Is stroke incidence increased in survivors of adult cancers? A systematic review and meta-analysis

Association between cancer, CHA2DS2VASc risk, and in-hospital ischaemic stroke in patients hospitalized for atrial fibrillation

BACKGROUND

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is commonly encountered in cancer patients. We investigated the CHA2DS2VASc score, and its association with in-hospital ischaemic stroke in patients with cancer who were hospitalized for AF.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Using the United States National Inpatient Sample, all hospitalizations with principal diagnosis of AF between October 2015 and December 2018 were stratified by cancer diagnosis, type, and CHA2DS2VASc risk categories (low risk, low-moderate risk, moderate-high risk). In-hospital ischaemic stroke and its association with the CHA2DS2VASc risk score was assessed across the groups using hierarchical multivariable logistic regression with adjusted odds ratios (aOR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI). Discrimination of CHA2DS2VASc score for in-hospital ischaemic stroke was evaluated with Receiver Operating Characteristic and Area Under the Curve (AUC). Among 1 341 870 included hospitalizations, 71 965 (5.4%) had comorbid cancer. Cancer patients had a higher proportion of moderate-high CHA2DS2VASc risk compared with their non-cancer counterparts (86.5% vs. 82.3%, P < 0.001). Compared with their low CHA2DS2VASc risk counterparts, cancer patients in low-moderate and moderate-high risk scores had similar odds of developing stroke (aOR 1.28 95% CI 0.22-7.63 and aOR 1.78 95% CI 0.41-7.66, respectively). The CHA2DS2VASc risk score had poor discrimination for ischaemic stroke in the cancer group (AUC 0.538 95% CI 0.477-0.598).

CONCLUSION

Cancer patients with AF have high CHA2DS2VASc risk. Discrimination of CHA2DS2VASc for ischaemic stroke is lower in cancer than non-cancer patients, and CHA2DS2VASc may not be adequate in determining ischaemic risk in cancer population.

Non-Hypertensives and Those with Normal Cholesterol Are More Likely to Have Concomitant Cancer amongst Patients with Ischemic Stroke: A Retrospective Cross-Sectional Registry-Based Study

INTRODUCTION

Patients with cancer are known to have an increased risk of ischemic stroke (IS) around the time of their diagnosis. However, there is a paucity of data in Asian populations, and as such, we aimed to determine cancer incidence rates and patterns in Asian IS patients as well as investigate the differences in vascular risk profile of IS patients with and without concomitant cancer.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cross-sectional study using data from the Singapore Stroke and Cancer registries. We defined cases as patients with IS and a cancer diagnosis 2 years before or after the index IS. Cancer incidence was determined using the same direct age-standardization method performed for the Singapore general population in the 2015 Singapore cancer report. Multivariable logistic regression was used to analyze differences in vascular risk factors.

RESULTS

Among 21,068 IS patients (mean age, 67.9 ± 13.3 years), 6.3% (1,330) were found to have concomitant cancer; 4.4% (935) had prior cancer while 1.8% (395) had cancer diagnoses within 2 years following IS. The cancer incidence among IS patients was 3,393 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1,937-4,849) per 100,000 person-years compared to 219-231 per 100,000 person-years in the general population. Older age (odds ratio [OR], 1.02 [95% CI, 1.01-1.02] per year), males (OR, 1.25 [95% CI, 1.11-1.41), Chinese ethnicity (OR, 1.61 [95% CI, 1.37-1.89]) and a lower prevalence of hypertension (OR, 0.84 [95% CI, 0.73-0.97)]), and hyperlipidemia (OR, 0.53 [95% CI, 0.45-0.62]) were independently associated with cancer-related IS.

CONCLUSIONS

The age-standardized cancer incidence was 15 times higher in IS patients than the general population. IS patients with concomitant cancer were older and had a lower prevalence of vascular risk factors.

The Risk of Ischemic and Hemorrhagic Stroke in Head and Neck Cancer: A Longitudinal Cohort Study

Several studies have shown that head and neck cancer is associated with an increased risk of stroke incidence. However, investigations of the association between the two diseases based on a matching cohort dataset are still limited. Therefore, we identified the incidence and risk of stroke in patients with head and neck cancer using a nationwide population-based cohort dataset. A total of 5248 individuals without cancer and 1312 with cancer were enrolled from the dataset after a 4:1 propensity score matching. We found that the incidence of overall stroke (per 1000 person years) was 19.29 for those with head and neck cancer, consisting of 17.32 as ischemic type and 2.74 as hemorrhagic type. Additionally, patients with head and neck cancer had a significantly increased risk of overall and ischemic stroke development but not hemorrhagic stroke. Moreover, the risk of stroke development over time was relatively high within the first year after the diagnosis of head and neck cancer. However, in the subgroup analysis, oral cavity cancer survivors showed an increased risk of both ischemic and hemorrhagic strokes. Therefore, our nationwide population-based cohort study suggests that clinicians should closely monitor patients with head and neck cancers for the early detection of stroke.

When Two Maladies Meet: Disease Burden and Pathophysiology of Stroke in Cancer

Stroke and cancer are disabling diseases with an enormous global burden, disproportionately affecting vulnerable populations and low- and middle-income countries. Both these diseases share common risk factors, which warrant concerted attention toward reshaping population health approaches and the conducting of fundamental studies. In this article, an overview of epidemiological trends in the prevalence and burden of cancer and stroke, underlying biological mechanisms and clinical risk factors, and various tools available for risk prediction and prognosis are provided. Finally, future recommendations for research and existing gaps in our understanding of pathophysiology. Further research must investigate the causes that predispose patients to an increased risk of stroke and/or cancer, as well as biomarkers that can be used to predict growing morbidity and mortality.

Incidence of stroke in the first year after diagnosis of cancer—A systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Patients newly diagnosed with cancer represent a population at highest risk for stroke. The objective of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to estimate the incidence of stroke in the first year following a new diagnosis of cancer.

Methods

We searched MEDLINE and EMBASE from January 1980 to June 2021 for observational studies that enrolled adults with a new diagnosis of all cancers excluding non-melanoma skin cancer, and that reported the incidence of stroke at 1 year. PRISMA guidelines for meta-analyses were followed. Two reviewers independently extracted data and appraised risk of bias. We used the Dersimonian and Laird random effects method to pool cumulative incidences after logit transformation, and reported pooled proportions as percentages. Statistical heterogeneity was assessed using the I² statistic.

Results

A total of 12,083 studies were screened; 41 studies were included for analysis. Data from 2,552,121 subjects with cancer were analyzed. The cumulative incidence of total stroke at 1 year was 1.4% (95% CI 0.9–2.2%), while the pooled incidence of ischemic stroke was 1.3% (95% CI 1.0–1.8%) and 0.3% (95% CI 0.1–0.9%) for spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH), with consistently high statistical heterogeneity (>99% I²).

Conclusion

The estimated incidence of stroke during the first year after a new diagnosis of cancer is 1.4%, with a higher risk for ischemic stroke than ICH. Cancer patients should be educated on the risk of stroke at the time of diagnosis. Future studies should evaluate optimal primary prevention strategies in this high-risk group of patients.

Systematic review registration

https://osf.io/ucwy9/.

Protein Biomarkers in Blood Reflect the Interrelationships Between Stroke Outcome, Inflammation, Coagulation, Adhesion, Senescence and Cancer

The most important predictors for outcomes after ischemic stroke, that is, for health deterioration and death, are chronological age and stroke severity; gender, genetics and lifestyle/environmental factors also play a role. Of all these, only the latter can be influenced after the event. Recurrent stroke may be prevented by antiaggregant/anticoagulant therapy, angioplasty of high-grade stenoses, and treatment of cardiovascular risk factors. Blood cell composition and protein biomarkers such as C-reactive protein or interleukins in serum are frequently considered as biomarkers of outcome. Here we aim to provide an up-to-date protein biomarker signature that allows a maximum of mechanistic understanding, to predict health deterioration following stroke. We thus surveyed protein biomarkers that were reported to be predictive for outcome after ischemic stroke, specifically considering biomarkers that predict long-term outcome (≥ 3 months) and that are measured over the first days following the event. We classified the protein biomarkers as immune‑inflammatory, coagulation-related, and adhesion-related biomarkers. Some of these biomarkers are closely related to cellular senescence and, in particular, to the inflammatory processes that can be triggered by senescent cells. Moreover, the processes that underlie inflammation, hypercoagulation and cellular senescence connect stroke to cancer, and biomarkers of cancer-associated thromboembolism, as well as of sarcopenia, overlap strongly with the biomarkers discussed here. Finally, we demonstrate that most of the outcome-predicting protein biomarkers form a close-meshed functional interaction network, suggesting that the outcome after stroke is partially determined by an interplay of molecular processes relating to inflammation, coagulation, cell adhesion and cellular senescence.