The management of complex periprosthetic humeral fractures: a case series of strut allograft augmentation, and a review of the literature

Operative and nonoperative treatment of periprosthetic humerus fractures after shoulder arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Periprosthetic humerus fracture is a relatively rare complication following shoulder arthroplasty. As shoulder arthroplasty volume increases, more periprosthetic fractures are anticipated. Some surgeons routinely operate on humerus shaft fractures adjacent to a humeral stem, while others recommend first-line nonoperative treatment. The purpose of this study was to identify and describe the prevalence of operative and nonoperative treatment options for periprosthetic humerus fractures, their associated outcomes, and complications. Our goal was to provide clinical insights for surgeons on the outcomes and complications associated with various treatment options.

METHODS

We performed a systematic review of studies reporting clinical or radiographic outcomes and complications after operative or nonoperative treatment of postoperative periprosthetic humerus fractures following shoulder arthroplasty. Subgroup analysis was conducted for differences in surgical outcomes between open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) and revision arthroplasty.

RESULTS

Twenty studies met the inclusion criteria (196 humeri). The mean clinical follow-up period was 2.6 years. Most fractures were Cofield B (42%), followed by C (27%), and A (12%); 19% were not classified. Forty-two percent of index implants were reverse total shoulders, 27% anatomic total shoulders, 16% hemiarthroplasties, and 1% resurfacing; implant design was not reported for 14%. The average time from index procedure to fracture was 2.9 years. One hundred sixty-seven (85%) fractures were treated operatively, 26 (13%) were treated nonoperatively, and 3 (2%) were missing information. Overall complication rate was 46%. Nonoperatively treated fractures had a higher complication rate (69% vs. 43%, P = .04) and increased risk of malunion (19% vs. 1%, P = < .001). Nonoperative management failed in 57% of Cofield B fractures. Time to union was shorter in the ORIF group than the revision arthroplasty group (24 weeks vs. 30 weeks, P < .001). Among operatively treated fractures, revision arthroplasty was associated with more complications (61% vs. 25%, P = .04) and higher nonunion rates (22% vs. 0%, P = .008) than ORIF.

CONCLUSIONS

Complications may be more frequent than previously understood. With a 70% healing rate, nonoperative management is a viable treatment option, but should be weighed against high risk of complications and need for future procedures, especially in Cofield B fractures. Treatment with ORIF is associated with a higher union rate and fewer complications than revision arthroplasty.

Periprosthetic humerus fractures after shoulder arthroplasty: an evaluation of available classification systems

BACKGROUND

Periprosthetic proximal humerus fractures (PPHFs) are a detrimental complication of shoulder arthroplasty, yet their characterization and management have been poorly studied. We aimed to determine the intra- and interobserver reliability of 4 previously described PPHF classification systems to evaluate which classifications are the most consistent.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 32 patients (34 fractures) that were diagnosed with a PPHF between 1990 and 2017. Patient electronic medical records and research electronic data capture (REDCap) were used for data collection. Post-PPHF radiographs in multiple views for all 34 cases were organized into an encrypted, randomized Qualtrics survey. Four blinded fellowship-trained shoulder and elbow surgeons graded each fracture using previously reported classification systems by (1) Wright and Cofield (1995), (2) Campbell et al (1998), (3) Worland et al (1999), and (4) Groh et al (2008), along with selecting a preferred management strategy for each fracture. Grading was performed twice with at least 2 weeks between each randomized attempt. Intraobserver reliability was calculated as an unweighted Cohen kappa coefficient between attempt 1 and attempt 2 for each surgeon. Interobserver reliability and agreeability between surgeons' preferred management strategies were calculated for each classification system using Fleiss kappa coefficient. The kappa coefficients were interpreted using the Landis and Koch criteria.

RESULTS

The average intraobserver kappa coefficient for each classification was as follows: Wright and Cofield = 0.703, Campbell = 0.527, Worland = 0.637, Groh = 0.699. The overall Fleiss kappa coefficient for interobserver reliability for each classification was as follows: Wright and Cofield = 0.583, Campbell = 0.488, Worland = 0.496, Groh = 0.483. Interobserver reliability was significantly greater with the Wright and Cofield classification. Using Landis and Koch criteria, all the classification systems assessed demonstrated only moderate interobserver agreement. Additionally, the mean interobserver agreeability kappa coefficient for preferred management strategy was 0.490, indicating only moderate interobserver agreement.

CONCLUSION

There is only moderate interobserver reliability among the 4 PPHF classification systems and the preferred management strategy for the fractures assessed. Of the 4 PPHF classification systems, Wright and Cofield demonstrated the greatest mean intraobserver reliability and overall interobserver reliability. Our study highlights a need for the development of a PPHF classification system that can achieve high intra- and interobserver reliability and that can allow for a standardized treatment algorithm in the management of PPHFs.

[Periprosthetic fractures of the shoulder girdle]

Periprosthetic fractures of the shoulder girdle will increasingly become part of routine clinical practice due to rising numbers of joint replacements and the demographic changes. Diagnostically, the status of the rotator cuff, bed of the implant (stable or loose), type of shoulder arthroplasty as well as exclusion of joint infections are crucial for therapeutic decision-making. Novel imaging tools, such as dual-energy computed tomography provide improved preoperative planning options. The unified classification system describes the fracture location, stability of the prosthesis and quality of the bone. While nonoperative treatment is reserved for patients with severe pre-existing conditions and nondisplaced fractures, the standard treatment of fractures with a stable bed include fixation with cerclage wiring and angular stable plates. Modern implant systems with variable angle screw holes, attachment plates and hinges enable secure fixation around the stem. In cases of a loose stem revision arthroplasty is necessary. There are currently only a limited number of clinical studies with only few patients that analyzed clinical and radiological results. Thus, increased research efforts are indispensable in order to compare treatment options and improve treatment quality.

Restoration of Humeral Bone Stock Two Years After Internal Fixation of a Periprosthetic Fracture with a Loose Stem: A Report of Two Cases

CASE

We describe 2 patients who sustained a periprosthetic humeral fracture with a loosened long-stemmed Coonrad-Morrey total elbow prosthesis. As noted in the literature, the success rate for a major revision with use of strut grafts is around 70%; therefore, both cases were managed without revision of the prosthesis. A submuscular locking plate was placed following typical fracture fixation principles. Screws that interfered with the humeral stem and the distal flange stabilized both the distal fragment and the humeral stem.

CONCLUSION

At 2 years postoperatively, both fractures had healed, with increased endosteal bone stock. In each case, the prosthesis was successfully salvaged, and radiographic reconstitution of the implant-bone interface was noted after 2 years.

Peri-prosthetic humeral non-union: Where biology meets bio-mechanic. A case report

INTRODUCTION

The worldwide incidence of traumatic fractures has been growing over the last years due to the progressive aging of the population. Today, the increase of arthroplasty procedures in orthopaedic surgery is related to a high rate of peri-prosthetic fractures. Healing of the fracture is a multifactorial metabolic process; if these factors are impaired, healing process could be interrupted resulting in non-union.

PRESENTATION OF CASE

We report our experience about a case of a humeral diaphysis non-union secondary to peri-prosthetic fracture (reverse shoulder arthroplasty) treated by conservative approach.

DISCUSSION

We treated this patient using a multilevel approach, consisting of revision surgery and drug therapy.

CONCLUSION

We assume that an aggressive revision surgery done with bone autograft implant and a bone healing therapy administering teriparatide off-label can reduce the convalescence in non-unions and can improve prognosis.