Management of the mangled extremity

Management of the Mangled Extremity

Mangled extremities represent one of the most challenging injuries. They indicate the need for a comprehensive trauma assessment to rule out coexisting injuries. Treatment options include amputation and attempts at limb salvage. Although both have been associated with chronic disability, new surgical techniques and evolving rehabilitation options offer hope for the future.

Lower limb preservation in pediatric trauma: a case study of Gustilo grade IIIC fracture in a 7-year-old

This case report describes the intricate aspects of managing pediatric lower limb trauma. A 7-year-old patient had a severe compound fracture and significant soft tissue damage in the left lower limb, classified as Gustilo Grade IIIC. This necessitated the use of scoring systems such as the Mangled Extremity Severity Score and limb salvage index to assess the likelihood of limb preservation. Despite these high amputation risk indicators, a multidisciplinary approach has led to limb salvage surgery with internal fixation. Detailed postoperative monitoring revealed progressive recovery culminating in restored sensation, bone healing, and functional recovery. The discussion emphasizes the difficulties in deciding between limb salvage and amputation, stressing the importance of tailored care and cautious scoring system interpretation in pediatric cases. This conclusion advocates the prioritization of limb salvage in children owing to their unique healing capabilities while highlighting the need for further research to refine treatment protocols for pediatric lower limb trauma.

Efficacious Enactment of Ilizarov for Mangled Forearm: A Case Report on Our Resolution for the Revitalization of a "Nearly Lost Limb"

Introduction

Mangled is the evocative term for a grievance caused by crushing, resulting in a limb confiscation. Motor vehicle crashes and industrial/farm accidents are the leading causes of such occurrences. The verdict to reconstruct or to amputate still commonly lies with the surgical skills and experience of the treating surgeon.

Case Report

We present a case of 33-year-old male military personnel involved in a road traffic accident who presented to our center with a mangled forearm with segmental fracture radius and fracture shaft of ulna with vascular injury. He was immediately taken up for early debridement, intramedullary fixation, vascular repair, and temporizing skin graft. After definitive soft-tissue flap coverage and a period of convalescence, the patient underwent Ilizarov external fixator application with successful rehabilitation. The patient achieved pain-free limb with functional range of motions of both elbow and wrist with functional capabilities of basic needs and activities of daily living.

Conclusion

The combination of osseous, vascular, soft-tissue, and nerve injury after severe trauma to an extremity is a great challenge in the mangled extremity. However, in young patients without significant systemic involvement and borderline injury scores, limb salvage should be attempted.

Uncommon Mechanism of Mangled Extremity; Three Cases of Rope Entanglement Injury of the Lower Leg

Rope entanglement injury is a rare entity. Previous reported studies mainly consisted of finger-related injuries. We describe three cases of rope entanglement injury of the lower leg. In the first patient, a belowthe- knee amputation was performed as the primary treatment for unilateral amputated lower limb. In the second patient, a below-the-knee amputation and perineal wound management were simultaneously performed. The third patient had vascular injury combined with internal soft tissue injury without related bone fracture. He suffered serious sequelae from a delay in transfer from a local hospital. Rope entanglement injuries of the lower leg do not present in a consistent manner, and the treatment of accompanying injuries should be considered from an early stage. Care should be taken to ensure that there are no internal injuries missed because the exterior appears to be stable.

Limb Salvage vs. Amputation: Factors Influencing the Decision-Making Process and Outcomes for Mangled Extremity Injuries

In the setting of acute severe limb injury, the clinical decision to either attempt limb salvage or to perform a primary amputation presents a significant challenge to the trauma team. The initial step in the management of a mangled limb is invariably resuscitation and stabilisation of the patient and an evaluation of the limb. However, the decision-making process on whether to amputate vs attempt limb salvage is dependent on a range of complex factors. This includes assessing the degree of injury to the components of the limb architecture, essential skeletal stability, soft tissues, vasculature, and neurological structures. Whether or not the patient would survive an attempt to limb salvage is of course not the only variable to be taken into account. The likely and expected outcomes of attempted salvage in each individual case must be considered and furthermore, what the acceptable side-effect profile including the risk of failure would be for each individual patient should be assessed against the importance, real or perceived, that limb function is maintained. Finally, the patient's choice should also be taken into account alongside their occupation and pre-morbid functional status. How the surgeon makes this life-changing, or life-threatening decision, is of great clinical significance, and there are myriad scoring systems published that purport to assist in this matter. However, the changing structures of the trauma system, expansion and advancement of skillsets and technology means an updated review is required to help weigh up the challenging decision of limb amputation vs salvage, which usually takes place in a time-pressured and highly emotional emergency setting. An evidence-based, standardised structure to assist in these calculations could support surgeons and improve outcomes for these patients.

Free Vascularized Fibular Flap with Bilateral Bipolar Latissimus Transfer for Upper Extremity Reconstruction: A Case Report

CASE

A 19-year-old woman presented with bilateral mangled upper extremities after jumping in front of a moving train. After revascularization, osteocutaneous free vascularized fibula flap was performed to reconstruct the right humerus. The left forearm required transradial amputation with acute targeted muscle reinnervation. Finally, staged bilateral bipolar latissimus dorsi functional muscle flaps were performed to restore elbow flexion.

CONCLUSION

Staged orthoplastic reconstruction of the upper extremities is an effective treatment approach for traumatic bone and soft-tissue defects. This patient's recovery demonstrates improved quality of life after severe upper extremity trauma.

Limb Salvage Versus Amputation for the Mangled Extremity: Factors Affecting Decision-Making and Outcomes

Complex limb injuries are severe injuries of the extremities that affect most or all components of the limb. Industrial/farm accidents and motor vehicle crashes are the mechanisms of injury for a large proportion of these presentations in the civilian population. While recent advances in surgery have led to more patients with complex limb injuries (that would have qualified for a primary amputation a few decades ago) undergoing limb-reconstruction surgeries, the existing evidence is inconclusive on the merits of limb salvage over amputation. Limb salvage surgery still carries considerable morbidity and mortality risks and requires careful consideration of several factors by the managing surgeons.

Comparison of Early versus Late Below Knee Amputation After Trauma With Standardized Prosthetic Care

BACKGROUND

High energy, lower extremity trauma is associated with longstanding pain and functional limitations. The clinical decision to proceed with early amputation or limb salvage is often controversial. This study was designed to compare differences in complications, costs, and clinical outcomes of below knee amputation (BKA) performed early after injury or after attempted limb salvage in a hospital with standardized prosthetic care following amputation.

METHODS

This is a retrospective comparative study of subjects who underwent BKA for a traumatic injury at a single level 1 trauma center and received standardized prosthetic care from a single manufacturer from 1999-2016 with minimum 2-year post-amputation follow up. Outcomes collected included demographics, surgical management, unplanned re-operations, and hospital and prosthetic cost data 2 years from time of injury.

RESULTS

Overall, 79 subjects met criteria. Early amputation (EA) was defined by median duration between injury and amputation (6 weeks) with 41 subjects in the EA group and 38 subjects in the late amputation (LA) group. Subjects in the EA group were more likely to have open fractures, high energy mechanism, and less likely to have medical comorbidities. Post-amputation infection was common in both groups (17/41 (42%) vs 17/38 (45%), p=0.77). Subjects undergoing EA were more likely to require unplanned post-amputation revision, 22/41 (54%) versus 10/38 (27%), p=0.017. Hospital costs and prosthetics/orthotics costs from the time of injury to two years following amputation were comparable, with mean hospital EA costs $136,044 versus LA costs $125,065, p=0.38. Mean prosthetics/orthotics costs of EA subjects were $33,252 versus LA costs $37,684, p=0.59.

CONCLUSION

Unplanned post-amputation revision surgeries were more common when BKA was performed early after trauma. Otherwise, outcomes and cost were comparable when amputation was performed early versus late. Level of Evidence: IV.

Ten-year outcome of unilateral leg replantation after bilateral lower leg amputation following traumatic injury: A case report

The absolute indications for lower limb replantation are not unequivocally established; rather, this procedure is still challenging and controversial. We report a case of a young male who underwent bilateral leg amputation, followed by unilateral replantation. The patient demonstrated good 10-year outcomes. A 23-year-old man had both of his lower legs crushed by heavy machinery that fell from the back of a truck, leading to amputation of bilateral lower limbs. Although bilateral amputation was recommended due to severe contusion on both sides, the patient and his family strongly requested replantation of the right leg, and surgery was started approximately 3 h after the injury. In addition to the emergency replantation, six surgeries were performed thereafter. Five months after the first surgery, the patient was fitted with a left lower leg prosthesis and started gait training. He was discharged 8 months later. Ten years after the replantation, the patient is satisfied with his leg. He has a normal gait with a prosthesis and has integrated into society with no functional deficit. There are still no clear standards for replantation after leg amputation, and individual decisions must be made based on the severity of the injury and the patient's general condition. In this case, we respected the patient's strong will to preserve the right leg and decided on the treatment plan. As a result, the patient was highly satisfied, and the spared right leg facilitated the patient's physical and mental recovery.

•

Lower limb replantation after amputation is challenging and controversial.

•

We report unilateral replantation after bilateral amputation in a young male.

•

Seven surgeries, including debridement and skin and nerve grafting, were required.

•

The patient demonstrated good 10-year outcomes with no functional deficit.

•

The spared right leg facilitated the patient's physical and mental recovery.

Primary amputation versus limb salvage in upper limb major trauma: a systematic review

PURPOSE

Severe upper limb injuries can result in devastating consequences to functional and psychological well-being. Primary objectives of this review were to evaluate indications for amputation versus limb salvage in upper limb major trauma and whether any existing scoring systems can aid in decision-making. Secondary objectives were to assess the functional and psychological outcomes from amputation versus limb salvage.

METHODS

A systematic review was carried out in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. A search strategy was conducted on the MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases. Quality was assessed using the ROBINS-I tool. The review protocol was registered in PROSPERO.

RESULTS

A total of 15 studies met inclusion criteria, encompassing 6113 patients. 141 underwent primary amputation and 5972 limb salvage. General indications for amputation included at least two of the following: uncontrollable haemodynamic instability; extensive and concurrent soft tissue, bone, vascular and/or nerve injuries; prolonged limb ischaemia; and blunt arterial trauma or crush injury. The Mangled Extremity Severity Score alone does not accurately predict need for amputation, however, the Mangled Extremity Syndrome Index may be a more precise tool. Comparable patient-reported functional and psychological outcomes are seen between the two treatment modalities.

CONCLUSIONS

Decision regarding amputation versus limb salvage of the upper limb is multifactorial. Current scoring systems are predominantly based on lower limb trauma, with lack of robust evidence to guide management of the upper extremity. Further high-quality studies are required to validate scoring systems which may aid in decision-making and provide further information on the outcomes from the two treatment options.

The mangled extremity: assessment, decision making and outcomes

The management of the mangled extremity continues to pose a significant challenge for ortho- paedic trauma surgeons. This article provides a comprehensive, up-to-date literature review on the assessment of complex limb injuries, and the variables that affect decision-making and outcomes in both limb salvage and amputation. Initial assessment involves using a systematic approach, saving life before limb, with early involvement of the relevant surgical specialities and multidisciplinary team. The decision to attempt limb salvage or perform amputation can be extremely difficult. Scoring systems can be used as a guide but should not be wholly relied upon; instead more emphasis should be placed on the surgeon's experience, extent of soft tissue damage, and patient factors and wishes. Outcomes following amputation versus limb salvage are comparable, with some studies suggesting amputation may be favourable. It is important to advise patients and families on what treatment is in their best interest so they can make an informed decision, and this must utilise a multidisciplinary approach.

Mangled extremity- Modern concepts in treatment

A mangled extremity is the most devastating limb injury and presents a challenge for the orthopedic surgeon. There are two main treatment options, reconstruction or amputation, but sometimes indications for either are not clear. There are many pro and contra arguments for both options. To make the decision easier numerous score systems have been introduced, but the final decision is based on the judgment and experience of the treating surgeon. Early extremity reconstruction appears to give better results than delayed or late reconstruction and should be the treatment of choice where possible. The goal in reconstruction of a lower extremity is to restore and maintain balance and ambulation, while restoration of an upper extremity's numerous functions is more demanding. In this paper the authors describe and suggest treatment approaches in patients with a severely mangled extremity, including assessment and treatment of all injured tissues, using defined protocols, with special attention to bone stabilization, revascularization, soft-tissue coverage and nerve reconstruction. These have a great impact on the outcome and function of the injured extremity. Rehabilitation and return to the preinjury level is slow and sometimes uncertain.

Open tibial fractures: An overview

Open tibial fractures are complex injuries with multifactorial outcomes and variable prognosis. The close proximity of the tibia to the skin makes it prone to extensive soft tissue damage and subsequent detrimental complications, such as infection and non-union. Thus, they were historically associated with high rates of amputation, sepsis, or even death. The advancement of surgical instruments and techniques, along the emergence of evidence-based guidance, have resulted in a significant reduction in complications. Peculiarly though, modern management strategies have a strong foundation in practices described in the ancient times. Nevertheless, post-operative complications are still a challenge in the management of open tibial fractures. Efforts are actively being made to refine the surgical approaches used, while noteworthy is the emergence of the Orthoplastic approach. The aim of this review is to summarise and discuss the historical perspective of the management of open tibial fractures, their epidemiology and classification, up-to-date principles of surgical management and outcomes following injury.

The timing of amputation of mangled lower extremities does not predict post-injury outcomes and mortality: A retrospective analysis from the ACS TQIP database

BACKGROUND

While limb salvage does not result in improved functional outcomes among patients with a mangled lower extremity, the impact of attempted limb salvage on mortality and complications is poorly understood. The objective of this study was to evaluate the relationship between attempted limb salvage and in-hospital outcomes among patients with a mangled lower extremity.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective cohort study of adults, 16 years or older, with a mangled lower extremity. Data were derived from the American College of Surgeons' Trauma Quality Improvement Program (2012-2017). We compared mortality, complications (severe sepsis, acute kidney injury [AKI], decubitus ulcers) and length of stay between patients managed with the intention of limb salvage (amputation beyond 24 hours or no amputation) and those who underwent early amputation (within 24 hours of presentation). Instrumental variable analysis was used to evaluate the relationship between management strategy and outcomes.

RESULTS

We identified 5,527 patients with a mangled lower extremity, of which 901 (16.3%) underwent early amputation. Among those managed with attempted limb salvage, 42.5% underwent amputation prior to discharge. After adjusting for patient and hospital characteristics, there was no association between initial management strategy and mortality (odds ratio, 1.20; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.83-1.74 early amputation vs. attempted limb salvage). Early amputation was associated with lower odds of AKI (OR, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.39-0.88) and a trend toward shorter length of stay (relative risk, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.52-1.14).

CONCLUSION

Over half of patients who sustain a mangled lower extremity undergo amputation during their initial hospital course. While a limb salvage strategy is associated with an elevated risk of AKI, there is no association between attempted limb preservation and mortality. These findings suggest that in patients in which there is no clear indication for early amputation, attempts at limb salvage do not come at the cost of increased mortality.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic study, level IV.

Guidelines for the acute care of severe limb trauma patients

GOAL

To provide healthcare professionals with comprehensive multidisciplinary expert recommendations for the acute care of severe limb trauma patients, both during the prehospital phase and after admission to a Trauma Centre.

DESIGN

A consensus committee of 21 experts was formed. A formal conflict-of-interest (COI) policy was developed at the onset of the process and enforced throughout. The entire guidelines process was conducted independently of any industrial funding (i.e., pharmaceutical, medical devices). The authors were advised to follow the rules of the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE®) system to guide assessment of the quality of evidence. The potential drawbacks of making strong recommendations in the presence of low-quality evidence were emphasised. Few recommendations remained non-graded.

METHODS

The committee addressed eleven questions relevant to the patient suffering severe limb trauma: 1) What are the key findings derived from medical history and clinical examination which lead to the patient's prompt referral to a Level 1 or Level 2 Trauma Centre? 2) What are the medical devices that must be implemented in the prehospital setting to reduce blood loss? 3) Which are the clinical findings prompting the performance of injected X-ray examinations? 4) What are the ideal timing and modalities for performing fracture fixation? 5) What are the clinical and operative findings which steer the surgical approach in case of vascular compromise and/or major musculoskeletal attrition? 6) How to best prevent infection? 7) How to best prevent thromboembolic complications? 8) What is the best strategy to precociously detect and treat limb compartment syndrome? 9) How to best and precociously detect post-traumatic rhabdomyolysis and prevent rhabdomyolysis-induced acute kidney injury? 10) What is the best strategy to reduce the incidence of fat emboli syndrome and post-traumatic systemic inflammatory response? 11) What is the best therapeutic strategy to treat acute trauma-induced pain? Every question was formulated in a PICO (Patient Intervention Comparison Outcome) format and the evidence profiles were produced. The literature review and recommendations were made according to the GRADE® methodology.

RESULTS

The experts' synthesis work and the application of the GRADE method resulted in 19 recommendations. Among the formalised recommendations, 4 had a high level of evidence (GRADE 1+/-) and 12 had a low level of evidence (GRADE 2+/-). For 3 recommendations, the GRADE method could not be applied, resulting in an expert advice. After two rounds of scoring and one amendment, strong agreement was reached on all the recommendations.

CONCLUSIONS

There was significant agreement among experts on strong recommendations to improve practices for severe limb trauma patients.

Outcomes of severe lower limb injury with Mangled Extremity Severity Score ≥ 7

AIMS

Complex fractures of the femur and tibia with associated severe soft tissue injury are often devastating for the individual. The aim of this study was to describe the two-year patient-reported outcomes of patients in a civilian population who sustained a complex fracture of the femur or tibia with a Mangled Extremity Severity Score (MESS) of ≥ 7, whereby the score ranges from 2 (lowest severity) to 11 (highest severity).

METHODS

Patients aged ≥ 16 years with a fractured femur or tibia and a MESS of ≥ 7 were extracted from the Victorian Orthopaedic Trauma Outcomes Registry (January 2007 to December 2018). Cases were grouped into surgical amputation or limb salvage. Descriptive analysis were used to examine return to work rates, three-level EuroQol five-dimension questionnaire (EQ-5D-3L), and Glasgow Outcome Scale-Extended (GOS-E) outcomes at 12 and 24 months post-injury.

RESULTS

In all, 111 patients were included: 90 (81%) patients who underwent salvage and 21 (19%) patients with surgical amputation. The mean age of patients was 45.8 years (SD 15.8), 93 (84%) were male, 37 (33%) were involved in motor vehicle collisions, and the mean MESS score was 8.2 (SD 1.4). Two-year outcomes in the cohort were poor: six (7%) patients achieved a GOS-E good recovery, the mean EQ-5D-3L summary score was 0.52 (SD 0.27), and 17 (20%) patients had returned to work.

CONCLUSION

A small proportion of patients with severe lower limb injury (MESS ≥ 7) achieved a good level of function 24 months post-injury. Further follow-up is needed to better understand the long-term trajectory of these patients, including delayed amputation, hospital readmissions, and healthcare utilization. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2021;103-B(4):769-774.

Clinical outcome of staged surgery after primary amputation for mangled extremity

INTRODUCTION

Amputation for a mangled extremity is an effective and reliable life-saving treatment method, which requires a relatively shorter duration for treatment than limb salvage. However, only a few studies have focused on treatment with amputation. Herein, we report good clinical outcomes achieved through staged surgery performed after amputation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This study included 47 patients (38 men, 9 women; average age, 52.4 years) diagnosed with mangled extremity, who underwent primary amputation between March 2014 and January 2019. The patients were divided into the initial closure (IC) groups (including 26 patients who underwent IC after amputation) and staged surgery (SS) (including 21 patients who underwent SS after amputation) groups. The presence of complications including necrosis and infection, consequent additional surgery, duration of hospitalization and expense for treatment, and functional scores of upper and lower extremities were assessed.

RESULTS

No specific postoperative complication was found in the SS group. However, additional surgeries were performed in the IC group because of complications including three cases of infection and two cases of necrosis. The differences between the hospitalization period, treatment cost, and functional examination conducted 1 year after surgery of the two groups were not statistically significant. The patients in the IC group who underwent additional surgery were hospitalized for a longer period and presented with lower functional scores due to delayed rehabilitation.

CONCLUSION

Staged surgery is a definitive and safe treatment option that can effectively reduce complications including infection and necrosis in patients with mangled extremity.

Patient profiles of below knee-amputation following road traffic accidents - An observational study from a level 1 trauma centre in India

BACKGROUND

Primary amputation below the level of the knee joint is the most frequently performed amputation following trauma; however, data about incidence, patient profiling, and causative factors are seldom available in India.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the profile and incidence of trauma-related amputations below the level of the knee joint at a level 1 trauma center.

METHODS

An observational study over six months was conducted at a level 1 trauma center of north India. Epidemiological data such as age, sex, occupation, socioeconomic status, mechanism of injury, time of surgery, single or staged procedure, and complications were recorded from the admission files.

OBSERVATIONS

125/3047 (4.1%) trauma patients underwent amputation, of which 32.8% (41 of 125) had amputation below the level of the knee joint. Unilateral transtibial amputation was the most common (85.3%) involving 40/41 males with a mean age of 37.2 years of low socioeconomic status. Road traffic accidents were the most common cause (85.36% of cases). 39 of 41 cases presented within 24 h of injury and underwent surgery within 24 h of presentation. Secondary surgery was needed in 24.4% of the patients and revision amputation was done in only 2.4% (n = 1/41). No patient developed medical complications, and the average hospital stay was 8.7 days with a range from 2 to 14 days.

CONCLUSION

We have documented a significant amputation rate in trauma cases (4.1%) reflecting on the seriousness of patients seen at our center. Most patients are young males at the peak of their productive lives, and from low socioeconomic status. Road Safety is essential, and specialized services for the amputees may be the need of the hour.

Interposition Arthroplasty of the Elbow After Proximal Ulna Reconstruction With the Masquelet Technique: A Case Report

INTRODUCTION

Periarticular bone loss in the upper extremity poses challenges for a functional reconstruction.

CASE

A 32-year-old man sustained an open elbow fracture-dislocation from a high-velocity gunshot resulting in significant bone and soft-tissue loss about the proximal ulna. He underwent bony reconstruction with the Masquelet technique and delayed interposition arthroplasty in an attempt to preserve function.

CONCLUSIONS

The Masquelet technique, coupled with interposition arthroplasty, may be used to address significant articular bony defects about the proximal ulna, allowing patients to maintain function and limit pain.

Free muscle flap coverage as last resort for therapy-resistant neuropathic pain in the upper extremity: A long-term retrospective follow-up study

BACKGROUND

Persistent neuropathic pain severely impacts physical functioning and quality of life (QoL). However, optimal surgical management of persistent neuropathic pain remains unclear. Extensive neurolysis with subsequent free muscle flap coverage, a new surgical procedure for neuropathic pain in the upper extremity, can be performed as a final option to establish pain reduction.

METHODS

All consecutive patients who received extensive microsurgical neurolysis with subsequent free muscle flap for persistent neuropathic pain in the upper extremity between 2007 and 2014 were identified. Patient-reported upper extremity function and QoL were assessed using three questionnaires (36-item short-form health survey (SF-36), the disabilities of the arm, shoulder, and head questionnaire, and the Michigan hand outcomes questionnaire).

RESULTS

Fifteen patients were identified; 80% had neuropathic pain in the upper extremity due to nerve injury and a median of 3.0 previous surgeries (range 1-6). Sixty-seven percent developed some kind of complication, flap loss occurred in 22%, and all received a new free flap (one failed again). At last follow-up, pre- and postoperative visual analog scale (VAS) scores significantly differed (p = 0.002), and the median VAS at last follow-up was 1.5. Ten patients (67%) responded to the questionnaires after a median follow-up of 5.7 year (range 2.6-7.3 years). Patients on average reported poorer SF-36 "Physical Component Score" (PCS) and "Bodily Pain" compared to Dutch norms. Forty percent of patients reported still having always (very) severe pain. However, 64% had a postoperative decrease of at least 3.0 on VAS.

CONCLUSION

Extensive neurolysis with free muscle flap coverage for persistent neuropathic pain in the upper extremity showed a positive effect on pain reduction on short-term follow-up, and also at five-year follow-up. The impact of pain on functional outcomes remained. Nevertheless, 60% of the patients still experience sufficient pain reduction.

Amputations versus Salvage: Reconciling the Differences

BACKGROUND

 There are many factors to consider when choosing between amputations versus salvage in lower extremity reconstructive surgery. Postoperative functionality and survival benefit are critical factors when deciding between limb salvage and amputation.

METHODS

 In this review, we present the evidence and the risks and benefits between these two options in the setting of the acute, trauma population and the chronic, diabetes population.

RESULTS

 The trauma population is on average young without significant comorbidities and with robust vasculature and core strength for recovery. Therefore, these patients can often recover significant function with anamputation and prosthesis. Amputation can therefore be the more desirable in this patient population, especially in the case of complete traumatic disruption, unstable patients, high risk of extensive infection, and significant nerve injury. However, traumatic lower extremity reconstruction is also a viable option, especially in the case of young patients and those with intact plantar sensation and sufficient available tissue coverage. The diabetic population with lower extremity insult has on average a higher comorbidity profile and often lower core strength. These patients therefore often benefit most from reconstruction to preserve limb length and improve survival. However, amputation may be favored for diabetics that have no blood flow to the lower extremity, recalcitrant infection, high-risk comorbidities that preclude multiple operations, and those with end stage renal disease.

CONCLUSION

 Many patient-specific factors should be considered when deciding between amputation vs. salvage in the lower extremity reconstruction population.

Management of Post-Traumatic Composite Bone and Soft Tissue Defect of Leg

Management of composite defects of leg following trauma requires a planned ortho-plastic approach right from the outset. Timely, planned intervention results in reduced amputation rates and improved limb salvage and function. Right from the time of presentation of the patient to the emergency with such injury, the process of decision making in terms of salvage or amputation, local flap cover/free flap cover, bone reconstruction first or soft tissue or both combined, come into play. Guidelines on management are unclear for such defects, a literature search yielding various methods being used by different authors.

This article is a review of current literature on management of composite leg defects.

A summary of the literature search in terms of various management options given by various authors including the rationale, advantages and disadvantages of each strategy has been provided in this article. The management protocol and method followed by the author in his institute for management of such composite defects have been described in detail. The article seeks to provide readers with an understanding of the management strategies so that appropriate method could be chosen to provide best result.

Damage control orthopaedics: State of the art

Damage control orthopaedics (DCO) originally consisted of the provisional immobilisation of long bone - mainly femur - fractures in order to achieve the advantages of early treatment and to minimise the risk of complications, such as major pain, fat embolism, clotting, pathological inflammatory response, severe haemorrhage triggering the lethal triad, and the traumatic effects of major surgery on a patient who is already traumatised (the “second hit” effect). In recent years, new locations have been added to the DCO concept, such as injuries to the pelvis, spine and upper limbs. Nonetheless, this concept has not yet been validated in well-designed prospective studies, and much controversy remains. Indeed, some researchers believe the indiscriminate application of DCO might be harmful and produce substantial and unnecessary expense. In this respect, too, normalised parameters associated with the acid-base system have been proposed, under a concept termed early appropriate care, in the view that this would enable patients to receive major surgical procedures in an approach offering the advantages of early total care together with the apparent safety of DCO. This paper discusses the diagnosis and treatment of severely traumatised patients managed in accordance with DCO and highlights the possible drawbacks of this treatment principle.

Salvage of mangled upper extremity using the Masquelet technique in a child: A case report

Aim

To report our experience with the Masquelet concept in a pediatric upper extremity following an open injury to the elbow.

Methods

A case report and literature review.

Results

An 11-year-old boy was transferred to our institution after a motor vehicle collision. There was a primary loss of the ulnohumeral articulation and the surrounding soft tissues as well as the ulnar nerve. Reconstruction used the Masquelet-induced membrane technique and a soft tissue flap. At the 30-month follow-up, the extremity was pain free and functional.

Conclusion

This case highlights the value of the Masquelet technique in pediatric extremity injuries, where there is a loss of a major articular segment, as well as significant soft tissue compromise.

Magnitude of Soft-Tissue Defect as a Predictor of Free Flap Failures: Does Size Matter?

OBJECTIVES

To examine the relationship between the magnitude of soft-tissue defect and the risk of free-flap and limb-salvage complications/failures.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort.

SETTING

Level I Trauma Center.

PATIENTS

One hundred twelve patients with free tissue transfers between January 2009 and June 2015.

INTERVENTION

A standardized approach using a consistent team of 2 orthopaedic microvascular surgeons was used for each free-flap reconstruction.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

Soft tissue defect size, total or partial flap failure, and unplanned reoperations.

RESULTS

Of 112 free-flap reconstructions, 57 complications occurred in 43-cases (38%) including 5 total flap failures (4.5%), 7 partial flap failures (6%), and 8 early (7%) and 38 delayed complications (33%). There was a significant correlation between the large defect size (≥200 cm) and partial/total flap failure (n = 80, P = 0.023). There was also a significant correlation between large soft tissue defect size and any complication that is, total or partial failure and early or delayed unplanned return to the operating room (n = 80, P = 0.002). Of the flaps used, multivariate analysis revealed that latissimus flaps had higher odds for failure.

CONCLUSIONS

Soft-tissue defect size ≥200 cm can be associated with a higher rate of total or partial flap failure and any complication in acute trauma setting, which may be due to a larger zone of injury, a higher level of difficulty in achieving complete debridement, and a more complex microvascular dissection. Current and future efforts will need to continue to focus on risk stratification for limb salvage efforts because an accurate assessment of risk is important to the patient, health care provider, and the health care system in general.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

The mangled extremity score and amputation: Time for a revision

BACKGROUND

The Mangled Extremity Severity Score (MESS) was developed 25 years ago in an attempt to use the extent of skeletal and soft tissue injury, limb ischemia, shock, and age to predict the need for amputation after extremity injury. Subsequently, there have been mixed reviews as to the use of this score. We hypothesized that the MESS, when applied to a data set collected prospectively in modern times, would not correlate with the need for amputation.

METHODS

We applied the MESS to patient data collected in the American Association for the Surgery of Trauma PROspective Vascular Injury Treatment registry. This registry contains prospectively collected demographic, diagnostic, treatment, and outcome data.

RESULTS

Between 2013 and 2015, 230 patients with lower extremity arterial injuries were entered into the PROspective Vascular Injury Treatment registry. Most were male with a mean age of 34 years (range, 4-92 years) and a blunt mechanism of injury at a rate of 47.4%. A MESS of 8 or greater was associated with a longer stay in the hospital (median, 22.5 (15, 29) vs 12 (6, 21); p = 0.006) and intensive care unit (median, 6 (2, 13) vs 3 (1, 6); p = 0.03). Of the patients' limbs, 81.3% were ultimately salvaged (median MESS, 4 (3, 5)), and 18.7% required primary or secondary amputation (median MESS, 6 (4, 8); p < 0.001). However, after controlling for confounding variables including mechanism of injury, degree of arterial injury, injury severity score, arterial location, and concomitant injuries, the MESS between salvaged and amputated limbs was no longer significantly different. Importantly, a MESS of 8 predicted in-hospital amputation in only 43.2% of patients.

CONCLUSION

Therapeutic advances in the treatment of vascular, orthopedic, neurologic, and soft tissue injuries have reduced the diagnostic accuracy of the MESS in predicting the need for amputation. There remains a significant need to examine additional predictors of amputation following severe extremity injury.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Prospective, prognostic study, level III.

Late Amputation Following Refracture After Removal of Multiplanar Circular External Fixator for Treatment of Severe Combat-Related Tibial Fracture: A Case Report

CASE

The multiplanar circular external fixator is commonly used in the treatment of severe combat-related tibial fractures. We present the case of a patient who sustained a refracture after removal of such a fixator. This complication contributed to failure of the limb salvage and ultimately resulted in the patient undergoing transtibial amputation.

CONCLUSION

The choice to pursue limb salvage or amputation must be a shared decision between the patient and provider. This discussion must now include the possibility of refracture if limb salvage is pursued using multiplanar circular external fixation. Further study is also required to define fracture stability after the removal of a multiplanar circular external fixator.

Severely comminuted radius fracture presenting as a signature patterned injury

Dilemma still prevails, regarding the exact management of mangled extremity injuries between limb salvage versus amputation, each having there own set of complications. We here present a case of severely comminuted fractures of radius (bag of bones) along with the multiple criss-cross shaped lacerated wounds on the forearm and wrist presenting as a "signature pattern injury" caused by entrapment of the limb in the concrete mixer. MESS score of patient was 8, a score valid for amputation, but contrary, we successfully salvaged the patient's limb with use of radio-carpal distracter. Management of mangled injuries should be individualized, with due consideration to the mechanism and force of injury, associated injuries, and the patient profile.

Primary amputation vs limb salvage in mangled extremity: a systematic review of the current scoring system

Background

In the last decades a lot of new reconstructive techniques were developed for the treatment of mangled lower extremity. However failed attempt to limb salvage is related to high risk of mortality for the patient. Several scores were developed to establish guidelines for the decision to amputate or not, however in literature there is no consensus about the reliability of this scores.

Methods

The authors focused their attention on the most used score system to provide guidance of the management of a mangled lower limb. The search term used included mangled lower extremity, MESS, PSI, LSI and NISSSA. The inclusion criteria were: studies dealing with mangled lower extremity; articles reporting MESS, PSI, LSI or NISSSA scores; articles published in English in PubMed, Cochrane, Scopus and web of science in the last 30 years, minimum number of cases in study of 15, minimum follow up of 1 year.

Results

According with the criteria described above, we found 134 articles in PubMed, 165 articles in Scopus, 111 articles in the Cochrane Library and 108 articles in Web of Science. The most used score in literature is the MESS. Few results are shown using the other severity scores. There are a lot of controversies in literature about the use of this scale. MESS seems to be more accurate than the LSI in prediction of limb salvage. LSI score shows better results when applied to type III tibial fractures. High sentivity of the PSI score is described when applied to predict successful limb salvage. Low sensitivity and specificity are described for the NISSSA score. The literature is very poor of articles related to mangled lower extremity in children. Higher sensitivity and specificity are described for these scores in children when compared to adult population.

Conclusion

The mangled lower extremity treatment is a challenge for the surgeon. Many scores were developed to help the surgeon, however they cannot be used as the sole criterion by which amputation decision are made and, in case of succesful limb salvage, they are not predictive of the functional recovery. Moreover, undue enthusiasm for new surgical techniques can lead to increased morbidity and mortality in case of secondary amputation.

Successful salvage of the upper limb after crush injury requiring nine operations: a case report

Emergency treatment of amputation is one of the most frequently used therapeutic methods for patients with severe upper limb crush injury with a mangled extremity severity score (MESS) of more than 7. With the development of advanced surgical repair techniques and reconstructive technology, cases that once required amputation can now be salvaged with appropriate management, and some limb functions may also be reserved. A patient with a severe upper limb crush injury with a MESS score of 10 was treated in our hospital. The limb was salvaged after 9 surgeries over 10 months. The follow-up visits over the next 18 months post-injury showed that the shoulder joint functions were rated as "excellent" (90) according to the Neer score, the Harris hip evaluation (HHS) for elbow joint functions was "good" (80), and the patient was very satisfied with the overall therapeutic outcome. We conclude from the successful outcome of this extreme injury that salvage attempts should be the first management choice for upper limbs with complex injuries to save as much function as possible. Amputation should only be adopted when the injury is life-threatening or no more function can be saved. The level of evidence was V.

Approach to complex upper extremity injury: an algorithm

Patients with complex upper extremity injuries represent a unique subset of the trauma population. In addition to extensive soft tissue defects affecting the skin, bone, muscles and tendons, or the neurovasculature in various combinations, there is usually concomitant involvement of other body areas and organ systems with the potential for systemic compromise due to the underlying mechanism of injury and resultant sequelae. In turn, this has a direct impact on the definitive reconstructive plan. Accurate assessment and expedient treatment is thus necessary to achieve optimal surgical outcomes with the primary goal of limb salvage and functional restoration. Nonetheless, the characteristics of these injuries places such patients at an increased risk of complications ranging from limb ischemia, recalcitrant infections, failure of bony union, intractable pain, and most devastatingly, limb amputation. In this article, the authors present an algorithmic approach toward complex injuries of the upper extremity with due consideration for the various reconstructive modalities and timing of definitive wound closure for the best possible clinical outcomes.