Trans-catheter paravalvular leak closure: a single-centre experience

Percutaneous Closure of Mitral Paravalvular Leak: Long-Term Results in a Single-Center Experience

Background: Paravalvular leak occurs in 5–17% of patients following surgical valve replacement, more often in mitral position. The prognosis without treatment is poor. Percutaneous device closure represents an alternative to repeat surgery. The objective of this work is to evaluate the medium and long-term results in the percutaneous closure of PVL in mitral prosthesis. Methods: This observational study is based on a retrospective registry including consecutive mitral PVL cases undergoing percutaneous closure at a single tertiary-care center from April 2010 to December 2020. The safety and efficacy results of the procedure, at 90 days and in the long term, were analyzed. Also, predictors of procedure failure and long-term events were identified. Results: A total of 128 consecutive mitral paravalvular leak closure procedures were included. Technical success was achieved in 115 (89.8%) procedures. The presence of multiple PVLs was the sole factor that independently predicted procedural failure. Median follow-up of our sample was 41.8 months (mean 47.7 ± 35.7 months). Underlying hemolytic anemia as the indication for PVL closure, a recent admission for decompensated HF, and lack of improvement in functional class emerged as consistent predictors of MACE and death during long-term follow-up, while lack of procedural success during the first PVL procedure and chronic kidney disease were also associated with MACE during follow-up. Conclusions: Percutaneous mitral PVL closure displayed high technical and procedural success rates, with an acceptable safety profile, in a high-risk population. Percutaneous mitral PVL closure achieved an improvement in short- and long-term functional class and a reduction of hemolysis in the vast majority of patients. In addition, long-term survival in our study was good, in particular for patients undergoing successful PVL closure procedures.

Mitral valve paravalvular leaks: Comprehensive review of literature

BACKGROUND

Mitral paravalvular leaks (mPVL) are a recognized complication for patients with mitral valve prostheses. Although clinically insignificant for many patients, it may pose life-threatening haemolysis and regurgitation-induced heart failure, and so clinicians should have a high index of suspicion in the presence of new symptoms.

AIMS

This review discusses the pathogenesis, clinical features, diagnosis, imaging and treatment of mPVLs.

METHODS

A comprehensive literature search was performed using PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane database, Google Scholar and Ovid. Search terms used included "mitral valve paravalvular leak," "transthoracic echocardiography," "2D transoesophageal echocardiography," "3D transoesophageal echocardiography," "cardiac computed tomography," (CT) "cardiac magnetic resonance imaging," "intracardiac echocardiography," "cinefluoroscopy," "fluoroscopy," and "percutaneous closure."

RESULTS

All patients with mPVLs should undergo regular full evaluation, including patient history, physical examination, laboratory work-up, imaging, and referral, if necessary. Echocardiography is fundamental to the diagnosis, and is augmented with cardiac magnetic resonance imaging, cardiac computerized tomography and fluoroscopy for further characterization and procedural planning amongst the structural heart team.

CONCLUSION

The prevalence of mPVL is expected to increase proportionally to the growing number of surgical and transcatheter valve replacements conducted in the ageing population. Multimodal imaging is instrumental in guiding diagnostic and therapeutic strategies when managing mPVLs. Advances in imaging and capabilities of transcather devices will prompt growing uptake of percutaneous treatment over conventional, higher-risk surgery for mPVL management.

Long-term outcomes of catheter-based intervention for clinically significant paravalvular leak

BACKGROUND

In most centres, clinically significant percutaneous paravalvular leak (PVL) closure following valve replacement surgery is reserved for those considered high-risk for surgery. There is a paucity of data regarding the long-term outcomes of these patients.

AIMS

Our goals were to assess the long-term outcomes of patients undergoing percutaneous PVL closure.

METHODS

A total of 100 consecutive transcatheter PVL closure procedures (74 mitral, 26 aortic) were performed in 95 patients between February 2005 and August 2019 at our hospital. Data collected included procedural success rates, indication-specific outcomes and mortality.

RESULTS

Mean follow-up was 5.6±6.1 years, mean age 62.6±15.2 years, and 45.4% were female. The device was successfully implanted in 88 procedures (88.0%). Patients who presented with heart failure (n=57) had a significant improvement in NYHA classification (29.2% Class III/IV versus 100.0%, p<0.001). For patients who presented with haemolytic anaemia (n=38), haemoglobin increased (11.94±1.634 vs 9.72±1.49, p<0.001) and LDH levels were reduced (1,354.90±1,225.55 vs 2,039.40±1,347.20, p<0.001) following the procedure. Rates of mortality were 3.8% at 90 days, 15.6% after 1 year, and 27.2% after 5 years.

CONCLUSIONS

For patients who are deemed intermediate- to high-risk for repeat surgery, transcatheter PVL closure shows reasonable clinical success rates, with a significant improvement in symptoms, and a relatively low rate of periprocedural complications.

Transcatheter closure of paravalvular leak: Multicenter experience and follow-up

BACKGROUND

Paravalvular leak (PVL) is a common complication following valve replacement, which leads to heart failure and hemolysis. Transcatheter PVL closure has emerged as a reliable alternative with promising results. We quote the combined three-center experience of PVL patients treated percutaneously.

METHODS

Consecutive patients treated percutaneously for PVL were retrospectively studied. Procedural characteristics, inhospital, and long-term clinical outcomes were assessed. Technical (successful deployment) and clinical (NYHA and/or hemolysis improvement) success were evaluated.

RESULTS

In total, 39 patients treated for PVL in either the aortic (12 patients) or the mitral (27 patients) position were studied. Amplatzer Vascular Plug III was the most commonly used device among the 45 devices totally implanted. Postprocedurally, the rates of at least moderate PVL (87.5% preprocedurally vs 10.5% at discharge) and functional status (mean NYHA class 2.8 ± 0.7 on admission vs 1.5 ± 0.8 at follow-up) were statistically significantly improved. Total population technical success rate was 89.7%, being comparable between patients treated for mitral or aortic valve PVLs (92.6% vs 83.3%, respectively). Clinical success was achieved in 82.1% of patient cohort without statistical difference among those with isolated aortic or mitral PVL or among those with PVL closure an indication of heart failure or hemolysis. During a mean follow-up of 33.5 months, five patients died, including one periprocedural death.

CONCLUSIONS

This multicenter recorded experience confirms that percutaneous PVL closure can be performed with high technical and clinical success rates and limited complications that lead to significant PVL reduction and functional status improvement.

Valve-in-valve transcatheter aortic valve replacement to treat multijet paravalvular regurgitation: A case series and review

Treatment advances for severe symptomatic aortic stenosis including transcatheter and open surgical valve replacement have improved patient survival, length of stay, and speed to recovery. However, paravalvular regurgitation (PVR) is occasionally seen and when moderate or greater in severity is associated with an at least 2-fold increase in 1 year mortality. While several treatment approaches focused on single-jet PVR have been described in the literature, few reports describe multijet PVR. Multijet PVR can successfully be treated with a variety of catheter-based options including valve-in-valve (ViV) transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). We present two patients with at least moderate PVR following aortic valve replacement who were successfully treated with ViV TAVR along with a review of literature highlighting our rationale for utilizing each management approach. Multijet PVR can be treated successfully with ViV TAVR, but additional options such as self-expanding occluder devices and bioprosthetic valve fracture have a role as adjunctive treatments to achieve optimal results. The etiology of multijet PVR can differ between patients, this heterogeneity underscores the paucity of data to guide treatment strategies. Therefore, successful treatment of multijet PVR requires familiarity with available therapeutic options to achieve optimal results and, by extension, decrease patient mortality.