Is there a role for lumbar puncture in early detection of subarachnoid hemorrhage after negative head CT?

Epidemiological trends of subarachnoid hemorrhage at global, regional, and national level: a trend analysis study from 1990 to 2021

BACKGROUND

Subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) is a subtype of hemorrhagic stroke characterized by high mortality and low rates of full recovery. This study aimed to investigate the epidemiological characteristics of SAH between 1990 and 2021.

METHODS

Data on SAH incidence, mortality, and disability-adjusted life-years (DALYs) from 1990 to 2021 were obtained from the Global Burden of Disease Study (GBD) 2021. Estimated annual percentage changes (EAPCs) were calculated to evaluate changes in the age-standardized rate (ASR) of incidence and mortality, as well as trends in SAH burden. The relationship between disease burden and sociodemographic index (SDI) was also analyzed.

RESULTS

In 2021, the incidence of SAH was found to be 37.09% higher than that in 1990; however, the age-standardized incidence rates (ASIRs) showed a decreased [EAPC: -1.52; 95% uncertainty interval (UI) -1.66 to -1.37]. Furthermore, both the number and rates of deaths and DALYs decreased over time. It was observed that females had lower rates compared to males. Among all regions, the high-income Asia Pacific region exhibited the highest ASIR (14.09/100,000; 95% UI 12.30/100,000 - 16.39/100,000) in 2021, with an EPAC for ASIR < 0 indicating decreasing trend over time for SAH ASIR. Oceania recorded the highest age-standardized mortality rates (ASMRs) and age-standardized DALYs rates among all regions in 2021 at values of respectively 8.61 (95% UI 6.03 - 11.95) and 285.62 (95% UI 209.42 - 379.65). The burden associated with SAH primarily affected individuals aged between 50 - 69 years old. Metabolic risks particularly elevated systolic blood pressure were identified as the main risk factors contributing towards increased disease burden associated with SAH when compared against environmental or occupational behavioral risks evaluated within the GBD framework.

CONCLUSIONS

The burden of SAH varies by gender, age group, and geographical region. Although the ASRs have shown a decline over time, the burden of SAH remains significant, especially in regions with middle and low-middle SDI levels. High systolic blood pressure stands out as a key risk factor for SAH. More specific supportive measures are necessary to alleviate the global burden of SAH.

Lumbar puncture-verified subarachnoid hemorrhage: bleeding sources, need of radiological examination, and functional recovery

BACKGROUND

The primary aim was to determine the diagnostic yield of vascular work-up, the clinical course during neurointensive care (NIC), and rate of functional recovery for patients with computed tomography (CT)-negative, lumbar puncture (LP)-verified SAH.

METHODS

In this retrospective study, 1280 patients with spontaneous SAH, treated at our NIC unit, Uppsala University Hospital, Sweden, between 2008 and 2018, were included. Demography, admission status, radiological examinations (CT angiography (CTA) and digital subtraction angiography (DSA)), treatments, and functional outcome (GOS-E) at 12 months were evaluated.

RESULTS

Eighty (6%) out of 1280 SAH patients were computed tomography (CT)-negative, LP-verified cases. Time between ictus and diagnosis was longer for the LP-verified SAH cohort in comparison to the CT-positive patients (median 3 vs 0 days, p < 0.001). One fifth of the LP-verified SAH patients exhibited an underlying vascular pathology (aneurysm/AVM), which was significantly less common than for the CT-verified SAH cohort (19% vs. 76%, p < 0.001). The CTA- and DSA-findings were consistent in all of the LP-verified cases. The LP-verified SAH patients exhibited a lower rate of delayed ischemic neurological deficits, but no difference in rebleeding rate, compared to the CT-verified cohort. At 1-year post-ictus, 89% of the LP-verified SAH patients had recovered favorably, but 45% of the cases did not reach good recovery. Having an underlying vascular pathology and an external ventricular drainage were associated with worse functional recovery (p = 0.02) in this cohort.

CONCLUSIONS

LP-verified SAH constituted a small proportion of the entire SAH population. Having an underlying vascular pathology was less frequent in this cohort, but still occurred in one out of five patients. Despite the small initial bleeding in the LP-verified cohort, many of these patients did not reach good recovery at 1 year, this calls for more attentive follow-up and rehabilitation in this cohort.

Subarachnoid hemorrhage in the emergency department

BACKGROUND

Subarachnoid hemorrhage accounts for more than 30,000 cases of stroke annually in North America and encompasses a 4.4% mortality rate. Since a vast number of subarachnoid hemorrhage cases present in a younger population and can range from benign to severe, an accurate diagnosis is imperative to avoid premature morbidity and mortality. Here, we present a straightforward approach to evaluating, risk stratifying, and managing subarachnoid hemorrhages in the emergency department for the emergency medicine physician.

DISCUSSION

The diversities of symptom presentation should be considered before proceeding with diagnostic modalities for subarachnoid hemorrhage. Once a subarachnoid hemorrhage is suspected, a computed tomography of the head with the assistance of the Ottawa subarachnoid hemorrhage rule should be utilized as an initial diagnostic measure. If further investigation is needed, a CT angiography of the head or a lumbar puncture can be considered keeping risks and limitations in mind. Initiating timely treatment is essential following diagnosis to help mitigate future complications. Risk tools can be used to assess the complications for which the patient is at greatest.

CONCLUSION

Subarachnoid hemorrhages are frequently misdiagnosed; therefore, we believe it is imperative to address the diagnosis and initiation of early management in the emergency medicine department to minimize poor outcomes in the future.

Acute headache management in emergency department. A narrative review

Headache is a significant reason for access to Emergency Departments (ED) worldwide. Though primary forms represent the vast majority, the life-threatening potential of secondary forms, such as subarachnoid hemorrage or meningitis, makes it imperative for the ED physician to rule out secondary headaches as first step, based on clinical history, careful physical (especially neurological) examination and, if appropriate, hematochemical analyses, neuroimaging or lumbar puncture. Once secondary forms are excluded, distinction among primary forms should be performed, based on the international headache classification criteria. Most frequent primary forms motivating ED observation are acute migraine attacks, particularly status migrainous, and cluster headache. Though universally accepted guidelines do not exist for headache management in an emergency setting, pharmacological parenteral treatment remains the principal approach worldwide, with NSAIDs, neuroleptic antinauseants, triptans and corticosteroids, tailored to the specific headache type. Opioids should be avoided, for their scarce effectiveness in the acute phase, while IV hydration should be limited in cases of ascertained dehydration. Referral of the patient to a Headache Center should subsequently be an integral part of the ED approach to the headache patients, being ascertained that lack of this referral involves a high rate of relapse and new accesses to the ED. More controlled studies are needed to establish specific protocols of management for the headache patient in the ED.