1
|
Chung KC, Wu KL, Su YL, Cheng KC, Tang CE, Song LC, Chen HH, Lee KC. Outcomes of Robot-Assisted Versus Laparoscopic Surgery for Colorectal Cancer in Adults Aged 75 Years and Older: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis of the US Nationwide Inpatient Sample. Dis Colon Rectum 2024; 67:1121-1130. [PMID: 38848125 DOI: 10.1097/dcr.0000000000003374] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/11/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Robot-assisted surgery has been increasingly adopted in colorectal cancer resection. OBJECTIVE The study aimed to compare the inpatient outcomes of robot-assisted versus conventional laparoscopic colorectal cancer resection in patients aged 75 years and older. DESIGN A retrospective, population-based study. SETTINGS This study analyzed data from the United States Nationwide Inpatient Sample from 2005 to 2018. PATIENTS Patients with colorectal cancer aged 75 years and older and who underwent robot-assisted or conventional laparoscopic resection. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Postoperative complications, prolonged length of stay, and total hospital costs were assessed. RESULTS Data from 14,108 patients were analyzed. After adjustment, any postoperative complications (adjusted OR = 0.87; 95% CI, 0.77-0.99; p = 0.030) and prolonged length of stay (adjusted OR = 0.78; 95% CI, 0.67-0.91; p = 0.001) were significantly less in the robotic than the laparoscopic group. In addition, robotic surgery was associated with significantly higher total hospital costs (26.06 USD greater cost; 95% CI, 21.35-30.77 USD; p < 0.001). LIMITATIONS The analysis was limited by its retrospective and observational nature, potential coding errors, and the lack of intraoperative factors, such as operative time, laboratory measures, and information on surgeons' experience. CONCLUSIONS In the United States, in patients with colorectal cancer aged 75 years and older who were undergoing tumor resections, compared to conventional laparoscopic surgery, robotic surgery is associated with better inpatient outcomes in terms of complication rate and risk of prolonged length of stay. This finding is especially true among patients with colon cancer. However, robotic surgery is associated with higher total hospital costs. See Video Abstract . RESULTADOS DE LA CIRUGA ASISTIDA POR ROBOT FRENTE A LA CIRUGA LAPAROSCPICA PARA EL CNCER COLORRECTAL EN ADULTOS AOS DE EDAD UN ANLISIS EMPAREJADO POR PUNTUACIN DE PROPENSIN DE LA MUESTRA NACIONAL DE PACIENTES HOSPITALIZADOS DE ESTADOS UNIDOS ANTECEDENTES:La cirugía asistida por robot se ha adoptado cada vez más en la resección del cáncer colorrectal.OBJETIVO:El estudio tuvo como objetivo comparar los resultados hospitalarios de la resección del cáncer colorrectal asistida por robot versus la laparoscópica convencional en pacientes ≥ 75 años.DISEÑO:Estudio retrospectivo de base poblacional.AJUSTES:Este estudio analizó datos de la Muestra Nacional de Pacientes Hospitalizados de Estados Unidos de 2005 a 2018.PACIENTES:Pacientes con cáncer colorrectal ≥ 75 años y sometidos a resección laparoscópica convencional o asistida por robot.PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE RESULTADO:Se evaluaron las complicaciones posoperatorias, la duración prolongada de la estancia hospitalaria y los costos hospitalarios totales.RESULTADOS:Se analizaron datos de 14.108 pacientes. Después del ajuste, cualquier complicación posoperatoria (aOR = 0,87; IC del 95 %: 0,77-0,99, p = 0,030) y duración prolongada de la estancia hospitalaria (aOR = 0,78; IC del 95 %: 0,67-0,91, p = 0,001) fueron significativamente menores en el grupo robótico que el grupo laparoscópico. Además, la cirugía robótica se asoció con costos hospitalarios totales significativamente mayores ($26,06 USD mayor costo; IC 95%: 21,35-30,77 USD, p < 0,001).LIMITACIONES:El análisis estuvo limitado por su naturaleza retrospectiva y observacional, posibles errores de codificación y la falta de factores intraoperatorios como el tiempo operatorio, medidas de laboratorio e información sobre la experiencia de los cirujanos.CONCLUSIONES:En Estados Unidos, los pacientes con cáncer colorrectal ≥ 75 años que se sometieron a resecciones tumorales, en comparación con la cirugía laparoscópica convencional, la cirugía robótica se asocia con mejores resultados hospitalarios en términos de tasa de complicaciones y riesgo de estadía prolongada, especialmente entre pacientes con cáncer de colon. Sin embargo, la cirugía robótica se asocia a costes hospitalarios totales más elevados. (Traducción-Yesenia Rojas-Khalil ).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kuan-Chih Chung
- Department of Anesthesiology, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | - Kuen-Lin Wu
- Division of Colorectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | - Yu-Li Su
- Division of Hematology Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | - Kung-Chuan Cheng
- Division of Colorectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | - Chien-En Tang
- Division of Colorectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | - Ling-Chiao Song
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, E-DA Hospital, I-Shou University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | - Hong-Hwa Chen
- Division of Colorectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | - Ko-Chao Lee
- Division of Colorectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Ingham AR, Kong CY, Wong TN, McSorley ST, McMillan DC, Nicholson GA, Alani A, Mansouri D, Chong D, MacKay GJ, Roxburgh CSD. Robotic-assisted surgery for left-sided colon and rectal resections is associated with reduction in the postoperative surgical stress response and improved short-term outcomes: a cohort study. Surg Endosc 2024; 38:2577-2592. [PMID: 38498212 PMCID: PMC11078791 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-024-10749-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2023] [Accepted: 02/10/2024] [Indexed: 03/20/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION There is growing evidence that the use of robotic-assisted surgery (RAS) in colorectal cancer resections is associated with improved short-term outcomes when compared to laparoscopic surgery (LS) or open surgery (OS), possibly through a reduced systemic inflammatory response (SIR). Serum C-reactive protein (CRP) is a sensitive SIR biomarker and its utility in the early identification of post-operative complications has been validated in a variety of surgical procedures. There remains a paucity of studies characterising post-operative SIR in RAS. METHODS Retrospective study of a prospectively collected database of consecutive patients undergoing OS, LS and RAS for left-sided and rectal cancer in a single high-volume unit. Patient and disease characteristics, post-operative CRP levels, and clinical outcomes were reviewed, and their relationships explored within binary logistic regression and propensity scores matched models. RESULTS A total of 1031 patients were included (483 OS, 376 LS, and 172 RAS). RAS and LS were associated with lower CRP levels across the first 4 post-operative days (p < 0.001) as well as reduced complications and length of stay compared to OS in unadjusted analyses. In binary logistic regression models, RAS was independently associated with lower CRP levels at Day 3 post-operatively (OR 0.35, 95% CI 0.21-0.59, p < 0.001) and a reduction in the rate of all complications (OR 0.39, 95% CI 0.26-0.56, p < 0.001) and major complications (OR 0.5, 95% CI 0.26-0.95, p = 0.036). Within a propensity scores matched model comparing LS versus RAS specifically, RAS was associated with lower post-operative CRP levels in the first two post-operative days, a lower proportion of patients with a CRP ≥ 150 mg/L at Day 3 (20.9% versus 30.5%, p = 0.036) and a lower rate of all complications (34.7% versus 46.7%, p = 0.033). CONCLUSIONS The present observational study shows that an RAS approach was associated with lower postoperative SIR, and a better postoperative complications profile.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Abigail R Ingham
- Academic Unit of Surgery and School of Cancer Sciences, College of Medicine, Veterinary and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, New Lister Building, Glasgow Royal Infirmary, Glasgow, G31 2ER, UK
- Lister Department of Surgery, Glasgow Royal Infirmary, 84 Castle Street, Glasgow, G4 0SF, UK
| | - Chia Yew Kong
- Academic Unit of Surgery and School of Cancer Sciences, College of Medicine, Veterinary and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, New Lister Building, Glasgow Royal Infirmary, Glasgow, G31 2ER, UK
- Lister Department of Surgery, Glasgow Royal Infirmary, 84 Castle Street, Glasgow, G4 0SF, UK
| | - Tin-Ning Wong
- Academic Unit of Surgery and School of Cancer Sciences, College of Medicine, Veterinary and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, New Lister Building, Glasgow Royal Infirmary, Glasgow, G31 2ER, UK
- Lister Department of Surgery, Glasgow Royal Infirmary, 84 Castle Street, Glasgow, G4 0SF, UK
| | - Stephen T McSorley
- Academic Unit of Surgery and School of Cancer Sciences, College of Medicine, Veterinary and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, New Lister Building, Glasgow Royal Infirmary, Glasgow, G31 2ER, UK
- Lister Department of Surgery, Glasgow Royal Infirmary, 84 Castle Street, Glasgow, G4 0SF, UK
| | - Donald C McMillan
- Academic Unit of Surgery and School of Cancer Sciences, College of Medicine, Veterinary and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, New Lister Building, Glasgow Royal Infirmary, Glasgow, G31 2ER, UK
- Lister Department of Surgery, Glasgow Royal Infirmary, 84 Castle Street, Glasgow, G4 0SF, UK
| | - Gary A Nicholson
- Department of General Surgery, Queen Elizabeth University Hospital, 1345 Govan Road, Glasgow, G51 4TF, UK
| | - Ahmed Alani
- Department of General Surgery, Queen Elizabeth University Hospital, 1345 Govan Road, Glasgow, G51 4TF, UK
| | - David Mansouri
- Academic Unit of Surgery and School of Cancer Sciences, College of Medicine, Veterinary and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, New Lister Building, Glasgow Royal Infirmary, Glasgow, G31 2ER, UK
- Lister Department of Surgery, Glasgow Royal Infirmary, 84 Castle Street, Glasgow, G4 0SF, UK
| | - David Chong
- Academic Unit of Surgery and School of Cancer Sciences, College of Medicine, Veterinary and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, New Lister Building, Glasgow Royal Infirmary, Glasgow, G31 2ER, UK
- Lister Department of Surgery, Glasgow Royal Infirmary, 84 Castle Street, Glasgow, G4 0SF, UK
| | - Graham J MacKay
- Academic Unit of Surgery and School of Cancer Sciences, College of Medicine, Veterinary and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, New Lister Building, Glasgow Royal Infirmary, Glasgow, G31 2ER, UK
- Lister Department of Surgery, Glasgow Royal Infirmary, 84 Castle Street, Glasgow, G4 0SF, UK
| | - Campbell S D Roxburgh
- Academic Unit of Surgery and School of Cancer Sciences, College of Medicine, Veterinary and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, New Lister Building, Glasgow Royal Infirmary, Glasgow, G31 2ER, UK.
- Lister Department of Surgery, Glasgow Royal Infirmary, 84 Castle Street, Glasgow, G4 0SF, UK.
- Academic Unit of Surgery, School of Cancer Sciences, Room 2.60, Level 2 New Lister Building, Glasgow Royal Infirmary, Glasgow, G31 2ER, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Alkhamis A, Soliman D, Alkandari O, Alrashed A, Alansari M, Alsadder K, Chamkha Z, Souza D, AlShaban B, Alsafran S, Almazeedi S. Outcomes in robotic-assisted compared to laparoscopic-assisted colorectal surgery in a newly established colorectal tertiary center: a retrospective comparative cohort study. J Robot Surg 2024; 18:152. [PMID: 38564083 DOI: 10.1007/s11701-024-01908-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/28/2024] [Accepted: 03/09/2024] [Indexed: 04/04/2024]
Abstract
The robotic platform matches or surpasses laparoscopic surgery in postoperative results. However, limited date and slow adoption are noticed in the middle east. We aimed to report outcomes of robotic and laparoscopic colorectal surgery performed by fellowship-trained robotic colorectal surgeons and compare it to larger more experienced centers. Retrospective review of prospectively collected data between 2021 and 2023 of 107 patients who had robotic-assisted or laparoscopic-assisted colorectal surgery was included in the study. The outcomes were overall morbidity, serious morbidity, mortality, conversion to open, length of hospital stay, and the quality of oncological specimen. Of 107 patients, 57 were in the robotic and 50 were in the laparoscopic surgery groups. Overall, there were no significant differences in overall morbidity (46.8 vs. 53.2%, p = 0.9), serious morbidity (10.5 vs. 8%, p = 0.7), or mortality (0 vs. 4%, p = 0.2). Regarding oncological outcomes, there were no significant difference between the two groups regarding the number of lymph node harvested (17.7 ± 6.9 vs 19.0 ± 9.7, p = 0.5), R0 resections (92.7 vs. 87.1%, p = 0.5), and the rate of complete mesorectal excision (92.7 vs. 71.4%, p = 0.19). The study found that the robotic group had an 86% reduction in conversion rate to open surgery compared to the laparoscopic group, despite including more obese and physically dependent patients (OR = 0.14, 95% CI 0.03-0.7, p = 0.01). Robotic surgery appears to be a safe and effective as laparoscopic surgery in smaller colorectal surgery programs led by fellowship-trained robotic surgeons, with outcomes comparable to those of larger programs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ahmed Alkhamis
- Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Health Sciences Center, Kuwait University, State of Kuwait, Kuwait City, Kuwait.
- Colorectal and Robotics Surgery Unit, Department of Surgery, Jaber Al-Ahmed Hospital, State of Kuwait, Kuwait City, Kuwait.
| | - Diaa Soliman
- Colorectal and Robotics Surgery Unit, Department of Surgery, Jaber Al-Ahmed Hospital, State of Kuwait, Kuwait City, Kuwait
- Department of General Surgery, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA
| | - Omar Alkandari
- Kuwait Institute for Medical Specialization, Ministry of Health, Kuwait City, Kuwait
| | - Ahmad Alrashed
- Colorectal and Robotics Surgery Unit, Department of Surgery, Jaber Al-Ahmed Hospital, State of Kuwait, Kuwait City, Kuwait
| | - Mohammad Alansari
- Colorectal and Robotics Surgery Unit, Department of Surgery, Jaber Al-Ahmed Hospital, State of Kuwait, Kuwait City, Kuwait
| | - Khaled Alsadder
- Colorectal and Robotics Surgery Unit, Department of Surgery, Jaber Al-Ahmed Hospital, State of Kuwait, Kuwait City, Kuwait
| | - Zeinab Chamkha
- Colorectal and Robotics Surgery Unit, Department of Surgery, Jaber Al-Ahmed Hospital, State of Kuwait, Kuwait City, Kuwait
| | - Dante Souza
- Department of Surgery, TriHealth Good Samaritan Hospital, Cincinnati, OH, USA
| | - Bader AlShaban
- Colorectal and Robotics Surgery Unit, Department of Surgery, Jaber Al-Ahmed Hospital, State of Kuwait, Kuwait City, Kuwait
| | - Salman Alsafran
- Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Health Sciences Center, Kuwait University, State of Kuwait, Kuwait City, Kuwait
- Endocrine Surgery Unit, Department of Surgery, Jaber Al-Ahmed Hospital, State of Kuwait, Kuwait City, Kuwait
| | - Sulaiman Almazeedi
- Colorectal and Robotics Surgery Unit, Department of Surgery, Jaber Al-Ahmed Hospital, State of Kuwait, Kuwait City, Kuwait
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Ravindra C, Igweonu-Nwakile EO, Ali S, Paul S, Yakkali S, Teresa Selvin S, Thomas S, Bikeyeva V, Abdullah A, Radivojevic A, Abu Jad AA, Ravanavena A, Balani P. Comparison of Non-Oncological Postoperative Outcomes Following Robotic and Laparoscopic Colorectal Resection for Colorectal Malignancy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Cureus 2022; 14:e27015. [PMID: 35989760 PMCID: PMC9386330 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.27015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/03/2022] [Accepted: 07/19/2022] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
|
5
|
Tschann P, Weigl MP, Lechner D, Mittelberger C, Jäger T, Gruber R, Girotti PNC, Mittermair C, Clemens P, Attenberger C, Szeverinski P, Brock T, Frick J, Emmanuel K, Königsrainer I, Presl J. Is Robotic Assisted Colorectal Cancer Surgery Equivalent Compared to Laparoscopic Procedures during the Introduction of a Robotic Program? A Propensity-Score Matched Analysis. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14133208. [PMID: 35804985 PMCID: PMC9264883 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14133208] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/26/2022] [Revised: 06/26/2022] [Accepted: 06/28/2022] [Indexed: 12/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary The introduction of a robotic program is challenging and requires extensive experience in minimally invasive surgery. Short-term outcomes and oncological quality should not differ between robotic and laparoscopic surgery. To our knowledge, no data on the quality of surgery at the time of introduction of the robotic platform are available. The aim of this study was to compare short-term outcomes and oncological findings of robotic-assisted colorectal resections with those of conventional laparoscopic surgery within the first three years after the introduction of the robotic platform. Abstract Background: Robotic surgery represents a novel approach for the treatment of colorectal cancers and has been established as an important and effective method over the last years. The aim of this work was to evaluate the effect of a robotic program on oncological findings compared to conventional laparoscopic surgery within the first three years after the introduction. Methods: All colorectal cancer patients from two centers that either received robotic-assisted or conventional laparoscopic surgery were included in a comparative study. A propensity-score-matched analysis was used to reduce confounding differences. Results: A laparoscopic resection (LR Group) was performed in 82 cases, and 93 patients were treated robotic-assisted surgery (RR Group). Patients’ characteristics did not differ between groups. In right-sided resections, an intracorporeal anastomosis was significantly more often performed in the RR Group (LR Group: 5 (26.31%) vs. RR Group: 10 (76.92%), p = 0.008). Operative time was shown to be significantly shorter in the LR Group (LR Group: 200 min (150–243) vs. 204 min (174–278), p = 0.045). Conversions to open surgery did occur more often in the LR Group (LR Group: 16 (19.51%) vs. RR Group: 5 (5.38%), p = 0.004). Postoperative morbidity, the number of harvested lymph nodes, quality of resection and postoperative tumor stage did not differ between groups. Conclusion: In this study, we could clearly demonstrate robotic-assisted colorectal cancer surgery as effective, feasible and safe regarding postoperative morbidity and oncological findings compared to conventional laparoscopy during the introduction of a robotic system.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter Tschann
- Department of General and Thoracic Surgery, Academic Teaching Hospital Feldkirch, Carinagasse 47, 6800 Feldkirch, Austria; (M.P.W.); (D.L.); (C.M.); (P.N.C.G.); (T.B.); (J.F.); (I.K.)
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +43-(0)-5522-303-0; Fax: +43-(0)-5522-303-7505
| | - Markus P. Weigl
- Department of General and Thoracic Surgery, Academic Teaching Hospital Feldkirch, Carinagasse 47, 6800 Feldkirch, Austria; (M.P.W.); (D.L.); (C.M.); (P.N.C.G.); (T.B.); (J.F.); (I.K.)
| | - Daniel Lechner
- Department of General and Thoracic Surgery, Academic Teaching Hospital Feldkirch, Carinagasse 47, 6800 Feldkirch, Austria; (M.P.W.); (D.L.); (C.M.); (P.N.C.G.); (T.B.); (J.F.); (I.K.)
| | - Christa Mittelberger
- Department of General and Thoracic Surgery, Academic Teaching Hospital Feldkirch, Carinagasse 47, 6800 Feldkirch, Austria; (M.P.W.); (D.L.); (C.M.); (P.N.C.G.); (T.B.); (J.F.); (I.K.)
| | - Tarkan Jäger
- Department of Surgery, Paracelsus Medical University/Salzburger Landeskliniken (SALK), 5020 Salzburg, Austria; (T.J.); (R.G.); (K.E.); (J.P.)
| | - Ricarda Gruber
- Department of Surgery, Paracelsus Medical University/Salzburger Landeskliniken (SALK), 5020 Salzburg, Austria; (T.J.); (R.G.); (K.E.); (J.P.)
| | - Paolo N. C. Girotti
- Department of General and Thoracic Surgery, Academic Teaching Hospital Feldkirch, Carinagasse 47, 6800 Feldkirch, Austria; (M.P.W.); (D.L.); (C.M.); (P.N.C.G.); (T.B.); (J.F.); (I.K.)
| | - Christof Mittermair
- Department of Surgery, St. John of God Hospital, Teaching Hospital of Paracelsus Medical University, 5020 Salzburg, Austria;
| | - Patrick Clemens
- Department of Radio-Oncology, Academic Teaching Hospital, 6800 Feldkirch, Austria;
| | - Christian Attenberger
- Private University in the Principality of Liechtenstein, 9495 Triesen, Liechtenstein;
- Institute of Medical Physics, Academic Teaching Hospital Feldkirch, 6800 Feldkirch, Austria;
| | - Philipp Szeverinski
- Institute of Medical Physics, Academic Teaching Hospital Feldkirch, 6800 Feldkirch, Austria;
| | - Thomas Brock
- Department of General and Thoracic Surgery, Academic Teaching Hospital Feldkirch, Carinagasse 47, 6800 Feldkirch, Austria; (M.P.W.); (D.L.); (C.M.); (P.N.C.G.); (T.B.); (J.F.); (I.K.)
| | - Jürgen Frick
- Department of General and Thoracic Surgery, Academic Teaching Hospital Feldkirch, Carinagasse 47, 6800 Feldkirch, Austria; (M.P.W.); (D.L.); (C.M.); (P.N.C.G.); (T.B.); (J.F.); (I.K.)
| | - Klaus Emmanuel
- Department of Surgery, Paracelsus Medical University/Salzburger Landeskliniken (SALK), 5020 Salzburg, Austria; (T.J.); (R.G.); (K.E.); (J.P.)
| | - Ingmar Königsrainer
- Department of General and Thoracic Surgery, Academic Teaching Hospital Feldkirch, Carinagasse 47, 6800 Feldkirch, Austria; (M.P.W.); (D.L.); (C.M.); (P.N.C.G.); (T.B.); (J.F.); (I.K.)
| | - Jaroslav Presl
- Department of Surgery, Paracelsus Medical University/Salzburger Landeskliniken (SALK), 5020 Salzburg, Austria; (T.J.); (R.G.); (K.E.); (J.P.)
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Operating on the Mesentery in Robotic Colonic Surgery—General Techniques. Clin Colon Rectal Surg 2022; 35:281-287. [PMID: 35966983 PMCID: PMC9365489 DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-1743586] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/16/2023]
Abstract
AbstractDuring colorectal surgery the mesentery is the organ on which the greatest amount of operating time is focused. It has recently gained increasing attention. This technical review focuses on the mesentery during robotic colonic procedures. Specifically, we focus upon how to access, dissect, and divide the mesentery using the robotic platform. We also touch on the management of bleeding and some specific disease etiologies.
Collapse
|
7
|
Hannan E, Feeney G, Ullah MF, Ryan C, McNamara E, Waldron D, Condon E, Coffey JC, Peirce C. Robotic versus laparoscopic right hemicolectomy: a case-matched study. J Robot Surg 2021; 16:641-647. [PMID: 34338996 PMCID: PMC9135878 DOI: 10.1007/s11701-021-01286-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/25/2021] [Accepted: 07/20/2021] [Indexed: 12/02/2022]
Abstract
The current gold standard surgical treatment for right colonic malignancy is the laparoscopic right hemicolectomy (LRH). However, laparoscopic surgery has limitations which can be overcome by robotic surgery. The benefits of robotics for rectal cancer are widely accepted but its use for right hemicolectomy remains controversial. The aim of this study was to compare outcomes in patients undergoing robotic right hemicolectomy (RRH) and LRH in a university teaching hospital. Demographic, perioperative and postoperative data along with early oncological outcomes of patients who underwent RRH and LRH with extracorporeal anastomosis (ECA) were identified from a prospectively maintained database. A total of 70 patients (35 RRH, 35 LRH) were identified over a 4-year period. No statistically significant differences in estimated blood loss, conversion to open surgery, postoperative complications, anastomotic leak, 30-day reoperation, 30-day mortality, surgical site infection or lengths of stay were demonstrated. Surgical specimen quality in both groups was favourable. The mean duration of surgery was longer in RRH (p < < 0.00001). A statistically significant proportion of RRH patients had a higher BMI and ASA grade. The results demonstrate that RRH is safe and feasible when compared to LRH, with no statistical difference in postoperative morbidity, mortality and early oncological outcomes. A difference was noted in operating time, however was influenced by training residents in docking the robot and a technically challenging cohort of patients. Operative time has shortened with further experience. Incorporating an intracorporeal anastomosis technique in RRH offers the potential to improve outcomes compared to LRH.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Enda Hannan
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, University Hospital Limerick, St Nessan's Road, Dooradoyle Co, Limerick, Ireland.
| | - Gerard Feeney
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, University Hospital Limerick, St Nessan's Road, Dooradoyle Co, Limerick, Ireland
| | - Mohammad Fahad Ullah
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, University Hospital Limerick, St Nessan's Road, Dooradoyle Co, Limerick, Ireland
| | - Claire Ryan
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, University Hospital Limerick, St Nessan's Road, Dooradoyle Co, Limerick, Ireland
| | - Emma McNamara
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, University Hospital Limerick, St Nessan's Road, Dooradoyle Co, Limerick, Ireland
| | - David Waldron
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, University Hospital Limerick, St Nessan's Road, Dooradoyle Co, Limerick, Ireland
| | - Eoghan Condon
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, University Hospital Limerick, St Nessan's Road, Dooradoyle Co, Limerick, Ireland
| | - John Calvin Coffey
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, University Hospital Limerick, St Nessan's Road, Dooradoyle Co, Limerick, Ireland.,School of Medicine, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland
| | - Colin Peirce
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, University Hospital Limerick, St Nessan's Road, Dooradoyle Co, Limerick, Ireland.,School of Medicine, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Fleming CA, Cullinane C, Lynch N, Killeen S, Coffey JC, Peirce CB. Urogenital function following robotic and laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery: meta-analysis. Br J Surg 2021; 108:128-137. [PMID: 33711141 DOI: 10.1093/bjs/znaa067] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/30/2020] [Accepted: 10/06/2020] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Mixed results are reported on clinical and cancer outcomes in laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery (LRCS) compared with robotic rectal cancer surgery (RRCS). However, more favourable functional outcomes are reported following RRCS. This study compared urinary and sexual function following RRCS and LRCS in male and female patients. METHODS A systematic review and meta-analysis of urinary and sexual function after RRCS and LRCS was performed following PRISMA and MOOSE guidelines, and registered prospectively with PROSPERO (ID:CRD42020164285). The functional outcome reporting tools most commonly included: the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) and Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI). Mean scores and changes in mean scores from baseline were analysed using RevMan version 5.3. RESULTS Ten studies were included reporting on 1286 patients. Some 672 patients underwent LRCS, of whom 380 (56.5 per cent) were men and 116 (17.3 per cent) were women (gender not specified in 176 patients, 26.2 per cent). A total of 614 patients underwent RRCS, of whom 356 (58.0 per cent) were men and 83 (13.5 per cent) were women (gender not specified in 175 patients, 28.5 per cent). Regarding urinary function in men at 6 months after surgery, IPSS scores were significantly better in the RRCS group than in the LRCS group (mean difference (MD) -1.36, 95 per cent c.i. -2.31 to -0.40; P = 0.005), a trend that persisted at 12 months (MD -1.08, -1.85 to -0.30; P = 0.007). ΔIIEF scores significantly favoured RRCS at 6 months [MD -3.11 (95%CI -5.77, -0.44) P <0.021] and 12 months [MD -2.76 (95%CI -3.63, -1.88) P <0.001] post-operatively. Mixed urinary and sexual function outcomes were reported for women. CONCLUSION This meta-analysis identified more favourable urinary and erectile function in men who undergo robotic compared with conventional laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer. Outcomes in women did not identify a consistently more favourable outcome in either group. As robotic rectal cancer surgery may offer more favourable functional outcomes it should be considered and discussed with patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C A Fleming
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Cork University Hospital, Cork, Ireland
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, University Hospital Limerick, Limerick, Ireland
| | - C Cullinane
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Cork University Hospital, Cork, Ireland
| | - N Lynch
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Cork University Hospital, Cork, Ireland
| | - S Killeen
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Cork University Hospital, Cork, Ireland
| | - J C Coffey
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, University Hospital Limerick, Limerick, Ireland
- Graduate Entry Medical School, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland
- Centre for Interventions in Infection, Inflammation and Immunity, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland
| | - C B Peirce
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, University Hospital Limerick, Limerick, Ireland
- Graduate Entry Medical School, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Fu D, Chen Y, Xu D. Circulating miR-449a predicts survival outcome for colorectal cancer following curative resection: An observational study. Medicine (Baltimore) 2021; 100:e25022. [PMID: 33847612 PMCID: PMC8052019 DOI: 10.1097/md.0000000000025022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/12/2020] [Accepted: 02/10/2021] [Indexed: 01/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Previous studies showed that microRNA (miR)-449a may function as a tumor suppressor. However, the expression pattern and value of circulating miR-449a in colorectal cancer (CRC) remain unclear. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to measure circulating miR-449a level of CRC patients and evaluate its value for predicting prognosis.Plasma samples of 343 consecutive CRC patients and 162 healthy controls were obtained. Circulating miR-449a levels were measured by using real-time quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reactions. All enrolled patients were followed up in a regular interval after surgery. The clinical data and survival outcome of all 343 patients were collected. The correlation between circulating miR-449a level and survival outcomes was analyzed by univariate and multivariate analysis.Circulating miR-449a level in CRC patients was significantly decreased (P < .05) comparing with healthy controls. Low miR-449a was significantly associated with CEA and CA19-9 level (both P < .05). Furthermore, patients with a decreased miR-449a level had a lower 5-years overall survival (OS) rate than those with a high miR-449a (67.4% vs 76.9%, P = .03). Low circulating miR-449a level also been demonstrated as an independent risk factor for CRC in multivariate COX analysis (HR, 2.56; 95%CI: 1.15-8.63; P < .05).Circulating miR-449a was significantly decreased in CRC patients and closely related to poor prognosis, suggesting that miR-449a might can be used as a useful diagnostic and prognostic marker for CRC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dengke Fu
- Department of Oncology, Chuiyangliu Hospital Affiliated to Tsinghua University
| | - Yang Chen
- Department of Oncology, Chuiyangliu Hospital Affiliated to Tsinghua University
| | - Dongkui Xu
- Department of VIP Medical Services, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, PR China
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
The impact of body mass index on outcomes in robotic colorectal surgery: a single-centre experience. J Robot Surg 2021; 16:279-285. [PMID: 33813713 DOI: 10.1007/s11701-021-01235-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/20/2021] [Accepted: 03/29/2021] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
Obesity is an independent risk factor for postoperative morbidity and mortality in laparoscopic colorectal surgery (LCRS). The technological advantages of robotic colorectal surgery (RCRS) may allow surgeons to overcome the limitations of LCRS in obese patients, but it is largely unknown if this translates to superior outcomes. The aim of this study was to compare perioperative, postoperative and short-term oncological outcomes in obese (BMI ≥ 30.0 kg/m2) and non-obese (BMI < 30 kg/m2) patients undergoing RCRS in a university teaching hospital. Demographic, perioperative and postoperative data along with short-term oncological outcomes of obese and non-obese patients that underwent RCRS for both benign and malignant colorectal disease were identified from a prospectively maintained database. A total of 107 patients (34 obese, 73 non-obese) underwent RCRS over a 4-year period. No statistically significant differences in the incidence of complications, 30-day reoperation, 30-day mortality, conversion to open surgery, anastomotic leak or length of inpatient stay were demonstrated. Obese patients had a significantly higher rate of surgical site infection (SSI) (p < 0.0001). Short-term oncological outcomes in both groups were favourable. There was no statistically significant difference in median duration of surgery between the two cohorts. The results demonstrate that obese patients undergoing RCRS in this institution experience similar outcomes to non-obese patients. These results suggest that RCRS is safe and feasible in obese patients and may be superior to LCRS in this cohort, where the literature suggests a higher complication rate compared to non-obese patients. The inherent advantages of robotic surgical platforms, such as improved visualisation, dexterity and ergonomics likely contribute to the improved outcomes in this challenging patient population.
Collapse
|
11
|
The art of robotic colonic resection: a review of progress in the past 5 years. Updates Surg 2021; 73:1037-1048. [PMID: 33481214 PMCID: PMC8184527 DOI: 10.1007/s13304-020-00969-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/14/2020] [Accepted: 12/28/2020] [Indexed: 01/12/2023]
Abstract
Surgery is developing in the direction of minimal invasiveness, and robotic surgery is becoming increasingly adopted in colonic resection procedures. The ergonomic improvements of robot promote surgical performance, reduce workload for surgeons and benefit patients. Compared with laparoscopy-assisted colon surgery, the robotic approach has the advantages of shorter length of hospital stay, lower rate of conversion to open surgery, and lower rate of intraoperative complications for short-term outcomes. Synchronous robotic liver resection with colon cancer is feasible. The introduction of the da Vinci Xi System (Intuitive Surgical, Inc., Sunnyvale, CA, USA) has introduced more flexibility to colonic operations. Optimization of the suprapubic surgical approach may shorten the length of hospital stay for patients who undergo robotic colonic resection. Single-port robotic colectomy reduces the number of robotic ports for better looking and faster recovery. Intestinal anastomosis methods using totally robotic surgery result in shorter time to bowel function recovery and tolerance to a solid diet, although the operative time is longer. Indocyanine green is used as a tracer to assess blood supplementation in the anastomosis and marks lymph nodes during operation. The introduction of new surgical robots from multiple manufacturers is bound to change the landscape of robotic surgery and yield high-quality surgical outcomes. The present article reviews recent advances in robotic colonic resection over the past five years.
Collapse
|