1
|
Schițcu VH, Munteanu VC, Borz MB, Cojocaru I, Labo SV, Tise AI. "Bottoms-up" minimally-invasive approach to inguinal lymph node dissection for penile cancer management. A single-center comparative study versus open approach and review. Arch Ital Urol Androl 2024; 96:12643. [PMID: 39356018 DOI: 10.4081/aiua.2024.12643] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/06/2024] [Accepted: 06/06/2024] [Indexed: 10/03/2024] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Open inguinal lymph node dissection (OILND) plays a crucial role in penile cancer management, but in order to improve patient outcomes, minimally-invasive (MILND) approaches were developed. Our "bottoms-up" MILND is a novel endoscopic technique, changing the way the sequence of dissection is performed. This study aims to compare our approach to the current standard of OILND in terms of oncologic and perioperative outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS In our database, from 2016 to 2023, 12 patients underwent OILND and 16 had a "bottoms-up" MILND, which is performed with a three port configuration, starting the dissection under the fascia lata, dissecting the femoral vessels in the most distal part of the femoral fossa, followed by dissection of the proximal and superficial lymph nodes at the top of thefemoral triangle. RESULTS For MILND, median operation time per groin was shorter (58 vs 64 minutes, p=0.34), patients presented shorter hospital stays (10 vs 18 days, p=0.32) and fewer days with drains (14 vs 24 days, p=0.01). Median lymph node yield per groin was higher for MILND (10 vs 9 nodes, p=0.7), but OILND had a higher median of positive lymph nodes (4 vs 3 nodes, p=0.63). MILND patients experienced a lower incidence of major complications (33% vs 58%, p=0.007). CONCLUSIONS We have proved that our technique of MILND is not inferior to the current standard and we believe that it can further improve patient outcomes with a safer, simplified and easily reproducible approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vlad-Horia Schițcu
- Department of Urology, Institute of Oncology "Prof. Dr. Ion Chiricuţă", Cluj-Napoca.
| | | | - Mihnea Bogdan Borz
- Department of Urology, Institute of Oncology "Prof. Dr. Ion Chiricuţă", Cluj-Napoca.
| | - Ion Cojocaru
- Department of Urology, Institute of Oncology "Prof. Dr. Ion Chiricuţă", Cluj-Napoca.
| | - Sergiu Vasile Labo
- Department of Urology, Institute of Oncology "Prof. Dr. Ion Chiricuţă", Cluj-Napoca.
| | - Andrei-Ionut Tise
- Department of Urology, Institute of Oncology "Prof. Dr. Ion Chiricuţă", Cluj-Napoca.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Ge S, Zheng L, Li Y, Gan L, Wang Z, Zeng Z, Meng C, Li K, Ma J, Wang D, Ren Y. Comparing the safety and effectiveness of minimally invasive surgery and open inguinal lymph node dissection in penile cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY 2024; 50:108553. [PMID: 39059191 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2024.108553] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/07/2024] [Revised: 06/04/2024] [Accepted: 07/18/2024] [Indexed: 07/28/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To compare the safety and effectiveness of minimally invasive surgery (MIS) with open inguinal lymph node dissection (O-ILND) in penile cancer. METHODS We performed a systematic reviews and cumulative meta-analyses of primary results of interest according to PRISMA criteria, and quality assessment followed AMSTAR. The system searched five databases, including Zhiwang, Embase, PubMed, Cochrane Library and Web of Science. The search period ranged was from database creation until September 2023. The statistical analysis software used Stata16. RESULTS A total of 16 studies, including 898 patients. Compared to O-ILND, MIS is superior in length of stay (WMD = -2.96, 95%CI [-4.38, -1.54], P < 0.05), drainage time (WMD = -3.24, 95%CI [-4.70, -1.78], P < 0.05) and estimated blood loss (WMD = -35.70, 95%CI [-46.27, -25.14], P < 0.05), while operation time, recurrence rate and 5-year overall survival rate are the same. The number of lymph nodes dissection between the two groups are not statistically significant. Subgroup analyses found that there are more lymph nodes dissection in robotic-assisted inguinal lymph nodes dissection (WMD = 0.50, 95%CI [0.20, 0.80], P < 0.05). The overall complication rate of MIS was lower (OR = 0.26, 95%CI [0.09, 0.70], P < 0.05). CONCLUSION Minimally invasive inguinal lymph nodes dissection appears to be a better option for penile cancer cases. But more large samples and multicenter studies are needed to further confirm.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Si Ge
- Department of Urology, Nanchong Central Hospital, The Second Clinical College, North Sichuan Medical College (University), Nanchong, 63700, Sichuan, China; Department of Urology, School of Clinical Medicine, Southwest Medical University, Luzhou, 646000, Sichuan, China
| | - Lei Zheng
- Department of Urology, Nanchong Central Hospital, The Second Clinical College, North Sichuan Medical College (University), Nanchong, 63700, Sichuan, China
| | - Yunxiang Li
- Department of Urology, Nanchong Central Hospital, The Second Clinical College, North Sichuan Medical College (University), Nanchong, 63700, Sichuan, China; Department of Urology, School of Clinical Medicine, Southwest Medical University, Luzhou, 646000, Sichuan, China.
| | - Lijian Gan
- Department of Urology, Nanchong Central Hospital, The Second Clinical College, North Sichuan Medical College (University), Nanchong, 63700, Sichuan, China
| | - Zuoping Wang
- Department of Urology, Nanchong Central Hospital, The Second Clinical College, North Sichuan Medical College (University), Nanchong, 63700, Sichuan, China
| | - Zhiqiang Zeng
- Department of Urology, School of Clinical Medicine, Southwest Medical University, Luzhou, 646000, Sichuan, China
| | - Chunyang Meng
- Department of Urology, School of Clinical Medicine, Southwest Medical University, Luzhou, 646000, Sichuan, China
| | - Kangsen Li
- Department of Urology, Nanchong Central Hospital, The Second Clinical College, North Sichuan Medical College (University), Nanchong, 63700, Sichuan, China
| | - Jiakai Ma
- Department of Urology, Nanchong Central Hospital, The Second Clinical College, North Sichuan Medical College (University), Nanchong, 63700, Sichuan, China
| | - Deyu Wang
- Department of Urology, Nanchong Central Hospital, The Second Clinical College, North Sichuan Medical College (University), Nanchong, 63700, Sichuan, China
| | - Yuan Ren
- Department of Urology, School of Clinical Medicine, Southwest Medical University, Luzhou, 646000, Sichuan, China
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Aydin AM, Biben E, Yu A, Chakiryan NH, Mehrazin R, Spiess PE. Minimally Invasive Management of Inguinal Lymph Nodes in Penile Cancer: Recent Progress and Remaining Challenges. Cancers (Basel) 2024; 16:2935. [PMID: 39272796 PMCID: PMC11394048 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16172935] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/21/2024] [Revised: 08/19/2024] [Accepted: 08/21/2024] [Indexed: 09/15/2024] Open
Abstract
The diagnosis of occult inguinal lymph node metastasis in clinically node-negative invasive penile squamous cell carcinoma (PSCC) has remained a challenge, with substantial perioperative complications. The recent refinements in the technique of dynamic sentinel lymph node biopsy (DSLNB) demonstrated high diagnostic accuracy with considerably lower morbidity compared to conventional open modified/superficial inguinal lymph node dissection (ILND). Although DSLNB, if available, has been endorsed as the preferred method for nodal staging in patients with invasive PSCC and no palpable inguinal lymphadenopathy in the recent penile cancer guidelines, its utilization has been quite limited so far. Laparoscopic and robotic-assisted ILND have emerged as alternatives for nodal staging in this patient population and are shown to improve the rate of wound infections and postoperative pain. For management of nodal metastasis in patients with clinically palpable inguinal lymph nodes, minimally invasive ILND has shown promising results as well. Nonetheless, given the rarity of PSCC and the absence of prospective studies and clinical trials, nodal staging and treatment of nodal metastasis in clinical practice will likely continue to vary across the medical centers in the following years. In this review, we first summarize the evolution of DSLNB and minimally invasive ILND and discuss the advantages and drawbacks of each management strategy. We further discuss the remaining challenges and future perspectives in the management of inguinal lymph nodes in patients with PSCC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ahmet Murat Aydin
- Department of Urology, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR 72205, USA
| | - Emily Biben
- Department of Urology, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR 72205, USA
| | - Alice Yu
- Department of Genitourinary Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL 33612, USA
| | - Nicholas H Chakiryan
- Department of Urology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR 97239, USA
| | - Reza Mehrazin
- Department of Urology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY 10029, USA
| | - Philippe E Spiess
- Department of Genitourinary Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL 33612, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Vreeburg MTA, Donswijk ML, Albersen M, Parnham A, Ayres B, Protzel C, Pettaway C, Spiess PE, Brouwer OR. New EAU/ASCO guideline recommendations on sentinel node biopsy for penile cancer and remaining challenges from a nuclear medicine perspective. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2024; 51:2861-2868. [PMID: 38216778 DOI: 10.1007/s00259-023-06586-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/28/2023] [Accepted: 12/12/2023] [Indexed: 01/14/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The European Association of Urology (EAU) and the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) recently issued updated guidelines on penile cancer, emphasising dynamic sentinel node biopsy (DSNB) as the preferred method for surgical staging among patients with invasive penile tumours and no palpable inguinal lymphadenopathy. This paper outlines the rationale behind this new recommendation and describes remaining challenges, as well as strategies for promoting DSNB worldwide. MAIN TEXT DSNB offers high diagnostic accuracy with the lowest postoperative complications compared to open or minimally invasive inguinal lymph node dissection (ILND), prompting its preference in the new guidelines. Nevertheless, despite its advantages, there are challenges hampering the widespread adoption of DSNB. This includes the false-negative rate associated with DSNB and the potential negative impact on patient outcome. To address this issue, improvements should be made in several areas, including refining the timing and interpretation of the lymphoscintigraphy and the single photon emission computed tomography/computed tomography images. In addition, the quantity of tracer employed and choice of the injection site for the radiopharmaceutical should be optimised. Finally, limiting the removal of nodes without tracer activity during surgery may help minimise complication rates. CONCLUSION Over the years, DSNB has evolved significantly, related to the dedicated efforts and innovations in nuclear medicine and subsequent clinical studies validating its efficacy. It is now strongly recommended for surgical staging among selected penile cancer patients. To optimise DSNB further, multidisciplinary collaborative research is required to improve SN identification for better diagnostic accuracy and fewer complications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Manon T A Vreeburg
- Department of Urology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Maarten L Donswijk
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, The Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Maarten Albersen
- Department of Urology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Arie Parnham
- Department of Urology, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Benjamin Ayres
- Penile Cancer Centre, St George's University Hospitals NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Chris Protzel
- Department of Urology, University Hospital of Rostock, Rostock, Germany
| | - Curtis Pettaway
- Department of Urology, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, 77030-4009, USA
| | | | - Oscar R Brouwer
- Department of Urology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Ozambela M, McCormick BZ, Rudzinski JK, Pieretti AC, González GMN, Meissner MA, Papadopoulos JN, Adibi M, Matin SF, Dahmen AS, Spiess PE, Pettaway CA. Robotic or open superficial inguinal lymph node dissection as staging procedures for clinically node negative high risk penile cancer. Urol Oncol 2024; 42:120.e1-120.e9. [PMID: 38388244 DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2024.01.036] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/24/2023] [Revised: 01/27/2024] [Accepted: 01/29/2024] [Indexed: 02/24/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate perioperative and oncologic outcomes of a cohort of clinically node negative high-risk penile cancer patients undergoing robotic assisted inguinal lymph node dissection (RAIL) compared to patients undergoing open superficial inguinal lymph node dissection (OSILND). PATIENTS AND METHODS We retrospectively reviewed the clinical characteristics and outcomes of clinically node negative high-risk penile cancer patients undergoing RAIL at MDACC from 2013-2019. We sought to compare this to a contemporary open cohort of clinically node negative patients treated from 1999 to 2019 at MDACC and Moffit Cancer Center (MCC) with an OSILND. Descriptive statistics were used to characterize the study cohorts. Comparison analysis between operative variables was performed using Fisher's exact test and Wilcoxon's rank-sum test. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate survival endpoints. RESULTS There were 24 patients in the RAIL cohort, and 35 in the OSILND cohort. Among the surgical variables, operative time (348.5 minutes vs. 239.0 minutes, P < 0.01) and the duration of operative drain (37 vs. 22 days P = 0.017) were both significantly longer in the RAIL cohort. Complication incidences were similar for both cohorts (34.3% for OSILND vs. 33.3% for RAIL), with wound complications making up 33% of all complications for RAIL and 31% of complications for OSILND. No inguinal recurrences were noted in either cohort. The median follow-up was 40 months for RAIL and 33 months for OSILND. CONCLUSIONS We observed similar complication rates and surgical variable outcomes in our analysis apart from operative time and operative drain duration. Oncological outcomes were similar between the two cohorts. RAIL was a reliable staging and potentially therapeutic procedure among clinically node negative patients with penile squamous cell carcinoma with comparable outcomes to an OSILND cohort.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Manuel Ozambela
- Department of Urology at The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Barrett Z McCormick
- Department of Urology at The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Jan K Rudzinski
- Department of Urology at The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | | | | | - Matthew A Meissner
- Department of Urology at The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - John N Papadopoulos
- Department of Urology at The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Mehrad Adibi
- Department of Urology at The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Surena F Matin
- Department of Urology at The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Aaron S Dahmen
- Department of Urology at University of Chicago, Chicago, IL
| | - Philippe E Spiess
- Department of Genitourinary Oncology at Moffit Cancer Center, Tampa, FL
| | - Curtis A Pettaway
- Department of Urology at The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Sachdeva A, McGuinness L, Zapala Ł, Greco I, Garcia-Perdomo HA, Kailavasan M, Antunes-Lopes T, Ayres B, Barreto L, Campi R, Crook J, Johnstone P, Kumar V, Manzie K, Marcus JD, Necchi A, Oliveira P, Osborne J, Pagliaro LC, Protzel C, Bryan Rumble R, Sánchez Martínez DF, Spiess PE, Tagawa ST, van der Heijden MS, Parnham AS, Pettaway CA, Albersen M, Sangar VK, Brouwer OR, Sakalis VI. Management of Lymph Node-positive Penile Cancer: A Systematic Review. Eur Urol 2024; 85:257-273. [PMID: 37208237 DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2023.04.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/20/2022] [Revised: 03/27/2023] [Accepted: 04/19/2023] [Indexed: 05/21/2023]
Abstract
CONTEXT Lymph node (LN) involvement in penile cancer is associated with poor survival. Early diagnosis and management significantly impact survival, with multimodal treatment approaches often considered in advanced disease. OBJECTIVE To assess the clinical effectiveness of treatment options available for the management of inguinal and pelvic lymphadenopathy in men with penile cancer. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION EMBASE, MEDLINE, the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and other databases were searched from 1990 to July 2022. Randomised controlled trials (RCTs), nonrandomised comparative studies (NRCSs), and case series (CSs) were included. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS We identified 107 studies, involving 9582 patients from two RCTs, 28 NRCSs, and 77 CSs. The quality of evidence is considered poor. Surgery is the mainstay of LN disease management, with early inguinal LN dissection (ILND) associated with better outcomes. Videoendoscopic ILND may offer comparable survival outcomes to open ILND with lower wound-related morbidity. Ipsilateral pelvic LN dissection (PLND) in N2-3 cases improves overall survival in comparison to no pelvic surgery. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy in N2-3 disease showed a pathological complete response rate of 13% and an objective response rate of 51%. Adjuvant radiotherapy may benefit pN2-3 but not pN1 disease. Adjuvant chemoradiotherapy may provide a small survival benefit in N3 disease. Adjuvant radiotherapy and chemotherapy improve outcomes after PLND for pelvic LN metastases. CONCLUSIONS Early LND improves survival in nodal disease in penile cancer. Multimodal treatments may provide additional benefit in pN2-3 cases; however, data are limited. Therefore, individualised management of patients with nodal disease should be discussed in a multidisciplinary team setting. PATIENT SUMMARY Spread of penile cancer to the lymph nodes is best managed with surgery, which improves survival and has curative potential. Supplementary treatment, including the use of chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy, may further improve survival in advanced disease. Patients with penile cancer with lymph node involvement should be treated by a multidisciplinary team.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ashwin Sachdeva
- Division of Cancer Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK; Department of Urology, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK.
| | - Luke McGuinness
- Department of Urology, South Tyneside and Sunderland NHS Foundation Trust, Sunderland, UK
| | - Łukasz Zapala
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Isabella Greco
- Department of Urological Minimally Invasive and Robotic Surgery and Kidney Transplantation, Careggi Hospital, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Herney Andres Garcia-Perdomo
- Division of Urology/Uro-oncology, Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, Universidad Del Valle, Cali, Colombia
| | | | | | - Benjamin Ayres
- Department of Urology, St. George's University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Lenka Barreto
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Nitra, Nitra, Slovakia
| | - Riccardo Campi
- Unit of Oncologic Minimally-Invasive Urology and Andrology, Careggi University Hospital, Florence, Italy
| | - Juanita Crook
- British Columbia Cancer Agency, University of British Columbia, Kelowna, Canada
| | - Peter Johnstone
- Departments of Radiation Oncology and Health Outcomes and Behavior, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Vivek Kumar
- Department of Urology, Norfolk and Norwich University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Norwich, UK
| | | | | | - Andrea Necchi
- Department of Urology and Medical Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Pedro Oliveira
- Department of Pathology, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK; Centre for the Research and Technology of Agro-Environmental and Biological Sciences, University of Trásos-Montes and Alto Douro, Vila Real, Portugal; Veterinary Sciences Department, University of Trásos-Montes and Alto Douro, Vila Real, Portugal
| | | | | | | | - R Bryan Rumble
- American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA, USA
| | | | - Philippe E Spiess
- Department of Genitourinary Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Scott T Tagawa
- Division of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | | | - Arie S Parnham
- Department of Urology, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | | | - Maarten Albersen
- Department of Urology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Vijay K Sangar
- Division of Cancer Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK; Department of Urology, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Oscar R Brouwer
- The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Tobias-Machado M, Ornellas AA, Hidaka AK, Medina LG, Mattos PAL, Besio RS, Abreu D, Castro PR, Nishimoto RH, Astigueta J, Dourado A, Machado RD, Magnabosco WJ, Corona-Montes V, Villoldo GM, Zampolli HC, Taha A, Auad PR, Faria EF, Arantes PBO, Tavares A, Nascimento FSMS, Brazão ES, Rocha MM, Costa WH, Panico V, Reis LO, Almeida-Carrera RJ, Silva RC, Zequi SC, Calixto JRR, Sotelo R. Long-term oncological and surgical outcomes after Video Endoscopic Inguinal Lymphadenectomy (VEIL) in patients with penile cancer. Int Braz J Urol 2023; 49:580-589. [PMID: 37390124 PMCID: PMC10482462 DOI: 10.1590/s1677-5538.ibju.2023.0065] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/27/2023] [Accepted: 05/22/2023] [Indexed: 07/02/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To report outcomes from the largest multicenter series of penile cancer patients undergoing video endoscopic inguinal lymphadenectomy (VEIL). MATERIALS AND METHODS Retrospective multicenter analysis. Authors of 21 centers from the Penile Cancer Collaborative Coalition-Latin America (PeC-LA) were included. All centers performed the procedure following the same previously described standardized technique. Inclusion criteria included penile cancer patients with no palpable lymph nodes and intermediate/high-risk disease and those with non-fixed palpable lymph nodes less than 4 cm in diameter. Categorical variables are shown as percentages and frequencies whereas continuous variables as mean and range. RESULTS From 2006 to 2020, 210 VEIL procedures were performed in 105 patients. Mean age was 58 (45-68) years old. Mean operative time was 90 minutes (60-120). Mean lymph node yield was 10 nodes (6-16). Complication rate was 15.7%, including severe complications in 1.9% of procedures. Lymphatic and skin complications were noted in 8.6 and 4.8% of patients, respectively. Histopathological analysis revealed lymph node involvement in 26.7% of patients with non-palpable nodes. Inguinal recurrence was observed in 2.8% of patients. 10y- overall survival was 74.2% and 10-y cancer specific survival was 84.8%. CSS for pN0, pN1, pN2 and pN3 were 100%, 82.4%, 72.7% and 9.1%, respectively. CONCLUSION VEIL seems to offer appropriate long term oncological control with minimal morbidity. In the absence of non-invasive stratification measures such as dynamic sentinel node biopsy, VEIL emerged as the alternative for the management of non-bulky lymph nodes in penile cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marcos Tobias-Machado
- Instituto do Cancer Arnaldo Vieira de Carvalho, São Paulo, SP, Brasil
- Centro Universitário Faculdade de Medicina do ABC - FMABC, Santo André, SP, Brasil
| | | | - Alexandre K Hidaka
- Centro Universitário Faculdade de Medicina do ABC - FMABC, Santo André, SP, Brasil
| | - Luis G Medina
- USC Institute of Urology, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Pablo A L Mattos
- Associação Piauiense de Combate ao Câncer - Hospital São Marcos, Teresina, PI, Brasil
| | | | | | | | | | - Juan Astigueta
- Universidad Privada Antenor Orrego, Instituto Regional de Enfermedades Neoplásicas Norte, Trujillo, Perú
| | - Aurus Dourado
- Associação Piauiense de Combate ao Câncer - Hospital São Marcos, Teresina, PI, Brasil
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Anis Taha
- Instituto do Cancer Arnaldo Vieira de Carvalho, São Paulo, SP, Brasil
| | - Pericles R Auad
- Instituto do Cancer Arnaldo Vieira de Carvalho, São Paulo, SP, Brasil
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Walter H Costa
- AC Camargo Cancer Center, São Paulo, SP, Brasil
- National Institute for Science and Technology in Ocogenomic and Therapeutic Innovation INCIT/INOTE AC Camargo Cancer Center, São Paulo, SP, Brasil
| | | | - Leonardo O Reis
- UroScience, Escola de Ciências Médicas, Universidade de Campinas - UNICAMP, Campinas, SP, Brasil
- Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Campinas - PUC, Campinas, SP, Brasil
| | | | - Rafael C Silva
- Universidade Federal do Maranhão - UFMA, Maranhão, MA, Brasil
| | - Stênio C Zequi
- AC Camargo Cancer Center, São Paulo, SP, Brasil
- National Institute for Science and Technology in Ocogenomic and Therapeutic Innovation INCIT/INOTE AC Camargo Cancer Center, São Paulo, SP, Brasil
| | | | - Rene Sotelo
- USC Institute of Urology, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Glombik D, Davidsson S, Sandin F, Lambe M, Carlsson J, Sundqvist P, Kirrander P. Penile cancer: long-term infectious and thromboembolic complications following lymph node dissection - a population-based study (Sweden). Acta Oncol 2023:1-7. [PMID: 37130005 DOI: 10.1080/0284186x.2023.2206524] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/03/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To assess the long-term risks of infectious and thromboembolic events following inguinal (ILND) and pelvic (PLND) lymph node dissection in men with penile cancer. MATERIAL AND METHODS A total of 364 men subjected to ILND with or without PLND for penile cancer between 2000 and 2012 were identified in the Swedish National Penile Cancer Register. Each patient was matched based on age and county of residence with six penile cancer-free men. The Swedish Cancer Register and other population-based registers were used to retrieve information on treatment and hospitalisation for selected infectious and thromboembolic events. Hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated using Cox proportional hazard models with multiple imputation. RESULTS The risk of infectious events remained increased for more than five years postoperatively in men with penile cancer compared with matched controls. The palpable nodal disease was the only predictor of these events, with risk increasing with the cN stage. The HR at one, three and five years and six months postoperatively was 8.60 (95% CI 5.16-14.34), 4.02 (95% CI 2.65-6.09) and 1.93 (95% CI 1.11-3.38), respectively. An increased risk of thromboembolic events persisted for three years postoperatively. The HR at one and three years postoperatively was 13.51 (95% CI 6.53-27.93) and 2.12 (95% CI 1.07-4.20). The results correspond well with the over-prescription of anticoagulants observed during this period. An association with bulky disease (cN3) was observed. CONCLUSIONS Lymph node dissection for penile cancer is associated with an increased risk of infectious and thromboembolic events. The findings of this population-based study show that the risks of these events remain increased more than five years for infectious and three years for thromboembolic events. Improved awareness of long-term complications following ILND is of importance both among patients and care givers to ensure early detection and treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dominik Glombik
- Department of Urology, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden
| | - Sabina Davidsson
- Department of Urology, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden
| | | | - Mats Lambe
- Regional Cancer Centre Central-Sweden, Uppsala, Sweden
- Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Jessica Carlsson
- Department of Urology, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden
| | - Pernilla Sundqvist
- Department of Urology, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden
- School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden
| | - Peter Kirrander
- Department of Urology, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden
- School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Bada M, Crocetto F, Nyirady P, Pagliarulo V, Rapisarda S, Aliberti A, Boccasile S, Ferro M, Barone B, Celia A. Inguinal lymphadenectomy in penile cancer patients: a comparison between open and video endoscopic approach in a multicenter setting. J Basic Clin Physiol Pharmacol 2023; 34:383-389. [PMID: 36933235 DOI: 10.1515/jbcpp-2023-0038] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/09/2023] [Accepted: 02/25/2023] [Indexed: 03/19/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To compare differences of operative outcomes, post-operative complications and survival outcomes between open and laparoscopic cases in a multicenter study. METHODS This was a retrospective cohort study performed at three European centers from September 2011 to January 2019. The surgeon decision to perform open inguinal lymphadenectomy (OIL) or video endoscopic inguinal lymphadenectomy (VEIL) was done in each hospital after patient counselling. Inclusion criteria regarded a minimum follow-up of 9 months since the inguinal lymphadenectomy. RESULTS A total of 55 patients with proven squamous cell penile cancer underwent inguinal lymphadenectomy. 26 of them underwent OIL, while 29 patients underwent VEIL. For the OIL and VEIL groups, the mean operative time was 2.5 vs. 3.4 h (p=0.129), respectively. Hospital stays were lower in the VEIL group with 4 vs. 8 days in OIL patients (p=0.053) while number of days requiring drains to remain in situ was 3 vs. 6 days (p=0.024). The VEIL group reported a lower incidence of major complications compared to the OIL group (2 vs. 17%, p=0.0067) while minor complications were comparable in both groups. In a median follow-up period of 60 months, the overall survival was 65.5 and 84.6% in OIL and VEIL groups, respectively (p=0.105). CONCLUSIONS VEIL is comparable to OIL regarding safety, overall survival and post-operative outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maida Bada
- Department of Urology, San Bassanino Hospital, Bassano del Grappa, Vicenza, Italy
| | - Felice Crocetto
- Department of Neurosciences, Reproductive Sciences and Odontostomatology - Federico II University of Naples, Naples, Italy
| | - Peter Nyirady
- Department of Urology, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Budapest, Italy
| | - Vincenzo Pagliarulo
- Department of Urology, Emergency and Organ Transplantation, University of Bari Aldo Moro, Bari, Puglia, Italy
| | - Sebastiano Rapisarda
- Department of Urology, Pederzoli Hospital Private Clinic SpA, Peschiera del Garda, Veneto, Italy
| | - Antonio Aliberti
- Urology, ASL 3 Napoli Castellammare di Stabia, Castellammare di Stabia, Italy
| | - Stefano Boccasile
- Department of Urology, Cima Barcelona Hospital, Barcelona, Catalogna, Spain
| | - Matteo Ferro
- Istituto Europeo di Oncologia, Milano, Lombardia, Italy
| | - Biagio Barone
- Neurosciences, Reproductive Sciences and Odontostomatology, University of Naples Federico II, Napoli, Campania, Italy
| | - Antonio Celia
- Department of Urology, San Bassanino Hospital, Bassano del Grappa, Veneto, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
European Association of Urology-American Society of Clinical Oncology Collaborative Guideline on Penile Cancer: 2023 Update. Eur Urol 2023; 83:548-560. [PMID: 36906413 DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2023.02.027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 47] [Impact Index Per Article: 47.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/13/2023] [Accepted: 02/25/2023] [Indexed: 03/11/2023]
Abstract
CONTEXT Penile cancer is a rare disease but has a significant impact on quality of life. Its incidence is increasing, so it is important to include new and relevant evidence in clinical practice guidelines. OBJECTIVE To provide a collaborative guideline that offers worldwide physician and patient guidance for the management of penile cancer. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION Comprehensive literature searches were performed for each section topic. In addition, three systematic reviews were conducted. Levels of evidence were assessed, and a strength rating for each recommendation was assigned according to the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation) methodology. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS Penile cancer is a rare disease but its global incidence is increasing. Human papillomavirus (HPV) is the main risk factor for penile cancer and pathology should include an assessment of HPV status. The main aim of primary tumour treatment is complete tumour eradication, which has to be balanced against optimal organ preservation without compromising oncological control. Early detection and treatment of lymph node (LN) metastasis is the main determinant of survival. Surgical LN staging with sentinel node biopsy is recommended for patients with a high-risk (≥pT1b) tumour with cN0 status. While (inguinal) LN dissection remains the standard for node-positive disease, multimodal treatment is needed in patients with advanced disease. Owing to a lack of controlled trials and large series, the levels of evidence and grades of recommendation are low in comparison to those for more common diseases. CONCLUSIONS This collaborative penile cancer guideline provides updated information on the diagnosis and treatment of penile cancer for use in clinical practice. Organ-preserving surgery should be offered for treatment of the primary tumour when feasible. Adequate and timely LN management remains a challenge, especially in advanced disease stages. Referral to centres of expertise is recommended. PATIENT SUMMARY Penile cancer is a rare disease that significantly impacts quality of life. While the disease can be cured in most cases without lymph node involvement, management of advanced disease remains challenging. Many unmet needs and unanswered questions remain, underlining the importance of research collaborations and centralisation of penile cancer services.
Collapse
|
11
|
O'Brien JS, McVey A, Kelly BD, Chee J, Lawrentschuk N. Recent developments in the diagnosis and management of N1 penile cancer. Curr Opin Urol 2023; 33:64-69. [PMID: 36444651 DOI: 10.1097/mou.0000000000001058] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW This article presents a critical review of the current literature to provide a brief update on the contemporary advances in diagnosing and managing N1 penile cancer. RECENT FINDINGS Penile squamous cell carcinoma (pSCC) has evolved from being an orphan field for cancer innovation. Advances in the understanding tumour biology have enabled sophisticated diagnostics and predictive modelling to better characterize inguinal disease. Minimally invasive inguinal lymph node dissection is emerging as a technique that reduces morbidity while maintaining oncological safety. Furthermore, robust clinical trials are underway ,which will provide level one evidence to guide treatment decisions. Exciting advances in the field of immune-oncology offer promise as adjuvant therapies. International collaboration and centralisation of care will be essential to driving translational research and equitable evidence-based care. SUMMARY Improving outcomes for men with pSCC remains a global challenge. Radical inguinal lymph node dissection remains the gold standard for diagnosing and curing N1 disease. Although many promising developments are on the horizon, high-level evidence is required to guide therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jonathan S O'Brien
- Division of Cancer Surgery, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne
- Department of Urology, The Royal Melbourne Hospital
- Prostate Cancer Theranostics and Imaging Centre of Excellence, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre
| | - Aoife McVey
- Division of Cancer Surgery, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre
| | - Brian D Kelly
- Division of Cancer Surgery, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne
- Department of Urology, Eastern Health
| | - Justin Chee
- MURAC Health, East Melbourne
- Department of Urology, Alfred Health
| | - Nathan Lawrentschuk
- Division of Cancer Surgery, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne
- Department of Urology, The Royal Melbourne Hospital
- EJ Whitten Prostate Cancer Research Centre at Epworth Healthcare, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Nursing of Vulvar Cancer Radical Operation Combined with Laparoscopic Inguinal Lymph Node Dissection. Emerg Med Int 2022; 2022:8091114. [PMID: 36105671 PMCID: PMC9467793 DOI: 10.1155/2022/8091114] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/05/2022] [Revised: 07/23/2022] [Accepted: 07/29/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose. The application, development, and care of radical surgery combined with laparoscopic inguinal lymph node dissection for vulvar cancer. Methods. We searched the PubMed, Web of Science, the Cochrane Library, and EMBASE databases for published literature on the care of radical surgery combined with laparoscopic inguinal lymph node dissection for vulvar cancer up to June 2022. We used the following search terms and terms: “vulvar cancer,” “injury,” “radical vulvar cancer surgery,” “laparoscopic inguinal lymph node dissection,” and “care.” Results. Laparoscopic inguinal lymph node dissection has become a new surgical method for the treatment of vulvar cancer, and it effectively avoids all the problems associated with traditional surgery. In addition, radical vulvar cancer surgery and laparoscopic inguinal lymph node dissection combined with high-quality nursing interventions can promote patients’ recovery and reduce the occurrence of complications, which has important clinical significance. Conclusion. This article reviews the application, development, and nursing care of radical vulvar cancer surgery combined with laparoscopic inguinal lymph node dissection.
Collapse
|
13
|
Rawal SK, Singh A, Khanna A. Robot-Assisted Video Endoscopic Inguinal Lymph Node Dissection for Carcinoma Penis. J Endourol 2022; 36:S12-S17. [PMID: 36154450 DOI: 10.1089/end.2022.0420] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Inguinal lymph node status is the single most important prognostic factor for survival in patients with carcinoma penis. Various modifications and alternatives to open inguinal lymph node dissection have been developed as the same is associated with high postoperative morbidity such as wound infection, skin flap necrosis, lymphorrhea, and lymphedema. Robot-assisted video endoscopic inguinal lymph node dissection (RA-VEIL) has the potential to accomplish thorough inguinal lymph node dissection with definitively reduced postoperative morbidity. In this video, we demonstrate our technique of RA-VEIL: The fascia lata first approach and highlight our technical modifications of the conventionally described procedure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sudhir Kumar Rawal
- Division of Uro-Oncology, Department of Surgical Oncology, Rajiv Gandhi Cancer Institute and Research Centre, New Delhi, India
| | - Amitabh Singh
- Division of Uro-Oncology, Department of Surgical Oncology, Rajiv Gandhi Cancer Institute and Research Centre, New Delhi, India
| | - Ashish Khanna
- Division of Uro-Oncology, Department of Surgical Oncology, Rajiv Gandhi Cancer Institute and Research Centre, New Delhi, India
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Clinical Application of Noninflating Video-Endoscopic Inguinal Lymph Node Dissection. COMPUTATIONAL AND MATHEMATICAL METHODS IN MEDICINE 2022; 2022:8259990. [PMID: 35799632 PMCID: PMC9256332 DOI: 10.1155/2022/8259990] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/02/2022] [Revised: 06/12/2022] [Accepted: 06/16/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
Objective To assess the safety and efficacy of the application of self-made non-inflating suspension technique in video endoscopic inguinal lymph node dissection (ILND). Methods We collected 8 patients with penile carcinoma who underwent noninflating video-endoscopic ILND in the Department of Urology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, from May 2019 to March 2021. Then, surgical duration, blood loss, drainage tube indwelling time, hospital stay, number of dissected lymph nodes, and complications in the patients were analyzed. Results All patients (n = 8) finished the surgery successfully, with an average surgical duration of 125 (105-145) minutes, blood loss of 41 (25-50) mL, indwelling time of drainage tube of 7 (5-12) days, and a hospital stay of 14.8 (9-21) days. Additionally, 8.8 (3-14) left side and 7.3 (2-17) right side lymph nodes were dissected on average. Complications occurred in 3 patients during a perioperative period. The patients were followed up for 6-24 months, and none suffered recurrence or metastasis. Conclusion The efficacy of noninflating video-endoscopic ILND is good. Patients who have undergone the surgery not only have few postoperative complications but also have a good prognosis, suggesting the safety and availability of the clinical application.
Collapse
|
15
|
Arora A, Rodriguez A, Necchi A, Albersen M, Zhu Y, Spiess PE, Prakash G. Global Implications in Caring for Penile Cancer: Similarities and Divergences. Semin Oncol Nurs 2022; 38:151283. [DOI: 10.1016/j.soncn.2022.151283] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
|
16
|
Robotic-Assisted Video-Endoscopic Inguinal Lymphadenectomy (RAVEIL) and Video-Endoscopic Inguinal Lymphadenectomy (VEIL) versus Open Inguinal Lymph-Node Dissection (OILND) in carcinoma of penis: Comparison of perioperative outcomes, complications and oncological outcomes. A systematic review and meta-analysis. Urol Oncol 2021; 40:112.e11-112.e22. [PMID: 34895995 DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2021.11.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/15/2021] [Revised: 10/12/2021] [Accepted: 11/08/2021] [Indexed: 12/09/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To perform a systematic review and meta-analysis evaluating the peri-operative outcomes, complications, and oncological outcomes of Robotic-Assisted Video-Endoscopic Inguinal Lymphadenectomy (RAVEIL)/Video-Endoscopic Inguinal Lymphadenectomy (VEIL) with Open Inguinal Lymph-Node Dissection (OILND) for management of inguinal lymph-nodes in carcinoma of the penis. METHODS A comprehensive literature search was performed in January 2021 using the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases. Data from human studies comparing RAVEIL/VEIL vs. OILND in carcinoma of penis published in English was extracted and analyzed by two independent authors. RESULTS Two Randomised Controlled Trials and 6 cohort studies were included in the meta-analysis. RAVEIL/VEIL group exhibited increased operative time (Mean Difference [MD] = 15.28 [14.19; 16.38], P < 0.001), shorter hospital stay (MD = -1.06 [-1.14; -0.98], P < 0.001), and decreased duration of drainage (MD = -2.82 [-3.21; -2.43], P < 0.001), wound infection (Odds Ratio [OR] = 0.15 [0.08; 0.27], P < 0.001), skin necrosis (OR = 0.12 [0.05; 0.28], P < 0.001), lymphedema (OR = 0.41 [0.24; 0.72], P = 0.002), and major complications (OR = 0.11 [0.05; 0.24], P < 0.001) as compared to OILND group. Recurrence rate and number of deaths were comparable in both the groups. RAVEIL/VEIL groups showed slightly larger lymph-node yield (MD = 0.44 [0.18; 0.70], P < 0.001) as compared to OILND group. CONCLUSION RAVEIL/VEIL has lesser skin complications, lymphedema, and better lymph-node yield as compared to OILND. It is comparable in terms of lymphocele and recurrence. It has lesser hospital stay and duration of drainage but owing to heterogeneity, the results should be interpreted with caution. Further studies are required to determine long-term oncological outcomes like overall survival and disease-specific survival.
Collapse
|
17
|
Fankhauser CD, Lee EWC, Issa A, Oliveira P, Lau M, Sangar V, Parnham A. Saphenous-sparing Ascending Video Endoscopic Inguinal Lymph Node Dissection Using a Leg Approach: Surgical Technique and Perioperative and Pathological Outcomes. EUR UROL SUPPL 2021; 35:9-13. [PMID: 34825230 PMCID: PMC8605329 DOI: 10.1016/j.euros.2021.10.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 10/15/2021] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Open inguinal lymph node dissection (oILND) has high morbidity. Ascending saphenous-sparing video endoscopic ILND (VEILND-AS+) represents a minimally invasive alternative with potential benefits. Objective To describe our VEILND-AS+ technique and compare outcomes to oILND. Design, setting, and participants This was a retrospective cohort study of penile cancer patients. Surgical procedure VEILND-AS+ was performed according to the technique described in the supplementary video. Measurements We compared perioperative and pathological outcomes between the two procedures. Results and limitations In the study cohort of 206 men we performed 40 VEILND-AS+ and 251 oILND procedures. In comparison to oILND, VEILND-AS+ had a longer operation time (185 vs 120 min; p < 0.01) but a shorter hospital stay (2 vs 4 d; p < 0.01). A median of eight resected lymph nodes with a median of one affected node per groin was observed in both groups. Extranodal extension was found in 30% of cases after VEILND-AS+ and 35% after oILND. In both groups the median drainage time was 13 d. Wound infections were observed in 38% of cases after VEILND-AS+ and 27% after oILND (p = 0.19). Skin necrosis or wound breakdown occurred in 0% and 6% of cases after VEILND-AS+ and oILND (p < 0.01), while lymphoceles were drained in 18% and 7% of cases, respectively(p = 0.03). Following VEILND-AS+ and oILND, 20% and 14% of patients, respectively, were referred to a lymph oedema clinic (p < 0.01). Conclusions VEILND-AS+ is a safe procedure and offers shorter hospital stays and possibly a lower risk of skin necrosis and wound breakdown in comparison to oILND. Further improvements in the VEILND-AS+ technique are required to reduce complications associated with dead space and injury to lymphatic vessels. Patient summary For patients undergoing surgery on lymph nodes in the groin, a minimally invasive approach instead of open surgery led to discharge 2 days earlier and may have lower rates of severe wound complications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christian D Fankhauser
- The Christie NHS Foundation Trusts, Manchester, UK.,Luzerner Kantonsspital, Lucerne, Switzerland.,University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | | | | | | | - Maurice Lau
- The Christie NHS Foundation Trusts, Manchester, UK
| | - Vijay Sangar
- The Christie NHS Foundation Trusts, Manchester, UK
| | - Arie Parnham
- The Christie NHS Foundation Trusts, Manchester, UK
| |
Collapse
|