Outcomes of combination therapy including rituximab for antibody-mediated rejection after lung transplantation

Lymphocyte Depleting and Modulating Therapies for Chronic Lung Allograft Dysfunction

Chronic lung rejection, also called chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD), remains the major hurdle limiting long-term survival after lung transplantation, and limited therapeutic options are available to slow the progressive decline in lung function. Most interventions are only temporarily effective in stabilizing the loss of or modestly improving lung function, with disease progression resuming over time in the majority of patients. Therefore, identification of effective treatments that prevent the onset or halt progression of CLAD is urgently needed. As a key effector cell in its pathophysiology, lymphocytes have been considered a therapeutic target in CLAD. The aim of this review is to evaluate the use and efficacy of lymphocyte depleting and immunomodulating therapies in progressive CLAD beyond usual maintenance immunosuppressive strategies. Modalities used include anti-thymocyte globulin, alemtuzumab, methotrexate, cyclophosphamide, total lymphoid irradiation, and extracorporeal photopheresis, and to explore possible future strategies. When considering both efficacy and risk of side effects, extracorporeal photopheresis, anti-thymocyte globulin and total lymphoid irradiation appear to offer the best treatment options currently available for progressive CLAD patients. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: Effective treatments to prevent the onset and progression of chronic lung rejection after lung transplantation are still a major shortcoming. Based on existing data to date, considering both efficacy and risk of side effects, extracorporeal photopheresis, anti-thymocyte globulin, and total lymphoid irradiation are currently the most viable second-line treatment options. However, it is important to note that interpretation of most results is hampered by the lack of randomized controlled trials.

Anti-CD20 Antibody and Calcineurin Inhibitor Combination Therapy Effectively Suppresses Antibody-Mediated Rejection in Murine Orthotopic Lung Transplantation

Antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) is a risk factor for chronic lung allograft dysfunction, which impedes long-term survival after lung transplantation. There are no reports evaluating the efficacy of the single use of anti-CD20 antibodies (aCD20s) in addition to calcineurin inhibitors in preventing AMR. Thus, this study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of aCD20 treatment in a murine orthotopic lung transplantation model. Murine left lung transplantation was performed using a major alloantigen strain mismatch model (BALBc (H-2d) → C57BL/6 (BL/6) (H-2b)). There were four groups: isograft (BL/6→BL/6) (Iso control), no-medication (Allo control), cyclosporine A (CyA) treated, and CyA plus murine aCD20 (CyA+aCD20) treated groups. Severe neutrophil capillaritis, arteritis, and positive lung C4d staining were observed in the allograft model and CyA-only-treated groups. These findings were significantly improved in the CyA+aCD20 group compared with those in the Allo control and CyA groups. The B cell population in the spleen, lymph node, and graft lung as well as the levels of serum donor-specific IgM and interferon γ were significantly lower in the CyA+aCD20 group than in the CyA group. Calcineurin inhibitor-mediated immunosuppression combined with aCD20 therapy effectively suppressed AMR in lung transplantation by reducing donor-specific antibodies and complement activation.

Impact of Spousal Donation on Postoperative Outcomes of Living-donor Lobar Lung Transplantation

BACKGROUND

The effect of human leukocyte antigen mismatches between donors and recipients on postoperative outcomes of lung transplantation remains controversial. We retrospectively reviewed adult recipients receiving living-donor lobar lung transplantation (LDLLT) to examine the difference in de novo donor-specific antibody (dnDSA) development and clinically diagnosed unilateral chronic lung allograft dysfunction per graft (unilateral CLAD) between lung grafts donated by spouses (nonblood relatives) and nonspouses (relatives within the third degree). We also investigated the difference in prognoses between recipients undergoing LDLLTs including spouse donors (spousal LDLLTs) and not including spouse donors (nonspousal LDLLTs).

METHODS

In this study, 63 adult recipients undergoing LDLLTs (61 bilateral and 2 unilateral LDLLTs from 124 living donors) between 2008 and 2020 were enrolled. The cumulative incidence of dnDSAs per lung graft was calculated, and prognoses were compared between recipients undergoing spousal and nonspousal LDLLTs.

RESULTS

The cumulative incidence of both dnDSAs and unilateral CLAD in grafts donated by spouses was significantly higher than that in grafts donated by nonspouses (5-y incidence of dnDSAs: 18.7% versus 6.4%, P = 0.038; 5-y incidence of unilateral CLAD: 45.6% versus 19.4%, P = 0.011). However, there were no significant differences in the overall survival or chronic lung allograft dysfunction-free survival between recipients undergoing spousal and nonspousal LDLLTs ( P > 0.99 and P = 0.434, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Although there were no significant differences in prognoses between spousal and nonspousal LDLLTs, more attention should be paid to spousal LDLLTs because of the higher development rate of dnDSAs and unilateral CLAD.

Bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome after lung or haematopoietic stem cell transplantation: current management and future directions

Bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome (BOS) may develop after either lung or haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT), with similarities in histopathological features and clinical manifestations. However, there are differences in the contributory factors and clinical trajectories between the two conditions. BOS after HSCT occurs due to systemic graft-versus-host-disease (GVHD), whereas BOS after lung transplantation is limited to the lung allograft. BOS diagnosis after HSCT is more challenging, as the lung function decline may occur due to extrapulmonary GVHD, causing sclerosis or inflammation in the fascia or muscles of the respiratory girdle. Treatment is generally empirical with no established effective therapies. This review provides rare insights and commonalities of both conditions, that are not well elaborated elsewhere in contemporary literature, and highlights the importance of cross disciplinary learning from experts in other transplant modalities. Treatment algorithms for each condition are presented, based on the published literature and consensus clinical opinion. Immunosuppression should be optimised, and other conditions or contributory factors treated where possible. When initial treatment fails, the ultimate therapeutic option is lung transplantation (or re-transplantation in the case of BOS after lung transplantation) in carefully selected candidates. Novel therapies under investigation include aerosolised liposomal cyclosporine, Janus kinase inhibitors, antifibrotic therapies, and (in patients with BOS after lung transplantation) B-cell–directed therapies. Effective novel treatments that have a tangible impact on survival and thereby avoid the need for lung transplantation or re-transplantation are urgently required.

Allograft Dysfunction After Lung Transplantation for COPA Syndrome: A Case Report and Literature Review

COPA syndrome is an autoinflammatory disease with autoimmune and autoinflammatory manifestations affecting lungs, joints, and kidneys. COPA syndrome is caused by heterozygous loss-of-function mutations in the coatmer subunit alpha (COPA) gene, encoding α subunit of coatmer protein complex I (COP-I) coated vesicles. Mutant COPA induces constitutive activation of stimulator of interferon (IFN) genes (STING), leading to systemic inflammation and elevated type I interferon response. We have previously reported a Japanese family of COPA syndrome with a novel V242G mutation. Two out of 4 patients required lung transplantation due to intractable interstitial lung disease (ILD) and respiratory failure. Both of them deceased after lung transplantation, one due to sepsis and the other due to allograft dysfunction possibly caused by the reccurent ILD. The literature review indentified unfavorable outcome of the solid organ transplant in COPA syndrome and its related disease, however, precise clinico-pathological description of these cases has been scarce. Here, we report in detail the clinical course of our cases to clarify the pathophysiology of allograft dysfunction in COPA syndrome and propose potential therapeutic approaches to improve post-transplant graft survival.

Impacts of single nucleotide polymorphisms in Fc gamma receptor IIA (rs1801274) on lung transplant outcomes among Japanese lung transplant recipients

This study aimed to analyze the influences of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in Fc gamma receptor IIA (FCGR2A) on postoperative outcomes after lung transplantation (LTx). We enrolled 191 lung transplant recipients (80 undergoing living-donor lobar lung transplants [LDLLTs] and 111 undergoing deceased-donor lung transplants [DDLTs]) in this study. We identified SNPs in FCGR2A (131 histidine [H] or arginine [R]; rs1801274) and reviewed the infectious complication-free survival after ICU discharge. The SNPs in FCGR2A comprised H/H (n=53), H/R (n=24), and R/R (n=3) in LDLLT, and H/H (n=67), H/R (n=42), and R/R (n=2) in DDLT. Recipients with H/H (H/H group) and those with H/R or R/R (R group) were compared in the analyses of infectious complications. In multivariate analyses, the R group of SNPs in FCGR2A was associated with pneumonia-free survival (HR: 2.52 [95% confidence interval {CI}: 1.35-4.71], p=0.004), fungal infection-free survival (HR: 2.50 [95% CI: 1.07-5.84], p=0.035), and cytomegalovirus infection-free survival (HR: 2.24 [95% CI: 1.07-4.69], p=0.032) in LDLLT but it was not associated with infectious complication-free survival in DDLT. Therefore, in LDLLT, more attention to infectious complications might need to be paid for LTx recipients with H/R or R/R than for those with H/H.

Comparison of de novo donor-specific antibodies between living and cadaveric lung transplantation

BACKGROUND

Despite growing interest in donor-specific antibodies (DSAs) and antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) in lung transplantation (LTx), no study evaluating the outcomes in recipients with de novo DSAs (dnDSAs) in living-donor lobar LTx (LDLLT) exists. We compared various characteristics of DSAs in LDLLT with those in cadaveric LTx (CLT) based on prospectively collected data.

METHODS

Between October 2009 and September 2019, 211 recipients underwent LTx (128 CLTs and 83 LDLLTs). We reviewed 108 CLTs and 74 LDLLTs to determine the characteristics and clinical impact of dnDSAs. Eighteen data-deficient cases, 7 cases with preformed DSAs, and 4 re-transplants were excluded.

RESULTS

There were significant differences between CLT and LDLLT patients in age, primary disease, ischemic time, and number of human leukocyte antigen mismatches per donor. The dnDSA incidence in LDLLT (6.8%) was significantly lower than that in CLT (19.4%, p = 0.02). The dnDSAs appeared later in LDLLT (mean 1,256 days) than in CLT (mean 196 days, p = 0.003). According to Cox models analyzed using dnDSA as a time-dependent covariate, dnDSA positivity was significantly associated with a poor overall survival (OS; hazard ratio [HR] 3.46, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.59-7.57, p = 0.002) and poor CLAD-free survival in case of CLT (HR: 2.23, 95% CI: 1.08-4.63, p = 0.003). However, no such significant associations were noted in case of LDLLT.

CONCLUSIONS

The dnDSA occurrence was significantly lower and later in LDLLT than in CLT. Furthermore, dnDSA-positivity was significantly associated with worse OS and CLAD-free survival after CLT but not after LDLLT.

Postoperative outcomes of lung transplant recipients with preformed donor-specific antibodies

OBJECTIVES

Few studies have evaluated the outcomes of lung transplantation (LTx) in recipients with preformed donor-specific antibodies (DSAs). This study investigated the postoperative changes in preformed DSAs based on prospectively collected data of DSAs, and the influences of preformed DSAs on postoperative outcomes among LTx recipients.

METHODS

Between July 2010 and December 2019, 216 recipients underwent LTx (81 living-donor lobar lung transplants and 135 deceased-donor lung transplants). We reviewed 8 cases with preformed DSAs to determine postoperative changes in DSAs and compared postoperative outcomes between recipients with and without DSAs.

RESULTS

The preoperative mean fluorescence intensity of preformed DSAs ranged from 1141 to 14 695. Two recipients experienced antibody-mediated rejection within 2 weeks after LTx. DSAs disappeared in 7 recipients; however, 1 recipient experienced the relapse of DSAs and died from chronic lung allograft syndrome (CLAD), whereas 1 recipient had persisting DSAs within the study period and died from CLAD. Neither overall survival (OS) nor CLAD-free survival was significantly different between recipients with and without DSAs (P = 0.26 and P = 0.17, respectively). However, both OS and CLAD-free survival were significantly lower in recipients with DSAs against HLA class II than in those without these antibodies {5-year OS: 25.0% [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.9-66.5%] vs 72.1% (95% CI: 63.8-78.9%), P = 0.030 and 5-year CLAD-free survival: 26.7% (95% CI: 1.0-68.6%) vs 73.7% (95% CI: 66.5-79.5%), P = 0.002}.

CONCLUSIONS

Prognosis in recipients experiencing the relapse of preformed DSAs and those with persisting DSAs may be poor. The recipients with anti-HLA class II preformed DSAs had a significantly worse prognosis.