NOAC in "real world" patients with atrial fibrillation in Italy: results from the ISPAF-2 (Indagine Sicoa Paziente Con Fibrillazione Atriale) survey study

Effectiveness and Safety of Non-Vitamin K Oral Anticoagulants in Non-Valvular Atrial Fibrillation Patients: Results of A Real-World Study in a Metropolitan Area of Northern Italy

BACKGROUND

New oral anticoagulant agents (NOACs) are valid alternatives for vitamin K antagonists (VKA) in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) for stroke prevention. In clinical practice, NOACs users may differ from patients enrolled in clinical trials in age or comorbidities, and thus it is a critical issue to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of NOACs in the real-world. Accordingly, we assessed two-year overall mortality and hospital admissions for myocardial infarction, stroke or bleeding in patients with NVAF users of NOACs compared to warfarin-treated patients.

METHODS

This is a population-based retrospective new user active comparator study. All atrial fibrillation patients who were naïve and not switcher users of oral anticoagulants from January 2017 to December 2019 were included (n = 8543). Data were obtained from the electronic health records of the Milan Agency for Health Protection, Italy. Two-year risks for overall mortality, myocardial infarction, stroke and bleeding were computed using Cox models. Age, sex, number of comorbidities, use of platelet aggregation inhibitors and Proton pump inhibitors and area of residence were used as confounding factors. We also controlled by indication bias-weighting NOACs and warfarin users based on the weights computed by a Kernel propensity score.

RESULTS

For all NOACs, we found a decrease in the risks compared with warfarin for mortality (from -25% to -49%), hospitalization for myocardial infarction (from -16% to -27%, statistically significant for apixaban, edoxaban and rivaroxaban) and ischemic stroke (from -23% to -41%, significant for dabigatran and apixaban). The risk of bleeding was decreased for rivaroxaban (-33%) and numerically but not significantly for the other NOACs.

CONCLUSIONS

After two years of follow-up, in comparison with warfarin, NOACs users showed a significant reduction of overall mortality (all NOACs), hospital admission for myocardial infarction (apixaban and edoxaban), ischemic stroke (dabigatran) and bleeding (rivaroxaban).

Atrial fibrillation pattern and factors affecting the progression to permanent atrial fibrillation

Atrial fibrillation (AF) may progress from a non-permanent to a permanent form, and improvement in prediction may help in decision-making. In- and outpatients with non-permanent AF were enrolled in a prospective study and followed every 6 months. At baseline, 314 out of 523 patients (60%) had non-permanent AF (25.5% paroxysmal AF, 52.5% persistent, 2% first diagnosed AF). They were mostly males (188, 59.9%), median age 71 years [interquartile range (IQ) 62-77], median CHA₂DS₂VASc 3 (IQ 1-4), median HATCH score 1 (IQ 1-2). During a follow-up of 701 (IQ 437-902) days, 66 patients (21%) developed permanent AF. CHA₂DS₂VASc and HATCH scores were incrementally associated with AF progression (p for trend CHA₂DS₂VASc < 0.001, HATCH p = 0.001). Cox multivariable proportional hazard regression analysis showed that age [hazard ratio (HR) 1.042; 95%CI 1.005-1.080; p = 0.025], moderate-severe left atrial (LA) enlargement at echo (HR 2.072, 95%CI, 1.121-3.831; p = 0.020), antiarrhythmics drugs (HR 0.087, 95%CI 0.011-0.659, p = 0.018), EHRA score > 2 (HR 0.358, 95%CI 0.162-0.791, p = 0.011) and valvular disease (HR 2.196, 95%CI 1.072-4.499, p = 0.032) were significantly associated with AF progression. Adding "moderate-severe LA dilation" to clinical scores, eg. HATCH score (HATCH-LA) with 2 points (Cox multivariable regression analysis) improved prediction of AF progression vs. HATCH score (p = 0.0225). In patients without permanent AF, progression of AF was independently associated with age, LA dilation, AF symptoms severity, antiarrhythmic drugs and valvular disease. Adding LA dilation (moderate-severe volume increase) to clinical scores improved prediction of progression to permanent AF.

Self-report instruments for assessing adherence to warfarin therapy: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

The assessment of adherence to warfarin therapy is useful in clinical practice due to its wide variability in dose-response and risks of complications. The aim of this study was to investigate validated instruments used to assess adherence to warfarin therapy.

METHODS

Information was collected from the MEDLINE (PubMed), LILACS, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases. Search strategies were applied for each database, with no time limit or language restriction. Inclusion criteria consisted of study participants of ≥ 18 years of age, from both sexes, on chronic anticoagulation with warfarin for any indication and the use of validated instruments to assess adherence to warfarin therapy. Exclusion criteria consisted of duplicate articles, narrative or systematic reviews, and meta-analyses, as well as case reports/series and experimental studies involving animals. Two independent reviewers performed the following steps: evaluation of titles/abstracts, selection of studies after full reading, data extraction, and evaluation of potential bias. Discrepancies were resolved by a third reviewer.

RESULTS

Overall, 19 articles were selected for this systematic review, including 17 cross-sectional studies, one cohort study, and one quasi-experimental study, published from 2009 to 2019. The validated instruments identified in this review were Morisky Medication Adherence Scale (MMAS), the eight-item Morisky Medication Adherence Scale (MMAS-8), Measurement of Treatment Adherence (MTA), and Brief Medication Questionnaire (BMQ). Only MMAS-8 was tested for reliability, using the internal consistency assessment, with Cronbach's α range 0.56-0.71.

CONCLUSIONS

This review highlighted a gap in knowledge regarding the scarcity of validated instruments to assess adherence to warfarin therapy. Limitations were found in instruments that comprised the assessment of the isolated use of medication and the lack of analysis of other relevant therapeutic aspects. Future studies are needed to develop and validate more comprehensive instruments in an attempt to assess adherence to warfarin therapy.

PROSPERO

Registration number CRD42019128324.

Different Risk Profiles of European Patients Using Direct Oral Anticoagulants or Vitamin K Antagonists: a Rapid Review

Purpose of Review

We investigated the risk profiles of patients using direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) or vitamin K antagonists (VKA) in European cohort studies to estimate the importance of potential (measured or unmeasured) confounding factors in analyses comparing these drugs. We searched MEDLINE and EMBASE (2008–2018) for relevant studies and extracted information on age, sex, comorbidity, Charlson comorbidity index, HAS-BLED score (assessing risk of bleeding) and CHA2DS2-VASc score (assessing risk of stroke).

Recent Findings

Overall, 66 studies with 2,808,757 patients were included. Most patients were from France (37%), Denmark (24%) and Germany (23%). In 56 studies (85%), the focus was on patients with atrial fibrillation. Of the 43 studies comparing DOAC with VKA users, 33% reported a higher and 16% a lower age of DOAC compared with VKA users. The mean age varied by about 1 year in most of these studies. Rivaroxaban was used in the widest age range. Patients with DOAC more often had a history of stroke or bleedings, and patients with VKA more often had a history of diabetes, renal failure, cancer, heart failure or other heart diseases. Most studies did not observe differences regarding the HAS-BLED score or the CHA2DS2-VASc score between groups.

Summary

Our review suggests that there are relevant differences in the risk profiles of DOAC versus VKA users and between users of individual DOACs. Reported HAS-BLED or CHA2DS2-VASc scores did not reflect these differences. These patterns require careful consideration in the interpretation of observational studies comparing the effectiveness and the risks of these drugs, also when comparing the results of studies conducted in different countries.

Quality of life after switching from well-controlled vitamin K antagonist to direct oral anticoagulant: Little to GAInN

BACKGROUND

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) and vitamin K antagonists (VKA) prevent thromboembolism in atrial fibrillation (AF). DOAC have a fixed dosing regimen and obviate INR monitoring. Therefore, DOAC presumably affect quality of life (QoL) less than VKA. However, some VKA users appreciate the monitoring. A high time in the therapeutic range (TTR) leads to a lower impact on QoL. We assessed the influence of switching from well-controlled VKA to a DOAC on QoL.

METHODS

In the GAInN study, 241 patients with AF, a TTR ≥ 70%, and neither bleeding nor thrombosis while on VKA were randomised to switching to DOAC (n = 121) or continuing VKA (n = 120). Health-related (SF-36) and anticoagulation-related QoL (PACT-Q) was assessed at baseline and after six and twelve months of follow-up.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSION

SF-36 development did not differ between groups. After one year, average PACT-Q Convenience improvement was 2.5 (0.3-4.7) higher on DOAC. DOAC users were 6percentage points (95%CI -4-16) more likely to improve >5 points on Convenience; 22 pp. (95%CI 1-43) in patients who scored <95/100 at baseline. The probability to meaningfully improve on PACT-Q Satisfaction was 12 pp. (95%CI 0-25) higher on DOAC. However, 5 (4.1%) and 4 (3.3%) DOAC users resumed VKA because of side-effects and patient preference. Switching from well-controlled VKA to DOAC for AF leads to a higher probability of improved PACT-Q convenience and satisfaction, but also to a higher risk of side-effects. Arguably only patients who are not satisfied with VKA should switch, because they have more to gain by switching.

Sex-related differences in prevalence, treatment and outcomes in patients with atrial fibrillation

To analyze sex-related differences about AF prevalence, use of OAC and outcomes focusing on the older age classes. We used administrative data of the Lombardy Region, describing period prevalence, use of OAC and outcomes from 2002 to 2014 for all patients diagnosed with AF. AF prevalence over the 2002-2014 period was higher in males than in females (2.7% vs. 2.1%, p < 0.001), increasing with age. From 2003 to 2014, not treated AF patients decreased mostly in males (from 40.3 to 33.7% with respect to 43.7-39.8% in females). Age-stratified adjusted logistic regression analysis found that females were more likely treated with OAC when < 65 years in 2003 (OR 1.51, 95% CI 1.35-1.69) and in 2014 (OR 1.32, 95% CI 1.13-1.53); contrariwise, were less likely treated with OAC when age ≥ 75 years, in 2003 (OR 0.92, 95% CI 0.86-0.98) and in 2014 (OR 0.77, 95% CI 0.72-0.81).Adjusted Cox regression analysis confirmed that female AF patients had a higher risk of stroke (HR 1.18, 95% CI 1.14-1.21) and a lower risk of major bleeding (HR 0.83, 95% CI 0.80-0.86), while, had a lower risk for all-cause death (HR 0.82, 95% CI 0.80-0.83). AF prevalence was higher in male than in female patients, while thromboembolic risk was higher in female. Older female patients were under-treated with OAC particularly in recent years. Over long-term follow-up, female had a higher risk of stroke and a lower risk of major bleeding and all-cause death.

Is delayed cardioversion the better approach in recent-onset atrial fibrillation? No

Symptomatic atrial fibrillation (AF) is a common cause of emergency department (ED) referrals. In case of hemodynamic stability, the choice to either perform early cardioversion (pharmacologic or electrical) or to prescribe rate-lowering drugs and differ any attempts to restore sinus rhythm (i.e., wait-and-see approach) has been widely debated. Results of the recent Rate Control versus Electrical Cardioversion Trial 7-Acute Cardioversion versus Wait and See (RACE 7 ACWAS) have been considered a strong argument in favor of the wait-and-see approach. In this debate, we discuss several issues that would support early cardioversion, ranging from patients' satisfaction and costs to concerns about safety. Furthermore, the wait-and-see approach may translate into a missed opportunity to encourage widespread use of a "pill-in-the-pocket" home treatment: this underused option could allow rapid solving of many AF episodes, potentially avoiding future ED referrals. Our opinion is that a delayed cardioversion may introduce unneeded complications in the straightforward management of a common clinical problem. Therefore, early cardioversion should continue to be the preferred option because of its proven efficacy, safety and convenience.

Real-world 2-year outcome of atrial fibrillation treatment with dabigatran, apixaban, and rivaroxaban in patients with and without chronic kidney disease

Patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) and chronic kidney disease (CKD) are at increased risk of stroke and bleeding. Although direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) trials excluded patients with severe CKD, a growing portion of CKD patients have been starting DOACs and limited data from real-world outcome in this high-risk setting are available. The INSigHT registry included 632 consecutive NVAF patients that started apixaban (256 patients, 41%), dabigatran (245, 39%) and rivaroxaban (131, 20%) between 2012 and 2015. Based on creatinine clearance, two sub-cohorts were defined: (1) non-CKD group (CrCl 60-89 mL/min, 413 patients) and (2) CKD group (15-59 ml/min, 219). Compared to non-CKD patients, those with CKD, were at higher ischemic (CHA₂DS₂-VASc 4.5 vs 2.9, p < 0.001) and hemorrhagic risk (HAS-BLED 2.4 vs 1.8, p < 0.001). At 2-year follow-up, the overall ISTH-major bleeding and thromboembolic event rates were 5.2% and 2.3% and no significant difference between non-CKD and CKD patients for both efficacy and safety endpoints were observed. In non-CKD patients, the 2-year ISTH-major bleeding rates were higher in rivaroxaban group (HR 2.9, 95% CI 1.1-7.3; p = 0.047) while dabigatran showed non-significant excess in thromboembolic events (HR 4.3, 95% CI 0.9-20.8; p = 0.068). In CKD patients, a significantly higher rate of thromboembolic events was observed in rivaroxaban (HR 6.3, 95% CI 1.1-38.1; p = 0.044). This real-world, non-insurance database registry shows remarkable 2-year safety and efficacy profile of DOACs even in patients with moderate to severe CKD. Head to head differences between DOACs are exploratory, hypothesis generating and warrant further investigation in larger studies.