Appearance of bronchioloalveolar carcinoma and the rapid progression into invasive papillary adenocarcinoma

A decrease in the size of ground glass nodules may indicate the optimal timing for curative surgery

OBJECTIVES

Although ground glass nodules (GGNs) are generally considered to grow slowly to a large size, their natural progression remains unclear, and a decrease in tumor size has been reported in a few previous studies. The study aimed to retrospectively review the radiologic and pathological characteristics of resected ground glass nodules (GGNs) followed with chest computed tomography (CT) for at least a year before surgery to clarify the natural progression of GGNs.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The chest CT cans and clinical charts of 32 GGNs in 31 patients who underwent pulmonary resection between January 2006 and March 2013 were retrospectively reviewed. The definitions of pure GGNs and part-solid nodules were based on the tumor shadow disappearance rate. The tumor size was measured twice, and the mean size was used for evaluation.

RESULTS

The mean GGN size before surgery was 15.2 mm, and the median follow-up period before surgery was 21 months. In the follow-up period, 15 (58%) of 26 pure GGNs at the initial CT remained pure GGNs at the last CT. However, a solid component appeared in the remaining 11 tumors (42%) of the 26 initial pure GGNs. Furthermore, 1 GGN of the 15 GGNs that remained pure and 10 of the 11 GGNs with solid component also showed a size decrease. In addition, 6 part-solid nodules were observed at the initial CT. Of these, 3 showed a decrease in size during follow-up. Overall, 47% of the GGNs showed a size reduction on follow-up chest CT.

CONCLUSIONS

A size reduction was observed in nearly half of the GGNs and suggested the progression to an invasive adenocarcinoma. When a mild collapse of the GGNs is observed, a careful follow-up is necessary to identify a solid component. Tumor size decreases may represent the optimal timing of pulmonary resection for curative treatment.

Lesions in patients with multifocal adenocarcinoma are more frequently in the right upper lobes

OBJECTIVES

Opportunities to treat multifocal lung cancers, mostly adenocarcinoma, are increasing due to the development of imaging technologies. The optimal therapy modality to treat multifocally growing lung cancers remains obscure. To determine the features of multifocal lung cancers, we retrospectively reviewed patients with multiple lung lesions.

METHODS

Clinical, pathological and genetic characteristics of 31 patients with multifocal lesions were compared with those of patients who had had radical lung resection for solitary lung cancer. Gene mutation analyses for EGFR, KRAS and P53 were performed on three tumours of each of the patients who had four or more lesions.

RESULTS

Of the 31 patients, 17 had double tumours, 4 had triple tumours and 10 had 4 or more lesions. Patients with four or more lesions were significantly more likely to be females and never smokers. All of the histologically confirmed tumours of the cases with four or more lesions were adenocarcinoma in situ or lepidic predominant adenocarcinoma. The number of lesions in the right upper lobes when compared with the right lower lobes was significantly higher in patients with four or more lesions than in patients with double or triple lesions (P = 0.013). Five of the 12 tumours were positive for the EGFR mutation L858R in exon 21. No KRAS mutation was found.

CONCLUSIONS

Lesions in patients with multifocal adenocarcinoma are more frequently in the right upper lobes. Genetic analysis suggested that the specific EGFR mutation L858R in exon 21 might be the main factor contributing to lung carcinogenesis in multiple lung cancers. Further investigation of the right upper lobe in those patients compared with the lower lobes might provide more insights into lung carcinogenesis.

Approach to the ground-glass nodule

The detection of ground-glass opacity (GGO) is increasingly common. Sufficient data have been accumulated to formulate recommendations for observation, intervention, and treatment modalities. However, an understanding of many nuances and uncertainties in the available data is needed to avoid making management errors. This article discusses the range of possible entities, risk factors and characteristics that help make a presumptive clinical diagnosis, how often and for how long these should be followed when and how a biopsy should be done, how these lesions should be treated, and how multifocal GGOs should be approached.