Variability of adverse events in the public health-care service of the Tuscany region

The Relationship Between Staffing, Nurses' Emotional Exhaustion, and Adverse Patient Events in Critical Care Units in Sultanate of Oman

Background: Ensuring safe practices remains a top priority for healthcare policymakers. However, limited evidence has examined the link between individual, work-related factors, and patient safety within critical care units in Oman. Aim: To assess the relationship between staffing levels, job-related emotional exhaustion, and adverse patient events among nurses working in critical care units. Design: A cross-sectional study was conducted to collect data from critical care nurses in Oman. Nurses were recruited using a stratified proportional sampling method. Results: A total of 694 critical care nurses participated in the study. More than half (64.1%) of the critical care nurses experienced higher levels of emotional exhaustion. Significant predictors of adverse patient events included nurse staffing level (r = 0.09, p < 0.001), emotional exhaustion (β = 0.25, p < 0.001), hospital type (being affiliated with nonteaching hospitals) (p=0.021), and nationality (β = -0.15, p < 0.001). Conclusion: The occurrence of nurse-reported adverse events was associated with several key variables, including nurse staffing levels, emotional exhaustion, hospital type, and nationality. Implications for Nursing Management: To improve patient safety, healthcare policymakers should prioritize optimizing nurse staffing levels and implement strategies to reduce emotional exhaustion, particularly in nonteaching hospitals and among specific nurse demographics.

Iranian midwives' experiences of using the World Health Organization's Safe Childbirth Checklist: A qualitative research

BACKGROUND

The goal of natural childbirth care is to have a healthy mother and baby with minimal interventions that are contrary to health. Worldwide, there is concern that non-evidence-based interventions and care in labor and childbirth will remain standard practice. Therefore, access to care related to pregnancy and childbirth is considered a priority. To address safety concerns during organized births, the Safe Childbirth Checklist (SCC) was created by the World Health Organization (WHO). This checklist is a tool that combines evidence-based practices that should be provided before, during, and after childbirth. As midwives have a vital role in using this up-to-date evidence, this study was conducted to explore Iranian midwives' perception of using SCC.

MATERIALS AND METHOD

This qualitative study was conducted from January 2022 to April 2023 in two public (teaching and nonteaching) hospitals in Ahvaz, Iran. Seventeen semi-structured interviews were conducted with midwives who had more than one year of work experience in maternity wards. Participants were selected purposefully. A content analysis approach was used to analyze the data and extract themes.

RESULTS

All midwives had a positive attitude toward using SCC. The midwives' reasons for being in favor of using the checklist during the clinical procedures of childbirth are summarized in four main themes, namely "standardized maternity care practices," "SCC as a guide for performing essential childbirth practices," "self-efficacy of midwifery care," and "improved maternal and neonatal outcomes."

CONCLUSION

Midwives have endorsed this checklist as a guide to standard childbirth management. It seems that the use of this checklist will help to improve the health outcomes of mothers and babies by strengthening the self-efficacy of midwives.

Implementation of a comprehensive clinical risk management system in a university hospital

BACKGROUND

Adverse events during hospital treatment are common and can lead to serious harm. This study reports the implementation of a comprehensive clinical risk management system in a university hospital and assesses the impact of clinical risk management on patient harms.

METHODS

The clinical risk management system was rolled out over a period of eight years and consisted of a training of interdisciplinary risk management teams, external and internal risk audits, and the implementation of a critical incident reporting system (CIRS). The risks identified during the audits were analyzed according to the type, severity, and implementation of preventive measures. Other key figures of the risk management system were obtained from the annual risk reports. The number of liability cases was used as primary outcome measurement.

RESULTS

Of the 1,104 risks identified during the risk audits, 56.2% were related to organization, 21.3% to documentation, 15.3% to treatment, and 7.2% to patient information and consent. The highest proportion of serious risks was found in the category organization (22.7%), the lowest in the category documentation (13.6%). Critical incident reporting identified between 241 and 370 critical incidents per year, for which in 79.5% to 83% preventive measures were implemented within twelve months. The frequency of incident reports per department correlated with the number of active risk managers and risk team meetings. Compared with the years prior to the introduction of the clinical risk management system, an average annual reduction of harms by 60.1% (95% CI: 57.1; 63.1) was observed two years after the implementation was completed. On average, the rate of harms dropped by 5% per year for each 10% increase in roll-out of the clinical risk management system (incidence rate ratio: 0.95; 95% CI: 0.93; 0.97) .

CONCLUSION

The results of this project demonstrate the effectiveness of clinical risk management in detecting treatment-related risks and in reducing harm to patients.

Nature and type of patient-reported safety incidents at a tertiary hospital in South Africa during the COVID-19 period (2018-2021)- A retrospective review

The healthcare sector in South Africa has seen a rise in medical errors and negligence adversely affecting healthcare delivery. This study aimed to determine the nature and magnitude of Patient Safety Incidents at a tertiary hospital between April 2018 to March 2021 (the COVID-19 era). A retrospective review of Patient Safety Incidents forms and clinical records of inpatients above 12 years with a reported incident were included. The overall incidence of patient safety incidents was 4.40 PSIs per 10 000 patient-days. The majority of PSIs were harmful incidents (An incident that results in harm to a patient that is related to medical management, in contrast to disease complications or underlying disease) at 72.50% [145/200], followed by no harm incidents at 18.00% [36/200] and 9.50% [19/200] near-miss incidents. The five highest incident types were clinical process/procedure [83/200; 41.50%], behaviour [49/200; 24.50%], falls [28/200; 14%], complications [20/200; 10%], and pressure sores [11/200; 5.50%]. Incidents occurred more frequently within the week (83.50%) and during day shift (67.50%). Overall, the study showed low PSI reporting rates which is an inherent challenge with voluntary reporting. Notably, there has been an increasing trend in reporting. The results reflect a reporting culture more inclined to bring awareness to incidents that have negative outcomes.

Midwives' experiences with a safe childbirth checklist: A grounded theory study

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to explore midwives' experiences with a safe childbirth checklist used in handover situations from birth to hospital discharge. Quality of care and patient safety is highly recognised and a priority within health services globally. In handover situations, checklists have proven to reduce unwanted variation by standardising processes, which in turn contribute to increased quality of care. To improve the quality of care, a safe childbirth checklist was implemented at a large maternity hospital in Norway.

DESIGN

We conducted a Glaserian grounded theory (GT) study.

SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS

A total of 16 midwives were included. We included three midwives in one focus group and conducted 13 individual interviews. Years of experience as midwives ranged from one to 30 years. All included midwives worked in a large maternity hospital in Norway.

FINDINGS

The main concern faced by the midwives who used the checklist included no common understanding of the purpose of the checklist nor consensus on how to use the checklist. The generated grounded theory, individualistic interpretation of the checklist, involved the following three strategies that all seemed to explain how the midwives solved their main concern: 1) not questioning the checklist, 2) constantly evaluating the checklist, and 3) distancing oneself from the checklist. Experiencing an unfortunate event concerning the healthcare of both mother or newborn was a condition that could alter the midwives understanding and use of the checklist.

KEY CONCLUSIONS

The findings in this study showed that a general lack of common understanding and consensus on the rationale for implementing a safe childbirth checklist led to variations between midwives in how and whether the checklist was used. The safe childbirth checklist was described as long and detailed. It was not necessarily the midwife who was expected to sign the checklist who had carried out the tasks signed for. To ensure patient safety, recommendations for future practice include securing that separate sections of a safe childbirth checklist are limited to a specific time-point and midwife.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

Findings emphasise the importance of implementation strategies supervised by the leaders of the healthcare services. Further research should explore the understanding of organisational and cultural context when implementing a safe childbirth checklist to clinical practice.

Safety Analysis of 13 Suspicious Deaths in Intensive Care: Ergonomics and Forensic Approach Compared

OBJECTIVES

Thirteen suspicious deaths occurred in an intensive care unit of Tuscany, Italy, in 2015. All patients developed sudden unexplained coagulopathy leading to severe bleeding. None of them had been prescribed heparin, but supertherapeutic concentrations of heparin were found. After a nurse was arrested on suspicion of murdering Human Factor and Ergonomics (HF/E) experts received a mandate to identify system failures. According to the judgment of the Court of First Instance on April 2019, the nurse was found guilty.

METHODS

The HF/E group used a two-pronged safety analysis: understanding the conditions in which the healthcare practitioners were working in the period when the suspicious deaths emerged and reviewing the clinical records.

RESULTS

Fourteen patients admitted to the intensive care unit in 2014 and 2015 were selected on the basis of markedly abnormal coagulation tests (n = 13) or a family member's complaint (n = 1). In 13 cases, a massive, abrupt hemorrhage in the presence of an unexpected abnormality of coagulation tests occurred, whereas the fourteenth patient had the only prolongation of coagulation markers without bleeding. All cases examined classified as adverse events related to a coagulation disorder. Human factor and ergonomics analysis identified a number of latent and active failures that contributed to the event and provided a set of important recommendations for safety improvement.

CONCLUSIONS

When presented with a manifest, albeit suspected, wrongdoing with lethal consequences for patients, forensic investigators and safety investigators have distinctly different goals and methods. We believe that a memorandum of understanding between HF/E and forensic investigative teams provides an operative framework for allowing co-existence and fosters collaboration. The pursuit of safe care as a new emerging right for patients and balancing the right to legal justice with the right to safer healthcare merit further investigation and discussion.

Applicability of the Disruptions in Surgery Index in the Cardiovascular Management Scenarios - A Marker for Developing Functionally Efficient Teams

Introduction

To support the development of practices and guidelines that might help to reduce adverse events related to human factors, we aimed to study the response and perception by members of a cardiovascular surgery team of various error-driven or adverse features that might arise in the operating room (OR).

Methods

A previously validated Disruptions in Surgery Index (DiSI) questionnaire was completed by individuals working together in a cardiovascular surgical unit. Results were submitted to reliability analysis by calculating the Cronbach’s alpha coefficient. Non-parametric Kruskal-Wallis test and Dunn’s post-test were performed to estimate differences in perceptions of adverse events or outcomes between the groups (surgeons, nurses, anesthesiologists, and technicians). P<0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

Cronbach’s alpha reliability coefficients showed consistency within the recommended range for all disruption types assessed in DiSI: an individual’s skill (0.85), OR environment (0.88), communication (0.81), situational awareness (0.92), patient-related disruption (0.89), team cohesion (0.83), and organizational disruption (0.83). Nurses (27.4%) demonstrated significantly higher perception of disruptions than surgeons (25.4%), anesthetists (23.3%), and technicians (23.0%) (P=0.005). Study participants were more observant of their colleagues’ disruptive behaviors than their own (P=0.0001).

Conclusion

Our results revealed that there is a tendency among participants to hold a positive self-perception position. DiSI appears to be a reliable and useful tool to assess surgical disruptions in cardiovascular OR teams, identifying negative features that might imperil teamwork and safety in the OR. And human factors training interventions are available to develop team skills and improve safety and efficiency in the cardiovascular OR.

Proactive Risk Assessment through FMEA of Home Parenteral Nutrition Care Processes: A Survey Analysis

BACKGROUND

Home Parenteral Nutrition (HPN) is a lifesaving clinical care process. However, undetected hazards and vulnerabilities in care transitions from hospital to community care may pose risk to patient's safety. Avoidable complications and adverse events may hinder the benefits of treatment.

OBJECTIVE

The analysis carried out aims at framing through Human Factors and Ergonomics (HF/E) the critical issues for patient safety related to clinical care practices for HPN in healthcare organization.

METHODS

We present the results of a proactive risk assessment analysis based on the FMEA methodology (Failure Mode and Effects Analysis) carried out in three different areas of the regional health care system of Tuscany, Italy. The clinical risk management and patient safety unit assessed the risk perception of Healthcare Workers (HWs) in regard to patient safety and situational awareness throughout the HPN patient journey.

RESULTS

The analysis revealed heterogeneity in the Risk Priority Index (RPI) expressed by HWs. A lower RPI is associated with a HPN process that deploys in continuity between hospital care and community care. A higher RPI is associated with a quality and safety improvement process that is still ongoing. We also observed HWs expressing low RPI in the areas of the region where HPN has a hospital- focused approach and has limited adherence to patient safety requirements. Low RPI for HPN process may relate both to extensively deployed continuity of care and to jeopardized awareness on HPN phases and coordination. The analysis carried out enabled the definition of a common HPN workflow used as reference schema allowing for the definition of a set of recommendations for improving the quality and safety of the care processes. Moreover, the outcome of the proactive risk assessment laid the groundwork for the advancement of the patient safety regional requirements.

CONCLUSION

The analysis had the role of promoting the contextualization of the culture of quality and safety within the HPN process resulting in an improved awareness of the criticalities and the role of nutrition units throughout the care process.

[Adverse events in a Tunisian university hospital: incidence and risk factors]

OBJECTIVE

To determine the incidence and risk factors of adverse events (AE) in a Tunisian university hospital.

METHOD

We carried out a longitudinal observational study in 2016 over a period of 3&#160;months in the Sahloul university hospital of Sousse, Tunisia. Data were collected using a pretested form filled by doctors previously trained in the collection methodology, upon each visit to all hospitalized patients.

RESULTS

Overall, 1,357&#160;patients were eligible. We identified 168&#160;AEs in 131&#160;patients with AEs incidence of 12.4% (95% CI: [7.41 &#8211; 17.38]), and patient incidence of 9.7% (95% CI: [4.63 &#8211; 14.76]). The incidence density of AEs was 1.8&#160;events per 100&#160;days of hospitalization. Hospital acquired infection and unplanned readmission related to previous healthcare management were the most common AEs (43.4 and 12.5% respectively). Multivariate analysis revealed as independent factors of AEs: surgery (P&#160;= 0.013; RR&#160;=&#160;1.68; CI: [1.11-2.54]), the use of central-venous-catheter (P&#160;&lt;&#160;10&#8211;3; RR&#160;=&#160;4.1&#160;; CI: [2.1-8]), tracheotomy (P&#160;=&#160;0.001; RR&#160;=&#160;21.8; CI: [3.7-127.8]), transfusion (P&#160;= 0.014; RR&#160;=&#160;2.1; CI: [1.16-3.87]) and drug intake (P&#160;= 0.04; RR&#160;=&#160;2.2; CI:&#160;[1.04-4.7]).

CONCLUSION

The present study showed a high incidence of AEs and the involvement of invasive devices in their occurrence. Thus, targeted interventions are needed.

Care complexity individual factors associated with adverse events and in-hospital mortality

Introduction

Measuring the impact of care complexity on health outcomes, based on psychosocial, biological and environmental circumstances, is important in order to detect predictors of early deterioration of inpatients. We aimed to identify care complexity individual factors associated with selected adverse events and in-hospital mortality.

Methods

A multicenter, case-control study was carried out at eight public hospitals in Catalonia, Spain, from January 1, 2016 to December 31, 2017. All adult patients admitted to a ward or a step-down unit were evaluated. Patients were divided into the following groups based on the presence or absence of three adverse events (pressure ulcers, falls or aspiration pneumonia) and in-hospital mortality. The 28 care complexity individual factors were classified in five domains (developmental, mental-cognitive, psycho-emotional, sociocultural and comorbidity/complications). Adverse events and complexity factors were retrospectively reviewed by consulting patients’ electronic health records. Multivariate logistic analysis was performed to identify factors associated with an adverse event and in-hospital mortality.

Results

A total of 183,677 adult admissions were studied. Of these, 3,973 (2.2%) patients experienced an adverse event during hospitalization (1,673 [0.9%] pressure ulcers; 1,217 [0.7%] falls and 1,236 [0.7%] aspiration pneumonia). In-hospital mortality was recorded in 3,996 patients (2.2%). After adjustment for potential confounders, the risk factors independently associated with both adverse events and in-hospital mortality were: mental status impairments, impaired adaptation, lack of caregiver support, old age, major chronic disease, hemodynamic instability, communication disorders, urinary or fecal incontinence, vascular fragility, extreme weight, uncontrolled pain, male sex, length of stay and admission to a medical ward. High-tech hospital admission was associated with an increased risk of adverse events and a reduced risk of in-hospital mortality. The area under the ROC curve for both outcomes was > 0.75 (95% IC: 0.78–0.83).

Conclusions

Several care complexity individual factors were associated with adverse events and in-hospital mortality. Prior identification of complexity factors may have an important effect on the early detection of acute deterioration and on the prevention of poor outcomes.

New Rules on Patient's Safety and Professional Liability for the Italian Health Service

BACKGROUND

The phenomenon of clinical negligence claims has rapidly spread to United States, Canada and Europe assuming the dimensions and the severity of a pandemia. Consequently, the issues related to medical malpractice need to be studied from a transnational perspective since they raise similar problems in different legal systems.

METHODS

Over the last two decades, medical liability has become a prominent issue in healthcare policy and a major concern for healthcare economics in Italy. The failures of the liability system and the high cost of healthcare have led to considerable legislative activity concerning medical malpractice liability, and a law was enacted in 2012 (Law no. 189/2012), known as the "Balduzzi Law".

RESULTS

The law tackles the mounting concern over litigation related to medical malpractice and calls for Italian physicians to follow guidelines. Briefly, the law provided for the decriminalisation of simple negligence of a physician on condition that he/she followed the guidelines and "good medical practice" while carrying out his/her duties, whilst the obligation for compensation, as defined by the Italian Civil Code, remained. Judges had to consider that the physician followed the provisions of the guidelines but nevertheless caused injury to the patient.

CONCLUSION

However, since the emission of the law, thorny questions remain which have attracted renewed interest and criticism both in the Italian courts and legal literature. Since then, several bills have been presented on the topic and these have been merged into a single text entitled "Regulations for healthcare and patient safety and for the professional responsibility of healthcare providers".