1
|
Tokunaga T, Kashihara H, Yoshikawa K, Nakao T, Nishi M, Takasu C, Wada Y, Yoshimoto T, Shimada M. Comparison of the short-term surgical outcomes of lateral lymph node dissection for low rectal cancer using a robotic-assisted transabdominal approach alone or supported by a transanal approach. Surg Endosc 2024; 38:2070-2077. [PMID: 38438675 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-024-10730-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/17/2023] [Accepted: 01/28/2024] [Indexed: 03/06/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Lateral lymph node metastases are a major cause of local recurrence after surgery for advanced low rectal cancer. Lateral lymph node dissection (LLND) may reduce the risk of local recurrence in patients with suspected lateral lymph node metastasis. Recent reports have shown that robotic-assisted LLND can help to reduce the postoperative complication rate, such as urinary disturbance. Furthermore, with the advent of transanal total mesorectal excision, a novel LLND procedure that combines a transabdominal approach with a transanal approach has been reported. This study aimed to clarify the safety and feasibility of robotic-assisted LLND supported by a transanal approach for advanced low rectal cancer. METHODS Thirty-nine patients diagnosed to have low rectal cancer between June 2019 and May 2023 were retrospectively enrolled and divided according to whether they underwent LLND via a robotic-assisted transabdominal approach alone (transabdominal group, n = 19) or in combination with a transanal approach (2team group, n = 20). The patient characteristics and short-term surgical outcomes were compared between the two groups. RESULTS The total operation time was significantly shorter in the 2team group than in the transabdominal group (366 min vs. 513 min, P < 0.001), as was the time taken to perform unilateral LLND (64 min vs. 114 min, P < 0.001). Furthermore, there was significantly less intraoperative bleeding in the 2team group (30 mL vs. 80 mL, P = 0.004). There was no significant between-group difference in postoperative complications. The incidence of postoperative urinary disturbance was satisfactory at 5% in both groups. CONCLUSIONS The operation time for LLND performed by a robotic-assisted transabdominal approach was shortened when supported by a transanal approach. The frequency of postoperative urinary disturbance was low in both groups. Therefore, robotic-assisted abdominal LLND supported by a transanal approach can be considered a promising treatment option for advanced low rectal cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Takuya Tokunaga
- Department of Surgery, Tokushima University, 3-18-15 Kuramoto-cho, Tokushima, 770-8503, Japan.
| | - Hideya Kashihara
- Department of Surgery, Tokushima University, 3-18-15 Kuramoto-cho, Tokushima, 770-8503, Japan
| | - Kozo Yoshikawa
- Department of Surgery, Tokushima University, 3-18-15 Kuramoto-cho, Tokushima, 770-8503, Japan
| | - Toshihiro Nakao
- Department of Surgery, Tokushima University, 3-18-15 Kuramoto-cho, Tokushima, 770-8503, Japan
| | - Masaaki Nishi
- Department of Surgery, Tokushima University, 3-18-15 Kuramoto-cho, Tokushima, 770-8503, Japan
| | - Chie Takasu
- Department of Surgery, Tokushima University, 3-18-15 Kuramoto-cho, Tokushima, 770-8503, Japan
| | - Yuma Wada
- Department of Surgery, Tokushima University, 3-18-15 Kuramoto-cho, Tokushima, 770-8503, Japan
| | - Toshiaki Yoshimoto
- Department of Surgery, Tokushima University, 3-18-15 Kuramoto-cho, Tokushima, 770-8503, Japan
| | - Mitsuo Shimada
- Department of Surgery, Tokushima University, 3-18-15 Kuramoto-cho, Tokushima, 770-8503, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Ando M, Matsuda T, Sawada R, Hasegawa H, Yamashita K, Harada H, Urakawa N, Goto H, Kanaji S, Oshikiri T, Kakeji Y. Feasibility and safety of robotic surgery for low rectal cancer combined with transanal total mesorectal excision. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2023; 408:129. [PMID: 36991217 PMCID: PMC10060269 DOI: 10.1007/s00423-023-02870-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/10/2022] [Accepted: 03/24/2023] [Indexed: 03/31/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Laparoscopic surgery for low rectal cancer is often challenging. Transanal total mesorectal excision (TaTME) and robotic surgery have been introduced to overcome the technical difficulties in laparoscopic surgery and achieve more favorable outcomes. Hybrid robotic surgery, which combines TaTME with the abdominal robotic approach, incorporates the advantages of each of these surgical techniques and might achieve less invasive and safer surgery. This study evaluated the safety and feasibility of hybrid robotic surgery with TaTME (hybrid TaTME). METHODS We retrospectively reviewed 162 TaTME cases performed at our department from September 2016 to May 2022. Among them, 92 cases of conventional TaTME and 30 of hybrid TaTME were eligible. We used propensity score matching analysis (PSM) to adjust for patients' characteristics and compared the short-term outcomes of the two treatment groups. RESULTS Twenty-seven cases in each group were extracted using PSM. The operation time in hybrid TaTME was comparable to that in conventional TaTME. There was no significant difference in the postoperative hospital stay between the two groups. Other intra- and post-operative outcomes were also comparable between the two groups. Furthermore, no significant differences were observed between the two groups in the curative resection and recurrence rates. CONCLUSION Hybrid TaTME for low rectal cancer was as favorable as conventional TaTME in producing satisfactory short-term outcomes. However, furthermore, larger-scale studies conducted over longer study periods are needed to evaluate the validity of the findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Masayuki Ando
- Division of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, Japan
| | - Takeru Matsuda
- Division of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, Japan.
- Division of Minimally Invasive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, 7-5-2 Kusunoki-Chou, Chuo-Ku, Kobe, 650-0017, Japan.
| | - Ryuichiro Sawada
- Division of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, Japan
| | - Hiroshi Hasegawa
- Division of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, Japan
| | - Kimihiro Yamashita
- Division of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, Japan
| | - Hitoshi Harada
- Division of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, Japan
| | - Naoki Urakawa
- Division of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, Japan
| | - Hironobu Goto
- Division of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, Japan
| | - Shingo Kanaji
- Division of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, Japan
| | - Taro Oshikiri
- Division of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, Japan
| | - Yoshihiro Kakeji
- Division of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Clinical Safety and Effectiveness of Robotic-Assisted Surgery in Patients with Rectal Cancer: Real-World Experience over 8 Years of Multiple Institutions with High-Volume Robotic-Assisted Surgery. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14174175. [PMID: 36077712 PMCID: PMC9454525 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14174175] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/17/2022] [Revised: 08/17/2022] [Accepted: 08/25/2022] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary The aim of this retrospective observational study was to evaluate perioperative and short-term oncological outcomes of robotic-assisted rectal surgery (RRS) in hospitals with a high-volume of robotic-assisted surgeries. This study enrolled patients with rectal adenocarcinoma undergoing RRS from three high-volume institutions from December 2011 to June 2020. Compared with other studies, our results revealed the equivalent or superior perioperative and short-term oncological outcomes. Hence, RRS is an effective, safe, and feasible technique for patients with rectal cancers in high-volume hospitals. Abstract The perioperative and short-term oncological outcomes of robotic-assisted rectal surgery (RRS) are unclear. This retrospective observational study enrolled patients with rectal adenocarcinoma undergoing RRS from three high-volume institutions in Taiwan. Of the 605 enrolled patients, 301 (49.75%), 176 (29.09%), and 116 (19.17%) had lower, middle, and upper rectal cancers, respectively. Low anterior resection (377, 62.31%) was the most frequent surgical procedure. Intraoperative blood transfusion was performed in 10 patients (2%). The surgery was converted to an open one for one patient (0.2%), and ten (1.7%) patients underwent reoperation. The overall complication rate was 14.5%, including 3% from anastomosis leakage. No deaths occurred during surgery and within 30 days postoperatively. The positive rates of distal resection margin and circumferential resection margin were observed in 21 (3.5%) and 30 (5.0%) patients, respectively. The 5-year overall and disease-free survival rates for patients with stage I–III rectal cancer were 91.1% and 86.3%, respectively. This is the first multi-institutional study in Taiwan with 605 patients from three high-volume hospitals. The overall surgical and oncological outcomes were equivalent or superior to those estimated in other studies. Hence, RRS is an effective and safe technique for rectal resection in high-volume hospitals.
Collapse
|
4
|
Delgado SI, Koythong T, Turrentine MA, Sangi-Haghpeykar H, Guan X. Postoperative opioid use for patients with chronic pelvic pain undergoing robotic surgery for resection of endometriosis. J Robot Surg 2021; 16:421-427. [PMID: 34075544 DOI: 10.1007/s11701-021-01259-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/30/2021] [Accepted: 05/24/2021] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
We aimed to identify the amount of opioids used in the postoperative setting for patients with a history of chronic pelvic pain undergoing robotic surgical excision of endometriosis and compare this to patients undergoing benign robotic gynecologic surgery for other indications. We conducted a retrospective cohort study in an urban academic university hospital from January 2019 to March 2020. Data regarding opioid use was collected via a patient-reported survey that was given at the 3 weeks follow-up visit. Data regarding opioid use was compared to patients undergoing robotic surgery for other benign gynecologic indications. Our study included 158 patients, 119 undergoing surgery for endometriosis and 39 patients undergoing robotic surgery for other benign gynecologic indications. Patients undergoing surgery for endometriosis used on average 105.9 morphine milligram equivalents (MME), equivalent to 14 tabs of oxycodone 5 mg. There was no statistically significant difference in the amount of opioids used postoperatively based on stage of endometriosis or need for hysterectomy. Patients undergoing surgery for other benign indications used on average 49.4 MME, equivalent to 6 tabs of oxycodone 5 mg. The difference in amount of opioids used between patients with and without endometriosis was statistically significant. In conclusion, patients undergoing robotic surgery for endometriosis used over two times as many opioids postoperatively as patients without endometriosis and have a higher perceived postoperative pain. Providers should be aware of this difference in order to provide better pain control for this patient population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephanie I Delgado
- Director of Minimally Invasive Surgery, From the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Baylor College of Medicine, 6651 Main Street, Suite F1020, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Tamisa Koythong
- Director of Minimally Invasive Surgery, From the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Baylor College of Medicine, 6651 Main Street, Suite F1020, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Mark A Turrentine
- Director of Minimally Invasive Surgery, From the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Baylor College of Medicine, 6651 Main Street, Suite F1020, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Haleh Sangi-Haghpeykar
- Director of Minimally Invasive Surgery, From the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Baylor College of Medicine, 6651 Main Street, Suite F1020, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Xiaoming Guan
- Director of Minimally Invasive Surgery, From the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Baylor College of Medicine, 6651 Main Street, Suite F1020, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.
| |
Collapse
|