Taylor spatial frame in the treatment of neglected fractures

Corrective Intra-articular Osteotomy for Malreductions of Tibial Pilon Fractures in Patients Less Than 55 Years Old

BACKGROUND

Tibial pilon malreductions are challenging to correctively reconstruct, and the relevant literature is limited. This study aims to assess whether corrective intra-articular osteotomy is worthwhile to treat relatively younger (<55-year-old) patients with intra-articular malreductions of pilon fractures.

METHODS

This is a retrospective observational study with a minimum follow-up of 2 years. From 2013 to 2021, 21 patients (mean age: 39.2 ± 11.2 years) with intra-articular pilon malreductions ≥6 weeks treated with intra-articular osteotomies were analyzed. The median interval time until intra-articular osteotomy was 76 (interquartile range [IQR], 49-149) days. Plain radiographs and computed tomography were used for radiographic assessments. Clinical outcomes were evaluated with visual analog scale (VAS), the American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society (AOFAS) ankle-hindfoot score, the 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) score, and ankle range of motion (ROM).

RESULTS

The median follow-up duration was 34.6 (IQR, 26.1-74.3) months. The median articular displacement was reduced from 12.7 mm preoperatively to 2.7 mm postoperatively (P < .05). According to the Kellgren-Lawrence grading, 16 patients were assigned to stage II, 4 to stage III, and 1 to stage IV. In the 10 patients with available preoperative assessments, substantial improvement was found in the VAS score, from 5.90 to 2.0 at the final follow-up (P < .05). Similarly, the AOFAS ankle-hindfoot score and SF-36 scores improved (P < .05). Ankle ROM did not change a clinically meaningful amount. Progressive degenerative changes were noted in 2 of 10 patients who had adequate preoperative imaging. Four patients had VAS scores ≥4 including 1 patient who is scheduled for an arthrodesis.

CONCLUSION

In this small series, we found that the corrective osteotomies generally provided reasonable improvement at 3 years in patients <55 years old with intra-articular malreduction of pilon fractures. Prospective cohort studies are needed to determine if it is worthwhile in long-term outcome.

Neglected war injuries: Reconstruction versus amputation

INTRODUCTION

War injuries are remarkably different situations with profound severity and significant contamination compared to civilian injuries. Delayed definitive management makes the situation much more complicated. This study aimed to report the outcomes of limb reconstruction of neglected war injuries with a previous decision of amputation.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

From 2010 to 2021, 1104 patients with war-related fractures from conflict-zone countries were referred to our center including 589 open tibial fractures. Of these tibial fractures, amputation had already been decided in 54 cases, and the patients were looking for a trial of reconstruction and avoiding amputation. These cases were included in the current study. The treatment approach was a single-stage procedure with bone and soft tissue reconstruction.

RESULTS

This study included 54 male patients with a mean age of 26.3 years. Infection was the predominant feature in 43 cases (79.6 %). CT angiography revealed a one-vessel limb in 17 patients. Peripheral nerve injuries affected 15 patients. The mean time from injury to presentation was 8.5 weeks. The bone gap (2-13 cm) was evident in 44 cases. In four cases, the contralateral limb was amputated below the knee. There were associated injuries in nine cases. Rotational flap coverage was done in the same setting for 19 legs. Gastrocnemius flap was done in two cases. The mean follow-up duration was 45.1 months. The treatment methods included bifocal management (33 cases), trifocal management (17 cases), fibular transfer (two cases), and a mono-focal approach in two cases. All fractures healed successfully. The mean external fixation period was 7.6 months. Recurrence of infection occurred in three patients. A non-displaced refracture developed in one case. Five cases had a residual angular deformity. Eventually, the ASAMI bone and functional results were good in all cases.

CONCLUSIONS

Neglected war injuries constitute a complex problem where amputation may be indicated. Our approach includes one-stage limb reconstruction with the corticotomy-first technique, conservative debridement of the docking site, concomitant osteoplastic procedure, and gradual distraction to tackle all the aspects of the problem. The good results obtained in the presented series make it a valid approach to avoid amputation in neglected war injuries.

Neglected infected floating knee injury: evaluation of closed reduction techniques

PURPOSE

Floating knee injury is uncommon yet challenging problem. The situation is more complicated by presence of infection, open comminuted fractures, and late presentation. The aim of this study was to evaluate the closed reduction techniques by circular external fixation in a single stage to treat patients having infected neglected floating knee injuries.

METHODS

This retrospective study included 19 patients with a mean age of 34.4 years. The average duration from trauma to surgery was 51.1 days. All patients had at least one infected open fracture. According to Fraser's classification, ten injuries were type I, one case was type IIa, four were type IIb, and four were type IIc. Patients were treated by closed reduction techniques using the Ilizarov principles. Orthoplastic procedures were done in four cases in the same surgical setting.

RESULTS

Closed reduction and union were achieved in all cases with control of infection in 17 cases. The follow-up period averaged 41 months. The mean knee flexion was 97.4°. The complications included 5° extension lag (two cases), malunion (three cases), refracture (two cases), and DVT (four cases). The bone results were excellent (12 cases), good (5 cases), and poor (2 cases). The functional results were excellent (two cases), good (seven cases), acceptable (seven cases), and poor (three cases).

CONCLUSIONS

Closed reduction techniques using a circular frame provided a valid treatment option for infected neglected floating knee injuries in one stage without bone grafting. However, the high rate of complications and the diminished knee range of motion should be considered.

Neglected Tibial Pilon Fractures: Can Arthrodesis Be Avoided?

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the outcomes of neglected pilon fractures treated by the Ilizarov fixator and to determine whether this technique was successful in avoiding an ankle arthrodesis.

DESIGN

Retrospective case series.

SETTING

Level I university trauma center.

PATIENTS

Between January 2003 and March 2015, 18 patients (mean age of 42.17 years) with an untreated pilon fracture with late presentation (>1 month) were evaluated. Six patients were women and 12 were men. The mean duration from trauma to management was 11.17 weeks (range: 7-15). All fractures were OTA/AO 43 type C. Four cases were open fractures.

INTERVENTION

Closed fracture reduction, correction of deformity, and restoration of alignment by the Ilizarov fixator.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS

The radiographs were evaluated for tibial alignment, quality of reduction, and development of arthrosis. The American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) Ankle-Hindfoot Scale was used for functional assessment.

RESULTS

The follow-up period ranged from 18 to 168 months (mean; 38.00). The quality of reduction was excellent in 2 cases, satisfactory in 13 cases, and poor in 3 cases. The external fixator period averaged 29.06 weeks (range: 6.1-7.5 months). All fractures healed without deep infection. Ankle dorsiflexion and plantar flexion averaged 8.67 and 25.67 degrees, respectively, in 15 cases. Arthrodesis was performed for the remaining 3 cases. The mean AOFAS Ankle-Hindfoot score was 82.67. One case had mild anterior translation, and another 1 had a procurvatum of 5 degrees. Arthrosis developed in 6 ankles.

CONCLUSIONS

A satisfactory outcome was achieved after management by the Ilizarov fixator while avoiding arthrodesis in most cases of this series of neglected pilon fractures.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Hexapod External Fixation of Tibia Fractures in Children

Most tibia fractures in children can be treated nonoperatively. For fractures that do require surgery, however, the most common methods of management include plating or flexible nail insertion. Some fracture patterns, such as periphyseal fractures, fractures with bone and/or soft tissue loss, or fractures with delayed presentation, are not easily amenable to these techniques. Hexapod external fixators are especially helpful in these difficult cases. The purpose of this review is to discuss the principles of performing hexapod circular external fixation applied to pediatric tibia fractures. Some of the additional capabilities of the hexapod external fixator will also be highlighted.

Callus massage after distraction osteogenesis using the concept of lengthening then dynamic plating

Correction of complex deformities is a challenging procedure. Long-term wearing of a fixator after correction and lengthening are inconvenient and has a high rate of complication. The goals of the surgical treatment in the presented case were: (1) correction of the deformity and lengthening of the left leg by the Taylor spatial frame (TSF, Smith and Nephew, Marl, Germany); (2) reduction in the time the patient wears the TSF by changing the fixation system to a plate (lengthening then plating-LTP) and using a locking compression plate in conjunction with the 5.0 dynamic locking screws in order to accelerate bone healing.

Taylor spatial frame in the treatment of upper extremity conditions

BACKGROUND

Taylor spatial frame (TSF) is a modern multiplanar external fixator that combines ease of application and computer accuracy; it provides the capability of 1 to 6 axes of deformity correction sequentially or simultaneously by adjusting 6 connecting struts between 2 circular rings. Previous reports have documented the effectiveness of the TSF in acute fracture care, nonunion treatment, and in bone lengthening and deformity correction in the lower extremity. To the authors' knowledge, no previous case series in the English literature have documented the use of the TSF in treating upper extremity conditions. Our experience with the use of this external fixator in the treatment of upper extremity length abnormality, angulation, and bone transport is summarized.

METHODS

Over a period of 7 years, TSF was used in 12 patients with varying upper extremity pathologies that were collected from our prospective external fixator database. The classic TSF planning strategy was adopted and the TSF web-based program was used. All cases were followed for a minimum of 2 years. The database and radiographs were reviewed to obtain demographic data, malalignment parameters, final correction, time in the TSF, and complications.

RESULT

Patients' ages ranged from 8 to 18 years. Eight humeral and 4 radial cases were identified. These included 4 cubitus varus and 1 cubitus valgus deformity, 1 neglected supracondylar fracture, 2 humeral nonunion, 2 radial malunion cases, and 1 radial shaft septic nonunion. Time in the TSF varied according to patient age and bone involved. Five patients had superficial pin site infections that resolved with oral antibiotics. Postoperatively mean final angulation on the anteroposterior radiograph was 1 degree (range, 0 to 5 degrees) and the mean final angulation on the lateral radiograph was 0.5 degrees (range, 0 to 2 degrees). Union of bone was achieved in all cases.

CONCLUSIONS

The TSF is an external fixator that can be successfully used as a treatment alternative for the definitive treatment of upper extremity conditions involving a deformity and or shortening or bone transport in the pediatric and adolescent patient population.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV.