1
|
Alghazawi L, Fadel MG, Chen JY, Das B, Robb H, Rodriguez-Luna MR, Fakih-Gomez N, Perretta S, Ashrafian H, Fehervari M. Development and Evaluation of a Quality Assessment Tool for Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy Videos: A Review and Comparison of Academic and Online Video Resources. Obes Surg 2024; 34:1909-1916. [PMID: 38581627 PMCID: PMC11031436 DOI: 10.1007/s11695-024-07199-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/19/2023] [Revised: 03/21/2024] [Accepted: 03/21/2024] [Indexed: 04/08/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Video recording of surgical procedures is increasing in popularity. They are presented in various platforms, many of which are not peer-reviewed. Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) videos are widely available; however, there is limited evidence supporting the use of reporting guidelines when uploading LSG videos to create a valuable educational video. We aimed to determine the variations and establish the quality of published LSG videos, in both peer-reviewed literature and on YouTube, using a newly designed checklist to improve the quality and enhance the transparency of video reporting. METHODS A quality assessment tool was designed by using existing research and society guidelines, such as the Bariatric Metabolic Surgery Standardization (BMSS). A systematic review using PRISMA guidelines was performed on MEDLINE and EMBASE databases to identify video case reports (academic videos) and a similar search was performed on the commercial YouTube platform (commercial videos) simultaneously. All videos displaying LSG were reviewed and scored using the quality assessment tool. Academic and commercial videos were subsequently compared and an evidence-based checklist was created. RESULTS A total of 93 LSG recordings including 26 academic and 67 commercial videos were reviewed. Mean score of the checklist was 5/11 and 4/11 for videos published in articles and YouTube, respectively. Academic videos had higher rates of describing instruments used, such as orogastric tube (P < 0.001) and stapler information (P = 0.04). Fifty-four percent of academic videos described short-term patient outcomes, while not reported in commercial videos (P < 0.001). Sleeve resection status was not universally reported. CONCLUSIONS Videos published in the academic literature are describing steps in greater detail with more emphasis on specific technical elements and patient outcomes and thus have a higher educational value. A new quality assessment tool has been proposed for video reporting guidelines to improve the reliability and value of published video research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laith Alghazawi
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK.
| | - Michael G Fadel
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK
- Department of Bariatric and Metabolic Surgery, Chelsea and Westminster Hospital, London, UK
| | - Jun Yu Chen
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Bibek Das
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Henry Robb
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Maria Rita Rodriguez-Luna
- Research Institute Against Digestive Cancer (IRCAD), Strasbourg, France
- ICube Laboratory, Photonics Instrumentation for Health, Strasbourg, France
| | - Naim Fakih-Gomez
- Department of Bariatric and Metabolic Surgery, Chelsea and Westminster Hospital, London, UK
| | - Silvana Perretta
- Research Institute Against Digestive Cancer (IRCAD), Strasbourg, France
- Department of Digestive and Endocrine Surgery, University of Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France
- IHU-Strasbourg, Institute of Image-Guided Surgery, Strasbourg, France
| | - Hutan Ashrafian
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Matyas Fehervari
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK
- Gastrointestinal Surgery, Maidstone and Tunbridge Wells NHS Trust, Tunbridge Wells, UK
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Gönüllü E, Yüksel A, Coşkun M, Harmantepe T, Fırtına G, Karaman K. Oversewing the Staple Line: Does It Safe to Prevent Leakage? J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 2024; 34:120-126. [PMID: 37934468 DOI: 10.1089/lap.2023.0284] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction: The staple line (SL) leak remains one of the most serious complications after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG). The present study aims to determine whether reinforcing the SL with sutures is effective in maintaining tissue integrity. Materials and Methods: LSG Specimens of 60 patients were ex vivo studied. The specimens were divided into three groups: In group 1, the entire SL was reinforced, while the upper half part of the SL was reinforced from fundus to antrum in group 2. The SL was not reinforced in group 3. Then, the pressure inside the sample was increased, and the bursting pressure location and pressure value during the bursting were recorded. Results: The bursting pressure was significantly higher in entire and half oversewed SL groups than the none reinforced group (group 1: 115 mmHg [95-170]; group 2: 95 mmHg [80-120]; group 3: 40 mmHg [22-60], respectively, [P < .001]). The most common site of bursting was in the middle ⅓ of SL (35, 53.8%), followed by the proximal ⅓ part of SL (18, 27.7%), and the distal ⅓ part of SL (12, 18.5%), respectively. The bursting site was significantly more frequent in the corpus than the other parts of the SL (P = .013). Conclusion: Reinforcing the SL with sutures preserves tissue integrity. Although bursting was most frequently observed in the corpus region ex vivo, the fact that almost all real-life leaks develop in the area close to the Angle of His. This situation suggests that strengthening the suture line with reinforcement alone will not be protective enough against leaks in the fundus line, and factors such as tissue ischemia may be considered.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emre Gönüllü
- Gastrointestinal Surgery Department, Sakarya University Faculty of Medicine, Sakarya, Turkey
| | - Adem Yüksel
- Gastrointestinal Surgery Department, Sakarya University Faculty of Medicine, Sakarya, Turkey
| | - Murat Coşkun
- General Surgery Department, Sakarya Training and Research Hospital, Sakarya, Turkey
| | - Tarık Harmantepe
- General Surgery Department, Sakarya Training and Research Hospital, Sakarya, Turkey
| | - Gizem Fırtına
- Gastrointestinal Surgery Department, Sakarya University Faculty of Medicine, Sakarya, Turkey
| | - Kerem Karaman
- Gastrointestinal Surgery Department, Sakarya University Faculty of Medicine, Sakarya, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Higa K. Surgical Management of Bariatric Complications and Weight Regain. Gastroenterol Clin North Am 2023; 52:707-717. [PMID: 37919022 DOI: 10.1016/j.gtc.2023.09.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2023]
Abstract
The history and evolution of bariatric/metabolic surgical procedures allows for only a brief introduction to complications and surgical approaches for improved weight loss. Our specialty lacks standardization of our operations such as gastric pouch size, intestinal bypass lengths, and consensus on which procedure is best for each individual patient. Anatomic construct as well as adherence to lifestyle modifications can affect short- and long-term outcomes.
Collapse
|
4
|
Deffain A, Alfaris H, Hajjar R, Thibeault F, Dimassi W, Denis R, Garneau PY, Studer AS, Pescarus R. Long-term follow-up of a cohort with post sleeve gastrectomy leaks: results of endoscopic treatment and salvage surgery. Surg Endosc 2023; 37:9358-9365. [PMID: 37640954 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-023-10386-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/14/2023] [Accepted: 08/12/2023] [Indexed: 08/31/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) is the most performed bariatric procedure worldwide. The most challenging postoperative complication is gastric leak. The objectives of this study are to examine the efficacy and morbidity of different therapeutic strategies addressing leakage, and the long-term outcomes of a cohort of LSG leaks. METHODS A retrospective review of patients treated for LSG leaks between September 2014 and January 2023 at our high-volume bariatric surgery center was performed. RESULTS The charts of 37 patients (29 women and 8 men) were reviewed, with a mean age of 43 years and a median follow-up of 24 months. The mean preoperative body mass index was 45.1 kg/m2. Overall, 30/37 (81%) patients were successfully treated with endoscopic management, and 7/37 (19%) ultimately underwent salvage surgery. If the leak was diagnosed earlier than 6 weeks, endoscopic treatment had a 97% success rate. The median number of endoscopic procedures was 2 per patient, and included internal pigtails, stents, septoplasty, endoluminal vacuum therapy and over-the-scope clips. Complications included stent-related ulcers (10), esophageal stenosis requiring endoscopic dilatations (4), stent migrations (2) and kinking requiring repositioning (1), and internal pigtail migration (3). Revisional surgery consisted of proximal gastrectomy and Roux-en-Y esophago-jejunal anastomosis, Roux-en-Y fistulo-jejunostomy or classic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass proximal to the gastric stricture. In 62% of the cases, the axis/caliber of the LSG was abnormal. Beyond 4 attempts, endoscopy was unsuccessful. The success rate of endoscopic management dropped to 25% when treatment was initiated more than 45 days after the index surgery. CONCLUSIONS Purely endoscopic management was successful in 81% of cases; with 97% success rate if diagnosis earlier than 6 weeks. After four failed endoscopic procedures, a surgical approach should be considered. Delayed diagnosis appears to be a significant risk factor for failure of endoscopic treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Roy Hajjar
- Hôpital du Sacré Coeur, Montreal, Canada
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
The Evolving Management of Leaks Following Sleeve Gastrectomy. CURRENT SURGERY REPORTS 2023. [DOI: 10.1007/s40137-023-00357-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/08/2023]
|
6
|
Yzet C, Hakim S, Pioche M, Le Mouel JP, Deschepper C, Lafeuille P, Delcenserie R, Yzet T, Nguyen-Khac E, Fumery M, Brazier F. Endoscopic treatment of large gastric leaks after gastrectomy using the combination of double pigtail drains crossing a covered stent. Surg Endosc 2022; 36:9469-9475. [PMID: 36192655 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-022-09623-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/23/2022] [Accepted: 09/11/2022] [Indexed: 01/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Endoscopy is the gold standard for the treatment of postoperative gastric leaks (GL). Large fistulas are associated with high rate of treatment failure. The objective of this study was to assess the clinical efficacy of a combining technique using a covered stent (CS) crossing through pigtails (PDs) for large postsurgical GL leaks. METHODS All consecutive patients with large (> 10 mm) postsurgical GL treated endoscopically with a combination of a CS and PDs were included in a single-center retrospective study. The primary endpoint was the rate of GL closure. RESULTS A total of 29 patients were included. Twenty-five patients underwent sleeve gastrectomy. The fistula (median diameter 15 mm) was diagnosed 6 days (IQR 4-9) after surgery. Technical success was observed in all procedures. After a median follow-up of 10.7 months (IQR 3.8-20.7), GL closure was observed in 82.7% with a median time of 63 days (IQR 40-90). Surgical management was finally necessary in four patients after a median of 186 days (IQR 122-250). No complications related to combined endoscopic treatment were observed especially stent migration during the follow-up. CONCLUSION An endoscopic strategy combining CS crossing through PDs appears to be effective, safe and well tolerated for the treatment of large GL.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Clara Yzet
- Gastroenterology Unit, Amiens University Hospital, Université de Picardie Jules Verne, Amiens, France.
| | - Sami Hakim
- Gastroenterology Unit, Amiens University Hospital, Université de Picardie Jules Verne, Amiens, France
| | - Mathieu Pioche
- Gastroenterology Unit, Hopital Edouard Herriot, Lyon, France
| | - Jean-Phillippe Le Mouel
- Gastroenterology Unit, Amiens University Hospital, Université de Picardie Jules Verne, Amiens, France
| | - Constance Deschepper
- Gastroenterology Unit, Amiens University Hospital, Université de Picardie Jules Verne, Amiens, France
| | | | - Richard Delcenserie
- Gastroenterology Unit, Amiens University Hospital, Université de Picardie Jules Verne, Amiens, France
| | - Thierry Yzet
- Radiology Unit, Amiens University Hospital, Université de Picardie Jules Verne, Amiens, France
| | - Eric Nguyen-Khac
- Gastroenterology Unit, Amiens University Hospital, Université de Picardie Jules Verne, Amiens, France
| | - Mathurin Fumery
- Gastroenterology Unit, Amiens University Hospital, Université de Picardie Jules Verne, Amiens, France
| | - Franck Brazier
- Gastroenterology Unit, Amiens University Hospital, Université de Picardie Jules Verne, Amiens, France
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Treatment of Persistent Large Gastrocutaneous Fistulas After Bariatric Surgery: Preliminary Experience with Endoscopic Kehr's T-Tube Placement. Obes Surg 2022; 32:1377-1384. [PMID: 35141869 PMCID: PMC8933351 DOI: 10.1007/s11695-022-05935-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/25/2021] [Revised: 01/28/2022] [Accepted: 02/03/2022] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
Purpose Post-bariatric surgery gastrocutaneous fistula is a chronic leak with an incidence of 1.7 to 4.0% and no standardized management. A large gastrocutaneous fistula (LGCF) is not indicated for treatment with pigtail drains. We aimed to evaluate results of a novel treatment using endoscopic Kehr’s T-tube placement. Methods Only patients with a postoperative LGCF duration of > 10 days and a flow rate of > 50 cc by external drainage after revisional surgery for sepsis were included. Endoscopic placement of Kehr’s T-tube was performed. Patients had been reoperated with wash and drainage for severe sepsis after initial bariatric surgery in which no fistula had been discovered. Patients not reoperated, or with a fistula requiring intraoperative Kehr’s T-tube placement, or a pigtail drain were excluded. Primary outcomes were endoscopic characteristics and results (LGCF closure rate, Kehr T-tube retention time, etc.). Results The study group included 12 women, 2 men; body mass index 43.1 ± 4.5 kg/m2. Interventions were SG (7), RYGB (2), OAGB (4), and SADI-S (1). Endoscopic assessment was carried out after a mean of 33.2 ± 44.3 days after the bariatric procedure. The mean fistula orifice diameter was 2.0 ± 0.9 cm. Kehr’s T-tube was positioned at a mean 51.5 ± 54.8 days after the bariatric procedure. T-tube tolerance was excellent. Mean additional days: hospitalization, 34.4 ± 27.0; T-tube retention, 86.4 ± 73.1; fistula healing, 139.9 ± 111.5, LGCF closure rate, 92.9%. Complications: 1 pulmonary embolism, 2 T-tube migrations,1 drain-path bleed, 1 skin abscess. No mortality. Conclusions Endoscopic Kehr’s T-tube placement was successful in closing persistent post-bariatric surgery LGCF in 92.9% of patients. Graphical abstract ![]()
Collapse
|