Follow-up surveillance among colorectal cancer survivors of different sexual orientations

Theory of health promotion for sexual and gender minority populations with cancer

BACKGROUND

Structural factors (e.g., cisheteronormativity) promote minority stressors, which generate healthcare disparities among sexual and gender minority (SGM) populations (also known as lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer, intersexual, asexual, and other sexual and gender-expansive persons--LGBTQIA+) with cancer. The individual's biological, behavioral, social, and psychological response to minority stressors will vary throughout their life course. However, there is a lack of empirical and theoretical guidance for conceptualizing health outcomes among SGM subgroups.

PURPOSE

To propose a nursing theory for the health promotion of SGM populations with cancer.

METHODS

Walker and Avant's strategies for theoretical derivation were followed.

RESULTS

I present the definition, theoretical assumptions, concepts, propositions, and implications for practice, education, research, and policy of the derived theory.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION

The theory provides a nursing framework to understand and address the multilevel impact of minority stress on the health of SGM individuals throughout their cancer care continuum.

Sexual and gender diversity in cancer care and survivorship

PURPOSE OF THE REVIEW

Sexual and gender diverse (SGD) cancer patients possess unique identities and needs that must be considered during their cancer care. This narrative review explores the current literature on sexual and gender diversity in cancer care and survivorship, in addition to providing recommendations encouraged by the current literature.

RECENT FINDINGS

We performed a literature search for articles published in English between January 2021 and June 2022 in Medline ALL and Embase. Fifty-two studies were included in this review. The many identities encapsulated in 2SLGBTQIA+ (2 Spirited, Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, Queer, Intersexual, Asexual, Agender, Aromantic and all gender identities and sexual orientations that are not listed) communities each have their own unique backgrounds, needs and disparities in cancer care and survivorship. However, we also identified specific protective factors in the cancer experience of SGD patients such as reports of higher resiliency and stronger support networks. Much of the recent research features recommendations on improving cancer care by creating inclusive patient questionnaires, improving in-person and online resources, and educating healthcare providers and patient-facing staff on inclusive care.

SUMMARY

SGD patients have their own specific challenges during and following their cancer care. As the research continues to grow, we gain a better understanding of the needs of these patients and future steps to take to improve SGD patients' cancer experience.

Expression Levels and Clinical Significance of Serum miR-497, CEA, CA24-2, and HBsAg in Patients with Colorectal Cancer

The objective of the current study was to look at the levels of blood micro ribonucleic acid- (miR-) 497, carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), carbohydrate antigen (CA) 24-2, and hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) in patients with colorectal cancer (CRC), as well as the clinical importance of these markers in CRC patients. The serum levels of miR-497, CEA, CA24-2, and HBsAg were compared between 60 patients with CRC (observation group) and another 60 patients with colorectal polyps (control group). The 4 indicators in patients with lymph node metastasis and liver metastasis were compared. The diagnostic effects of 4 detection methods and the combined detection were analyzed, and the influence of 4 indicators on the 5-year cumulative survival rate of patients was discussed. The results showed that the serum levels of miR-497 and HBsAg were lower, and the levels of CEA and CA24-2 were higher in the observation group (P < 0.05). The combined detection had the best diagnostic effect, and CEA alone had the best prediction effect. The serum level of miR-497 was significantly lower in patients with lymphatic metastasis, with the significantly higher levels of CEA and CA24-2 (P < 0.05). The HBsAg level of patients with liver metastases was greatly lower than that of patients without liver metastases (P < 0.05). The 5-year cumulative survival rate of patients with high levels of CEA and CA24-2 was significantly lower than that of patients with low level of CEA. The 5-year cumulative survival rate was lower in patients with low level of HBsAg, but the difference was small. The 5-year cumulative survival rate of patients with elevated serum miR-497 was observably lower. In conclusion, combined detection could diagnose CRC more accurately. Serum miR-497, CEA, and CA24-2 were important in the diagnosis of lymph node metastasis of CRC. HBsAg did a better job of predicting liver metastases in CRC patients. High level of CEA significantly reduced the cumulative survival rate of CRC patients and could predict the long-term survival rate of patients. Serum levels of miR-497, CEA, CA24-2, and HBsAg played a positive role in the diagnosis and evaluation of CRC and could identify lymph node and liver metastases, having a high clinical guidance value.

Stage II/III Rectal Cancer Post-Treatment Surveillance Patterns of Care: A SEER- Medicare Study

Introduction

Despite high rectal cancer recurrence rates, knowledge on post-treatment surveillance utilization is limited. Hence, this study aims to estimate patterns of post-treatment surveillance and determine associated factors.

Patients and Methods

Retrospective study of 1,024 SEER-Medicare patients >65 years old diagnosed with stage II/III rectal cancer between 2007-2013. Logistic regression was used to determine factors associated with ≥1 colonoscopy, ≥2 physician visits, ≥2 carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) tests and ≥2 computed tomographic colonography (CT) within 14 months after primary treatment.

Results

Fifty-five percent had ≥1 colonoscopy, 54% had ≥2 physician visits, 47% had ≥2 CEA tests and 20% had ≥2 CTs. In multivariable logistic models, younger age and receipt of chemoradiation therapy (vs none) were significant across all surveillance procedures while clinical factors such as comorbidity were not. Being married (OR=1.69; 95% CI: 1.26-2.26) and proximity to a high-volume hospital (≤15 vs >30 minutes, OR=1.56; 95% CI: 1.00-2.43) were associated with ≥1 colonoscopy. Female gender (OR=1.56; 95% CI: 1.17-2.09), being married (OR=1.56; 95% CI: 1.17-2.08), white race (OR=1.79; 95% CI: 1.23- 2.62) and surgery from high-volume surgeon (OR=1.47; 95% CI: 1.06-2.04) were associated with ≥2 physician visits. Female gender (OR=1.45; 95% CI: 1.08-1.95), being married (OR=1.46; 95% CI: 1.08-1.96) and surgery from high-volume surgeon (OR=1.55; 95% CI: 1.10-2.17) had higher ≥2 CEA tests.

Conclusions

Post-treatment surveillance remains low but is more common among younger patients and recipients of chemoradiation. Distinct profiles of patient characteristics and provider volume were associated with individual surveillance procedures suggesting the need for multicomponent strategies to increase surveillance.