Postoperative adjuvant arterial chemoembolization improves the survival of hepatitis B virus-related hepatocellular carcinoma: a retrospective control study

Comparison of different adjuvant therapy regimen efficacies in patients with high risk of recurrence after radical resection of hepatocellular carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) has a high recurrence rate even after radical surgery. Postoperative adjuvant transhepatic arterial chemoembolization (PA-TACE), postoperative adjuvant hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (PA-HAIC), postoperative adjuvant radiotherapy (PA-RT), and postoperative adjuvant molecular targeted therapy have been demonstrated to be effective in reducing the postoperative recurrence rate. The present network meta-analysis was conducted to compare the effects of PA-TACE, PA-HAIC, PA-RT and postoperative adjuvant molecular targeted therapy on the overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) in HCC patients after radical resection and to determine the optimal treatment strategy.

METHODS

Network meta-analysis was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science were used to collect eligible studies up to December 25, 2022. Studies related to PA-TACE, PA-HAIC, and postoperative adjuvant molecular targeted therapy after radical HCC resection was included. The endpoints were OS and DFS, and the effect size was determined using hazard ratio with a 95% confidence interval. R software and "gemtc" package were employed to analyze the results.

RESULTS

A total of 38 studies involving 7079 patients with HCC after radical resection were ultimately enrolled to be analyzed. Four postoperative adjuvant therapy measures and two oncology indicators were evaluated. In this study, OS-related investigations validated that PA-Sorafenib and PA-RT markedly enhanced the OS rates in patients after radical resection when compared to PA-TACE and PA-HAIC. However, statistical analysis revealed no significant difference between PA-Sorafenib and PA-RT, as well as PA-TACE and PA-HAIC. In the DFS-related investigations, PA-RT demonstrated superior efficacy over PA-Sorafenib, PA-TACE, and PA-HAIC. Additionally, PA-Sorafenib displayed better efficacy than PA-TACE. Nevertheless, there was no statistical significance between PA-Sorafenib and PA-HAIC, as well as PA-TACE and PA-HAIC. We also performed a subgroup analysis of studies focusing on HCC complicated by microvascular invasion after radical resection. In terms of OS, both PA-RT and PA-Sorafenib demonstrated a noteworthy improvement over PA-TACE, whereas no statistical significance was detected between PA-RT and PA-Sorafenib. Likewise, for DFS, both PA-Sorafenib and PA-RT exhibited superior efficacy compared to PA-TACE.

CONCLUSION

In patients with HCC after radical resection and a high risk of recurrence, both PA-Sorafenib and PA-RT significantly improved OS and DFS when compared to PA-TACE and PA-HAIC. Notably, PA-RT exhibited superior efficacy over PA-Sorafenib, PA-TACE, and PA-HAIC in terms of DFS. Similarly, PA-Sorafenib appeared to be more effective than PA-TACE for DFS.

CT-Based Radiomics for the Recurrence Prediction of Hepatocellular Carcinoma After Surgical Resection

Purpose

To explore the effectiveness of radiomics signature in predicting the recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and the benefit of postoperative adjuvant transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (PA-TACE).

Patients and Methods

In this multicenter retrospective study, 364 consecutive patients with multi-phase computed tomography (CT) images were included. Recurrence-related radiomics features of intra- and peritumoral regions were extracted from the pre-contrast, arterial and portal venous phase, respectively. The radiomics model was established in the training cohort (n = 187) using random survival forests analysis to output prediction probability as “Rad-score” and validated by the internal (n = 92) and external validation cohorts (n = 85). Besides, the Clinical nomogram was developed by clinical-radiologic-pathologic characteristics, and the Combined nomogram was further constructed to evaluate the added value of the Rad-score for individualized recurrence-free survival (RFS) prediction, which is our primary and only endpoint. The performance of the three models was assessed by the concordance index (C-index). Furthermore, all the patients were stratified into high- and low-risk groups of recurrence by the median value of the Rad-score to analyze the benefit of PA-TACE.

Results

The model built using radiomics signature demonstrated favorable prediction of HCC recurrence across all datasets, with C-index of 0.892, 0.812, 0.809, separately in the training, the internal and external validation cohorts. Univariate and multivariate analysis revealed that the Rad-score was an independent prognostic factor. Significant differences were found between the high- and low-risk group in RFS prediction in all three cohorts. Further analysis showed that compared with the low-risk group, patients with the high-risk received more benefits from PA-TACE.

Conclusion

The newly developed Rad-score was not only a powerful biomarker in predicting the RFS of HCC but also a strong stratification basis to explore the high-risk patients who could benefit from PA-TACE.

Survival benefits from adjuvant transcatheter arterial chemoembolization in patients undergoing liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Although adjuvant transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) has been used to prevent recurrence after surgery in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), the survival benefits from adjuvant TACE remain controversial. We sought to systematically evaluate the data on the effectiveness of adjuvant TACE for HCC, as well as identify patient populations that might benefit from adjuvant TACE.

METHODS

The PubMed, Embase, Medline and Cochrane library were systematically searched for studies published before July 2019 that compared adjuvant TACE versus surgery alone for HCC. The study endpoints were overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS). Patients with large HCC (⩾5 cm), multinodular HCC, microvascular invasion (MVI), or portal vein tumor thrombosis (PVTT) were analyzed in subgroup analyses.

RESULTS

Twenty-four studies with 6977 patients were included in the analytic cohort. The pooled analysis demonstrated that adjuvant TACE was associated with a better OS and DFS [hazard ratio (HR): 0.67 and 0.67, both p < 0.01]. In subgroup analyses, pooled results revealed that adjuvant TACE was associated with an improved OS and DFS in patients with multinodular HCC (HR: 0.79 and 0.31, both p < 0.01), MVI (HR: 0.62 and 0.67, both p < 0.01), or PVTT (HR: 0.49 and 0.58, both p < 0.01), but not among patients with large HCC (⩾5 cm).

CONCLUSION

Postoperative adjuvant TACE may be effective to improve OS and DFS in patients with multinodular HCC, or HCC with MVI or PVTT. Future randomized controlled trials are needed to better define the benefit of adjuvant TACE in subset patients with HCC.

Transcatheter hepatic arterial chemoembolization combined with Kangai injection for hepatitis B virus-related hepatocellular carcinoma: A protocol for a PRISMA-compliant meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Kangai injection, a well-known insect-derived traditional Chinese medicine preparation, has been widely applied as a promising adjunctive drug for hepatitis B virus (HBV)-related hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, its exact clinical efficacy and safety is still not well investigated. In this study, we aimed to summarize the efficacy and safety of Kangai injection for patients with HBV-related HCC through the meta-analysis.

METHODS

All available randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and high-quality prospective cohort studies that investigated the efficacy and safety of Kangai injection for patients with HBV-related HCC were searched from ten electronic databases including Google Scholar, PubMed, Excerpt Medica Database (Embase), Cochrane Library, Medline, Web of Science (WOS), China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), China Scientific Journal Database (CSJ) Chinese, Biomedical Literature Database (CBM) and Wanfang Database. Papers in Chinese or English published from January 2000 to September 2020 will be included without any restrictions.Study selection and data extraction will be performed independently by 2 researchers. The clinical outcomes including overall response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), quality of life (QoL), clinical symptoms, virological indicators, immune function and adverse events, were systematically evaluated. Review Manager 5.3 and Stata 14.0 were used for data analysis, and the quality of the literatures was also evaluated.

RESULTS

The results of this study will be published in a peer-reviewed journal, and provide a helpful evidence for clinicians to formulate the best postoperative adjuvant treatment strategy for HBV-related HCC patients.

CONCLUSION

Our study will draw an objective conclusion of the efficacy of Kangai injection on curative effect (ORR and DCR), clinical symptoms, virological indicators, QoL, and immune function in patients with HBV-related HCC.

INPLASY REGISTRATION NUMBER

INPLASY202090014.

Determinants of pain in advanced HCC patients recieving hepatic artery infusion chemotherapy

Purpose Hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) is one of the options to treat unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). The majority of HCC patients suffer great pain in the course of HAIC treatment. To improve the quality of life and the efficacy of HAIC treatment, the causes of pain, the choice of an analgesic regimen, and the relationship between pain and prognosis of HCC were analyzed. Methods A total of 376 HCC patients under HAIC in our hospital were recriuted between March 2017 and September 2019. Multivariate linear regression analysis (stepwise) was used to calculate the potential factors related to the severe pain in HCC patients under HAIC. Analgesics treatments were carried out based on the results of the visual analogue scale (VAS) score which was used to evaluate the pain. Results The mean value of the VAS score is 3.604, which indicates that the pain in most patients is mild and endurable. Intra-arterial lidocaine injection is an effective method in most patients (96%, 361 of 376), and the total score of VAS is reduced from 1355 to 195 following lidocaine injection. Multivariate analysis suggestes that oxaliplatin (OXA) preparation time, hepatic artery diameter and OXA manufacturers (R² = 0.859) are influential factors for pain scores. Conclusion This study demonstrates an effective way to systematically assess and ease pain in HCC patients with HAIC treatment. OXA preparation time, hepatic artery diameter, and OXA manufacturers are the potential influencing factors for pain. This work presented here will provide a detailed understanding of the clinical application of HAIC in advanced HCC patients.

A systematic review and meta-analysis of adjuvant transarterial chemoembolization after curative resection for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to systematically evaluate and determine those patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) that would benefit from the administration of postoperative adjuvant transarterial chemoembolization (PA-TACE).

METHODS

PubMed, Embase and Cochrane Library were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies up to July 30, 2019. The outcome of Overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were extracted and converted to hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (95%CIs).

RESULTS

A total of 40 studies (10 RCTs and 30 non-RCTs) involving 11,165 patients were included. Overall, PA-TACE was associated with an increased OS [HR, 0.71 (95% CI, 0.65-0.77); P < 0.001] and DFS [HR, 0.73 (95% CI, 0.66-0.80); P < 0.001]. Subgroup analysis in patients with microvascular invasion (MVI), tumor diameter >5 cm or multinodular tumors demonstrated that PA-TACE improved OS and DFS. In patients without MVI, PA-TACE showed no improvement in OS [HR, 1.14 (95% CI, 0.85-1.53); P = 0.370], and resulted in worse DFS than curative resection alone [HR, 1.20 (95% CI, 1.03-1.39); P = 0.002].

CONCLUSION

This meta-analysis indicated that PA-TACE was beneficial in patients with HCC who were at high risk of postoperative recurrence including tumor diameter >5 cm, multinodular tumors and MVI-positive. In patients with tumor diameter ≤5 cm, single tumor or MVI-negative. PA-TACE does not appear to improve outcomes and may potentially promote postoperative recurrence in certain patients.

Resection Plus Post-operative Adjuvant Transcatheter Arterial Chemoembolization (TACE) Compared with Resection Alone for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

PURPOSE

Multiple studies have demonstrated adjuvant transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (aTACE) after resection improved outcomes compared to resection alone for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Unlike pre-operative TACE which targets a lesion, aTACE is administered in the proximal hepatic artery to destroy cancer cells within the remaining liver. This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to quantify this survival and disease-free survival (DFS) benefit.

METHODS

A search of five databases was performed from inception to 20 August 2019.

RESULTS

A total of 26 studies (six randomized controlled trials) involving 7817 patients were included. Patients treated with resection plus aTACE had significantly better 1-year survival (OR, 2.53 [95% CI, 1.70-3.76, p < 0.001) and 1-year DFS (OR, 1.91 [95% CI, 1.60-2.28, p < 0.001) compared to resection alone. The survival benefit remained significant for 2- to 5-year survival (OR 2.39, 1.83, 2.12, 1.87, respectively) and 2- to 4-year DFS (OR 1.85, 1.24, 1.67, respectively). Subgroup analysis showed significant survival benefit with aTACE in microvascular invasion (MVI)-positive HCC, portal venous tumour thrombus (PVTT) that does not involve the main trunk, PVTT-negative, satellite nodules, with and without resection margin < 1 cm. No mortalities were reported with aTACE.

CONCLUSION

Post-operative aTACE is safe and improves overall and disease-free survival, with the greatest benefit in MVI-positive patients. The current evidence weakly supports the use of adjuvant TACE for patients without PVTT, with PVTT that does not involve the main trunk, with and without a resection margin < 1 cm, and patients with satellite nodules.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level 1.

Adjuvant transarterial chemoembolization for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma after radical hepatectomy: a real world study

Objective: To investigate the clinical value of the adjuvant transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) after radical resection, and identify the potential beneficiaries.Methods: Patients were identified through the primary liver cancer big data (PLCBD) between 2012 and 2015. Overall survival (OS) between adjuvant TACE group and non-TACE was evaluated by Kaplan-Meier before and after propensity scoring match (PSM). Subgroup analysis was conducted stratified by risk factors.Results: A total of 2066 HCC patients receiving radical resection were identified. Patients with multiple tumors, tumor diameter >5 cm, satellite, and advanced stage were more likely to accept adjuvant TACE. Before PSM, the 1-, 3-, and 5-year OS rates in the TACE group and non-TACE group were 89%, 58%, 17%, and 88%, 53%, 13% (p = .43), respectively. While, the corresponding rates were 89%, 58%, 17%, and 86%, 49%, 11%, (p = .038), respectively after 1:1 PSM. In addition, patients were found to significantly benefit from adjuvant TACE if they had age ≥50 years, no cirrhosis, AFP ≤ 200 ng/ml, surgical margin <1 cm, tumor diameter >5 cm, no capsule, no satellite, or CN stage Ib/IIa (all p < .05), but patients with age < 50 years, tumor size ≤5 cm, or CN stage Ia were found to significantly benefit from radical resection in DFS (all p < .05).Conclusion: Currently, we concluded that not all of patients with HCC would benefit from adjuvant TACE. Patients with age ≥50 years, tumor size >5 cm, or CN stage Ib/IIa were strongly recommended to receive adjuvant TACE.

Prognostic predictors for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma receiving adjuvant transcatheter arterial chemoembolization

OBJECTIVES

We aimed to confirm the clinical effectiveness of postoperative adjuvant transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (PA-TACE) in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma after liver resection, and further identify the patients who could benefit most from PA-TACE.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Propensity score matching at a ratio of 1 : 2 was used between hepatectomy patients with and without receiving PA-TACE. Kaplan-Meier analysis was performed to compare overall survival and recurrence-free survival between two groups. Univariate COX regression and stratified analyses were performed to screen and identify survival predictors for PA-TACE patients. The identified predictive markers were validated in an external cohort.

RESULTS

The propensity analysis matched 116 patients in PA-TACE group to 232 in the control group. Visible protective effect of PA-TACE was shown by survival curves in matched series (log-rank P=0.009 and 0.008), with hazard ratio of being 0.599 (95% confidence interval: 0.420-0.855) and 0.623 (95% confidence interval: 0.449-0.866), respectively, for overall survival and recurrence-free survival. The identified prognostic predictors for PA-TACE included TNM stage, tumor size and number, hepatitis B infection, spleen diameter, preoperative serum α-fetoprotein, alkaline phosphatase, γ-glutamyl transpeptidase and monocyte, and three risk signatures (aspartate aminotransferase-to-alanine aminotransferase ratio, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, and systemic immune-inflammation index).

CONCLUSION

The treatment effectiveness of adjuvant transcatheter arterial chemoembolization for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma after surgery was validated in this study, and the best candidates for PA-TACE were identified as well, including patients with late-stage tumor, portal hypertension, and high preoperative serum levels of α-fetoprotein, alkaline phosphatase, γ-glutamyl transpeptidase, and monocytes.

Adjuvant transcatheter arterial chemoembolization after radical resection of hepatocellular carcinoma patients with tumor size less than 5 cm: a retrospective study

Objective: Our aim is to retrospectively compare the disease-free survival (DFS) of adjuvant TACE after surgical resection on patients with tumor less than 5 cm. Methods: A total of 307 patients with HCC underwent hepatic resection between January 2014 to December 2016 were enrolled in this study. Among these, 172 patients underwent surgical treatment only (group A) and 135 patients received surgical resection followed by adjuvant TACE (group B). Propensity score matching (PSM) analysis is used to minimize baseline differences between two groups. DFS was compared between the two groups and Cox proportional hazard model was used to predict the factor for recurrence. Results: Before PSM, the 1, 2, 3 year DFS rate of group A and B were 90.1%, 83.3%, 75.3% versus 85.2%, 73.9%, 68.1%, respectively (p = .286). After PSM, the 1, 2, 3 year DFS rate of group A and group B were 90.3%, 80.8%, 71.9% versus 89.2%, 77.8%, 71.3%, respectively (p = .791). In subgroup analysis where patients presented with microvascular invasion (MiVI), before PSM the 1, 2, 3 year DFS rate were 77.8%, 77.8%, 77.8% and 70%, 70%, 47.3%, for group A and B, respectively (p = .491). After PSM the 1, 2, 3 year DFS rate for group A and B were 71.4%, 71.4%, 71.4% and 100%, 100%, 50%, respectively (p = .440). Cox proportional hazard model identified tumor size ≥3 cm as factor related to recurrence. Conclusions: Adjuvant TACE does not improve the DFS of HCC patients with tumor size less than 5 cm.

Tumor Size Affects Efficacy of Adjuvant Transarterial Chemoembolization in Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma and Microvascular Invasion

BACKGROUND

Patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and microvascular invasion (mVI) have shown dismal postoperative prognosis; however, whether adjuvant transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) can improve their outcomes remains unclear.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively identified 549 eligible patients to form the crude cohort and adopted propensity score matching method to assemble another cohort of 444 patients with similar baseline characteristics. We assessed the effects of adjuvant TACE by stratified analyses and multivariate Cox analyses in two cohorts.

RESULTS

There was significant interaction between tumor size and adjuvant TACE with respect to overall survival (OS; p = .006 for interaction). In the matched cohort, patients who received adjuvant TACE showed higher rates of 5-year OS (72.4% vs. 50.9%, p = .005) and 5-year recurrence-free survival (50.5% vs. 36.4%, p = .003) in the tumor ≤5 cm subgroup, but not in the tumor >5 cm subgroup (32.3% vs. 24.9%, p = .350 and 18.8% vs. 19.7%, p = .180). The independent protective role of adjuvant TACE on OS was observed in patients with tumor ≤5 cm (adjusted odds ratio [OR] = 0.59, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.36-0.97) but not in patients with tumor >5 cm (adjusted OR = 1.17, 95% CI 0.84-1.62). The effects of adjuvant TACE did not change materially while the analysis was performed in the crude cohort.

CONCLUSION

For patients with HCC and mVI, adjuvant TACE was associated with improved outcomes, but not for those with tumor >5 cm, according to the current protocol.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

The outcomes of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma and microvascular invasion who received adjuvant transarterial chemoembolization were inconsistent in this study. According to the current protocol, adjuvant transarterial chemoembolization was associated with improved prognosis in patients with microvascular invasion, except for those with tumor >5 cm. Multivariate Cox models confirmed adjuvant transarterial chemoembolization was an independent protective factor in the tumor ≤5 cm subgroup but not in the tumor >5 cm subgroup.

Micro RNA-4651 Serves as a Potential Biomarker for Prognosis When Selecting Hepatocellular Carcinoma Patients for Postoperative Adjuvant Transarterial Chemoembolization Therapy

Our previous reports have shown that microRNA-4651 is a potential early diagnostic and prognostic marker for hepatocellular carcinoma. We aimed to investigate whether microRNA-4651 modified postoperative adjuvant transarterial chemoembolization (pa-TACE) to improve the prognosis of hepatocellular carcinoma. A hospital-based retrospective study, including 302 patients with advanced-stage hepatocellular carcinoma who received tumor resection or tumor resection plus pa-TACE as an initial therapy, was conducted to assess the effects of microRNA-4651 on pa-TACE treatment. MicroRNA-4651 expression in tumor tissues was tested using the TaqMan-PCR technique. The sensitivity of tumor cells to doxorubicin (an anticancer drug used in pa-TACE procedure) was analyzed by the half-maximal inhibitory concentration (IC50). Upregulated microRNA-4651 expression in tumor tissues can improve the therapeutic response of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma on pa-TACE (hazard ratios [95% confidence intervals] = 0.32 [0.22-0.46] for death risk and 0.39 [0.28-0.56] for tumor-recurrence risk, respectively), but downregulated expression cannot. Functional analyses-displayed microRNA-4651 mimics decreased while its inhibitor increased the IC50 of tumor cells to doxorubicin (0.65 [0.61-0.69] versus 2.17 [1.98-2.37] µM). Cytochrome P450 2W1 was shown as a possible target of microRNA-4651. Additionally, dysregulation of microRNA-4651 also affected the clinical pathological features of hepatocellular carcinoma and was an independent prognostic factor for this cancer. Conclusion: These results indicate that increasing microRNA-4651 expression may be beneficial for pa-TACE in improving hepatocellular carcinoma prognosis.

Multiple Antigen Stimulating Cellular Therapy (MASCT) For Hepatocellular Carcinoma After Curative Treatment: A Retrospective Study

Background & Aims: The prognosis of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) remains poor and available treatment options are limited. This retrospective study evaluated the efficacy of Multiple Antigen Stimulating Cell Therapy (MASCT) as an adjuvant therapy for the treatment of HCC after curative treatment.

Methods: Patients who underwent HCC curative treatments were classified into two groups: the MASCT group, in which patients received MASCT treatment after curative treatment (n = 47), and the control group, in which patients did not receive any treatment after curative treatment (n = 99). Patients who received ≥ 5 courses of MASCT treatment before recurrence or death (n = 26) were further stratified into a subgroup (multiple-course MASCT group) for analysis. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). The secondary endpoints were disease-free survival (DFS) and safety.

Results: Kaplan-Meier analysis showed no statistically significant difference in OS between the MASCT group and the control group (P = 0.132), nor in DFS (P = 0.310) (median: 36.17 vs. 24.27 months). However, when comparing the multiple-course MASCT treated group to the control group, Kaplan-Meier analysis showed a significant difference in OS (P = 0.011), but not in DFS (P = 0.104) (median: 47.10 vs. 24.27 months). The overall incidences of treatment-related adverse events in the MASCT group and control group were 14.89% (7/47) and 19.19% (19/99), respectively. No MASCT treatment-related serious adverse events were reported.

Conclusions: Although the MASCT group was not associated with significantly longer OS or DFS, the multiple-course MASCT group showed significantly improved overall survival after curative treatment, and the treatment procedures were well-tolerated. Multiple-course MASCT may therefore provide another choice for patients with HCC after curative treatment.

Hepatocellular carcinoma cases with high levels of c-Raf-1 expression may benefit from postoperative adjuvant sorafenib after hepatic resection even with high risk of recurrence

Background and Aims

Liver resection combined with postoperative sorafenib to prevent recurrence remains a controversial approach for cases of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), especially cases with a high risk of recurrence. This study aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of liver resection combined with sorafenib for HCC with a high risk of recurrence.

Results

Most of the cases of HCC were caused by hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection (23 cases, 92%). Most of these tumors (21 cases, 84%) were stage III according to the TNM staging system (12 cases with IIIa, 9 cases with IIIb). In the months after hepatic resection, 19 of the 25 cases (76%) were diagnosed with HCC recurrence or metastasis. Based on the tumor histological biomarker grading system, the group with higher expression levels of c-Raf-1 showed significantly longer overall survival than the group with lower expression of c-Raf-1 (P = 0.012). However, the long-term tumor-free survival advantage disappeared (P = 0.061). Univariate and multivariate analyses indicated that higher expression of c-Raf-1 was significantly associated with better overall survival (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.842; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.211–2.542; P = 0.031) and tumor-free survival (HR: 1.319; 95% CI: 1.017–1.543; P = 0.046) in HCC patients who underwent radical hepatic resection.

Patients and Methods

We retrospectively collected 25 HCC cases with a high risk of recurrence who underwent radical liver resection and who took sorafenib postoperatively from Jan 2010 to Dec 2012. Factors that might contribute to tumor recurrence and treatment failure such as clinical factors, tumor features, and molecular biomarkers were included in our analysis.

Conclusions

HCC patients with a high risk of post-hepatic resection recurrence may benefit from postoperative sorafenib administered as an adjuvant therapy, especially in cases with high levels of c-Raf-1 expression on histological examination.

Adjuvant transarterial chemoembolization for patients after curative resection of hepatocellular carcinoma: a meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of adjuvant transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) after curative hepatectomy in improving the survival of patients with primary hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

METHODS

MEDLINE, Embase and the Cochrane Library were searched for randomized or nonrandomized studies comparing postoperative adjuvant TACE with curative resection alone. Meta-analysis was performed after converting time-event data into a hazard ratio (HR), using an inverse diversity model.

RESULTS

Eight randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and 12 retrospective studies matched the selection criteria, thereby including 3191 patients (779 in RCT, 2412 in observational studies) for the meta-analysis. The meta-analysis showed that receiving adjuvant TACE was associated with improved overall survival (OS, ln[HR] = 0.70, 95%CI: 0.63-0.78, p < .001) and recurrence-free survival (RFS, ln[HR] = 0.69, 95%CI: 0.63-0.76, p < .001) after curative hepatectomies. The results of observational studies were consistent with those of RCTs. Furthermore, meta-regression was utilized to detect study-level factors associated with treatment outcome. It revealed that overall survival was similar among patients treated with various combinations of chemotherapeutic drugs. Subgroup analyses demonstrated that repeated TACE interventions do not provide a higher survival benefit compared with a single course, and patients with a single tumor or tumor size ≥5cm might stand to benefit the most from adjuvant TACE therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

This meta-analysis demonstrated that postoperative adjuvant TACE could achieve higher OS and RFS than surgical resection alone. However, these results need to be validated through further high-quality clinical studies.

Hepatic resection alone versus in combination with pre- and post-operative transarterial chemoembolization for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

The prognosis of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) treated with hepatic resection may be improved by the adjunctive use of transarterial chemoembolization (TACE). This study aimed to systematically compare the outcomes between hepatic resection with and without TACE groups.

METHODS

All relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and non-RCTs were searched by the PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases. Overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were two major outcomes. Meta-analyses were performed according to the timing of TACE (pre- or post-operative TACE). Subgroup analyses were also performed. Hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (95%CIs) were calculated.

RESULTS

Overall, 55 papers were included (14 RCTs and 41 non-RCTs). Overall meta-analyses demonstrated that OS and DFS were statistically similar between hepatic resection with and without pre-operative TACE groups (HR = 1.01, 95%CI = 0.87-1.19, P = 0.87; HR = 0.91, 95%CI = 0.82-1.01, P = 0.07). Subgroup analyses of RCTs or non-RCTs showed that OS and DFS remained statistically similar between hepatic resection with and without pre-operative TACE groups. Subgroup analysis of incomplete or no tumor necrosis showed that OS was worse in hepatic resection with pre-operative TACE group than in hepatic resection without pre-operative TACE group. By contrast, subgroup analysis of complete tumor necrosis showed that DFS was better in hepatic resection with pre-operative TACE group than in hepatic resection without pre-operative TACE group.Overall meta-analyses demonstrated that OS and DFS were better in hepatic resection with post-operative TACE group than in hepatic resection without post-operative TACE group (HR = 0.85, 95%CI = 0.72-1.00, P = 0.06; HR = 0.83, 95%CI = 0.73-0.94, P = 0.004). Subgroup analyses of RCTs, vascular invasion, or large HCC showed that OS and DFS remained better in hepatic resection with post-operative TACE group than in hepatic resection without post-operative TACE group. By contrast, subgroup analyses of non-RCTs, no vascular invasion, or small HCC showed that OS and DFS were statistically similar between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Post-operative TACE, rather than pre-operative TACE, may be considered as an adjunctive treatment option for HCC treated with hepatic resection.

Prognostic significance of Cbx4 expression and its beneficial effect for transarterial chemoembolization in hepatocellular carcinoma

Our recent investigations showed that polycomb chromobox 4 (Cbx4) promotes angiogenesis and metastasis of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) through its sumoylating action on hypoxia-inducible factor-1α protein. Here, we attempt to identify the prognostic significances of Cbx4 by a retrospective analyses in 727 cases of HCC patients with and without postoperative transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) or transarterial embolization (TAE). Binary logistic regression tests indicated that Cbx4 is correlated with histological grading, tumor-node-metastasis stage, microvessel density, distant metastasis and hematogenous metastasis of HCC. By univariate and multivariate analyses, we show that Cbx4 is an independent prognostic factor of HCC, and both TAE and TACE treatments have no effects on the overall survival in HCC patients with low Cbx4 expression. More intriguingly, TACE prolongs, while TAE shortens, the overall survival of HCC patients with high Cbx4 expression, indicating that Cbx4 is a good biomarker on decision-making to perform postoperative TACE in HCC patients. Moreover, Cbx4 overexpression enhances while Cbx4 silencing antagonizes doxorubicin-induced cell death of HCC cell lines. In conclusion, Cbx4 is an independent prognostic factor for HCC patients, and the patients with high Cbx4 expression should receive postoperative TACE treatment to improve their survival.