Pulmonary metastasis: rationale for local treatments and techniques

Efficacy of adjuvant chemotherapy after complete resection of pulmonary metastasis from colorectal cancer

The most effective treatment for pulmonary metastasis from colorectal cancer (CRC) is complete resection. However, as the recurrence rate after resection of the pulmonary metastases from CRC is high, postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy is often performed in clinical practice. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of single-agent adjuvant chemotherapy after resection of pulmonary metastasis from CRC. The medical records of 16 patients who underwent the first complete resection of pulmonary metastasis from CRC were retrospectively reviewed. A total of eight patients were treated with single-agent adjuvant chemotherapy after resection of pulmonary metastasis, and oral fluoropyrimidines were selected in all regimens. As a result, the relapse-free survival rate after resection of pulmonary metastasis in the group that received postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy was significantly improved in comparison with the group treated with surgery alone. In the subgroup analysis, patients who benefited from postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy in some high-risk groups were selected, including patients with a high tumor stage or poor immunological status. In conclusion, single-agent adjuvant chemotherapy after resection of pulmonary metastasis from CRC was effective for reducing the risk of recurrence and was safe to administer. In addition, certain risk factors may identify patients who would receive more benefit from postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy after resection of pulmonary metastasis from CRC.

Prognostic Significance of the Immunological Indices in Patients Who Underwent Complete Resection of Pulmonary Metastases of Colorectal Cancer

BACKGROUND/AIM

The neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and the density of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) have been reported as immunological prognostic factors for various cancers. We evaluated the association between the prognosis and the immunological status in patients who underwent complete resection of pulmonary metastases of colorectal cancer (CRC).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We evaluated the associations between the NLR before the resection of pulmonary metastases and the relapse-free survival (RFS) or overall survival (OS), or between the density of TILs in the pulmonary metastasis and the RFS or OS.

RESULTS

The RFS and OS were significantly worse in the NLR-High group than in the NLR-Low group. The RFS was significantly longer in the CD3⁺TILs-High group than in the CD3⁺TILs-Low group.

CONCLUSION

The NLR and the density of TILs may have prognostic significance in patients who undergo complete resection of pulmonary metastases of CRC.

Recent improvement of survival prognosis after pulmonary metastasectomy and advanced chemotherapy for patients with colorectal cancer

OBJECTIVES

New chemotherapeutic regimens (i.e. FOLFOX or FOLFIRI with molecular targeted drugs) have improved the prognosis of patients with unresectable or recurrent colorectal cancer. To estimate the prognostic impact of these chemotherapies, we examined the chronological change in survival rates of patients who underwent pulmonary metastasectomy for colorectal cancer metastasis.

METHODS

Using a large database, we conducted a retrospective, multi-institutional study to collect data of 1223 eligible patients from 26 institutions who had undergone pulmonary metastasectomy with curative intent. We divided those patients who underwent metastasectomy in different time periods according to the major trend of chemotherapy regimens for recurrent colorectal cancer: those who underwent metastasectomy between 1990 and 1999 ( N  = 451, Group A), between 2000 and 2004 ( N  = 433, Group B) or between 2005 and 2007 ( N  = 339, Group C).

RESULTS

Five-year overall survival rates after metastasectomy were 45% in Group A, 56% in Group B and 66% in Group C ( P  < 0.0001) whereas rates after metastasectomy plus chemotherapy were 32% in Group A, 47% in Group B and 70% in Group C ( P  = 0.0059). The prognosis of patients who underwent both metastasectomy and chemotherapy in Group C was significantly better than that of the other two groups. Overall survival of patients who did not receive chemotherapy was not significantly different between the groups.

CONCLUSION

Survival rates of patients after pulmonary metastasectomy for colorectal cancer metastasis who underwent chemotherapy have increased over the years. It implies that newer chemotherapy regimens might have had a positive impact on these patients.

Management of lung nodules newly found by virtual-assisted lung mapping: a case report

BACKGROUND

Virtual-assisted lung mapping is a novel bronchoscopic lung marking technique that uses virtual images to perform multiple concurrent dye marking of barely palpable pulmonary tumors. Subsequent chest computed tomography is required to confirm the locations marked. We here report a patient in whom computed tomography after virtual-assisted lung mapping unexpectedly revealed additional tiny pulmonary nodules.

CASE PRESENTATION

A 64-year-old woman with a history of renal cell carcinoma presented with two pulmonary nodules suspicious of metastases from renal cell carcinoma. Because we anticipated that the nodules would be difficult to palpate intraoperatively, we performed virtual-assisted lung mapping prior to attempting to resect them. Computed tomography after mapping unexpectedly detected two additional nodules. Although the existing markings did not relate to the newly found nodules, we used imaginary auxiliary lines and anatomical landmarks to extend the lung map to incorporate the unexpected nodules. The additional nodules were successfully resected by thoracoscopic wedge resection. Pathologic examination identified all nodules as metastases from renal cell carcinoma, and the surgical margins were negative.

CONCLUSIONS

Imaginary auxiliary lines and anatomical landmarks extended the existing lung map of virtual-assisted lung mapping, enabling resection of unexpected pulmonary nodules found in post-mapping computed tomography images.

Role of pulmonary metastasectomy in colorectal cancer in the era of modern multidisciplinary therapy

PURPOSE

To clarify the role of pulmonary metastasectomy in colorectal cancer in the era of modern multidisciplinary therapy.

METHODS

The characteristics and outcomes of the patients who underwent pulmonary metastasectomy for colorectal cancer through 2002 (n = 26) and from 2003 (n = 68) were compared.

RESULTS

The patients treated from 2003 had a smaller tumor size and more frequently had a history of extra-pulmonary relapses than did those treated through 2002. There was a significant improvement in the 5-year overall survival (42.0% vs. 73.1%, p = 0.03) but not the 5-year relapse-free survival (41.4% vs. 37.5%, p = 0.85) after pulmonary metastasectomy from 2003. The rate of patients who received local therapy with curative intent after the first pulmonary metastasectomy was significantly higher in patients treated from 2003 than in those treated through 2002 [4/13, (31%) vs. 25/39 (64%), p = 0.04]. The survival after relapse after the first pulmonary metastasectomy was significantly longer in patients treated from 2003 than in those treated through 2002 (median survival time: 14 vs. 47 months).

CONCLUSIONS

Pulmonary metastasectomy for colorectal cancer remains an important treatment option in the sense that it can achieve a good relapse-free survival.

Differential diagnosis between primary lung squamous cell carcinoma and pulmonary metastasis of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma

Differentiation between lung squamous cell carcinoma and pulmonary metastasis of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma is clinically important because the prognoses and therapeutic options are considerably different. However, the clinical, pathological, and immunohistochemical diagnostic methods have not yet been fully established. Although various molecular methods have been developed, they have not yet been practically applied. A combined approach involving molecular and immunohistochemical analysis, such as one that uses antibodies selected on the basis of comprehensive genetic analysis results, may be effective. We suggest a new diagnostic criteria using the clinical characteristics and the result of immunohistochemical analysis. However, there are two underlying problems in the development of new diagnostic methods: tumor heterogeneity and determination of the diagnostic accuracy.

Simultaneous lung resection via a transdiaphragmatic approach in patients undergoing liver resection for synchronous liver and lung metastases

BACKGROUND

For patients with synchronous liver and lung metastases from colorectal cancer, the invasiveness of adding thoracic to abdominal surgery is an obstacle to concurrent liver and lung metastasectomy. We developed a simple technique to resect lung lesions via a transdiaphragmatic approach without thoracic incision in patients undergoing liver metastasectomy.

METHODS

Sixteen patients with synchronous liver and unilateral lung metastases underwent transdiaphragmatic wedge resection of lung lesions simultaneous with liver metastasectomy. Short-term operative outcomes were compared with those in 102 patients treated with conventional unilateral wedge resection for colorectal lung metastases.

RESULTS

Twenty peripheral (<3 cm from the pleura) lung lesions from various locations in the lung were resected via transdiaphragmatic approach. No conversions to conventional approach were required. The median tumor number and size were 1 (range, 1-3) and 8 mm (range, 3-30 mm), respectively. Transdiaphragmatic resection reduced median operative blood loss compared with conventional resection (0 mL vs 50 mL [P < .001]) and reduced median duration of hospital stay compared with staged liver and lung resection (6 days vs 11 days [P < .001]). Operative duration and rates of lung-related morbidity and positive surgical margin were similar between the transdiaphragmatic and conventional groups (104 minutes vs 105 minutes [P = .61], 13% vs 4% [P = .15], and 6% vs 5% [P = .73], respectively).

CONCLUSION

Simultaneous transdiaphragmatic resection of peripheral lung lesions is safe in patients undergoing liver resection. The low-invasive transdiaphragmatic approach facilitates aggressive operative treatment for synchronous liver and lung metastases.