Long-term outcomes of robotic mesh sacrocolpopexy

Identifying Patient and Surgical Criteria for Same-Day Discharge After Robotic-Assisted Sacrocolpopexy

Introduction: To review the postrobotic-assisted sacrocolpopexy (RASC) course of women admitted for 23 hours post-RASC and identify events requiring intensive medical care or potentially leading to deleterious outcome or urgent readmission if that patient had same-day discharge (SDD) instead of observed overnight. Methods: Patients undergoing RASC from January to December 2020 at one institution were identified and relevant data were obtained via retrospective chart review. Patient exclusions: RASC start time after 12:00 PM, concurrent posterior colporrhaphy, rectopexy, or hysterectomy, or conversion to open. Results: Sixty-nine patients (median age 71 years old) met study criteria with majority American Society of Anesthesiologists class 2 (n = 46, 67%) or 3 (n = 22, 32%). Patient characteristics included prior abdominal surgeries (n = 58, 84%), prior hysterectomy/prolapse repair (n = 25, 37%), known allergy to pain medication (n = 25, 36%), and administration of a postoperative antiemetic (n = 37, 54%) or intra-/postoperative keterolac (n = 36, 52%). Median surgery length was 269 minutes. Postoperative events that may have resulted in urgent readmissions if they had SDD were observed in 6% of patients. In the 1st week post-RASC, there were no readmissions. Conclusions: In this limited quality assurance study, patients undergoing RASC experienced no major complications requiring intensive care. Postoperative events were almost entirely nausea and pain, with no readmissions within the 1st week.

Single-center study for robotic-assisted laparoscopic sacropexies: a one-fits-all strategy for pelvic organ prolapse?

Purpose

Sarcopenia has been established as the “gold standard” for the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse (POP). Minimal invasive laparoscopy can help to reduce the risks of open access surgery. We compare the surgical results and outcomes of robotic-assisted sacropexies.

Methods

In this monocentric retrospective study we enrolled 49 patients operated on symptomatic POP. Patients were divided into two groups according to the type of robotic-assisted sacropexy: patients with a history of hysterectomy received robotic-assisted sacrocolpopexy (RSCP; n = 19), while patients with subtotal hysterectomy received robotic-assisted cervicosacropexy (RCSP; n = 30). Failure was defined as recurrence of the disease with a need for reoperation. Validated questionnaires (the Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory—20 (PFDI-20) and Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire—7 (PFIQ-7)), were used for evaluation of patients quality of life postoperatively.

Results

The comparison between RCSP versus RSCP showed that the latter is related to slightly but not significantly increased recurrence rates and a higher impact of POP symptoms on quality of life in long-term follow-up (p = 0.04). Perioperative data showed similar complication rates in both RSP types but shorter postoperative time of bladder catheterization in the case of RCSP (p = 0.008).

Conclusions

The monocentric long-term data confirm that RSP is a safe and effective method of surgical POP treatment, regardless of the site of the anatomical compartment. In comparison to RSCP, RCSP is associated with a lower impact of POP symptoms on patients’ quality of life with a tendency to slightly lower rates of POP recurrence.

Challenges of Managing Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms in Women with Tamoxifen Use

Objective:

Tamoxifen complicates management of conditions such as urinary tract infections (UTIs), urinary incontinence (UI), and/or pelvic organ prolapse (POP) that traditionally benefit from hormonal intake; thus, we reviewed our experience in managing these hormonally deprived women.

Materials and Methods:

After IRB approval, electronic medical records from women with current use or history of tamoxifen use and referred to a tertiary care center with female pelvic medicine and reconstructive surgery expertise for UTI, UI, and/or POP were reviewed.

Results:

From 2015 to 2020, 32 women treated with tamoxifen 10–40 mg for a median of 4 years were referred for UTIs (9), UI (10), symptomatic POP (8), or for a combination of these (5). Participants with UTI treated with antibiotics, prophylactic supplements, and/or electrofulguration had satisfactory response at median follow-up of 1 year (interquartile range [IQR]: 0.5–1). Ten of 15 women with UI chose intervention, with no self-reported UI recurrence at median follow-up of 2.5 years (IQR: 1–3). All but one participant with POP underwent vaginal or open/robotic mesh repairs, with satisfactory outcomes at median follow-up of 3 years (IQR: 2–7).

Conclusions:

The management of UTIs, UI, and POP in women on tamoxifen or unable to benefit from hormonal intake is challenging, but traditional interventions can be considered with satisfactory results.

New "Wrinkle Method" for Intracorporeal Anterior Vaginal Wall Plication during Sacrocolpopexy

In this study, we introduce a new wrinkle method for intracorporeal anterior vaginal wall plication during sacrocolpopexy for pelvic organ prolapse (POP) aiming to decrease POP recurrence and postoperative vaginal wall mesh erosion. The wrinkle method was performed using robotic sacrocolpopexy (RSC) on 57 symptomatic POP patients. Sixty-six patients underwent conventional RSC before the development of the wrinkle method. Feasibility and perioperative outcomes were compared. The wrinkle method is not time consuming. The total operative time was shorter in the wrinkle group than in the non-wrinkle group; however, this was attributed to lower adhesiolysis in the wrinkle group. No differences were recorded in the mean estimated blood loss and complication rates between the two groups. In conclusion, although we were unable to confirm that the wrinkle method decreased POP recurrence and vaginal wall mesh erosion after RSC because of the short follow-up period, our preliminary findings are positive in terms of safety. Further long-term well designed randomized controlled trials are required to elucidate the benefits of the wrinkle method.

Robotic Sacrocolpopexy for Treatment of Apical Compartment Prolapse

Abdominal sacrocolpopexy is the gold-standard treatment for apical compartment prolapse, as it is more effective and durable than the transvaginal approach. In the current era of minimally invasive surgery, laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy techniques have been described, but have not gained popularity due to their complexity and steep learning curves. To overcome this problem, robotic sacrocolpopexy was introduced, and has shown equivalent outcomes and safety compared to open and laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy based on findings that have been accumulated over 15 years.

Robotic-assisted repair of pelvic organ prolapse: a scoping review of the literature

The purpose of this article is to perform a scoping review of the medical literature regarding the efficacy, safety, and cost of robotic-assisted procedures for repair of pelvic organ prolapse in females. Sacrocolpopexy is the “gold standard” repair for apical prolapse for those who desire to maintain their sexual function, and minimally-invasive approaches offer similar efficacy with fewer risks than open techniques. The introduction of robotic technology has significantly impacted the field, converting what would have been a large number of open abdominal sacrocolpopexy (ASC) procedures to a minimally-invasive approach in the United States. Newer techniques such as nerve-sparing dissection at the sacral promontory, use of the iliopectineal ligaments and natural orifice vaginal sacrocolpopexy may improve patient outcomes. Prolapse recurrence is consistently noted in at least 10% of patients regardless of route of mesh placement. Ancillary factors including pre-operative prolapse stage, retention of the cervix, type of mesh implant, and genital hiatus (GH) size all adversely affect surgical efficacy, while trainees do not. Minimally-invasive apical repair procedures are suited to early recovery after surgery protocols but may not be appropriate for all patients. Studies evaluating longer-term outcomes of robotic sacrocolpopexies are needed to understand the relative risk/benefit ratio of this technique. With several emerging robotic platforms with improved features and a focus on decreasing costs, the future of robotics seems bright.

Vaginal cuff perforation during robotic-assisted mesh recto-sacrocolpopexy

INTRODUCTION

We report on the management of intraoperative vaginal cuff perforation during robotic-assisted mesh recto-sacrocolpopexy for vaginal vault prolapse with defecatory dysfunction.

CASE PRESENTATION

A 75-year-old woman with vaginal bulge and constipation was to undergo a joint robotic mesh recto-sacrocolpopexy. Intraoperatively, mesh was secured to the left posterior vaginal wall following dissection. Prior to contralateral suture placement, the vaginal cuff split open and exposed an end-to-end anastomotic sizer previously inserted in the vagina. Due to subsequent mesh erosion risk, we proceeded with vaginotomy closure with running and interrupted absorbable sutures, removal of mesh, direct suture rectopexy to the promontory, and enterocele defect correction by reapproximating the right and left wings of the peritoneum flaps over the rectum with running sutures. Patient reported satisfactory outcomes after 2 years.

CONCLUSION

We reviewed our experience with vaginal cuff perforation during robotic-assisted mesh recto-sacrocolpopexy prompting enterocele repair and rectopexy without mesh.

The current status of sacrocolpopexy in the management of apical prolapse

Pelvic organ prolapse (POP) is a prevalent condition that negatively affects women' s quality of life. There is growing recognition that adequate support for the vaginal apex is an important component of a durable surgical repair for women with advanced prolapse, including the anterior and posterior wall prolapse. Surgical treatment options include abdominal and vaginal approaches, the former of which can be performed open, laparoscopically, and robotically. Sacrocolpopexy is a common procedure designed for the treatment of prolapse including uterine or vaginal vault prolapse and multiple-compartment prolapse. Although traditionally performed as an open abdominal procedure, minimally invasive sacrocolpopexy, whether laparoscopic or robotic, has been successfully performed in the clinical practice by many pelvic reconstructive surgeons. In order to require an outstanding cosmetic result, transumbilical/transvaginal single-port sacrocolpopexy has been developed to achieve the goal and initial outcomes have demonstrated their efficacy, safety and feasibility. However, up to date, there are many variations to these procedures, with different levels of evidence to support each of them. Herein we reviewed the current literatures on current surgical choices for women with apical prolapse.

Robotic sacrocolpopexy for the management of pelvic organ prolapse: quality of life outcomes

BACKGROUND

Our aim was to investigate longer-term surgical and quality of life (QOL) outcomes in a cohort of women undergoing robotic-assisted laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy (RALS) for pelvic organ prolapse (POP).

METHODS

We performed a retrospective cohort study at a single institution of female patients undergoing RALS with and without concomitant robotic-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy, urethral sling, and rectocele repair. Scores from the Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory (PFDI) and Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire (PFIQ) surveys were used to evaluate QOL outcomes. Clinical improvement was defined by a decrease in a patient's PFDI and PFIQ postoperative score by ⩾70%.

RESULTS

Clinical improvement was seen in 62.6% by the PFIQ and in 64% by the PFDI survey. Younger patient age (OR 0.92, p = 0.011) and worse preoperative American Urological Association (AUA) Quality of Life score (OR 1.42, p = 0.046) were associated with clinical improvement. Within the PFIQ, 35.6% of patients saw clinical improvement with their bowel symptoms, compared with bladder (54.1%, p < 0.001) and prolapse (45.6%, p = 0.053) symptoms. Within the PFDI, 45.5% of patients reached clinical improvement with their bowel symptoms, compared with bladder (56.7%, p = 0.035) and prolapse (62.6%, p < 0.001) symptoms. Of the patients who had a rectocele repair, 46.3% reached clinical improvement in their CRADI-8 score, and 51% saw clinical improvement in the bowel portion of the PDFI.

CONCLUSIONS

Significantly fewer patients reached clinical improvement within the portions of the surveys that focus on bowel symptoms, compared with symptoms related to urination and POP. Of those that had a concomitant rectocele repair, approximately half reached clinical improvement with their bowel symptoms.