Current trends in the management of acute appendicitis

Derivation and validation of the APPEND score: an acute appendicitis clinical prediction rule

BACKGROUND

Although many clinical prediction rules (CPRs) for appendicitis exist, none have been developed for a New Zealand population presenting with right iliac fossa (RIF) pain. The aim of this study was to derive and validate an appendicitis CPR for our population.

METHOD

This is a retrospective review of all patients from December 2010 to February 2012 of at least 15 years of age presenting to the general surgery service with RIF pain. Patient data were divided into derivation and validation groups. Univariate and multiple regression analyses identified significant predictors of appendicitis which were used to construct a CPR. A retrospective validation study was then performed and the CPR was refined accordingly. Finally, the accuracy of the CPR was tested.

RESULTS

The final components of the new CPR, the APPEND score, were Anorexia, migratory Pain, local Peritonism, Elevated C-reactive protein, Neutrophilia and male gender (Dude). This CPR has an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.84. The CPR can stratify patients into low, intermediate and high-risk groups which may standardize patient care and reduce the negative appendicectomy rate.

CONCLUSION

A new CPR for predicting appendicitis, in patients presenting with RIF pain, has been derived and validated for use in our population. A prospective study to further evaluate its performance is required.

[Perioperative CRP quantification for appendectomy: Clinically useful or a waste of money?]

BACKGROUND

Appendectomy is the most frequently performed non-elective surgical procedure in general surgery. Despite the questionable benefit, inflammatory markers, such as leukocyte count and C-related protein (CRP) are often determined before and after the surgical procedure. Clinicians are not infrequently confronted with the question whether a patient can be discharged despite an increase in inflammatory laboratory parameters.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of the current study was to retrospectively evaluate the clinical course of patients after appendectomy and the correlation with inflammatory laboratory findings.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A total of 969 patients underwent a surgical procedure due to clinically suspected acute appendicitis. All clinical, laboratory and histopathological data were obtained from the patient records and a quality control database. Laboratory results were correlated with clinical and histopathological data (e.g. t-test, χ (2)-test, regression analysis and ROC curves).

RESULTS

In patients without acute appendicitis operative trauma caused an increase in CRP up to a median of 31 mg/dl on the first postoperative day and up to 47 mg/dl on postoperative day 2. The overall morbidity was 6.2%. The strongest predictive parameter for complications was a CRP of more than 108 mg/l on the first postoperative day with an odds ratio of 16.6 (96% CI 6.4/42.8, p < 0.001, specificity 88% and sensitivity 69%). Patients with CRP values below the threshold suffered from complications in 1.1 % of cases in contrast to patients above the threshold in 16.8% of cases (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

A moderate postoperative elevation of CRP values is not a general contraindication for discharge; however, postoperative determination of CRP serum values after appendectomy might be an effective predictor for complications and should therefore be measured in the clinical routine.

Factors influencing the course of acute appendicitis in adults and children

PURPOSE

Our aim was to determine predictive factors for the diagnosis and postoperative complications of acute appendicitis.

MATERIALS AND PATIENTS

Data sets of 1,439 consecutive adults and children who had an appendectomy between 1999 and 2008 were retrospectively analyzed.

RESULTS

A mild acute appendicitis was present in 50 % (n = 722) and a severe acute appendicitis in 25 % (n = 355) of the patients. No signs of any pathology were found in 6 % (n = 82). Gender, white blood count (WBC), C-reactive protein (CRP), and ultrasound (US) examination were important indicators of mild acute and severe acute appendicitis in adults and children. Postoperative complications occurred in 16 % (237/1,439), mainly consisting of wound infections (8 %, n = 122) and bowel dysfunction (5 %, n = 76). Sixty-two patients (4.3 %) required reoperations. One patient died (1/1,439, 0.07 % mortality rate). Age, pathology, and the presence of bacteria in the intraoperative swab were important predictive factors for postoperative complications in adults and children. Time since onset of symptoms and type of operation were also associated with postoperative complications among adults. Complications developed in 21 and 9 % of the adults (155/754 and 10/125) who had open and laparoscopic surgery, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Besides history and clinical examination, WBC, CRP, and US examination remain important factors for diagnosing acute appendicitis. Complications are related to the pathology, presence of bacteria, and type of operation. Early diagnosis within 48 h may be important. A laparoscopic procedure in adults may also cause fewer wound infections.

Laparoscopy grading system of acute appendicitis: new insight for future trials

BACKGROUND

The mini-invasive techniques have revolutionized the surgery; however, the superiority of laparoscopic access for complicated appendicitis is still controversial. The most critical point has been the dismal quality of the methodology found in the series comparing laparoscopic and laparotomic procedures. The lack of stratification criteria to evaluate the inflammation in the appendix and abdomen has been pointed out by several authors.

PURPOSE

To validate the laparoscopic grading system for acute appendicitis.

METHODS

Prospective study of 186 patients with presumed acute appendicitis who underwent an appendectomy if diagnostic laparoscopy showed appendicitis or normal-looking appendix without any other intra-abdominal disease. The appendix was graded as to different levels based upon its visual appearance: grade 0 (normal looking), 1 (redness and edema), 2 (fibrin), 3A (segmental necrosis), 3B (base necrosis), 4A (abscess), 4B (regional peritonitis), and 5 (diffuse peritonitis). This was then compared with a histologic assessment of the removed appendix supplemented by a biochemical study of collected peritoneal fluid (gold standard) to determine the diagnostic indexes. Besides that, the κ coefficient confirmed concordance between them.

RESULTS

Laparoscopic sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy for acute appendicitis diagnosis were 100%, 63.3%, and 84.1%, respectively, and presented substantial concordance [κ=0.74 (95% confidence interval, 0.60-0.88)]. Sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of the laparoscopic grading system were 63%, 83.3%, and 80.1%, respectively, and presented moderate concordance [κ=0.39 (95% confidence interval, 0.23-0.55)]. The biochemical-histologic grading system changed for 48 (25.8%) patients who had been previously classified by surgeons during laparoscopy. Most incorrect graduation occurred in grades 0 and 1. The presence of exudates was confirmed in all cases classified as grades 4A, 4B, and 5.

CONCLUSIONS

Laparoscopy showed good to excellent accuracy for diagnosis and grading of acute appendicitis. The better grading system allowed the evaluation of patients with acute appendicitis in the same clinical stage.

Negative appendicectomy rate as a quality metric in the management of appendicitis: impact of computed tomography, Alvarado score and the definition of negative appendicectomy

INTRODUCTION

The negative appendicectomy rate (NAR) is a quality metric in the management of appendicitis. While computed tomography (CT) has been associated with a low NAR, Alvarado scoring produces an acceptable NAR. The definition of negative appendicectomy may affect the NAR. This study examined the impact of CT, Alvarado score and definition on the NAR.

METHODS

The charts of 1,306 emergency appendicectomy patients from 1996 to 2010 were reviewed. Three five-year cohorts were created (Cohort A: 1996-2000, Cohort B: 2001-2005, Cohort C: 2006-2010) and the NAR was calculated for each cohort using two definitions of negative appendicectomy: absence of inflammation (NAR-STD) and absence of intramural neutrophils (NAR-STR). NAR-STD was correlated to the CT rate for Cohorts B and C and also to Alvarado score for Cohort C.

RESULTS

When the definition of negative appendicectomy was changed, the NAR rose from 9.2% to 15.8% (p=0.0097) for Cohort A, from 2.8% to 8.6% (p=0.0180) for Cohort B (CT rate: 80.6%) and from 3.0% to 6.7% (p=0.0255) for Cohort C (CT rate: 92.4%). The introduction of CT lowered NAR-STD from 1996-2000 (9.2%) to 2001-2010 (2.9%) but increasing the CT rate from 2001-2010 had no impact on the NAR. The positive predictive value for Alvarado score (98.60%) and CT (99.03%) were similar.

CONCLUSIONS

The definition of a negative appendicectomy determines the NAR. CT reduces the NAR regardless of definition but routine CT is unnecessary for male patients with positive Alvarado scores. Early/mild appendicitis may resolve without surgery and CT may contribute to unnecessary surgery. Alvarado scoring allows selective use of CT in suspected appendicitis.

The management of right iliac fossa pain - is timing everything?

BACKGROUND

Right iliac fossa (RIF) pain remains the commonest clinical dilemma encountered by general surgeons. We prospectively audited the management of acute RIF pain, examining the relationship between symptom duration, use of pre-operative radiological imaging and patient outcome.

METHODS

Over a six-month period, 302 patients, median age 18 years, 59% female, were admitted with RIF pain. Symptoms, clinical findings and laboratory results were documented. Patient management, timing of radiological investigations and operations, and outcome were recorded prospectively.

RESULTS

Non-specific abdominal pain (26%), gynaecological (22%) and miscellaneous causes (14%) accounted for most admissions. Ultimately, 119 patients (39%) had appendicitis. Anorexia, tachycardia or rebound tenderness in the RIF significantly predicted a final diagnosis of appendicitis. Patients with perforated appendicitis (n = 29) had a longer duration of pre-hospital symptoms (median 50h) compared to those with simple appendicitis (median 17 h) (p<0.001). The use of pre-operative imaging resulted in an increased time to surgery but was not associated with increased post-operative morbidity or perforated appendicitis.

CONCLUSION

The majority of patients presenting to hospital with RIF pain did not have appendicitis. Increased duration of pre-hospital symptoms was the main factor associated with perforated appendicitis. However, increased in-hospital time to theatre was not associated with perforated appendicitis or post-operative morbidity.

Ultrasonic diagnosis of acute appendicitis with atypical clinical manifestations

AIM: To explore the value of high and low frequency ultrasound in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis with atypical clinical manifestations.

METHODS: A total of 65 acute appendicitis patients with atypical clinical symptoms and signs but confirmed by surgery and pathology were examined and diagnosed by high frequency (7.0-10.0 MHz) associated with low frequency (3.5-4.0 MHz) ultrasound. Their ultrasonic images of acute appendicitis were reviewed retrospectively.

RESULTS: Fifty-four (83.08%) patients were diagnosed by ultrasound. The rates of diagnosis by high frequency and low frequency ultrasound were significantly different (83.08% vs 61.53%, χ² = 4.32, P < 0.05). Some indirect evidences were achieved by ultrasonography: appendiceal fecalith was observed in 33 (61.11%) patients, local adynamic ileus in 25 (46.29%) patients, periappendicular fluid in 21 (38.88%) patients and complex mass in 14 (25.92%) patients. Mesenteric lymphadenectasis was found in 10 (18.52%) patients.

CONCLUSION: In most cases, the correct diagnosis of acute appendicitis with atypical clinical manifestations can be made by high frequency associated with low frequency ultrasound.