Acute dystonic reaction secondary to prochlorperazine use in the treatment of hyperemesis gravidarum

Akathisia and oculogyric crisis in hyperemesis gravidarum

Hyperemesis gravidarum complicates 0.5-2% of pregnancies. HG is associated with insomnia, significantly increased risks of anxiety and depression, and may be associated with feelings of guilt, social isolation and thoughts of suicidal ideation or termination of pregnancy. Anti-emetic therapy may be complicated by akathisia and dystonic reactions, which may affect the ongoing management of nausea and vomiting. A case of akathisia and oculogyric crisis following the addition of parenteral prochlorperazine to ondansetron and metoclopramide is presented. The treatment options for extrapyramidal side effects with anti-emetics in pregnancy and for ongoing treatment of nausea and vomiting are discussed.

Antiemetic treatment of hyperemesis gravidarum in 1,064 Norwegian women and the impact of European warning on metoclopramide: a retrospective cohort study 2002–2019

Background

Women suffering from severe nausea and vomiting during pregnancy, hyperemesis gravidarum, have poor quality of life and increased risk of potentially fatal maternal and fetal complications. There is increasing and reassuring knowledge about safety of antiemetics in pregnancy. In 2013, the European Medical Agency (EMA) issued a warning on metoclopramide limiting treatment to maximum five days. Metoclopramide was the most used antiemetic in pregnancy at the time the warning was implemented in the Norwegian hyperemesis guidelines (2014). We aimed at describing changes in the treatment of hyperemesis over time, including changes associated with the EMA warning.

Methods

Retrospective chart review of all women hospitalized for hyperemesis gravidarum with metabolic disturbances between 01/Jan/2002 and 31/Dec/2019 at a university hospital serving nearly 10% of the pregnant population in Norway. Time-series analysis described changes over time and interrupted time series analysis quantified changes in treatment and clinical outcomes related to the EMA warning.

Results

In total, 1,064 women (1.2% of the birthing population) were included. The use of meclizine, prochlorperazine, and ondansetron increased during 2002–2019. This led to a yearly increase in the percentage of women using any antiemetic of 1.5% (95%CI 0.6; 2.4) pre-hospital, 0.6% (95%CI 0.2; 1.1) during hospitalization, and 2.6% (95%CI 1.3; 3.8) at discharge. Overall, only 50% of the women received antiemetics pre-hospital. Following the EMA warning, prehospital use of metoclopramide dropped by 30% (95%CI 25; 36), while use of any antiemetic pre-hospital dropped by 20% (95%CI 5.7; 34). In timely association, we observed a decrease in gestational age (-3.8 days, 98.75%CI 0.6; 7.1) at first admission, as well as indication of increased rate of termination of pregnancy with an absolute increase of 4.8% (98.75%CI 0.9; 8.7) in 2014.

Conclusion

During 2002–2019, the overall use of antiemetics in treatment of hyperemesis increased. The EMA-warning on metoclopramide in 2013 temporarily limited pre-hospital antiemetic provision associated with hospitalization at lower gestational length and indication of an increase in termination of pregnancy.

Akathisia preceding an oculogyric crisis in a patient treated with prochlorperazine for hyperemesis gravidarum

Prochlorperazine is a class I-A anti-emetic recommended for the treatment of severe nausea and vomiting in pregnancy. We present a case where a patient presented with hyperemesis gravidarum refractory to pyridoxine/doxylamine and dimenhydrinate and developed akathisia and dystonia after receiving prochlorperazine. Her condition resolved immediately following the administration of diphenhydramine. While procholorperazine is known to very rarely cause focal dystonias such as an oculogyric crisis, the influence of phenothiazines and neuroleptics on dopaminergic receptors can also trigger behavioural changes, which can rapidly evolve into a life-threatening condition.