Robotic repair of partial anomalous pulmonary venous connection: the initial experience and technical details

Totally Endoscopic Atrial Septal Defect Repair on Beating Heart: Clinical Outcome and Single-Surgeon Learning Curve Experience

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the safety and efficacy of the Hanoi ASD procedure, which is totally endoscopic surgery for atrial septal defect (ASD) repair on beating heart. In addition, the present study also aimed to analyze the learning curve for this procedure.

METHODS

From May 2016 to February 2023, 198 consecutive ASD patients weighing ≥20 kg were enrolled in the retrospective study. The Hanoi ASD procedure includes (1) unilateral or bilateral femoral arterial cannulation; (2) two or three 5 mm trocars and a 15 mm port; (3) ASD repair on beating heart, preventing air embolism with CO2 insufflation and keeping the left atrium full of blood; and (4) not snaring the inferior vena cava. Cumulative sum (CUSUM) analysis was used to evaluate the cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) and operation time learning curves. Variables among the learning curve phases were compared.

RESULTS

The CPB and operation times were 90 (72 to 115) min and 180 (150 to 220) min, respectively. Total drainage volume was 190 (120 to 290) mL. No endoscopic failure or major complications were complications were excluding factors causing bias, the CUSUMCPBtime analysis for the remaining 131 patients included 3 phases. Phase 1 was the initial learning period (cases 1 to 34), phase 2 represented the technical competence period (cases 35 to 54), and phase 3 was the challenging period (cases 55 to 131).

CONCLUSIONS

The Hanoi ASD procedure is safe and feasible for repairing ASD in patients weighing ≥20 kg. According to the learning curve analysis, 34 cases were required to achieve technical efficiency, and 54 cases were required to address highly challenging cases.

Minimal access in cardiac surgery

Over the past two decades, minimally invasive cardiac surgery has been adopted with the use of endoscopic methods in 1990s and advanced robotic surgery since the early 2000s. In parallel with technological developments, surgical experience has increased and several cardiac operations are able to be performed using different mini-incisions. In this review, we discuss approaches to minimally invasive cardiac surgery, incisions, technical details, and suggestions.

Impact of additional annuloplasty on tricuspid valve and cardiac functions after atrial septal defect closure in adults

BACKGROUND

Surgical indications for moderate to severe tricuspid regurgitation (TR) during atrial septal defect (ASD) closure are still unclear. Additional tricuspid valve annuloplasty (TVP) can be beneficial to avoid postoperative persistent TR. Therefore, we compared the results of surgical ASD closure with or without additional TVP in patients who presented with moderate-to-severe TR.

METHODS

Between November 2009 and June 2016, 103 patients with ASD and moderate-to-severe TR underwent surgical ASD closure without (n = 76, group 1) and with additional TVP (n = 27, group 2). Clinical outcomes and echocardiographic data were analyzed.

RESULTS

There was no mortality. Postoperative outcomes were similar despite significantly longer aortic clamping time in group 2 (P = .003). Mean TR grade, right atrial diameter, right ventricular end-diastolic diameter, pulmonary artery pressure, and Qp/Qs ratio decreased significantly in both groups (P < .05). Mean follow-up time was 5.3 months (range: 1 month-6.2 years) in group 1 and 6.1 months (range: 1 month-4.1 years) in group 2 (P = .66). Echocardiography results showed significant decrease in TR grade in both groups (P = .93). The incidence of persistent moderate to severe TR was higher in isolated ASD closure group (14.4% vs 3.7%, P = .086). Additional TVP provided greater regression in TR grade (-1.49 ± 0.9 vs -1.89 ± 0.8, P = .041).

CONCLUSION

Despite TVP being associated with longer ischemic time, postoperative outcomes were comparable to ASD closure alone. Both approach demonstrated an effective decrease in TR, but TVP provided greater regression and lower incidence of persistent TR. Therefore, additional TVP should be considered in patients undergoing ASD closure with moderate-to-severe TR.

A comparison of robotically-assisted endoscopic versus sternotomy approach for myxoma excision: A single-center experience

Background

In this study, we present our single-center experience in robotically-assisted endoscopic surgery versus conventional median sternotomy approach in patients undergoing cardiac myxoma excision.

Methods

Between January 2011 and September 2019, a total of 46 patients (24 males, 22 females; mean age 54.1±12.5 years; range, 25 to 79 years) who had a confirmed diagnosis of isolated cardiac myxoma were included in the study. The patients were divided into two groups as those undergoing robotic-assisted surgery (n=16) and those undergoing conventional median sternotomy (n=30). Clinical characteristics, operative, and postoperative outcomes were compared. Robotic approach to right or left-sided tumors and postoperative pain scores were also analyzed.

Results

There was no mortality or major complication. No conversion to sternotomy was needed in robotic procedures. The mean cardiopulmonary bypass and aortic cross-clamp times were significantly shorter in the median sternotomy group (p=0.001 for both). The mean ventilation time and the length of hospital stay were significantly shorter in robotic surgery than sternotomy group (p=0.043 and p=0.048, respectively). The mean amount of postoperative blood loss and transfusion rate were significantly lower in robotic surgery patients (p=0.001 and p=0.022, respectively). The mean postoperative pain scores were significantly lower in patients undergoing robotic surgery (p=0.022).

Conclusion

Robotic-assisted endoscopic surgery can be performed safely and effectively for cardiac myxoma excision with shorter hospital stay, less pain, and less amount of blood product use, as well as more favorable cosmetic results compared to conventional median sternotomy.

Robotic-assisted cardiac surgery without lung isolation utilizing single-lumen endotracheal tube intubation

OBJECTIVES

This study assessed the feasibility and outcomes of performing robotic cardiac surgery without lung isolation using single-lumen (SL) endotracheal tube intubation.

METHODS

Between 2013 and 2017, 132 patients underwent robotically-assisted atrial septal defect closure. A retrospective analysis was performed of 23 patients (11 males, mean age 30.9 ± 5 years) who underwent robotic surgery with double-lumen (DL) endotracheal tube intubation (group 1) compared with 109 patients (57 males, mean age 32.4 ± 7.5 years) undergoing the same procedure with SL endotracheal intubation (group 2). The patient groups were compared in terms of demographic characteristics, operative data, and complications. The technical feasibility of the robotic procedure without lung isolation was evaluated.

RESULTS

There were no mortality, intraoperative complication, and conversion. Mean total anesthesia time was significantly decreased in the SL intubation group (238.3 ± 22.4 vs 227.2 ± 21.2 minutes; P = .025). First-pass intubation success was significantly higher in the SL intubation group (17 [73.9%] vs 98 [89.9%] patients; P = .032). Mean ventilation time (10.9 ± 5.3 hours), intensive care unit stay (16.8 ± 10.1 hours), and the length of hospital stay (3.8 ± 1.2 days) was significantly decreased in patients with SL tube (P < .05). Unilateral reexpansion pulmonary edema was observed in five (21.7%) patients with DL tube, whereas no patient with SL tube had this complication.

CONCLUSIONS

SL endotracheal tube intubation without lung isolation is a feasible and safe airway alternative in robotic cardiac procedures. This approach resulted in shorter anesthesia time, ventilation time and the length of hospital stay. Port placement and robotic set-up can be uneventfully performed without lung isolation.

Transcatheter closure vs totally endoscopic robotic surgery for atrial septal defect closure: A single-center experience

BACKGROUND

Transcatheter closure is the preferred method for atrial septal defect (ASD) closure. Robotic surgery has become the least invasive technique for ASD closure. Therefore, we sought to evaluate the outcomes in patients who underwent ASD closure with transcatheter or robotic surgery techniques.

METHODS

A total of 462 patients underwent totally endoscopic robotic (n = 217) or transcatheter ASD closure (n = 245). Demographic data, perioperative data, and outcomes were compared.

RESULTS

The mean age was lower in the robotic surgery group than the transcatheter group (31.4 ± 11.8 vs 39.4 ± 13.2 years; P = .001). Ventilation time, intensive care unit (ICU) stay, and hospital stay was significantly lower in the transcatheter group. The postoperative new-onset neurological event was seen in one (0.5%) patient in robotic surgery, and four (1.6%) patients in the transcatheter closure group. New-onset atrial fibrillation was found to be higher in transcatheter closure (two vs seven patients; P = .133) group. Surgical conversion to a larger incision occurred in two patients (1%) in robotic surgery, while two patients (0.5%) underwent emergency median sternotomy due to device embolization to the main pulmonary artery. There was no mortality in both groups. During follow-up, one patient (0.5%) who underwent robotic surgery was reoperated, and two patients (0.8%) who underwent transcatheter procedure required surgical intervention due to device migration and severe residual shunting (P = .635).

CONCLUSION

Both transcatheter and robotic surgery approaches had excellent outcomes but transcatheter closure had shorter hospital and ICU stays. Robotic surgery provides a similar complication risk that can be comparable to the transcatheter approach as well as patient comfort and cosmetic advantage over the other surgical techniques.