Transfusion requirements and outcomes in patients undergoing abdominal aortic surgery using intra-operative cell salvage

What Are We Transfusing? Evaluating the Quality and Clinical Utility of Intraoperatively Salvaged Red Blood Cells in Spinal Deformity Surgery: A Nonrandomized Controlled Trial

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Intraoperative red blood cell (RBC) salvage is frequently used in contemporary spine surgery, despite clinical concern in its efficacy as a surrogate for blood-banked allogeneic packed RBCs (pRBCs). During spine surgery, salvaged RBCs (sRBCs) are exposed to injurious high-heat electrocautery, prolonged stasis, and abrasive pharmaceuticals, potentially making sRBCs a poor blood substitute. We therefore sought to scientifically and objectively define the quality of sRBCs in the context of complex spine surgery.

METHODS

This is a single-center, prospective, nonrandomized controlled trial of patients undergoing posterior-based multilevel thoracolumbar instrumented fusion for spinal deformity with planned use of intraoperative RBC salvage between June 2022 and July 2023. Surgeries were performed by fellowship-trained spinal neurosurgeons and orthopedic surgeons. The participants were split based on transfusion of sRBCs (given sufficient yield) vs no sRBC transfusion. Primary outcomes were RBC electrolyte composition, indices, deformability, and integrity, which were evaluated in comparison blood samples: Baseline, pRBC, and sRBC. Secondary outcomes were related to clinical effects of sRBC transfusion. Morphological assessment used Stimulated Raman Histology and machine learning. Deformability was assessed using ektacytometry.

RESULTS

A total of 174 patients were included. The mean age was 50.2years ±25.4, 58.6% was female, the mean level fused was 10.0 ± 3.9, and 58.0% received sRBCs (median 207.0 mL). sRBCs differed significantly on standard laboratory measures, had a high proportion (30.7%) of shrunken and irregularly spiculated morphologies, and demonstrated abnormal deformability and relaxation kinetics. The hemolysis index was significantly elevated in sRBCs (2.9 ± 1.8) compared with Baseline samples and pRBCs (P < .01). Transfusion of sRBCs was associated with suboptimal resuscitation and provided no practical clinical benefit.

CONCLUSION

RBCs salvaged during posterior thoracolumbar spine surgery are irreversibly injured, with hemolysis index exceeding Food and Drug Administration and Council of Europe transfusion standards in all samples, questioning their efficacy and safety as a blood substitute.

The effectiveness of cell salvage in extracorporeal circulation surgeries in relation to use of health resources after use: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Alternatives to allogeneic blood transfusions are sought for resource management reasons and it is necessary to investigate the efficiency and efficacy on Cell Salvage use. The objective of this study is to analyze the effectiveness of the Cell Salvage system in addressing factors related to healthcare service utilization that may lead to increased healthcare expenditure.

Methods

A systematic review with meta-analysis was conducted through literature search in Medline, CINAHL, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library. Inclusion criteria were studies in English/Spanish, without year restriction and Randomized Controlled Trials design, conducted in adults.

Results

Twenty-six studies were included in the systematic review, involving a total of 4781 patients (nexperimental group = 2365; ncontrol group = 2416). Significant differences favored the Cell Salvage system in units of transfused Red Blood Cells, in terms of units (p = 0.04; SMD = -0.42 95 % CI = -0.83 to -0.02) and individuals (p = 0.001; RR = 0.71, 95 % CI = 0.60 to 0.84) transfused. No significant differences were found in ICU (p = 0.93) and hospital stay duration (p = 0.21), number of reoperations (p = 0.68), and number of units and individuals transfused in terms of platelets (p > 0.05).

Conclusions

Cell Salvage use holds high potential for reducing healthcare costs and indirectly contributing to improving blood and blood product reserves within blood banks. Results obtained thus far do not provide definitive evidence regarding the duration of hospital stay, ICU stay, need for reoperation, or the quantity of transfused platelets. Therefore, it is recommended to increase the number of studies to assess the impact on the economic models of the Cell Salvage system.

Efficacy and cost-effectiveness of cell saver usage in the repair of thoracic aortic aneurysms and dissections

INTRODUCTION

A substantial amount of blood loss occurs during the open repair of aortic aneurysms or dissections. The aim of the present study is to determine the efficacy and cost-effectiveness of cell saver devices in blood conservation during the open repair of thoracic aortic pathologies.

METHODS

The present study prospectively collected the data pertaining to 25 patients who underwent surgical management of thoracic aortic aneurysms or dissections using a cell saver (Group 1, n = 25). The volume and cost of transfusion and postoperative outcomes were compared with the second group of patients who underwent surgery without the use of cell savers in the previous year (Group 2, n = 25); the data pertaining to the same were retrospectively collected from the hospital records. The patient characteristics and categorical variables were compared using the x² test and Fisher's exact test. Transfusion volume and costs were compared using the independent samples t-test and Mann-Whitney U test.

RESULTS

The patients in both the groups displayed similar characteristics and risk factors. The total volume of allogenic red blood cell (p < 0.001) and total blood product (p = 0.01) transfusions were significantly lower in Group 1. The cost of red blood cell (p < 0.001) and total transfusions (p = 0.03) were lower in Group 1. The two groups displayed similar in-hospital morbidity and mortality rates.

CONCLUSIONS

There was a significant association between the use of cell savers and the decreased need for red blood cell and total blood product transfusions. Considering the cost of the cell saver set, transfusion costs in the two groups were comparable.

Balancing the Blood Component Transfusion Ratio for High- and Ultra High-Dose Cell Salvage Cases

OBJECTIVE

To assess the ratio of non-red blood cell to red blood cell components required to avoid coagulopathy when transfusing large amounts of salvaged blood using laboratory test-guided therapy.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

SETTING

Single-center, academic hospital.

PARTICIPANTS

Thoracoabdominal and abdominal open aortic surgery patients.

MEASUREMENT AND MAIN RESULTS

Thirty-eight patients in whom at least 1,000 mL of salvaged red blood cells were transfused were identified and divided into the following 2 cohorts: 1,000-to-2,000 mL of salvaged red blood cells (high dose) (n = 20) and >2,000 mL of salvaged red blood cells (ultra-high dose) (n = 18). Compared with the high-dose cohort, the ultra high-dose cohort received ∼4 times more salvaged red blood cells (1,240 ± 279 mL v 5,550 ± 3,801 mL). With transfusion therapy guided by intraoperative coagulation tests and thromboelastography, the adjusted ratio of non-red blood cell to red blood cell components (plasma + platelets + cryoprecipitate:allogeneic + salvaged red blood cells) was 0.59 ± 0.66 in the high-dose and 0.93 ± 0.27 in the ultra high-dose cohorts. Multiple coagulation parameters were normal and similar between cohorts at the end of surgery, as determined by the mean, median, and 95% confidence intervals.

CONCLUSIONS

When transfusing large volumes of salvaged blood, it is important to balance the ratio between non-red blood cell and red blood cell components. Through a laboratory test-guided approach, coagulopathy was not detected when transfusing blood in ratios of approximately 1:2 for patients receiving 1,000-to-2,000 mL of salvaged blood and 1:1 for patients receiving >2,000 mL of salvaged blood.

Clinical Utility of Autologous Salvaged Blood: a Review

INTRODUCTION

Autologous salvaged blood, commonly referred to as "cell saver" or "cell salvage" blood, is an important method of blood conservation. Understanding the mechanism of action and summarizing the existing evidence regarding the safety, efficiency, and the relative costs of cell salvage may help educate clinicians on how and when to best utilize autotransfusion.

METHODS

This review focuses on issues concerning the quality of red blood cells (RBC), efficiency, and the cost effectiveness relative to autotransfusion. The key considerations of safe use and clinical applicability are described along with the challenges for wider dissemination.

RESULTS

Cell salvage can reduce requirements for allogeneic transfusions, along with the associated risks and costs. Autologous salvaged RBCs provide high-quality transfusion, since the cells have not been subjected to the adverse effects of storage as occurs with banked blood. The risks for RBC alloimmunization and transfusion-related infectious diseases are also avoided. With a careful selection of cases, salvaged blood can be more cost effective than donor blood. Cell salvage may have a role in cardiac, major vascular, orthopedic, transplant, and trauma surgeries. However, there remain theoretical safety concerns in cases with bacterial contamination or in cancer surgery.

CONCLUSION

In addition to other methods of blood conservation used in patient blood management programs, autologous salvaged blood adds value and is cost effective for appropriate surgical cases. Evidence suggests that autologous salvaged blood may be of higher quality and confer a cost reduction compared with the allogeneic banked blood, when used appropriately.

Are we cross-matching too much blood for elective open abdominal aortic aneurysm repair?

OBJECTIVES

This study aims to identify current blood transfusion requirements in elective open abdominal aortic aneurysm repair and to compare this to an existing maximum surgical blood order schedule.

METHODS

We retrospectively identified patients who underwent elective open abdominal aortic aneurysm repair over a 40-month period in our institution. Pre-operative number of units cross-matched and the number of units actually transfused were identified. The cross-match to transfusion ratio was then calculated.

RESULTS

Blood transfusion at any time post-operatively was required in 23 (48.9%) cases. Patients needing an intra-operative blood transfusion had a median of 2 units. Of the pre-operative cross-matched units (123), only 43 were used, giving a cross-match to transfusion ratio of 2.86.

CONCLUSION

Our current maximum surgical blood order schedule is poorly followed and a cross-match to transfusion ratio of 2.86 indicates we are cross-matching too many units for elective open abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. A carefully considered individualised management of blood products, with the requirement of at least a valid group and save sample, may be more appropriate.

Cell salvage as part of a blood conservation strategy in anaesthesia

The use of intraoperative cell salvage and autologous blood transfusion has become an important method of blood conservation. The main aim of autologous transfusion is to reduce the need for allogeneic blood transfusion and its associated complications. Allogeneic blood transfusion has been associated with increased risk of tumour recurrence, postoperative infection, acute lung injury, perioperative myocardial infarction, postoperative low-output cardiac failure, and increased mortality. We have reviewed the current evidence for cell salvage in modern surgical practice and examined the controversial issues, such as the use of cell salvage in obstetrics, and in patients with malignancy, or intra-abdominal or systemic sepsis. Cell salvage has been demonstrated to be safe and effective at reducing allogeneic blood transfusion requirements in adult elective surgery, with stronger evidence in cardiac and orthopaedic surgery. Prolonged use of cell salvage with large-volume autotransfusion may be associated with dilution of clotting factors and thrombocytopenia, and regular laboratory or near-patient monitoring is required, along with appropriate blood product use. Cell salvage should be considered in all cases where significant blood loss (>1000 ml) is expected or possible, where patients refuse allogeneic blood products or they are anaemic. The use of cell salvage in combination with a leucocyte depletion filter appears to be safe in obstetrics and cases of malignancy; however, further trials are required before definitive guidance may be provided. The only absolute contraindication to the use of cell salvage and autologous blood transfusion is patient refusal.