The impact of an outpatient parenteral antibiotic therapy (OPAT) clinic for adults with cellulitis: an interrupted time series study

Outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy with continuous infusion of meropenem: A retrospective analysis of three years of clinical experience

INTRODUCTION

Data regarding outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy (OPAT) with continuous infusion of meropenem (CIM) remain scarce and controversial. We aimed to analyze its outcomes.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective analysis of a cohort of patients who received OPAT with CIM during a three-year period at a single center in northwest Spain. Demographics, clinical data and OPAT outcomes were recorded.

RESULTS

Since January 2017-December 2019, 34 patients received 35 OPAT episodes with CIM. The median age was 75 years, and 18 (51.4%) had a Charlson comorbidity index>2. Twelve (34.3%) had respiratory infection, 11 (31.4%) urinary tract infection, and 12 (34.3%) other infections. Twenty-one (60%) received a dose of 6g/day, and 27 (77.1%) received combined antibiotic therapy. The duration of OPAT with CIM was 10 median days. Pseudomonas aeruginosa was the most frequently (34.3%) isolated microorganism and 10 (28.6%) infections were polymicrobial. During OPAT and hospital at home unit admission, 4 (11.4%) patients had any adverse reaction that required CIM withdrawal, 2 (5.7%) were readmitted, and 3 (8.8%) died (2 infection-related deaths). After 30 days from discharge 6 (18.8%) of 32 not-censored patients had unplanned readmissions (2 infection-related), 6 (18.8%) developed recurrence (3 relapses, 3 reinfections) and 1 (3.1%) died (none-infection-related death). Twenty-three (71.9%) of these 32 patients did not experience unplanned readmission, recurrence or death.

CONCLUSION

CIM can be an option to be administrated in OPAT programs in selected patients. Further studies are warranted to increase evidence regarding its use, and to externally validate our findings.

Outpatient parenteral antibiotic therapy (OPAT) and inpatient treatment strategies for emergency department patients with cellulitis: a cost analysis

OBJECTIVES

Emergency department (ED) patients with cellulitis requiring intravenous antibiotics may be treated via outpatient parenteral antibiotic therapy (OPAT) as opposed to hospitalization. The primary objective was to compare healthcare costs for the following strategies: community intravenous antibiotics with referral to an OPAT clinic operated by infectious disease specialists ('OPAT clinic' strategy); community intravenous antibiotics with return to ED if necessary ('return to ED' strategy); and hospital admission.

METHODS

Using a hospital administrative database, we conducted a cost analysis using patient-level data of adult cellulitis patients presenting to two tertiary care EDs and were treated with intravenous antibiotics in one of three ways: OPAT clinic strategy; return to ED strategy; and hospital admission. Costs were estimated from Canada's publicly funded health system perspective. The primary outcome was the mean total cost (2015 CAD) per patient for each treatment strategy. A generalized linear model was performed to adjust for baseline characteristics, including age, sex and comorbidities.

RESULTS

A total of 808 patients met inclusion criteria: OPAT clinic strategy (N = 341); return to ED strategy (N = 228) and hospital admission (N = 239). The mean total cost of care for the treatment strategies were: OPAT clinic: $2170 (95% CI $1905-$2436); return to ED: $1493 (95 %CI $1264-$1722); and hospital admission: $10,145 (95% CI $8668-$11,622). Results from the regression analysis suggested that the OPAT clinic strategy was associated with a cost-saving of $7394 (95% CI $6154-$8633, p < 0.001) compared to hospital admission and an increased cost of $651 (95% CI $367-$935, p < 0.001) when compared to the return to ED approach.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first Canadian study that compares the cost of different OPAT strategies for cellulitis patients. While both OPAT strategies are safe and far less costly than hospital admission, our findings suggest that a dedicated OPAT clinic for patients with cellulitis is more expensive than the return to ED strategy.

Evaluate the Effectiveness of Outpatient Parenteral Antimicrobial Therapy (OPAT) Program in Saudi Arabia: A Retrospective Study

(1) Background: Outpatient parenteral antibiotic therapy (OPAT) is a well-established and cost-effective measure that improves the efficient use of healthcare resources and increases bed availability. Only limited published data is available to illustrate OPAT implementation and outcomes in Saudi Arabia. The main objective of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of OPAT in a tertiary center in Saudi Arabia. (2) Methods: In this retrospective study, clinical charts of enrolled patients were reviewed in a tertiary care center from the initial month of November 2017 to March 2020. All admitted patients with a central line and who enrolled in the OPAT of the hospital during this study period were included. The primary outcome was the 30-days readmission rate of OPAT patients. Secondary outcomes were factors associated with OPAT failure. Descriptive analysis of the data was used to express the results. (3) Results: We enrolled 90 patients; 54 (60%) were male; the mean age was 55.16 (±17.7) years old. The mean duration of the antimicrobial treatment was 21.9 (+24.6) days. All patients completed the intended course of therapy. Ertapenem was the most frequently used antimicrobial (43%), followed by vancomycin (11.2%). Urinary tract infections (UTIs) are some of the most common bacterial infections in 25 patients (26.9%), followed by osteomyelitis in 16 patients (17.2%). Extended-spectrum beta-lactamase E.coli was the highest common isolated microorganism (44.9%), followed by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus MRSA (16.9%). The readmission to the hospital during therapy was required for 12 patients (13.3%). Shifting from hospital care to OPAT care resulted in cost savings of 18 million SAR in the overall assessment period and avoided a total of 1984 patient days of hospitalization. (4) Conclusion: The findings have shown that OPAT therapy was effective with minimum hospital readmissions and therapy complications. OPAT programs can reduce healthcare costs and should be integrated into practice.