Is it reasonable to use a lower DOAC dose in some patients with VTE? NO

The incidence, risk factors, characteristics, and prognosis of recurrent deep venous thrombosis in the contralateral lower extremity

BACKGROUND

Recurrent events after a first symptomatic deep venous thrombosis (DVT) are relatively frequent, but little is known about contralateral recurrent DVT (RDVT).

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of patients with a first symptomatic lower extremity DVT between January 2017 and April 2021. The incidence, demographics, risk factors, and prognosis of RDVT were analyzed, with differences compared between patients with contralateral RDVT and those with ipsilateral RDVT.

RESULTS

In 570 consecutive patients with DVT, 28 patients (4.91%) developed contralateral RDVT, and 49 patients (8.60%) developed ipsilateral RDVT during a mean follow-up of 27.62 ± 14.84 months. Contralateral RDVT was more frequently found in the right lower extremity, whereas ipsilateral RDVT had more left lower extremity involvement. The median follow-up was 12 months until ipsilateral RDVT and 26.5 months until contralateral RDVT. In multivariate Cox analysis, inherited thrombophilia, stent extension with 50% to 100% coverage, autoimmune disease and anticoagulation noncompliance were identified as risk factors for contralateral RDVT. During follow-up, 5 patients (17.86%) with contralateral RDVT and 10 patients (20.41%) with ipsilateral RDVT died (P > .05), with 12 of 15 dying of an underlying malignancy.

CONCLUSIONS

The incidence of contralateral RDVT after a first symptomatic DVT is relatively low, and contralateral DVT is strongly associated with stent extension with 50% to 100% coverage, autoimmune disease, anticoagulation noncompliance, and inherited thrombophilia. Compared with ipsilateral RDVT, contralateral RDVT occurs later and is more often in the right lower extremity. Survival following contralateral RDVT is similar to survival following ipsilateral RDVT, with underlying malignancy being the leading cause of death.

Predictors of use of direct oral anticoagulants in patients with venous thromboembolism: Findings from the Registro Informatizado Enfermedad Tromboembólica registry

Background

Current guidelines recommend the use of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) for patients with venous thromboembolism (VTE). However little is known about the use of DOACs in daily practice.

Methods

We used the RIETE registry to identify predictors of use of DOACs for initial and/or long-term therapy of VTE based on patient-related factors, institution-related factors or over time.

Results

Among 41,678 patients from March 2013 to September 2021, 12,286 (29%) used DOACs: for initial therapy 6,456; for long-term therapy 12,046. On multivariable analysis, independent predictors were: age < 65 years (odds ratio [OR]: 1.30; 95% CI: 1.23-1.38), body weight <50 kg (OR: 0.54; 95% CI: 0.45-0.65) or >120 kg (OR: 0.64; 95% CI: 0.53-0.77), initial VTE presentation as pulmonary embolism (OR: 1.18; 95% CI: 1.13-1.25), recent bleeding (OR: 0.53; 95% CI: 0.45-0.63), renal insufficiency (OR: 0.44; 95% CI: 0.38-0.51), liver cirrhosis (OR: 0.32; 95% CI: 0.20-0.52), thrombocytopenia (OR: 0.40; 95% CI: 0.34-0.49), atrial fibrillation (OR: 1.58; 95% CI: 1.42-1.75) and prior VTE (OR: 1.14; 95% CI: 1.06-1.22). The DOACs were more likely used in other European countries (OR: 8.97; 95% CI: 8.49-9.49), America (OR: 6.35; 95% CI: 5.67-7.11) or in other countries of the world (OR: 2.99; 95% CI: 2.70-3.31) than in Spain, and progressively increased from 2013-2015 to 2016-2018 (OR: 2.78; 95% CI: 2.62-2.95) and 2019-2021 (OR: 6.36; 95% CI: 5.95-6.80).

Conclusion

In this large multinational VTE registry, variations were observed in the use of DOACs according to patient or country factors, and over time. The safety, costs, and influence of the DOACs on VTE-related outcomes in daily practice warrant further investigation.

Management of antithrombotic therapy in gray areas of venous thromboembolism: a Delphi consensus panel

For some years now, direct-acting oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have entered the clinical practice for stroke prevention in non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) or for prevention and treatment of venous thromboembolism (VTE). However, there is uncertainty on DOACs' use in some clinical scenarios that are not fully explored by clinical trials, but commonly encountered in the real world. We report a Delphi Consensus on DOAC use in VTE patients. The consensus dealt with seven main topics: (1) clinical superiority of DOACs compared to VKAs; (2) therapeutic options for patients with intermediate risk PE; (3) therapeutic management of patients with deep vein thrombosis (DVT); (4) DOACs' role in oncological patients with VTE; (5) role of the reversal agent; (6) safety of low doses of DOACs in VTE patients; (7) DOACs long-term therapy (more than 12 months) in VTE patients; Forty-six physicians (cardiologists, internists, angiologists, oncologists, hematologists, and geriatricians) from Italy expressed their level of agreement on each statement by using a five-point Likert scale (1: strongly disagree, 2: disagree, 3: somewhat agree, 4: agree, 5: strongly agree). Votes 1-2 were considered as disagreement, while votes 3-5 as agreement. For each statement an agreement of ≥ 66% among the respondents was considered consensus. A brief discussion about the results for each topic is also reported.