Can experienced surgeons predict the additional value of a CT scan in patients with displaced intra-articular distal radius fractures?

Traditional radiography versus computed tomography to assess reduced distal radius fractures

INTRODUCTION

This study compares computed tomography (CT) with plain radiography in its ability to assess distal radius fracture (DRF) malalignment after closed reduction and cast immobilization.

METHODS

Malalignment is defined as radiographic fracture alignment beyond threshold values according to the Dutch guideline encompassing angulation, inclination, positive ulnar variance and intra-articular step-off or gap. After identifying 96 patients with correct alignment on initial post-reduction radiographs, we re-assessed alignment on post-reduction CT scans.

RESULTS

Significant discrepancies were found between radiographs and CT scans in all measurement parameters. Notably, intra-articular step-off and gap variations on CT scans led to the reclassification of the majority of cases from correct alignment to malalignment. CT scans showed malalignment in 53% of cases, of which 73% underwent surgery.

CONCLUSION

When there is doubt about post-reduction alignment based on radiograph imaging, additional CT scanning often reveals malalignment, primarily due to intra-articular incongruency.

Distal Radius Fracture Management: Surgeon Factors Markedly Influence Decision Making

INTRODUCTION

It is our hypothesis that physician-specific variables affect the management of distal radius (DR) fractures in addition to patient-specific factors.

METHODS

A prospective cohort study was conducted evaluating treatment differences between Certificate of Additional Qualification hand surgeons (CAQh) and board-certified orthopaedic surgeons who treat patients at level 1 or level 2 trauma centers (non-CAQh). After institutional review board approval, 30 DR fractures were selected and classified (15 AO/OTA type A and B and 15 AO/OTA type C) to create a standardized patient data set. The patient-specific demographics and surgeon's information regarding the volume of DR fractures treated per year, practice setting, and years posttraining were obtained. Statistical analysis was done using chi-square analysis with a postanalysis regression model.

RESULTS

A notable difference was observed between CAQh and non-CAQh surgeons. Surgeons in practice longer than 10 years or who treat >100 DR fractures/year were more likely to choose surgical intervention and obtain a preoperative CT scan. The two most influential factors in decision making were the patients' age and medical comorbidities, with physician-specific factors being the third most influential in medical decision making.

DISCUSSION

Physician-specific variables have a notable effect on decision making and are critical for the development of consistent treatment algorithms for DR fractures.

Computed Tomography vs Standard Radiograph in Preoperative Planning of Distal Radius Fractures with Articular Involvement

Introduction

Distal radius fractures with articular involvement are more likely to require surgical management. Treatment decisions are based on parameters which are obtained from plain radiographs. This study aims to determine the differences between computed tomography and standard radiographs in the preoperative planning of distal radius fractures with articular involvement. This was performed by measuring the intraobserver and interobserver reliability between three systems used to interpret the main fracture characteristics and two treatment decisions.

Materials and methods

Forty-three cases of distal radius fractures with articular involvement were included. Fracture displacement was measured using plain radiographic and computed tomography. Five orthopedic surgeons evaluate the images to determine the AO/OTA classification, the articular fragments, the biomechanical columns involved, and recommend a surgical approach and implant for fracture fixation.

Results

An articular step-off was identified in 13 cases (30%) with the standard radiographs and in 22 (51%) cases with the computed tomography (p = 0.00). Interobserver variation for preoperative planning was slight when evaluated using the standard radiographs. Computed tomography improves reliability for AO/OTA classification and articular fragments but not for the biomechanical columns. Intraobserver variation for preoperative planning was slight to moderate for AO/OTA classification and slight to fair for identification of articular fragments and biomechanical columns. With regard to selection of the surgical approach, there was slight to moderate variation and, finally, for fracture fixation it was slight to fair.

Conclusion

Information provided by conventional radiography and computed tomography are sufficiently different as to induce the surgeon to select different treatments for the same fracture.

How to cite this article

Azi ML, Teixeira MB, de Carvalho SF, et al. Computed Tomography vs Standard Radiograph in Preoperative Planning of Distal Radius Fractures with Articular Involvement. Strategies Trauma Limb Reconstr 2019;14(1):15–19.

Evidence-Based Review of Distal Radius Fractures

Distal radius fractures are one of the most commonly treated fractures in the United States. The highest rates are seen among the elderly, second only to hip fractures. With the increasing aging population these numbers are projected to continue to increase. Distal radius fractures include a spectrum of injury patterns encountered by general practitioners and orthopedists alike. This evidence-based review of distal radius fractures incorporates current and available literature on the diagnosis, management, and treatment of fractures of the distal radius.