Surgical outcomes of acute type A aortic dissection in dialysis patients

Long-term outcome of acute type A aortic dissection repair in chronic kidney disease patients

Preoperative renal dysfunction is associated with mortality in patients with acute type A aortic dissection (ATAAD) repair. However, the long-term outcome of chronic kidney dysfunction (CKD) in ATAAD is unclear. The study aimed to evaluate the long-term outcome of CKD in patients with ATAAD repair. We retrospectively studied patients with ATAAD repair using data from the Taiwan's National Health Insurance Research Database between July 1, 2004, and December 31, 2013. The outcomes of interest included all-cause mortality, readmission due to any cause, redo aortic surgery, major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events, and liver and renal outcomes. There were 3328 patients who received ATAAD repair. These patients were divided into CKD and non-CKD groups. In-hospital mortality in the CKD group was significantly higher than that in the non-CKD group (32.5% vs 18.8%, respectively, odds ratio 2.14, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.37-3.36). During long-term follow-up, patients with CKD had higher risks of all-cause mortality including in-hospital death (52.6% vs 32.5%; hazard ratio 1.83, 95% CI 1.32-2.55), mortality after discharge (29.7% vs 16.8%; hazard ratio 2.09, 95% CI 1.02-4.29), and readmission rates (67.1% vs 51.6%; subdistribution hazard ratio 2.00, 95% CI 1.43-2.79). However, no significant difference was observed between the dialysis and non-dialysis groups. On the basis of our results, patients with CKD carry a poor long-term outcome after ATAAD repair. Cardiac surgeons should be aware of this condition when dealing with ATAAD repair.

Impact of GERAADA score in patients with acute type A aortic dissection

Background

Despite continuous developments and advances in the perioperative management of patients suffering from acute aortic dissection type A (AADA), the associated postoperative morbidity and mortality remain high and strongly depend on the preoperative clinical status. The associated postoperative mortality is still hard to predict prior to the surgical procedure. The so-called German Registry of Acute Aortic Dissection Type A (GERAADA) score uses very basic and easily retrievable parameters and was specifically designed for predicting the 30-day mortality rate in patients undergoing surgery for AADA. This study evaluated impact of the GERAADA score in the authors’ institutional results.

Methods

Among 101 acute type A aortic dissection patients treated at our hospital during August 2015–March 2021, the GERAADA was calculated individually and retrospectively. Predicted and actual mortalities were assessed, and independent predicted factors were searched. The primary endpoint was defined as comparison of GERAADA scores and early mortality, and the secondary endpoints were defined as comparison of GERAADA scores and other postoperative results, and comparison of preoperative factors and postoperative results regardless to GERAADA scores.

Results

While the overall 30-day mortality for the entire study cohort calculated by the GERAADA score was 14.3 (8.1–77.6)%, the actual mortality rate was 6%. However, the GERAADA score was significantly high in some postoperative complications and showed significant correlation with some peri- and post-operative factors. In addition, factors not belonging to GERAADA score such as time from onset to arrival at the hospital, time from onset to arrival at the operation room, spouse presence, and hemodialysis were significantly associated with 30-day mortality.

Conclusions

Although the actual mortality was lower than predicted, GERAADA score may impact on the postoperative course. In addition, it would be desirable to add parameters such as the time from onset to arrival, family background, and hemodialysis for further accuracy.

Surgical outcomes of acute type A aortic dissection in dialysis patients: lessons learned from a single-center’s experience

There is a paucity of data describing the safety and efficacy of acute type A aortic dissection (ATAAD) repair surgeries in dialysis patients. Our study aimed to investigated the influence of dialysis on early and late outcomes in end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients who received repair surgery for ATAAD. A total of 882 ATAAD patients who received emergency aortic dissection repair at our center from January 2015 to December 2019 were retrospectively screened in this study and divided into the dialysis group (n = 16) and the non-dialysis group (n = 866), depending on whether they required dialysis for preoperative ESRD. No significant difference of age, preoperative hemodynamics, organ ischemia conditions, operative variables as well as the 30-Day mortality and in-hospital complications was discovered between two groups. However, the survival rates and the proportion of late aortic event (sudden death and reoperation) free population at 1 and 3 years after surgery were significantly decreased in dialysis patients compared to non-dialysis patients. Our study indicated that the short-term surgical outcomes of ATAAD in dialysis patients were comparable to non-dialysis patient. However, the dialysis patients were associated with a worse long-term prognosis.

Aortic Agatston score correlates with the progression of acute type A aortic dissection

Aortic calcification in the tunica media is correlated with aortic stiffness, elastin degradation, and wall shear stress. The study aim was to determine if aortic calcifications influence disease progression in patients with acute type A aortic dissection (ATAAD). We retrospectively reviewed a total of 103 consecutive patients who had undergone surgery for ATAAD at our institution between January 2009 and December 2019. Of these, 85 patients who had preoperatively undergone plain computed tomography angiography (CTA) for evaluation of their aortic calcification were included. Moreover, we assessed the progression of aortic dissection after surgery via postoperative CTA. Using a classification and regression tree to identify aortic Agatston score thresholds predictive of disease progression, the patients were classified into high-score (Agatston score ≥ 3344; n  =   36) and low-score (<3344; n  =   49) groups. Correlations between aortic Agatston scores and CTA variables were assessed. Higher aortic Agatston scores were significantly correlated with the smaller distal extent of aortic dissection (p < 0.001), larger true lumen areas of the ascending (p  =  0.009) and descending aorta (p =   0.002), and smaller false lumen areas of the descending aorta (p =  0.028). Patients in the high-score group were more likely to have DeBakey type II dissection (p =  0.001) and false lumen thrombosis (p  =  0.027) than those in the low-score group, thereby confirming the correlations. Aortic dissection in the high-score group was significantly less distally extended (p < 0.001). A higher aortic Agatston score correlates with the larger true lumen area of the ascending and descending aorta and the less distal progression of aortic dissection in patients with ATAAD. Interestingly, the findings before and after surgery were consistent. Hence, aortic Agatston scores are associated with aortic dissection progression and may help predict postoperative residual dissected aorta remodeling.

Differences in the clinical presentation, management, and in-hospital outcomes of acute aortic dissection in patients with and without end-stage renal disease

Background

Few studies have evaluated the clinical presentation, management, and outcomes of patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) presenting with acute aortic dissection (AAD) in real-world clinical practice. Thus, this study investigated the clinical characteristics, management, and outcomes of AAD patients with ESRD.

Methods

A total of 217 patients were included. We evaluated the differences in the clinical features, management, and in-hospital outcomes of patients with and without a history of ESRD presenting with AAD.

Results

A history of ESRD was present in 71 of 217 patients. Patients with ESRD had atypical clinical manifestations (p < 0.001) and were more likely to be managed medically compared with patients without ESRD (p = 0.002). Hypertension and type B aortic dissection were significantly more common among patients with ESRD. Moreover, patients with ESRD had lower leucocyte and platelet counts than patients without ESRD in laboratory findings (p < 0.001). However, hospitalization days and in-hospital mortality were similar between the two groups (p > 0.05). Multivariate analysis identified Type A aortic dissection as an independent predictor of in-hospital mortality among patients without ESRD (OR, 13.68; 95% CI, 1.92 to 98.90; P = 0.006).

Conclusions

This study highlights differences in the clinical characteristics, management, and outcomes of AAD patients with ESRD. These patients usually have atypical symptoms and more comorbid conditions and are managed more conservatively. However, these patients have no in-hospital survival disadvantage over those without ESRD. Further studies are needed to better understand and optimize care for patients with ESRD presenting with AAD.

The results of aortic arch replacement using antegrade cerebral perfusion in haemodialysis patients: analysis of the Japan cardiovascular surgery database

OBJECTIVES

There have been limited data available regarding aortic arch replacement in dialysis patients. The purpose of this study was to examine real-world data and to determine the impact of preoperative dialysis status and other risks on surgical aortic arch replacement using the Japan Cardiovascular Surgery Database.

METHODS

A total of 5044 patients who underwent elective, isolated aortic arch replacement using antegrade cerebral perfusion during 2014-2017 were eligible for the study. Of these, 89 patients received haemodialysis preoperatively. The patients were divided into 6 groups according to their preoperative estimated glomerular filtration rate and dialysis status for comparison. Preoperative and postoperative data were examined using a multivariable regression model.

RESULTS

The overall surgical mortality rates of non-Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) (estimated glomerular filtration rate >60 ml/min/1.73 m2), stage 3A, stage 3B, stage 4, stage 5 CKD and dialysis patients were 2.6%, 3.1%, 6.8%, 11.6%, 16.7% and 13.5%, respectively. After risk adjustment, dialysis was shown to be strongly associated with surgical mortality (odds ratio 4.39 and 95% confidence interval 2.22-8.72) and have a trend to be associated with postoperative stroke (odds ratio 2.02, 95% confidence interval 1.00-4.10, P = 0.051) when compared to the non-CKD group. As predictors of mortality, male sex, peripheral arterial disease, preoperative liver dysfunction and impaired left ventricular function were identified.

CONCLUSIONS

The Japanese nationwide database revealed the outcomes of aortic arch replacement in dialysis patients. Appropriate counselling and an alternative strategy should be considered for such patients with multiple risks for mortality.

Factors Affecting Outcomes in Acute Type A Aortic Dissection: A Systematic Review

Acute type A aortic dissection is a clinical emergency and is associated with significant morbidity and mortality rates if not managed promptly in specialised and high-volume centres. The mortality rate is increased by 1% for each hour delay in management; however, with advancement in clinical practice, diagnostic imaging and clinician awareness, this has been dramatically reduced to below 30% in most international centres. Not only timing of recognition of the pathology, but also other factors can significantly affect outcomes of such critical pathology. This includes, but is not limited to, age, extent of the pathology, existence of connective tissue disorders, hypertension, diabetes mellitus and surgeon experience. This narrative review will focus on current clinical practice and the evidence behind optimising each factor to minimise adverse outcomes in such high-risk cohort.