Impact of a rapid molecular test for positive blood cultures from neonatal intensive care patients on clinical management: a retrospective audit

Rapid Diagnostic Tests and Antimicrobial Stewardship Programs for the Management of Bloodstream Infection: What Is Their Relative Contribution to Improving Clinical Outcomes? A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Evidence about the clinical impact of rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) for the diagnosis of bloodstream infections is limited, and whether RDT are superior to conventional blood cultures (BCs) embedded within antimicrobial stewardship programs (ASPs) is unknown.

METHODS

We performed network meta-analyses using results from studies of patients with bloodstream infection with the aim of comparing the clinical impact of RDT (applied on positive BC broth or whole blood) to conventional BC, both assessed with and without ASP with respect to mortality, length of stay (LOS), and time to optimal therapy.

RESULTS

Eighty-eight papers were selected, including 25 682 patient encounters. There was an appreciable amount of statistical heterogeneity within each meta-analysis. The network meta-analyses showed a significant reduction in mortality associated with the use of RDT + ASP versus BC alone (odds ratio [OR], 0.72; 95% confidence interval [CI], .59-.87) and with the use of RDT + ASP versus BC + ASP (OR, 0.78; 95% CI, .63-.96). No benefit in survival was found associated with the use of RDT alone nor with BC + ASP compared to BC alone. A reduction in LOS was associated with RDT + ASP versus BC alone (OR, 0.91; 95% CI, .84-.98) whereas no difference in LOS was shown between any other groups. A reduced time to optimal therapy was shown when RDT + ASP was compared to BC alone (-29 hours; 95% CI, -35 to -23), BC + ASP (-18 hours; 95% CI, -27 to -10), and to RDT alone (-12 hours; 95% CI, -20 to -3).

CONCLUSIONS

The use of RDT + ASP may lead to a survival benefit even when introduced in settings already adopting effective ASP in association with conventional BC.

Clinical impact of implementation of rapid diagnostic testing of blood cultures with Staphylococcus aureus on patient outcomes

Rapid diagnostic testing in microbiology labs shortens the time to identification of bacteria in blood cultures. Cepheid® GeneXpert® MRSA/SA PCR can be used to distinguish MRSA and MSSA from non-Staphylococcus aureus organisms in blood cultures. This study aims to determine if implementation of MRSA/SA PCR for blood culture pathogen identification, plus daily antimicrobial stewardship intervention, can reduce time to appropriate therapy, vancomycin duration, 30 day mortality, and 90 day recurrence in veterans. A total of 113 patients in the pre-implementation cohort and 73 patients in the post-implementation cohort were evaluated. Time to appropriate therapy was decreased from 49.8 (pre-implementation) to 20.6 (post-implementation) hours. There was a numerically shorter median duration of vancomycin therapy in the post-implementation group. There was no difference in 30 day mortality or 90 day recurrence between groups. Use of MRSA/SA PCR can improve antimicrobial use when combined with once-daily antimicrobial stewardship review.

Recent advances in the microbiological diagnosis of bloodstream infections

Rapid identification (ID) and antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) of the causative agent(s) of bloodstream infections (BSIs) are essential for the prompt administration of an effective antimicrobial therapy, which can result in clinical and financial benefits. Immediately after blood sampling, empirical antimicrobial therapy, chosen on clinical and epidemiological data, is administered. When ID and AST results are available, the clinician decides whether to continue or streamline the antimicrobial therapy, based on the results of the in vitro antimicrobial susceptibility profile of the pathogen. The aim of the present study is to review and discuss the experimental data, advantages, and drawbacks of recently developed technological advances of culture-based and molecular methods for the diagnosis of BSI (including mass spectrometry, magnetic resonance, PCR-based methods, direct inoculation methods, and peptide nucleic acid fluorescence in situ hybridization), the understanding of which could provide new perspectives to improve and fasten the diagnosis and treatment of septic patients. Although blood culture remains the gold standard to diagnose BSIs, newly developed methods can significantly shorten the turnaround time of reliable microbial ID and AST, thus substantially improving the diagnostic yield.