Helicobacter pylori in immigrants: a "foreign" bacterium?

Pylera and sequential therapy for first-line Helicobacter pylori eradication: a culture-based study in real clinical practice

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Italian guideline suggests 10-day sequential or bismuth-based quadruple therapies for first-line Helicobacter pylori treatment. Comparison between these regimens is lacking. We assessed the efficacy of these therapies in clinical practice and evaluated the role of primary bacterial resistance toward clarithromycin and metronidazole.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Consecutive patients with H. pylori infection were enrolled. Bacterial culture with antibiotics susceptibility testing was attempted in all cases. Patients received either a sequential therapy with esomeprazole 40 mg for 10 days plus amoxicillin 1000 mg for the first 5 days followed by clarithromycin 500 mg and tinidazole 500 mg (all twice daily) for the remaining 5 days, or bismuth-based therapy with esomeprazole 20 mg twice daily and Pylera 3 tablets four times daily for 10 days. H. pylori eradication was assessed by using C-urea breath test.

RESULTS

A total of 495 patients were enrolled. Following sequential (250 patients) and quadruple (245 patients) therapies, the eradication rate were 92 and 91%, respectively, at intention-to-treat analysis and 96 and 97%, respectively, at per protocol analysis. Overall, the pattern of bacterial resistance did not significantly affect the cure rate, but the presence of clarithromycin and metronidazole dual resistance tended to reduce the success rate of both sequential (84.8 vs. 90.1%; P=0.4) and quadruple (85 vs. 94.1%; P=0.06) therapies. Adverse events occurred more frequently with the quadruple than with sequential therapy (56.9 vs. 25.8%; P<0.001).

CONCLUSION

In our country, sequential and bismuth-based quadruple therapy achieved similarly high eradication rates as first-line treatments for H. pylori infection in clinical practice.

Role of gastritis pattern on Helicobacter pylori eradication

Helicobacter pylori eradication rate following standard triple therapy is decreasing. Identification of predictive factors of therapy success would be useful for H. pylori management in clinical practice. This study aimed to evaluate the role of different gastritis patterns on the efficacy of the currently suggested 14-day triple therapy regimen. One-hundred and seventeen, consecutive, non-ulcer dyspeptic patients, with H. pylori infection diagnosed at endoscopy, were enrolled. All patients received a 14-day, triple therapy with lansoprazole 30 mg, clarithromycin 500 mg and amoxicillin 1 g, all given twice daily. Bacterial eradication was assessed with (13)C-urea breath test 4-6 weeks after completion of therapy. H. pylori infection was cured in 70.1% at ITT analysis and 83.7% at PP analysis. The eradication rate tended to be lower in patients with corpus-predominant gastritis as compared to those with antral-predominant gastritis at both ITT (66.1 vs 74.5%) and PP (80.4 vs 87.2%) analyses. The multivariate analysis failed to identify factors associated with therapy success. However, 14-day triple therapy does not achieve acceptable H. pylori cure rate in Italy, and should be not recommended in clinical practice.

Helicobacter pylori therapy: Present and future

Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) plays a crucial role in the pathogenesis of chronic active gastritis, peptic ulcer and gastric mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue-lymphoma, and is also involved in carcinogenesis of the stomach. H. pylori treatment still remains a challenge for physicians, since no current first-line therapy is able to cure the infection in all treated patients. Several factors may help in the eradication of therapy failure. We reviewed both bacterial and host factors involved in therapeutic management of the H. pylori infection. In addition, we evaluated data on the most successful therapy regimens - sequential and concomitant therapies - currently available for H. pylori eradication.

Helicobacter pylori in First Nations and recent immigrant populations in Canada

The diminishing prevalence of Helicobacter pylori infection among most segments of the Canadian population has led to changes in the etiologies and patterns of associated upper gastrointestinal diseases, including fewer peptic ulcers and their complications. Canadian Aboriginals and recent immigrants are among populations in which the prevalence of H pylori infection remains high and, therefore, the health risks imposed by H pylori remain a significant concern. Population-based strategies for H pylori eradication in groups with a low prevalence of infection are unlikely to be cost effective, but such measures are attractive in groups in which the prevalence rates of infection remain substantial. In addition to a lower prevalence of peptic ulcers and dyspepsia, the public health value of eradication may be particularly important if this leads to a reduction in the prevalence of gastric cancer in high prevalence groups. Therefore The Canadian Helicobacter Study Group held a conference that brought together experts in the field to address these issues, the results of which are reviewed in the present article. Canadians with the highest prevalence of H pylori infection are an appropriate focus for considering the health advantages of eradicating persistent infection. In Canadian communities with a high prevalence of both H pylori and gastric cancer, there remains an opportunity to test the hypothesis that H pylori infection is a treatable risk factor for malignancy.