Power of screening tests for colorectal cancer enhanced by high levels of M2-PK in addition to FOBT

The Importance of Evaluating Serum Levels of Tumor Markers M2-PK and Inhibin A in Patients Undergoing Colonoscopy

Despite the use of colonoscopy to detect colon cancer due to its aggressiveness, high cost, and lack of patient compliance, the use of laboratory tests with high accuracy and sensitivity, such as tumor marker M2-PK and Inhibin A is recommended and can be effective for early diagnosis and screening of patients in the early stages. We studied 46 patients admitted it the gastrointestinal ward of Amir al Momenin Hospital and 45 normal (age and sex-matched) subjects as a control group (case-control and retrospective studies). Before the colonoscopy, the level of tumor marker M2-PK in the stool sample and the serum level of Inhibin A were evaluated in patients and the control group. The level of tumor marker M2-PK was significantly higher in the group with hyperplastic polyps and colon cancer (P < .001) than in the control group. At the same time, there was no significant difference in Inhibin A level (P = .054). In the hyperplastic polyps group 73% and in the colorectal cancer group 27% had a positive immunochemical fecal occult blood (IFOBT) result, significantly higher than the control group (P < .001). Evaluation of the level of tumor marker M2-PK in the stool sample in association with the three-time iFOBT test method may be suggested as a quick and noninvasive method for screening and diagnosis of polyps and early stages of colon cancer.

Fecal biomarkers: Non-invasive diagnosis of colorectal cancer

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most common cancer in the world in terms of morbidity and mortality, which brings great health hazards and economic burdens to patients and society. A fecal examination is an effective method for clinical examination and the most commonly used method for the census. It is simple, non-invasive, and suitable for large-scale population screening. With the development of molecular biology, lots of efforts have been made to discover new fecal biomarkers for the early screening of colorectal cancer. In this review, we summarize and discuss the recent advances of fecal biomarkers for CRC screening or diagnosis, including DNA biomarkers, RNA biomarkers, protein biomarkers, gut microbes and volatile organic compounds focusing on their diagnostic evaluation for CRC, which can provide a basis for the further development of new and effective CRC fecal screening and early diagnosis techniques.

Comparison of faecal protein biomarkers' diagnostic accuracy for colorectal advanced neoplasms: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Early diagnosis of colorectal advanced neoplasms (ANs), including colorectal cancer (CRC) and advanced adenoma (AA), has a positive effect on the survival rate. As a first attempt, the aim of this meta-analysis was to compare the diagnostic accuracy of faecal protein biomarkers for the detection of colorectal neoplasms with consideration of a wide range of covariates. A systematic literature search was performed up to Jun 10, 2021 on Web of Sciences, Scopus and PubMed. The diagnostic accuracies were calculated using the bivariate/hierarchical random effect model. Biomarkers were determined to be clinically applicable (CA) if they had areas under the curve > 0.70 and positive and negative likelihood ratios > 2 and < 0.5, respectively. A total of 47,059 test results were extracted from 16 immunochemical faecal occult blood test (iFOBT), 26 pyruvate kinase-M2 (PK-M2) and 23 faecal calprotectin (FC) studies. Only iFOBT, PK-M2 and FC for CRC plus iFOBT and PK-M2 for AN were CA. iFOBT had significantly superior accuracy (P = 0.02 versus PK-M2 and P < 0.01 versus FC for CRC; P < 0.01 versus PK-M2 for AN). Regarding covariates, the lateral flow method of PK-M2 measurement increased its accuracy for CRC detection compared to the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (P < 0.01). iFOBT is recommended as the most accurate faecal biomarker for CRC and AN diagnosis.

Towards Novel Non-Invasive Colorectal Cancer Screening Methods: A Comprehensive Review

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the leading cancer-related causes of death in the world. Since the 70s, many countries have adopted different CRC screening programs, which has resulted in a decrease in mortality. However, current screening test options still present downsides. The commercialized stool-based tests present high false-positive rates and low sensitivity, which negatively affects the detection of early stage carcinogenesis. The gold standard colonoscopy has low uptake due to its invasiveness and the perception of discomfort and embarrassment that the procedure may bring. In this review, we collected and described the latest data about alternative CRC screening techniques that can overcome these disadvantages. Web of Science and PubMed were employed as search engines for studies reporting on CRC screening tests and future perspectives. The searches generated 555 articles, of which 93 titles were selected. Finally, a total of 50 studies, describing 14 different CRC alternative tests, were included. Among the investigated techniques, the main feature that could have an impact on CRC screening perception and uptake was the ease of sample collection. Urine, exhaled breath, and blood-based tests promise to achieve good diagnostic performance (sensitivity of 63-100%, 90-95%, and 47-97%, respectively) while minimizing stress and discomfort for the patient.