Efficacy of new multimodal preventive measures for post-operative deep sternal wound infection

Reducing Sternal Wound Infection Rates in Patients Undergoing Cardiothoracic Surgery with Sternotomy

LOCAL PROBLEM

Sternal wound infections (SWIs), whether superficial or deep, are associated with increased morbidity, mortality, and costs. From 2016 to 2017, our facility saw a 50% decrease in SWIs among patients undergoing cardiothoracic surgery with sternotomy. From 2017 to 2018, however, we identified a 33% increase in SWIs, prompting us to address our cardiac nurses' sternal wound care education and practice.

PURPOSE

The purpose of our quality improvement (QI) project was to identify opportunities for improvement in postoperative sternal incision care and to implement evidence-based processes to reduce the incidence of SWIs among cardiothoracic surgery patients.

METHODS

A literature review was performed to identify interventions focused on evidence-based SWI reduction. During the first quarter of 2019, our postoperative incision care guidelines were revised and released to staff, a new surgical wound cleansing product was supplied, and RN education was provided. Cardiac nurses were surveyed in April 2019 to identify any remaining knowledge and practice deficits and to assess their adherence to the new guidelines. The survey responses helped us to further improve our nurse education. We also provided periodic nurse reeducation and enhanced patient and family education. All such interventions were implemented by the end of June 2019.

RESULTS

Between January and June 2019, we had one SWI. From July 2019 through December 2020, an 18-month period, we experienced zero SWIs. Although beginning in 2021, we saw an increase in SWIs-four in 2021 and five in 2022-our incidence rates remain below 0.5% and we continue to work toward an SWI goal of zero.

CONCLUSION

This QI project identified opportunities for improvement, implemented evidence-based strategies for wound care and education, and successfully achieved a zero SWI rate for a period of 18 months.

Eliminating sternal wound infections: Why every cardiac surgery program needs an I hate infections team

Objectives

The majority of studies examining deep sternal wound infection (DSWI) prevention focus on ameliorating 1 variable at a time. There is a paucity of data regarding the synergistic effects of combining clinical and environmental interventions. This article describes an interdisciplinary, multimodal approach to eliminate DSWIs at a large community hospital.

Methods

We developed a robust, multidisciplinary infection prevention team to evaluate and act in all phases of perioperative care to achieve a cardiac surgery DSWI rate of 0, named: the I hate infections team. The team identified opportunities for improved care and best practices and implemented changes on an ongoing basis.

Results

Patient-related interventions consisted of preoperative methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus identification, individualized perioperative antibiotics, antimicrobial dosing strategies, and maintenance of normothermia. Operative-related interventions involved glycemic control, sternal adhesives, medications and hemostasis, rigid sternal fixation for high-risk patients, chlorhexidine gluconate dressings over invasive lines, and use of disposable health care equipment. Environment-related interventions included optimizing operating room ventilation and terminal cleaning, reducing airborne particle counts, and decreasing foot traffic. Together, these interventions reduced the DSWI incidence from 1.6% preintervention to 0% for 12 consecutive months after full bundle implementation.

Conclusions

A multidisciplinary team focused on eliminating DSWI identified known risk factors and implemented evidence-based interventions in each phase of care to ameliorate risk. Although the influence of each individual intervention on DSWI remains unknown, use of the bundled infection prevention approach reduced the incidence to 0 for the first 12 months after implementation.

Does Incisional Negative Pressure Wound Therapy Prevent Sternal Wound Infections?

BACKGROUND

 Incisional negative pressure wound therapy has been described as an effective method to prevent wound infections after open heart surgery in several publications. However, most studies have examined relatively small patient groups, only a few were randomized, and some have manufacturer-sponsorship. Most of the studies have utilized Prevena; there are only a few reports describing the PICO incisional negative pressure wound therapy system.

METHODS

 We conducted a prospective cohort study involving a propensity score-matched analysis to evaluate the effect of PICO incisional negative pressure wound therapy after coronary artery bypass grafting. A total of 180 high-risk patients with obesity or diabetes were included in the study group. The control group included 772 high-risk patients operated before the initiation of the study protocol.

RESULTS

 The rates of deep sternal wound infections in the PICO group and in the control group were 3.9 and 3.1%, respectively. The rates of superficial wound infections needing operative treatment were 3.1 and 0.8%, respectively. After propensity score matching with two groups of 174 patients, the incidence of both deep and superficial infections remained slightly elevated in the PICO group. None of the infections were due to technical difficulties or early interruption of the treatment.

CONCLUSION

 It seems that incisional negative pressure wound therapy with PICO is not effective in preventing wound infections after coronary artery bypass grafting. The main difference in this study compared with previous reports is the relatively low incidence of infections in our control group.