Long-term results of second-stage thoracic endovascular aortic repair following total aortic arch replacement

Thoracic endovascular aortic repair in penetrating aortic ulcer combined with isolated left vertebral artery: A case report

RATIONALE

Penetrating aorta ulcer (PAU) with isolated left vertebral artery (ILVA) is a rare condition, accounting for no more than 1% of all kinds of aorta diseases. And traditional treatment was open surgery with total arch replacement by elephant trunk. Here, we report a case of PAU combined with ILVA managed by thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) technique.

PATIENT CONCERNS

A 65-year-old male with chronic hypertension and Nicotine abuse underwent intermittent back pain for 2 years and aggravated a bit for 1 week.

DIAGNOSES

Preoperative computed tomography angiogram (CTA) indicated PAU combined with ILVA.

INTERVENTIONS

TEVAR was performed for PAU following with retrograde in situ fenestration and chimney technique for revascularization of ILVA and left subclavian artery (LSA), respectively.

OUTCOMES

The operation was successfully and the patient was discharged from hospital after 1 week of treatment. Postoperatively, the images of CTA illustrated the patency of aorta, ILVA, and LSA without obvious endoleak. Besides, no ischemia attack or other relative syndromes were detected at 6-months follow-up.

LESSONS

This case demonstrates that TEVAR is an alternative to elephant trunk especially for PAU with ILVA. And it also showed the precise exposure of ILVA and necessity to reconstruct ILVA during TEVAR operation in order to reduce the occurrence of ischemia attack.

Aortic Dissection: Novel Surgical Hybrid Procedures

The management of patients with aortic dissection is challenging and its treatment is an area of development and innovation. Conventional surgical techniques are associated with significant risks in terms of mortality and morbidity in such high-risk patients. As a result of cumulative advances in technology, classical surgical techniques have been improved and enhanced by the newer endovascular approaches, leading to novel surgical hybrid procedures. Impressive early results have been seen with frozen elephant techniques, revascularisation of the supra-aortic branches and branched/fenestrated thoracic endovascular aortic repair-alone procedures. This review describes the techniques involved in the latest hybrid procedures for aortic dissection and their outcomes.

Elephant trunk technique for hybrid aortic arch repair

The original elephant trunk technique was developed by Borst in 1983 for the treatment of aortic arch aneurysms. This technique reduced operative risks, but was associated with cumulative mortality rates of 6.9 % for the first stage and 7.5 % for the second stage. Patients also waited a long time between two major surgical procedures. Only 50.4 % of patients underwent the second-stage surgery, and there was a significant interval mortality rate of 10.7 %. With the advent of stent-graft techniques, two different hybrid elephant trunk techniques were developed. One technique is first-stage elephant trunk graft placement followed by second-stage endovascular completion. The conventional elephant trunk graft provides a good landing zone for the stent-graft, and endovascular completion is a useful alternative to conventional second-stage surgery. This method has few major complications, and a postoperative paraplegia rate of 1.1 %. The other technique is the frozen elephant trunk technique. This technique eliminates the need for subsequent endovascular completion, and is particularly useful for the treatment of acute type A dissection because it can achieve a secure seal. However, it is associated with a higher rate of spinal cord ischemia than other methods such as the original elephant trunk technique. The left subclavian artery (LSA) is often lost when performing a hybrid elephant trunk procedure. Revascularization of the LSA should be performed to prevent arm ischemia and neurological complications such as paraplegia or stroke, although the level of evidence for this recommendation is low.

Thoracic endovascular aortic repair in patients with prior open aortic surgery

OBJECTIVE

To review our experience of thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) in patients with prior open aortic repair (OAR).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Stent-grafts were deployed in the arch, descending thoracic and thoracoabdominal aortae of 39, 13 and 5 patients, respectively, and in a deteriorated extra-anatomical prosthesis in one. The access route was the femoral artery in 10 of 23 patients with, and in 30 of 35 patients without a prior abdominal prosthesis. Prior prostheses and elephant trunks comprised 57 of 116 landing zones and 23 proximal landing zones, respectively.

RESULTS

Three patients died before discharge. Type II endoleaks developed in six patients, and Types I and III developed in one patient each. Type I endoleaks were not found at landing zones comprising prosthetic grafts. The overall actuarial three-year survival rate including early mortality was 86.5%.

CONCLUSION

The clinical outcomes of TEVAR were excellent, even in patients with prior OAR. Prosthetic grafts, including elephant trunks, provided good landing zones for TEVAR. Prostheses with larger-caliber designs are recommended for iliac artery reconstruction in future TEVAR.

A novel detachable filter to prevent thromboembolism during endovascular surgery

OBJECTIVE

Thromboembolism remains a serious complication during endovascular surgery. Commercially available filter devices, which are unified with the stenting systems, provide short-time performance owing to the adhesion of thrombus to the filters themselves. We have, therefore, developed a new detachable filter that can be used in all major aortic branches and shows greater longevity. The present study assessed the efficacy of the new detachable filter and examined the feasibility of deploying and retrieving the filters.

METHODS

We first performed in vitro studies. Our experimental flow model used silicon tubing to simulate the aortic branches. Polystyrene-divinylbenzene microspheres (100 and 200 μm in diameter), which simulated embolic particles, were injected into the tubing after the detachable filter was deployed. The capture efficacy (number of microspheres trapped in the detachable filter/total injected microspheres) was calculated. In the in vivo studies, the detachable filters were implanted into the carotid, visceral, and renal arteries of 5 mongrel dogs. Angiography was performed every 30 minutes. At 5 hours after implantation, each detachable filter was retrieved by a gooseneck snare catheter.

RESULTS

In the in vitro studies, our detachable filters showed high capture efficacy, capturing 99.2% of the 100-μm microspheres and 99.4% of the 200-μm microspheres. In the in vivo studies, all detachable filters were successfully deployed into the major branches. Each angiographic study revealed smooth flow without any embolic obstruction of the filter. At 5 hours after deployment, all devices were completely retrieved by the snare catheter without aortic injury.

CONCLUSIONS

The new detachable filter showed high efficacy in capturing the particles. All detachable filters were successfully deployed for 5 hours, and the filters were retrieved from the aortic branches without any complications. This novel detachable filter can help prevent serious distal thromboembolism during endovascular surgery.