1
|
Li M, Lian X, Yang W, Ding K, Jin L, Jiao Z, Ma L, Chen W. Percutaneous Reduction and Hollow Screw Fixation Versus Open Reduction and Internal Fixation for Treating Displaced Intra-Articular Calcaneal Fractures. Med Sci Monit 2020; 26:e926833. [PMID: 33147205 PMCID: PMC7650089 DOI: 10.12659/msm.926833] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/25/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND We investigated the outcomes of displaced intra-articular calcaneal fractures (DIACFs) treated by percutaneous reduction and hollow screw fixation (PRHCF) versus open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF). MATERIAL AND METHODS Seventy-one patients were randomly allocated to group A (by PRHCF) and group B (by ORIF). Operative time, visual analogue scale (VAS) score, time from injury to operation, postoperative hospital stay, preoperative and postoperative radiographic measurements, and complications were recorded. Functional outcomes were assessed using the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) scores. RESULTS Finally, 59 patients were followed up for at least 12 months (range, 12-24 months). Group A showed significantly more advantages than group B in term of operative time, intraoperative blood loss, time to operation, postoperative hospital stay, and postoperative pain relief during the first 3 days (P<0.001). However, more intraoperative fluoroscopy was required in group A than in group B (P<0.001). The calcaneal width, height, length, Böhler angle, and Gissane angle in each group were significantly improved postoperatively (all P<0.001), although not significantly different in the postoperative comparisons between both groups. The AOFAS scores were slightly superior in group A than in group B (88.3 vs. 86.4, P=0.08). The rate of incidence of postoperative complications was lower in group A than in group B (3.2% vs. 10.8%, respectively; OR, 0.28, 95% CI, 0.03 to 2.84), although there was no significant difference (P=0.337). CONCLUSIONS PRHCF showed comparable clinical and radiological outcomes as ORIF, demonstrating it is a safe and effective alternative in treating DIACFs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ming Li
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, The Third Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, Hebei, China (mainland)
| | - Xiaodong Lian
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, The Third Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, Hebei, China (mainland)
| | - Weijie Yang
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, The Third Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, Hebei, China (mainland)
| | - Kai Ding
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, The Third Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, Hebei, China (mainland)
| | - Lin Jin
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, The Third Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, Hebei, China (mainland)
| | - Zhenqin Jiao
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, The Third Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, Hebei, China (mainland)
| | - Lijie Ma
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, The Third Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, Hebei, China (mainland)
| | - Wei Chen
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, The Third Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, Hebei, China (mainland).,Key Laboratory of Biomechanics of Hebei Province, Shijiazhuang, Hebei, China (mainland)
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
A Novel Minimally Invasive Reduction Technique by Balloon and Distractor for Intra-Articular Calcaneal Fractures: A Report of 2 Cases. Case Rep Orthop 2018; 2018:7909184. [PMID: 29854520 PMCID: PMC5944197 DOI: 10.1155/2018/7909184] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/31/2017] [Accepted: 04/05/2018] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Treatment of displaced intra-articular fractures of the calcaneus remains a challenge for the orthopaedic surgeon. Conservative therapy is known to produce functional impairment. Surgical approach is plagued by soft-tissue complications and insufficient fracture reduction. We describe a minimally invasive technique that will hopefully improve these issues. We want to present our first experience through two cases. The first was a 46-year-old man who presented with a Sanders type IIBC calcaneal fracture, and the second was a 86-year-old woman with a type IIIBC calcaneal fracture. We introduced 2 Schanz screws in the talus and the calcaneus. After distraction, we introduced an inflatable balloon inside the calcaneus. By inflating the balloon, the articular surface was reduced by lifting it up. Then bone cement was injected in order to maintain the reduction. Additional screw fixation was used in the young patient. Postoperative imaging showed good congruence of the subtalar joint without leakage of cement, for the two cases. After 2 months, the patients had no pain and were without soft-tissue complications. We advocate this technique to perform a minimally invasive reduction and fixation of intra-articular calcaneal fractures because it preserves soft-tissues and provides good clinical results with early weight-bearing.
Collapse
|
3
|
Pan M, Chai L, Xue F, Ding L, Tang G, Lv B. Comparisons of external fixator combined with limited internal fixation and open reduction and internal fixation for Sanders type 2 calcaneal fractures: Finite element analysis and clinical outcome. Bone Joint Res 2017; 6:433-438. [PMID: 28747337 PMCID: PMC5539306 DOI: 10.1302/2046-3758.67.2000640] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The aim of this study was to compare the biomechanical stability and clinical outcome of external fixator combined with limited internal fixation (EFLIF) and open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) in treating Sanders type 2 calcaneal fractures. METHODS Two types of fixation systems were selected for finite element analysis and a dual cohort study. Two fixation systems were simulated to fix the fracture in a finite element model. The relative displacement and stress distribution were analysed and compared. A total of 71 consecutive patients with closed Sanders type 2 calcaneal fractures were enrolled and divided into two groups according to the treatment to which they chose: the EFLIF group and the ORIF group. The radiological and clinical outcomes were evaluated and compared. RESULTS The relative displacement of the EFLIF was less than that of the plate (0.1363 mm to 0.1808 mm). The highest von Mises stress value on the plate was 33% higher than that on the EFLIF. A normal restoration of the Böhler angle was achieved in both groups. No significant difference was found in the clinical outcome on the American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society Ankle Hindfoot Scale, or on the Visual Analogue Scale between the two groups (p > 0.05). Wound complications were more common in those who were treated with ORIF (p = 0.028). CONCLUSIONS Both EFLIF and ORIF systems were tested to 160 N without failure, showing the new construct to be mechanically safe to use. Both EFLIF and ORIF could be effective in treating Sanders type 2 calcaneal fractures. The EFLIF may be superior to ORIF in achieving biomechanical stability and less blood loss, shorter surgical time and hospital stay, and fewer wound complications.Cite this article: M. Pan, L. Chai, F. Xue, L. Ding, G. Tang, B. Lv. Comparisons of external fixator combined with limited internal fixation and open reduction and internal fixation for Sanders type 2 calcaneal fractures: Finite element analysis and clinical outcome. Bone Joint Res 2017;6:433-438. DOI: 10.1302/2046-3758.67.2000640.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Pan
- Orthopaedics Department, Southern Medical University Fengxian District Central Hospital, No. 6600, Nanfeng Road, Fengxian District, Shanghai, China
| | - L Chai
- Orthopaedics Department, The People's Hospital of Bozhou, Anhui Province, No. 3, Xuejia Alley, Qiaocheng District, Bozhou city, Anhui Province, China
| | - F Xue
- Orthopaedics Department, Southern Medical University Fengxian District Central Hospital, No. 6600, Nanfeng Road, Fengxian District, Shanghai, China
| | - L Ding
- Orthopaedics Department, Southern Medical University Fengxian District Central Hospital, No. 6600, Nanfeng Road, Fengxian District, Shanghai, China
| | - G Tang
- Orthopaedics Department, Southern Medical University Fengxian District Central Hospital, No. 6600, Nanfeng Road, Fengxian District, Shanghai, China
| | - B Lv
- Orthopaedics Department, Southern Medical University Fengxian District Central Hospital, No. 6600, Nanfeng Road, Fengxian District, Shanghai, China
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Feng Y, Shui X, Wang J, Cai L, Yu Y, Ying X, Kong J, Hong J. Comparison of percutaneous cannulated screw fixation and calcium sulfate cement grafting versus minimally invasive sinus tarsi approach and plate fixation for displaced intra-articular calcaneal fractures: a prospective randomized controlled trial. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2016; 17:288. [PMID: 27422705 PMCID: PMC4946135 DOI: 10.1186/s12891-016-1122-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/26/2016] [Accepted: 06/09/2016] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The management of displaced intra-articular calcaneal fractures (DIACFs) remains challenging and controversial. A prospective randomized controlled trial was conducted to compare percutaneous reduction, cannulated screw fixation and calcium sulfate cement (PR+CSC) grafting with minimally invasive sinus tarsi approach and plate fixation (MISTA) for treatment of DIACFs. METHODS Ultimately, 80 patients with a DIACFs were randomly allocated to receive either PR+CSC (N = 42) or MISTA (N = 38). Functional outcomes were evaluated using the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) hindfoot scores. Radiological results were assessed using plain radiographs and computed tomography (CT) scans, and postoperative wound-related complications were also recorded. RESULTS The average time from initial injury to operation and the average operation time in the PR+CSC group were both significantly shorter than those in the MISTA group (p < 0.05). There were significantly fewer complications in the PR+CSC group than those in the MISTA group (7.1 % vs 28.9 %, p < 0.001). The calcaneal width immediate postoperatively and at the final follow-up in the MISTA group were obviously improved compared to those in the PR+CSC group (p < 0.001). The variables of sagittal motion and hindfoot motion of the AOFAS scoring system in the PR+CSC group were significantly higher than those in the MISTA group (p < 0.05). The good and excellent results in the two groups were comparable for Sanders Type-II calcaneal fractures, but the good to excellent rate in the MISTA group was significantly higher for Sanders Type-III fractures (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION The clinical outcomes are comparable between the two minimally invasive techniques in the treatment of Sanders Type-II DIACFs. The PR+CSC grafting is superior to the MISTA in terms of the average time between initial injury and operation, operation time, wound-related complications and subtalar joint activity. However, the MISTA has its own advantages in improving the calcaneal width, providing a more clear visualization and accurate reduction of the articular surface, especially for Sanders Type-III DIACFs. TRIAL REGISTRATION ChiCTRIOR16008512 . 21 May 2016.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yongzeng Feng
- Department of Orthopaedics Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, NO. 109, Xue Yuan West Road, Lucheng District, Wenzhou, Zhejiang Province, 325027, China
| | - Xiaolong Shui
- Department of Orthopaedics Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, NO. 109, Xue Yuan West Road, Lucheng District, Wenzhou, Zhejiang Province, 325027, China
| | - Jianshun Wang
- Department of Orthopaedics Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, NO. 109, Xue Yuan West Road, Lucheng District, Wenzhou, Zhejiang Province, 325027, China
| | - Leyi Cai
- Department of Orthopaedics Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, NO. 109, Xue Yuan West Road, Lucheng District, Wenzhou, Zhejiang Province, 325027, China
| | - Yang Yu
- Department of Orthopaedics Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, NO. 109, Xue Yuan West Road, Lucheng District, Wenzhou, Zhejiang Province, 325027, China
| | - Xiaozhou Ying
- Department of Orthopaedics Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, NO. 109, Xue Yuan West Road, Lucheng District, Wenzhou, Zhejiang Province, 325027, China
| | - Jianzhong Kong
- Department of Orthopaedics Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, NO. 109, Xue Yuan West Road, Lucheng District, Wenzhou, Zhejiang Province, 325027, China
| | - Jianjun Hong
- Department of Orthopaedics Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, NO. 109, Xue Yuan West Road, Lucheng District, Wenzhou, Zhejiang Province, 325027, China.
| |
Collapse
|