal Vacuum Therapy as Effective Treatment for Patients with Postoperative Leakage After Metabolic Bariatric Surgery-A Single-Center Experience. Obes Surg 2024:10.1007/s11695-024-07367-2. [PMID: 39046624 DOI: 10.1007/s11695-024-07367-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/04/2024] [Revised: 06/09/2024] [Accepted: 06/14/2024] [Indexed: 07/25/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Metabolic bariatric surgery (MBS) is standardized and safe. Nevertheless, complications such as anastomotic leakage (AL) or staple-line leakage (SLL) can occur. In upper GI or colorectal surgery, endoluminal vacuum therapy (EVT) offers a therapeutic alternative to revisional surgery. Data on EVT in patients with leakage after MBS remain scarce. The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of EVT and its potential as endoscopic alternative to revisional surgery. MATERIAL AND METHODS All patients treated for AL or SLL with EVT after MBS between 01/2016 and 08/2023 at the Department for General Surgery, Medical University Vienna, were included in this retrospective, single-center study. Therapeutic value of EVT as management option for acute postoperative leakage after MBS in daily practice was evaluated. Statistical analyses were performed descriptively. RESULTS Twenty-one patients were treated with EVT within the observational period of 7 years. In 11 cases (52.4%), the index surgery was a primary bariatric intervention; in 10 cases (47.6%), a secondary surgery after initial MBS was performed. Favored approach was a combination of revisional surgery and EVT (n = 18; 85.7%), intermediate self-expanding metal stent (SEMS) in 16 (76.2%) cases. EVT was changed six times (0-33) every 3-4 days. Mean EVT time was 25.1 days (3-97). No severe associated complications were detected and EVT showed an efficacy of 95.2%. CONCLUSION This small case series supports the trend to establish EVT in daily clinical practice when revisional surgery after MBS is needed, thus preventing further reoperation and reducing associated morbidity and mortality in critically ill patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L Gensthaler
- Division of Visceral Surgery, Department of General Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria
| | - M Stauffer
- Division of Visceral Surgery, Department of General Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria
| | - J Jedamzik
- Division of Visceral Surgery, Department of General Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria
| | - C Bichler
- Division of Visceral Surgery, Department of General Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria
| | - L Nixdorf
- Division of Visceral Surgery, Department of General Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria
| | - P Richwien
- Division of Visceral Surgery, Department of General Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria
| | - J Eichelter
- Division of Visceral Surgery, Department of General Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria
| | - F B Langer
- Division of Visceral Surgery, Department of General Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria
| | - G Prager
- Division of Visceral Surgery, Department of General Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria.
| | - D M Felsenreich
- Division of Visceral Surgery, Department of General Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Hany M, Torensma B, Zidan A, Ibrahim M, Abouelnasr AA, Agayby ASS, Sayed IE. Outcomes of primary versus conversional Roux-En-Y gastric bypass after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: a retrospective propensity score-matched cohort study. BMC Surg 2024; 24:84. [PMID: 38448841 PMCID: PMC10919008 DOI: 10.1186/s12893-024-02374-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/09/2023] [Accepted: 02/27/2024] [Indexed: 03/08/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Conversional surgery is common after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) because of suboptimal weight loss (SWL) or poor responders and gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) is the most common conversional procedure after LSG. METHODS A retrospective cohort study analyzed patients who underwent primary RYGB (PRYGB) or conversional RYGB (CRYGB) at three specialized bariatric centers between 2008 and 2019 and tested for weight loss, resolution of GERD, food tolerance (FT), early and late complications, and the resolution of associated medical problems. This was analyzed by propensity score matching (PSM). RESULTS In total, 558 (PRYGB) and 155 (CRYGB) completed at least 2 years of follow-up. After PSM, both cohorts significantly decreased BMI from baseline (p < 0.001). The CRYGB group had an initially more significant mean BMI decrease of 6.095 kg/m2 at 6 months of follow-up (p < 0.001), while the PRYGB group had a more significant mean BMI decrease of 5.890 kg/m2 and 8.626 kg/m2 at 1 and 2 years, respectively (p < 0.001). Food tolerance (FT) improved significantly in the CRYGB group (p < 0.001), while CRYGB had better FT than PRYGB at 2 years (p < 0.001). A GERD resolution rate of 92.6% was recorded in the CRYGB (p < 0.001). Both cohorts had comparable rates of early complications (p = 0.584), late complications (p = 0.495), and reoperations (p = 0.398). Associated medical problems at 2 years significantly improved in both cohorts (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS CRYGB is a safe and efficient option in non- or poor responders after LSG, with significant weight loss and improvement in GERD. Moreover, PRYGB and CRYGB had comparable complications, reoperations, and associated medical problem resolution rates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mohamed Hany
- Department of Surgery, Medical Research Institute, Alexandria University, 165 Horreya Avenue, Alexandria, 21561, Egypt.
- Consultant of bariatric surgery at Madina Women's hospital (IFSO-certified bariatric center), Alexandria, Egypt.
| | - Bart Torensma
- Clinical Epidemiologist, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC), Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Ahmed Zidan
- Department of Surgery, Medical Research Institute, Alexandria University, 165 Horreya Avenue, Alexandria, 21561, Egypt
| | - Mohamed Ibrahim
- Department of Surgery, Medical Research Institute, Alexandria University, 165 Horreya Avenue, Alexandria, 21561, Egypt
| | - Anwar Ashraf Abouelnasr
- Department of Surgery, Medical Research Institute, Alexandria University, 165 Horreya Avenue, Alexandria, 21561, Egypt
| | - Ann Samy Shafiq Agayby
- Department of Surgery, Medical Research Institute, Alexandria University, 165 Horreya Avenue, Alexandria, 21561, Egypt
| | - Iman El Sayed
- Biomedical Informatics and Medical Statistics Department, Medical Research Institute, Alexandria University, Alexandria, Egypt
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Hany M, Ibrahim M, Samir M, Agayby ASS, Torensma B. Management of Leak by Intraoperative Megastent Insertion During Revisional Bariatric Metabolic Surgery: a Case Report. Obes Surg 2024; 34:293-294. [PMID: 38062343 PMCID: PMC10781870 DOI: 10.1007/s11695-023-06943-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/13/2023] [Revised: 11/02/2023] [Accepted: 11/08/2023] [Indexed: 01/11/2024]
Abstract
We describe gastric tube continuity restoration (gastrogastrostomy) in a patient who underwent revisional laparoscopic one-anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB) due to weight recurrence after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (SG). The patient sought restoration to SG due to poor quality of life. A postoperative 11-mm leak at the site of the gastrogastrostomy, attributed to adhesions and edema from a marginal ulcer, complicated the procedure. As a result, laparoscopic exploration was performed, followed by insertion of a megastent. We hereby present video documentation of this case report as well as megastent insertion technique for the treatment of such complications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mohamed Hany
- Department of Surgery, Medical Research Institute, Alexandria University, 165 Horreya Avenue, Hadara, Alexandria, 21561, Egypt.
- Madina Women's Hospital, Alexandria, Egypt.
| | - Mohamed Ibrahim
- Department of Surgery, Medical Research Institute, Alexandria University, 165 Horreya Avenue, Hadara, Alexandria, 21561, Egypt
| | - Mohamed Samir
- Department of Surgery, Medical Research Institute, Alexandria University, 165 Horreya Avenue, Hadara, Alexandria, 21561, Egypt
| | - Ann Samy Shafiq Agayby
- Department of Surgery, Medical Research Institute, Alexandria University, 165 Horreya Avenue, Hadara, Alexandria, 21561, Egypt
| | - Bart Torensma
- Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC), Leiden, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Revisional Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass Versus Revisional One-Anastomosis Gastric Bypass After Failed Sleeve Gastrectomy: a Randomized Controlled Trial. Obes Surg 2022; 32:3491-3503. [PMID: 36098907 PMCID: PMC9469810 DOI: 10.1007/s11695-022-06266-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/13/2022] [Revised: 08/30/2022] [Accepted: 09/01/2022] [Indexed: 12/02/2022]
Abstract
Background
High rates of revision surgery have been reported for laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG), with weight regain (WR) as the most frequently reported cause. Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) is the most commonly performed revision procedure, whereas one-anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB) is a less popular approach. Methods A single-blinded randomized controlled trial was conducted. One hundred seventy-six patients were enrolled and randomized. After loss to follow-up, 80 patients for RYGB and 80 patients for OAGB were analyzed, with a 2-year follow-up. Patients with grade B or higher gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) were excluded. Early and late postoperative complications were recorded. Body mass index (BMI), percentage of excess BMI loss (%EBMIL), nutritional laboratory test results, and the resolution of associated medical problems were assessed after revision surgery. Results After 2 years, both groups achieved significantly lower BMI than their post-LSG nadir BMI (p < 0.001). The %EBMIL changes showed significantly faster weight loss in the OAGB group than in the RYGB at the 6-month follow-up (mean difference: 8.5%, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.2 to 16.9%). However, at 1-year and 2-year follow-ups, the differences were statistically insignificant (p > 0.05). Early and late complications were similar between two groups. Both groups showed improvement or resolution of associated medical problems, with no statistically significant differences after 2 years (p = 1.00). Conclusion Both revisional RYGB and OAGB have comparable significant weight loss effects when performed for WR after LSG. After a 2-year follow-up, both procedures were safe, with no significant differences in the occurrence of complications and nutritional deficits. Graphical abstract ![]()
Collapse
|
5
|
Goudarzi H, Obney JR, Hemmatizadeh M, Anbara T. Endoscopic Self-Expanding Metallic Stent Placement in the Management of Post Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy Complications. JOURNAL OF DIGESTIVE ENDOSCOPY 2022. [DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-1754333] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
Introduction Endoscopic treatments have become popular by providing the best solution for healing complications while allowing oral nutrition. In this study, we aim to evaluate outcomes of the endoscopic-covered stents for staple line complications following bariatric surgery.
Methods A prospective evaluation was performed for all patients treated for staple line complications after bariatric surgery. Bariatric patients with acute leaks, chronic gastrocutaneous fistulas, and anastomotic strictures refractory to endoscopic dilation after sleeve gastrectomy were included in this survey.
Results From January 2019 to June 2020, 41 patients (12 with acute leaks, 16 with chronic fistulas, and 13 with strictures) were treated with endoscopic silicone-covered stents (polyester or nitinol). The mean follow-up was 3.5 months. Immediate symptomatic improvement occurred in 95.2% (91.7% of acute leaks, 81.2% of fistulas, and 92.3% of strictures). In addition, 87.8% of patients initiated oral feeding immediately after stenting. There was no mortality case in this population.
Conclusion Although stent migration rarely occurs in subjects, the endoscopic silicone-covered stents strategy is one of the best treatments for anastomotic complications after bariatric surgery, providing rapid healing while simultaneously allowing for oral nutrition.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Jacob R. Obney
- Department of Biology, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, Texas, United States
| | | | - Taha Anbara
- Department of Surgery, Erfan Niayesh Hospital, Tehran, Iran
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Hany M, Torensma B, Ibrahim M, Zidan A, Gaballah M, Aly AFMA, Abu-Sheasha GA. Comparison of 5-Year Follow-up Outcomes Between Primary and Revision Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypasses After Open Vertical Banded Gastroplasty: an Inverse Propensity Score-Weighted Analysis. Obes Surg 2022; 32:3023-3033. [PMID: 35796945 PMCID: PMC9392695 DOI: 10.1007/s11695-022-06189-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/16/2022] [Revised: 06/25/2022] [Accepted: 06/27/2022] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Vertical banded gastroplasty (VBG) is associated with high weight regain; Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) is used as a revision procedure in patients with VBG experiencing weight regain. This study compared the 5-year follow-up outcomes of primary (PRYGB) and revision RYGB after VBG (RRYGB). METHODS Patients who underwent PRYGB or RRYGB after VBG from 2008 to 2016 were enrolled. Data on weight regain, weight loss (WL), food tolerance (FT), early and late complications, and resolution or improvement in associated medical conditions were analyzed. RESULTS PRYGB and RRYGB groups had 558 and 156 patients, respectively, after exclusion of the lost to follow-up patients. PRYGB group showed significantly lower mean body mass index (over the entire follow-up period), early complications, reintervention rates for late complications, and overall reintervention rates than that of the RRYGB group. On the other hand, FT scores, odds of late complications, and improvements (in the fifth year) in associated medical conditions were comparable between the two groups. CONCLUSION RRYGB in patients with VBG who regained weight showed comparable safety and resolution of associated diseases to that of PRYGB over the 5-year follow-up period. The WL in the RRYGB group was acceptable despite being less than that of the PRYGB group. FT was better after RRYGB than that of PRYGB in the first year; however, both were comparable at the fifth year follow-up. Patients with VBG undergoing RYGB should receive attentive treatment and evaluation of associated factors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mohamed Hany
- Department of Surgery, Medical Research Institute, Alexandria University, 165 Horreya Avenue, Hadara, 21561, Alexandria, Egypt. .,Bariatric Surgery at Madina Women's Hospital (IFSO Center of Excellence), Alexandria, Egypt.
| | - Bart Torensma
- Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC), Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Mohamed Ibrahim
- Department of Surgery, Medical Research Institute, Alexandria University, 165 Horreya Avenue, Hadara, 21561, Alexandria, Egypt
| | - Ahmed Zidan
- Department of Surgery, Medical Research Institute, Alexandria University, 165 Horreya Avenue, Hadara, 21561, Alexandria, Egypt
| | - Muhammad Gaballah
- Department of Surgery, Medical Research Institute, Alexandria University, 165 Horreya Avenue, Hadara, 21561, Alexandria, Egypt
| | - Ayman Farouk Mohammad Ahmed Aly
- Department of Surgery, Medical Research Institute, Alexandria University, 165 Horreya Avenue, Hadara, 21561, Alexandria, Egypt
| | - Ghada Ahmed Abu-Sheasha
- Department of Bio-Medical Informatics and Medical Statistics, Medical Research Institute, Alexandria University, Alexandria, Egypt
| |
Collapse
|