Impact of Endoscopic Sleeve Gastroplasty in Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Endoscopic Sleeve Gastroplasty for the Treatment of Metabolic Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty (ESG) is an incisionless weight loss procedure that has been demonstrated to be safe and effective for the treatment of obesity; however, the efficacy of ESG for the treatment of comorbid type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and other components of metabolic syndrome (MetS) has been less well studied. We aimed to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of available literature to evaluate the outcomes of ESG on T2DM and MetS.

METHODS

Bibliographic databases were systematically searched for studies assessing the outcomes of ESG on T2DM and MetS. Studies were included if they reported at least one objective outcome related to T2DM or other components of MetS, including hyperlipidemia (HLD), hypertriglyceridemia, and hypertension (HTN). This study was deemed IRB exempt.

RESULTS

Ten studies with 4320 patients were included. At 12 months, ESG was associated with significant improvements in T2DM, HLD, and HTN, with risk difference of - 0.72 [95% CI, - 0.87 to - 0.58, p < 0.00001], - 0.65 [95% CI, - 0.78 to - 0.52, p < 0.00001], and - 0.60 [95% CI, - 0.66 to - 0.53, p < 0.00001], respectively. Disease improvement was defined as patients being able to stop some or all of their related treatment medications. Additionally, there were significant reductions in hemoglobin A1c (HGBA1c), fasting blood glucose, homeostatic model assessment for insulin resistance (HOMA-IR), low-density lipoprotein, and triglycerides.

CONCLUSIONS

ESG is an effective modality for the treatment of comorbid T2DM and MetS in patients with obesity. Additional studies are needed to establish long-term responses and to compare ESG against established pharmacologic and surgical techniques.

Endoscopic Weight Loss Options

Endoscopic therapies for obesity have emerged as safe, effective, and minimally-invasive alternatives to traditional approaches, including lifestyle modification, anti-obesity medications, and bariatric surgery. Currently, in the United States, 2 types of endoscopic weight loss therapies are Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved and are commercially available-intragastric balloons and endoscopic gastric remodeling. These devices and procedures are associated with approximately 10% to 20% total weight loss at 1 year and have distinct technical features, benefits, and risks that providers should be familiar with. This article will focus on the primary FDA-approved endoscopic treatments for obesity and also cover those in development.

The evolution and current state of bariatric endoscopy in Western countries

With the alarmingly increasing prevalence of obesity in the Western world, it has become necessary to provide more acceptable treatment options for patients with obesity. Minimally invasive endoscopic techniques are continuously evolving. Currently, metabolic and bariatric endoscopies encompass several different techniques that can offer significant weight loss and improvement in comorbidities with a favorable safety profile. Restrictive bariatric procedures include the use of intragastric balloons and gastric remodeling techniques with different suturing devices. Several studies have demonstrated the efficacy and safety of these techniques that are widely used in clinical practice. Small intestine-targeted metabolic endoscopy is an intriguing and rapidly evolving field of research, although it is not widespread in routine practice. These techniques include duodenal-jejunal bypass liners, duodenal mucosal resurfacing, and incisionless anastomoses. The aim of this review article is to provide a detailed update on the currently available bariatric endoscopy techniques in Western countries.

Effectiveness and Safety of the Allurion Swallowable Intragastric Balloon for Short-term Weight Loss: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Obesity poses a severe health problem worldwide, with an estimated impact on 17.5% of the adult population by 2035. Among the endoscopic applications for treating this comorbidity, intragastric balloons are the most widely used. The new liquid-filled swallowable balloon meets the requirements of major guidelines and allows significant weight loss with few adverse events. This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to demonstrate the efficacy and safety profile of this new device for weight loss.

METHODS

We conducted a search from 2016 to 2024 to assess the efficacy of the swallowable intragastric balloon for weight loss, including improvements in metabolic profiles and anthropometric measurements. Additionally, we evaluated potential adverse events related to the device to demonstrate its safety.

RESULTS

Eleven observational studies totalling 2107 patients were included, showing a reduction of 4.75 in BMI (95% CI: -5.02; -4.47), a mean total weight loss of 12.47% (95% CI: -13.77; -11.17), a mean excess weight loss of 48.04% (95% CI: -50.61; -45.48), and a rate of serious adverse events of 0.90%. An improvement in the metabolic profile was observed for three parameters: HDL, triglycerides, and glycaemia.

CONCLUSION

The swallowable liquid-filled intragastric balloon is safe and effective for managing weight loss within a four-month follow-up period.

Effect of Bariatric Surgery on the Sonographic Grade of Metabolic-Associated Fatty Liver Disease at 12-Month Follow-Up

BACKGROUND

Metabolic-associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD) is the most prevalent liver disease across the globe. One of the most effective treatments for this disease is weight loss. This study aimed to determine how metabolic and bariatric surgery (MBS) affects MAFLD sonographic grades.

METHODS

In 2021, a pre-post study was conducted on 73 patients who underwent MBS. The study collected demographic information and ultrasound grades of MAFLD before and after MBS.

RESULTS

A total of 73 patients underwent MBS, with 58 females and 15 males. The patients had a mean age of 39.8 ± 8.88 years and a mean BMI of 42.12 ± 5.98 kg/m2. Of these patients, 53 (72.6%) underwent SG, while 20 (27.4%) underwent RYGB. The preoperative BMI for females and males decreased significantly at the 12-month follow-up (P = 0.0001). However, males experienced more prominent weight changes (P = 0.009), but there was no statistically significant difference in fatty liver grade changes after MBS between males and females (P = 0.056), which suggests that the effect of MBS on fatty liver grades is not gender-specific. There was a significant reduction in BMI and fatty liver grade for patients under and over 40 years old after surgery (P = 0.0001). However, there was no statistically significant difference in fatty liver grade and BMI changes after MBS between the two age groups. RYGB was found to be more effective than SG in reducing fatty liver grade, BMI, and %TWL (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Bariatric surgery can play a vital role in reducing the weight and severity of metabolic-associated fatty liver disease.

Endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty for metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease

INTRODUCTION

Metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD, formerly nonalcoholic fatty liver disease - NAFLD) is a chronic liver condition linked to obesity and metabolic syndrome. It affects one-third of people globally and, in some cases, can lead to metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis (MASH, formerly nonalcoholic steatohepatitis, NASH) and fibrosis. Weight loss is crucial for the treatment of MASLD, but diet and lifestyle modifications often fail.

AREAS COVERED

In recent years, endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty (ESG) has gained popularity as an effective and minimally invasive option for obesity treatment, with widespread use worldwide. We present a current overview of the most significant studies conducted on ESG for the management of obesity and MASLD. Our report includes data from published studies that have evaluated the impact of ESG on noninvasive hepatic parameters used to estimate steatosis and fibrosis. However, at present, there are no data available on liver histology.

EXPERT OPINION

ESG has shown promising results in treating MASLD evaluated by noninvasive tests, but current data is limited to small, nonrandomized studies. More research is needed, particularly on the effects of ESG on histologically proven MASH. If future research confirms its efficacy, ESG may be incorporated into treatment guidelines in the future.

Treatment Options and Continuity of Care in Metabolic-associated Fatty Liver Disease: A Multidisciplinary Approach

The terms non-alcoholic fatty liver disease and non-alcoholic steatohepatitis have some limitations as they use exclusionary confounder terms and the use of potentially stigmatising language. Recently, a study with content experts and patients has been set to change this nomenclature. The term chosen to replace non-alcoholic fatty liver disease was metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD), which avoids stigmatising and helps improve awareness and patient identification. MASLD is the most common cause of chronic liver disease with an increasing prevalence, accounting for 25% of the global population. It is considered the hepatic manifestation of the metabolic syndrome with lifestyle playing a fundamental role in its physiopathology. Diet change and physical activity are the cornerstones of treatment, encompassing weight loss and healthier behaviours and a holistic approach. In Europe, there is no approved drug for MASLD to date and there is a substantial unmet medical need for effective treatments for patients with MASLD. This review not only provides an update on advances in evidence for nutrition and physical activity interventions but also explores the different therapeutic options that are being investigated and whose development focuses on the restitution of metabolic derangements and halting inflammatory and fibrogenic pathways.

Obesity Is Associated with Fatty Liver and Fat Changes in the Kidneys in Humans as Assessed by MRI

BACKGROUND

Obesity is associated with metabolic syndrome and fat accumulation in various organs such as the liver and the kidneys. Our goal was to assess, using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) Dual-Echo phase sequencing, the association between liver and kidney fat deposition and their relation to obesity.

METHODS

We analyzed MRI scans of individuals who were referred to the Chaim Sheba Medical Center between December 2017 and May 2020 to perform a study for any indication. For each individual, we retrieved from the computerized charts data on sex, and age, weight, height, body mass index (BMI), systolic and diastolic blood pressure (BP), and comorbidities (diabetes mellitus, hypertension, dyslipidemia).

RESULTS

We screened MRI studies of 399 subjects with a median age of 51 years, 52.4% of whom were women, and a median BMI 24.6 kg/m2. We diagnosed 18% of the participants with fatty liver and 18.6% with fat accumulation in the kidneys (fatty kidneys). Out of the 67 patients with fatty livers, 23 (34.3%) also had fatty kidneys, whereas among the 315 patients without fatty livers, only 48 patients (15.2%) had fatty kidneys (p < 0.01). In comparison to the patients who did not have a fatty liver or fatty kidneys (n = 267), those who had both (n = 23) were more obese, had higher systolic BP, and were more likely to have diabetes mellitus. In comparison to the patients without a fatty liver, those with fatty livers had an adjusted odds ratio of 2.91 (97.5% CI; 1.61-5.25) to have fatty kidneys. In total, 19.6% of the individuals were obese (BMI ≥ 30), and 26.1% had overweight (25 < BMI < 30). The obese and overweight individuals were older and more likely to have diabetes mellitus and hypertension and had higher rates of fatty livers and fatty kidneys. Fat deposition in both the liver and the kidneys was observed in 15.9% of the obese patients, in 8.3% of the overweight patients, and in none of those with normal weight. Obesity was the only risk factor for fatty kidneys and fatty livers, with an adjusted OR of 6.3 (97.5% CI 2.1-18.6).

CONCLUSIONS

Obesity is a major risk factor for developing a fatty liver and fatty kidneys. Individuals with a fatty liver are more likely to have fatty kidneys. MRI is an accurate modality for diagnosing fatty kidneys. Reviewing MRI scans of any indication should include assessment of fat fractions in the kidneys in addition to that of the liver.