Full functional-length urethral sphincter- and neurovascular bundle preservation improves long-term continence rates after robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy

Surgical techniques to preserve continence after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy

Radical prostatectomy significantly impacts the inherent anatomy of the male pelvis and the functional mechanisms of urinary continence. Incontinence has a considerable negative influence on the quality of life of patients, as well as their social and psychological wellbeing. Numerous surgical techniques have been demonstrated to support the preservation of continence during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP). In this in-depth analysis, we give a general summary of the surgical techniques used in RARP and their impact on incontinence rates.

The NeuroSAFE frozen section technique during radical prostatectomy - Implementation and optimization of technical aspects in a routine pathology workflow

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

In prostate cancer patients, application of the NeuroSAFE frozen section technique during radical prostatectomy has been shown to increase the rate of nerve sparing surgery and to improve functional outcome for the patients. The aim of this study is to report on technical and organizational optimization opportunities of the procedure.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

All patients submitted to bilateral intraoperative frozen section from January 2018 until December 2020 (n = 452) were retrospectively analyzed and parameters such as turnaround time, staff situation in the laboratory and histologic properties of the tumors were assessed.

RESULTS

The median turnaround time per case was 40.3 ( ± 10.5) min. In 2020 the average time needed from accessioning to diagnosis was 38.1 min. Multivariate linear regression suggested that the number of technical assistants/cryotomes (46.1 min vs. 39.13 min; p < 0.001), the place of microscopic examination (43.0 min vs. 38.7 min; p < 0.001) and the presence of a positive margin (38.0 vs. 44.0 min; p < 0.001) were significant influential factors. The turnaround time was independent of the uropathological expertize of the consultant (39.84 min vs. 40.7 min; p = 0.09), the tumor grade (42.3 vs 39.8 min; p = 0.493) and the presence of extraprostatic extension (44.0 vs 39.8 min; p = 0.099).

CONCLUSION

The implementation of simple optimization measures in the workflow as well as structured training of all pathology staff involved in the examination leads to a significant increase in the efficiency of the examination while maintaining the same level of resources. The results could thus be a contribution to the broader application of the procedure.