Minimally invasive mitral valve surgery through right mini-thoracotomy: recommendations for good exposure, stable cardiopulmonary bypass, and secure myocardial protection

Outcomes of reoperation for total arch replacement combined with frozen elephant trunk after previous cardiovascular surgery

BACKGROUND

Aortic arch replacement(TAR) combined with frozen elephant trunk (FET) technique is a high-risk operation after previous cardiovascular surgery. The aim of the study was to review our strategy and outcomes in this cohort.

METHOD

Data were reviewed for patients who underwent TAR combined with FET after previous cardiovascular surgery from January 2010 to December 2020. The patients were divided into elective group and non-selective group.

RESULTS

63 eligible patients were divided into elective(n = 44) and non-elective(n = 19) groups. The interval between two operations was shorter in non-elective group than elective groups (P = 0.001). The indication for reoperation was different in two groups (P = 0.000), however, the type of reoperations has no differences. Cardiopulmonary bypass time was shorter in elective group than non-elective group (P = 0.000). The over-all 30-day mortality rate was 17.5%, and it was higher in non-elective group (P = 0.013). The 24h drainage increased in non-elective group (P = 0.001) as well as re-explore rate for bleeding (P = 0.022). Postoperative hospital stay prolonged in non-elective group (P = 0.002). However, rates of survival without further aortic events were 72.3 ± 7.1% in elective group, 72.9 ± 13.5% in non-elective group at 5 years, respectively (P = 0. 955).

CONCLUSION

Reduced 30-day mortality and shortened post-operative hospital stay was observed in elective group, however, long-term survival rate without reintervention were not affected.

Does a Small Body Have a Negative Impact on Minimally Invasive Mitral Valve Surgery?

Backgrounds

Minimally invasive mitral valve surgery (MIMVS) in patients with a small body presents surgeons with a technically difficult surgical maneuver. We hypothesized that physique might negatively influence the safety and technical complexity of MIMVS.

Methods

One hundred and twenty-one patients underwent MIMVS in our institution between May 2014 and April 2020. These patients were categorized into two groups. The first group was the small physique group (n = 20) consisting of patients with a stature <150 cm. The second group was the normal physique group (n = 101) consisting of patients with a stature >150 cm. The primary endpoint was freedom from death and major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCE). The secondary endpoint was freedom from moderate or severe mitral regurgitation.

Results

Cardiopulmonary bypass time (130 ± 29 vs. 156 ± 55 min, p = 0.02) and aortic cross-clamp time (75 ± 27 vs. 95 ± 39 min, p = 0.03) were significantly shorter in the small physique group. Both in the early and midterm periods, there was no significant difference in the mortality (early, 5.0 vs. 1.0%, p = 0.30. midterm, 5.0 vs. 1.0%, p = 0.09), MACCE (early, 5.0 vs. 6.9%, p = 0.65. midterm, 5.0 vs. 5.9%, p = 0.93) and the residual MR (early, 0 vs. 1.0%, p = 0.66. midterm, 5.0 vs. 4.9%, p = 0.93) between the two groups.

Conclusions

Small physique is not a hurdle for MIMVS in terms of the safety of the operation.

Optimal Management of Patients Treated With Minimally Invasive Cardiac Surgery in the Era of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery and Fast-Track Protocols: A Narrative Review

OBJECTIVES

Use of minimally invasive cardiac surgery (MICS) is increasing, but to exert its maximum effect on patient outcomes, MICS must be coupled with improved perioperative management, including the Enhanced Recovery after Surgery (ERAS) and fast-track protocols. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of ERAS and fast track in this context.

DESIGN

NARRATIVE REVIEW: The authors performed a narrative review that included patients treated with MICS and patients treated with the ERAS/fast-track protocols in the MEDLINE/PubMed database. The keywords ERAS and fast-track were combined with the following key words: minimally invasive cardiac surgery OR robotic cardiac surgery OR minimally invasive mitral surgery OR minimally invasive aortic surgery.

RESULTS

Overall, the authors selected six studies in which either the ERAS or fast-track protocol was applied. The reported adherence to ERAS protocols was high, and neither protocol-related complications nor in-hospital mortality occurred. Patients managed based on ERAS had significantly lower postoperative pain scores, fewer rates of blood transfusions, and shorter hospital and intensive care unit stays compared with those who received standard management. All ERAS patients were managed safely, with early extubation. Similarly, fast-track cardiac surgery, with immediate postprocedure extubation and early transfer to the ward, was shown to be safe, with no increased morbidity or mortality.

CONCLUSION

Use of standardized ERAS and fast-track protocols seems to be feasible and safe in the context of MICS, with improved outcomes. Both ERAS and fast track allow for a faster return to full functional status while minimizing perioperative complications.

Early and mid-term outcomes of minimally invasive mitral valve repair via right mini-thoracotomy: 5-year experience with 129 consecutive patients

Objectives

This study analyzed the experience of a single institution with minimally invasive mitral valve repair (MIMVr) via a right mini-thoracotomy (RT), including short and mid-term morbidity and mortality as surgical outcomes, and rates of reoperation. Late follow-up findings regarding mitral regurgitation (MR) were also assessed.

Methods

Between January 2014 and January 2020, a total of 141 consecutive patients underwent MIMVr for mitral regurgitation at our institution via an RT, with late follow-up results (median 35 ± 15 months) available for 129 (91.4%). Findings regarding surgical approach, complications, reoperations, and late survival were examined. Late echocardiographic results showing recurrence of MR after mitral repair were also noted. Survival, freedom from reoperation, and recurrent MR (grade > 2) were evaluated by Kaplan–Meier analysis.

Results

Mean age was 63.9 ± 14.3 years, mean ejection fraction was 66.9 ± 10.4%, and 2 patients (1.6%) underwent a reoperation. Concomitant procedures included atrial fibrillation ablation (18%), tricuspid valve surgery (16%). None (0%) experienced intraoperative conversion to sternotomy. A learning curve was observed as the number of cases increased. Overall in-hospital mortality and stroke incidence were both 0%. Freedom from recurrent MR (grade > 2) at 1, 3, and 5 years was 99.2, 94.9, and 94.9%, respectively, while freedom from reoperation at 1, 3, and 5 years after mitral valve repair was 98.4, 98.4, and 98.4%, respectively.

Conclusions

Early and mid-term results of MIMVr were satisfactory, with low rates of perioperative morbidity and recurrent MR, as well as reoperation and death. Furthermore, the protocols for patient selection and surgical approach were considered to be appropriate.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11748-020-01573-2.

Successful Double-Catheter Coil Embolization of an Iatrogenic Subclavian Artery to Internal Jugular Vein Fistula After Minimally Invasive Cardiac Surgery

It is essential to establish cardiopulmonary bypass by percutaneous insertion of a large-bore catheter via both the femoral vein and internal jugular vein (IJV) for minimally invasive cardiac surgery (MICS). Complications associated with IJV catheterization during MICS have been reported in the literature; however, vascular injury of the subclavian artery (SCA) is rare. We herein present a rare case in which an iatrogenic arteriovenous fistula (AVF) between the right SCA and IJV after MICS was successfully treated by endovascular coil embolization. A 61-year-old man who had undergone mitral valve repair by MICS 10 months before presentation was referred because of pulsatile cervical bruit and tinnitus. Radiographic examination revealed a right SCA pseudoaneurysm associated with an AVF located between the right common carotid artery and vertebral artery. The AVF was completely occluded with detachable coils using a double-catheter technique to avoid coil migration into the IJV. This technique has been used to treat high-flow or complex AVFs, including pulmonary and renal AVFs. As shown in the present case, it is also useful to treat an iatrogenic AVF between the SCA and IJV.

Robotic-assisted cardiac surgery without lung isolation utilizing single-lumen endotracheal tube intubation

OBJECTIVES

This study assessed the feasibility and outcomes of performing robotic cardiac surgery without lung isolation using single-lumen (SL) endotracheal tube intubation.

METHODS

Between 2013 and 2017, 132 patients underwent robotically-assisted atrial septal defect closure. A retrospective analysis was performed of 23 patients (11 males, mean age 30.9 ± 5 years) who underwent robotic surgery with double-lumen (DL) endotracheal tube intubation (group 1) compared with 109 patients (57 males, mean age 32.4 ± 7.5 years) undergoing the same procedure with SL endotracheal intubation (group 2). The patient groups were compared in terms of demographic characteristics, operative data, and complications. The technical feasibility of the robotic procedure without lung isolation was evaluated.

RESULTS

There were no mortality, intraoperative complication, and conversion. Mean total anesthesia time was significantly decreased in the SL intubation group (238.3 ± 22.4 vs 227.2 ± 21.2 minutes; P = .025). First-pass intubation success was significantly higher in the SL intubation group (17 [73.9%] vs 98 [89.9%] patients; P = .032). Mean ventilation time (10.9 ± 5.3 hours), intensive care unit stay (16.8 ± 10.1 hours), and the length of hospital stay (3.8 ± 1.2 days) was significantly decreased in patients with SL tube (P < .05). Unilateral reexpansion pulmonary edema was observed in five (21.7%) patients with DL tube, whereas no patient with SL tube had this complication.

CONCLUSIONS

SL endotracheal tube intubation without lung isolation is a feasible and safe airway alternative in robotic cardiac procedures. This approach resulted in shorter anesthesia time, ventilation time and the length of hospital stay. Port placement and robotic set-up can be uneventfully performed without lung isolation.

Totally endoscopic mitral valve repair using a three-dimensional endoscope system: initial clinical experience in Korea

Background

The lack of depth perception is a significant challenge in two-dimensional (2D) video-assisted/directed minimally invasive cardiac surgery (MICS). Accordingly, restoration of stereoscopic vision is potentially beneficial, and we present a single center experience of a three-dimensional (3D) endoscope system in cardiac surgery without robotic assistance.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed the initial 40 consecutive patients who received totally endoscopic mitral valve (MV) repair using a 3D endoscope system between September 2017 and April 2019. The preoperative characteristics, operative data, and immediate postoperative outcomes, including echocardiographic results, were investigated.

Results

In all the patients (n=40, 100%), successful MV repair using the standard repair techniques was achieved regardless of the location of the MV lesion as follows: anterior leaflet (n=8, 20.0%), posterior leaflet (n=15, 37.5%), and both leaflets (n=17, 42.5%). Concomitant tricuspid ring annuloplasty (n=9, 22.5%) and atrial fibrillation ablation (n=7, 17.5%) were performed. There was no mortality. One reoperation for bleeding occurred. One patient had a sternotomy conversion due to aortic dissection immediately after declamping. Postoperative mitral regurgitation (MR) grades were none or trace in 38 patients (95.0%) and mild in 2 patients (5.0%) on predischarge echocardiography.

Conclusions

Totally endoscopic MV repair using a 3D endoscope system is technically feasible and safe on the basis of this initial experience.

Simple Redo Proximal Thoracic Aortic Surgery with Peripheral Cardiopulmonary Bypass and Minimal Dissection

Reoperations on the proximal thoracic aorta are increasingly observed after previous aortic or cardiac operations. Redo proximal aortic surgery remains challenging with an increased mortality compared to first-time operations. For a successful redo proximal aortic surgery in a patient with complex pathological conditions, the surgical procedure and cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) should be simplified as much as possible. Herein, we report our experience of proximal aortic reoperations in which the strategy consisted of an axillo-axillary (jugular) and a femoro-femoral CPB in combination with minimal dissection of surgical adhesions. Satisfactory full-flow CPB was achieved with peripheral cannulations and the aid of vacuum-assisted venous drainage. A suitable surgical view of the proximal aorta was obtained without dissection of the heart. There was no operative mortality and the peripheral CPB was well managed without technical problems. We consider that the proposed strategy makes proximal aortic reoperations safe and simple.

Patient-specific access planning in minimally invasive mitral valve surgery

BACKGROUND

Minimally invasive mitral valve repair or replacement (MIMVR) approaches have been increasingly adopted for the treatment of mitral regurgitation, allowing a shorter recovery time and improving postoperative quality of life. However, inadequate positioning of the right mini thoracotomy access (working port) translates into suboptimal exposure, prolonged operative times and, potentially, reduction in the quality of mitral repair. At present, we are missing tools to further improve the positioning of the working port in order to ameliorate surgical exposure in a patient- specific fashion.

METHODS AND EVALUATION OF THE HYPOTHESIS

We hypothesized that computation of relevant anatomical measurements from preoperative CT scans in patients undergoing MIMVR may provide patient-specific information in order to propose the surgical access that best fits to the patient's morphology. We hypothesized that this may systematize optimal mitral valve exposure, facilitating the procedure and potentially ameliorating the outcomes. We also hypothesized that preoperative simulation of the working port site and surgical instruments' insertion using a three-dimensional virtual model of the patient is feasible and may help in the customization of ports positioning. The hypothesis was evaluated by a multidisciplinary team including cardiac surgeons, experts in medical image processing and biomedical engineers. CT scans of 14 patients undergoing MIMVR were segmented to visualize 3D chest bones and heart structures meshes. The mitral valve annulus is pointed manually by the expert or extracted automatically when contrast-enhanced CT scan was available. The valve plane was then calculated and the optimal incision location analyzed according to a) the perpendicularity and b) the distance between the intercostal spaces and the valve plane. An angle-chart representation for the 4th, 5th and 6th intercostal spaces and a color map illustrating the distance between the skin and the mitral valve were created. We started the development of a simulation tool for preoperative planning using 3D Slicer software.

CONCLUSIONS

Several patient-specific factors (including the orientation of the mitral valve plane and the morphology of the chest cage) may influence the performance of a MIMVR procedure, but they are not quantitatively considered in the current planning strategy. We suggest that the clinical results of MIMVR can be improved through preoperative virtual simulation and computer-assisted surgery (through determination of working port and surgical instruments insertion positioning). Further research is justified and the development of a software tool for clinical evaluation is warranted to verify the current hypothesis.

Axillary venous drainage in redo aortic root surgery

The axillary artery is an established alternative cannulation site for peripheral cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). However, axillary vein cannulation is not as common. Here, we present our experience with an axillo-axillary CPB combined with a femoro-femoral CPB in redo aortic root replacement. The full-flow bypass was obtained with vacuum-assisted drainage and excellent decompression of the heart was achieved without left heart venting. Although only adhesions around the aortic root graft were dissected, a comfortable surgical field could be obtained with our CPB strategy. Axillary vessels were easy to expose with a small single skin incision. Cerebral protection could be achieved in both antegrade and retrograde fashion when the circulatory arrest was required for an additional arch procedure. Our strategy based on axillo-axillary and femoro-femoral CPB was effective and feasible in redo aortic root replacement. We consider that it simplified the complex aortic reoperation.

Stonehenge technique is associated with faster aortic clamp time in group of minimally invasive aortic valve replacement via right infra-axillary thoracotomy

BACKGROUND

Trans-right axillary aortic valve replacement (TAX-AVR) remains uncommon. We developed a special method to pull the heart closer to the right chest wall to make the surgery as easy and safe as aortic valve replacement via median sternotomy. Because the retraction sutures lifting the ascending aorta and aortic root are arranged circularly around the wound, we named this technique "Stonehenge technique".

METHODS

We examined 47 patients who underwent aortic valve replacement through a small right infra-axillary thoracotomy as the initial surgical therapy. These patients were divided into two groups: the conventional TAX-AVR group that underwent AVR via the conventional small right axillary incision approach (n = 20) and the TAX-AVR with SH group that underwent AVR with the Stonehenge technique (n = 27).

RESULTS

The aortic cross-clamp and the extracorporeal circulation time were significantly shorter in the TAX-AVR with SH group than in the conventional TAX-AVR group (conventional TAX-AVR group: 125.5 ± 47.9; TAX-AVR with SH group: 96.0 ± 14.0, p = 0.004, and conventional TAX-AVR group: 163.8 ± 55.9; TAX-AVR with SH group: 140.0 ± 16.8, p = 0.04).

CONCLUSION

The outcomes of this technique depend on the site of the retraction sutures in the opened pericardium, direction of pull, amount of force applied, and precautions taken. If performed correctly, the ascending aorta and the root can be pulled from the wound to within the surgeon's fingers' reach, thereby reducing aortic cross-clamp and extracorporeal circulation times in group of minimally invasive aortic valve replacement via right infra-axillary thoracotomy.

Minimally invasive cardiac surgery in Japan: history and current status

This review examines the historical and current status of minimally invasive cardiac surgery (MICS) in Japan, based on reports that have been published in English. Although enthusiasm for MICS in Japan increased during the 1990s, it waned during the early 2000s because of various limitations. However, the introduction of minimally invasive mitral valve surgery, aortic valve replacement, atrial septal defect closure, and coronary artery bypass has led to the resurgence of MICS in Japan during recent years. Academic societies and a national registry system will play an important role in ensuring that this new wave of MICS is implemented safely and effectively. Off-the-job training and team building are also key factors for implementing a successful MICS program.

Three-port (one incision plus two-port) endoscopic mitral valve surgery without robotic assistance

OBJECTIVES

Totally endoscopic minimally invasive mitral valve surgery (MIMVS) is technically demanding and often performed with robotic assistance. We hypothesized that three-port video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) would facilitate endoscopic MIMVS and evaluated its feasibility and safety.

METHODS

From October 2010 to June 2016, we performed first-time MIMVS in 250 consecutive patients (122 male), with median age of 65 years (54-73 years, 25-75 percentile). The thoracic access ports comprised one small (3-5 cm) thoracotomy without a rib spreader plus two trocars (one for the endoscope and one for left-handed instruments), thus establishing triangular three-port VATS. Cannulas, an aortic clamp, and a left atrial retractor were inserted through the thoracotomy, and right-handed instruments were inserted through the remaining space. Cardiopulmonary bypass was established through a groin incision.

RESULTS

The etiology of the mitral valve lesion was myxomatous degeneration in 70% of patients, rheumatic disease in 9%, infectious endocarditis in 6%, and other conditions in 15%. Mitral valve repair was performed in 233 patients and replacement in 27. Two patients underwent conversion to replacement after attempted repair. Forty-nine patients underwent tricuspid annuloplasty, and 45 underwent the Maze procedure. One in-hospital death occurred within 30 days. Two patients developed stroke, three underwent re-exploration for bleeding, one developed low output syndrome, and one required new haemodialysis. The aortic clamp, bypass, and total operation times were 119 (94-149), 166 (134-200) and 237 (204-285) min, respectively, median (25-75%). The 5-year survival and reoperation-free rates were 98.3% ± 0.9% and 96.9% ± 1.2%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Three-port endoscopic MIMVS appears reproducible and safe.

Thoracoscope-Assisted Mitral Valve Replacement with a Small Incision in the Right Chest: A Chinese Single Cardiac Center Experience

BACKGROUND The aim of this study was to investigate the safety, feasibility, and clinical effectiveness of thoracoscopy-assisted mitral valve replacement via thoracic right-anterior minimal incision. MATERIAL AND METHODS A retrospective analysis was conducted of 225 patients with mitral valve lesions who were treated in our hospital from August 2012 to August 2015. Group A included 105 patients undergoing thoracoscopy-assisted mitral valve replacement via a thoracic right-anterior minimal incision, and group B included 120 patients undergoing conventional mitral valve replacement. We collected and analyzed clinical data from both groups. RESULTS The procedures were successful in patients of both groups. No severe complications or mortality were reported. Postoperative mechanical ventilation time (8.6±2.4 h vs. 12.4±3.2 h), duration of intensive care (1.7±1.2 d vs. 2.8±1.3 d), duration of postoperative analgesia use (28.7±8.9 h vs. 36.3±7.5 h), postoperative length of hospital stay (8.2±2.2 d vs. 12.8±2.1 d), pleural fluid drainage (210.5±60.5 ml vs. 425.4±75.6 ml), blood transfusion amount (420.5±80.4 ml vs. 658.3±96.7 ml), and operative incision length (4.7±1.1 cm vs. 22.4±2.5 cm) were significantly shorter (or lower) in group A than in group B. There were different advantages and disadvantages in the 2 kinds of operative procedure in terms of postoperative complications. CONCLUSIONS Thoracoscopy-assisted mitral valve replacement via thoracic right-anterior minimal incision has the same clinical efficacy, safety, and feasibility as conventional mitral valve replacement.

Minimally invasive mitral valve surgery through a right mini-thoracotomy

Since its introduction in the mid-1990s, minimally invasive mitral valve surgery (MIMVS) has been shown to be a feasible alternative to a conventional full-sternotomy approach, and several studies have reported excellent clinical outcomes with low perioperative morbidity and mortality. As a result, MIMVS is being increasingly employed as a routine procedure worldwide. On the other hand, several issues have been raised, including complications specific to this technique and its steep learning curve, while there are also concerns regarding the durability of a mitral valve repair through a limited access. In this study, the current status and future perspectives of MIMVS were examined.

Repeat Minimally Invasive Mitral Valve Replacement for Recurrent Mitral Stenosis after OMC in Patients Who Decline Blood Product Transfusion for Religious Reasons

Cardiac surgery for Jehovah's Witness (JW) patients is considered to be high risk because of patients' refusal to receive blood transfusion. We report a successful mitral valve replacement for recurrent mitral stenosis after OMC with minimally invasive right thoracotomy, without any transfusion of allogeneic blood or blood products. This minimally invasive mitral valve replacement through right thoracotomy was an excellent approach for JW patients.

Automated fastener versus manually tied knots in minimally invasive mitral valve repair: impact on operation time and short- term results

Background

This study compares the influence of two different annuloplasty attachment suture applications, namely the use of an automated fastener versus manually tied knots using a traditional knot pusher, on total operation time, on cardiopulmonary-bypass time and on cross-clamp time, and on short-term outcome.

Methods

Sixty patients underwent isolated minimally invasive mitral valve repair in Carpentier Type-II mitral disease with implantation of an annuloplasty ring in combination with correction of the prolapsing leaflet using artificial chords. The first 30 patients after implementation of a novel automated fastener were compared with the last 30 patients corrected with a traditional knot pusher. No significant differences with regard to demographic data (age, gender, NYHA class, ejection fraction, BMI, cardiovascular risk factors) between the two groups were found. All patients received isolated mitral valve repair in the first run. Bretschneider HTK was used for cardioplegic cardiac arrest in all patients.

Results

Transesophageal and transthoracic echocardiography at the end of operation and at discharge revealed no (n = 25), trace (n = 28) or mild (n = 7) residual regurgitation with no evidence of ring dehiscence and without any significant clinical differences between the groups. Cross-clamp, cardiopulmonary-bypass and total- operation time were significantly reduced in the automated fastener group compared to the group using a traditional knot pusher (87.1 ± 17.9 vs. 101.3 ± 17.8; p < 0.01, 138.1 ± 25.6 vs. 152.7 ± 24.9; p < 0.05, and 203.9 ± 31.02 vs. 223.8 ± 29.01; p < 0.01, respectively).

Conclusion

Our short-term results indicate a safe, reliable and fast application of the novel automated fastener device in combination with significant time savings in cardioplegic arrest and cardiopulmonary bypass.