Robotic resection of a common hepatic artery aneurysm

Robotic Surgery for Elective Repair of Visceral and Renal Artery Aneurysms: A Systematic Review

Background: The treatment choice of visceral artery aneurysms in an elective setting is debated. The durability and the risk of reintervention with endovascular treatment are still reasons for concern, whereas open surgery is invasive and burdened by major complications. In anecdotal reports and isolated studies, robotic-assisted surgery seems to provide the possibility of a minimally invasive treatment and the durability of traditional open surgery, but the literature supporting this view is scarce. This review aims to collect the results of robotic-assisted surgery in the treatment of visceral artery aneurysms. Methods: A systematic search of the main research databases was performed: the study endpoints were mortality and conversion rates, perioperative morbidity, and freedom from late complications and reinterventions. Results: We identified 16 studies on 53 patients. All cases underwent successful resection, with three conversions to laparoscopy. Perioperative and aneurysm-related mortality were nil. Over a median follow-up of 9 months, two reinterventions were reported (3.6%). Conclusion: The robotic technique is safe and effective in treating splenic and renal artery aneurysms, and it should be considered as a valuable alternative to endovascular and open repair, although larger sample sizes and a longer-term follow-up are necessary to confirm such results.

Which method of distal pancreatectomy is cost-effective among open, laparoscopic, or robotic surgery?

Background

The aim of this study was to analyze the clinical and economic impact of robotic distal pancreatectomy, laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy, and open distal pancreatectomy.

Methods

All consecutive patients who underwent distal pancreatic resection for benign and malignant diseases between January 2012 and December 2015 were prospectively included. Cost analysis was performed; all charges from patient admission to discharge were considered.

Results

There were 21 robotic (RDP), 25 laparoscopic (LDP), and 43 open (ODP) procedures. Operative time was longer in the RDP group (RDP =345 minutes, LDP =306 min, ODP =251 min, P=0.01). Blood loss was higher in the ODP group (RDP =192 mL, LDP =356 mL, ODP =573 mL, P=0.0002). Spleen preservation was more frequent in the RDP group (RDP =66.6%, LDP =61.9%, ODP =9.3%, P=0.001). The rate of patients with Clavien-Dindo > grade III was higher in the ODP group (RDP =0%, LDP =12%, ODP =23%, P=0.01), especially for non-surgical complications, which were more frequent in the ODP group (RDP =9.5%, LDP =24%, ODP =41.8%, P=0.02). Length of hospital stay was increased in the ODP group (ODP =19 days, LDP =13 days, RDP =11 days, P=0.007). The total cost of the procedure, including the surgical procedure and postoperative course was higher in the ODP group (ODP =30,929 Euros, LDP =22,150 Euros, RDP =21,219 Euros, P=0.02).

Conclusions

Cost-effective results of RDP seem to be similar to LDP with some better short-term outcomes.