Analysis of phenolic compounds in beer: from raw materials to the final product

UHPLC-PAD Protocol for the Simultaneous Identification of Polyphenols and Bitter Acids: Organoleptic and Nutraceutical Fingerprinting of Bergamot-Flavored Craft Beer

In this study, a UHPLC-PDA method for the simultaneous identification of polyphenols and bitter acids (alpha, beta, and isoalpha) in beer was developed. The resulting chemical profiles were leveraged to distinguish the characteristics of four (IPA, Lager, Blanche, ALE) bergamot-flavored beers, produced on a pilot-scale plant. In a streamlined 29 min analysis, thirty polyphenols and fourteen bitter acids were successfully identified under optimized separation conditions. Validation, encompassing parameters such as LOD (from 0.028 ppm for isorhamnetin to 0.106 for narirutin), LOQ (from 0.077 ppm for naringenin to 0.355 for narirutin), R2 (always more than 0.9992), repeatability (from 0.67% for tangeretin to 6.38% for myricetin), and reproducibility (from 0.99% for sinensetin to 6% for naringin), was conducted for polyphenol quantification using constructed calibration curves with seven levels. Exploring polyphenolic components as potential discriminators among different beer styles, a total of thirty-two polyphenolic compounds were identified and quantified, including characteristic bergamot peel polyphenols like neoeriocitrin (from 7.85 ppm for CBS2 to 11.95 ppm in CBS1); naringin (from 4.56 ppm for CBS4 to 10.96 in CBS1), and neohesperidin (from 5.93 in CBS3 to 15.95 for CBS2). The multivariate analysis provided additional insights into variations among specific beer styles, revealing discrepancies in the presence or relative concentrations of specific compounds linked to brewing ingredients and processes. This research enhances the fingerprinting of the chemistry governing beer quality through a straightforward and cost-effective analytical approach.

Changes in beer bitterness level during the beer production process

Beer has been enjoyed by consumers for years. Today, hops are inextricably associated with this beverage. Although they have been the subject of research for decades, knowledge of their bittering components and interactions during the beer production process is still incomplete. Current literature clearly indicates that the bitterness experienced in beer comes from a much wider range of compounds than just iso-α-acids. Although compounds that can be classified into β-acids, humulinones, hulupones, hard resins, and polyphenols are characterized by lower levels of bitterness and are present in hops in lower quantities than α-acids, they might determine, together with them, the final level of bitterness in beer. Unlike α-acids, the influence of compounds from these groups, their transformations, changes in their content during the beer production process and factors that affect their final concentration in beer have not yet been thoroughly studied. In case of α-acids, it is known that factors, such as chemical composition of wort, its extract and pH, amount of hops added and α-acids’ content, boiling time, and temperature at which hops were added influence the level of bitterness. This phenomenon is further complicated when dry hopping is used. Due to the presence of humulinones, polyphenols, and α-acids, a relatively simple spectrophotometric determination of IBU can give erroneous results. IBU determination, especially in dry-hopped beers, should be coupled with HPLC analysis, taking into account appropriate bitterness coefficients.

A review on the fate of phenolic compounds during malting and brewing: Technological strategies and beer styles

This review provides an overview on the influence of malting and brewing on the overall phenolic content of barley malt and beer. Beer phenolics are mainly originated from barley malt and can be found in free and bound forms, in concentrations up to 50% lower comparing to sweet wort. The use of roasted malts, in combination with proper milling and high mashing temperatures at low pH can lead to a release of bound phenolic forms and increased extraction. New technological strategies such as special yeasts, manipulation of enzymatic activity and dry-hopping may be relevant to improve the phenolic profile of beer and attain phenolic levels with benefits both for beer stability and consumer's health. As the content of free ferulic acid in beer only accounts up to approximately 15% of total content, further studies should put emphasis on its bound forms in different beer styles and non-alcoholic beers.