A systematic review of the clinical effectiveness of emergency endovascular therapy using mechanical thrombectomy in acute ischaemic stroke: implications for service delivery

Simplified classification of cavernous internal carotid artery tortuosity: a predictor of procedural complexity and clinical outcomes in mechanical thrombectomy

OBJECTIVES

Thromboaspiration catheters are increasingly used for the endovascular treatment of large vessel stroke (LVS), while tortuous vascular anatomy still remains one major challenge in mechanical thrombectomy. Prompt assessing and understanding cavernous internal carotid artery (cICA) tortuosity may help to predict procedural complexities of mechanical thrombectomy and thus improve the clinical outcomes.

METHODS

A retrospective review was performed on a cohort of LVS patients with thromboaspiration catheter. Simplified classification of cICA tortuosity was applied by measurement of the angle of the posterior genus (P) and the height from the peak of the posterior genu to the trough of the anterior genu (D). Statistical analyses were performed to analyze differences among the obtained types of cICA tortuosity regarding procedural characteristics and clinical outcomes.

RESULTS

A total of 150 patients with LVS proximal to the internal ICA terminus and middle cerebral artery (MCA) were included in this study, and three types of cICA tortuosity were defined by the simplified classification. The index, such as patients ages and hypertension, procedural fluoroscopy time, the degree of cICA tortuosity, first-pass success, final reperfusion, and 90-day mortality showed significant differences among the three types (P < 0.05), while 90-day good outcome (mRS 0-2) only presented significant difference between Type I and Type III (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The study indicated that the grading of cICA tortuosity is highly correlated with procedural complexity and clinical outcome in mechanical thrombectomy. The proposed classification system may be helpful in pre-procedure prognostication complexity and clinical outcomes.Abbreviations:LVS: large vessel stroke; cICA: cavernous internal carotid artery; mRS: modified Rankin Scale; AIS: acute ischemic stroke; MCA: middle cerebral artery; M1: first division of middle cerebral artery; M2: second division of middle cerebral artery; M3: third division of middle cerebral artery; TICI: Thrombolysis In Cerebral Infarction; TICI 2b: two-thirds of occluded territory reperfusion; DSA: digital subtraction angiography; FT: fluoroscopy time.

The Clinical Contribution of Neurovascular Ultrasonography in Acute Ischemic Stroke

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Patients with acute ischemic stroke receive computed tomography angiogram (CTA) and digital subtraction angiogram (DSA) for clinical evaluation. Current guidelines lack in defining indications for transcranial Doppler (TCD) and/or carotid duplex ultrasonography (CUS) in acute stroke evaluation or follow-up cerebrovascular imaging after reperfusion. We investigated the clinical utility of performing additional TCD/CUS after reperfusion in guiding postacute care stroke management.

METHODS

Retrospective review of acute ischemic stroke patients admitted to a comprehensive stroke center with CTA head and neck and/or DSA followed by TCD/CUS. Cases were reviewed by two authors to determine if TCD/CUS provided additional diagnostic information to aid management. A nominal group process, using a third author, achieved consensus in cases of disagreements.

RESULTS

Only 25 of 198 patients had CTA or DSA followed by TCD/CUS. Ten (40%) cases showed new clinical information from CUS aiding management. Of those with TCD, 5 patients (22.7%) had findings that impacted management. These clinical scenarios included detection of mobile thrombus requiring anticoagulation; distinguishing carotid near-occlusion from occlusion; confirming hemodynamic significance of intra/extracranial stenosis helping emergent stenting/endarterectomy; detecting hyperperfusion on TCDs causing symptoms; and establishing chronicity of carotid stenosis based on collateral flow patterns, which deferred further intervention.

DISCUSSION

Our experience shows that TCD/CUS may offer additional diagnostic information assisting postacute care management in small subset of patients with acute ischemic stroke. Larger studies are needed to research the clinical impact and cost-effectiveness of additional imaging and inform clinical guidelines for selecting patients who will benefit from these additional studies.

Acute ischaemic stroke: a systematic review of the cost-effectiveness of emergency endovascular therapy using mechanical thrombectomy

PURPOSE

Although good evidence exists regarding the clinical effectiveness of mechanical thrombectomy for people with acute ischaemic stroke, cost-effectiveness should also be considered. The aim of this study was to systematically review the evidence of cost-effectiveness of emergency endovascular therapy using mechanical thrombectomy in the management of acute ischaemic stroke.

METHODS

The search was carried out in PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and a grey literature search. Studies were included if they compared the costs and consequences of mechanical thrombectomy added to usual medical care compared to usual care alone for people with acute ischaemic stroke in the anterior and/or posterior region. Study quality was assessed using two appraisal tools tailored to economic evaluations.

FINDINGS

Thirteen studies were identified including twelve cost-utility analyses and one cost-benefit analysis. Studies could be dichotomised into those that evaluated first-generation (n = 4) and second-generation (n = 9) mechanical thrombectomy devices. Six studies had low applicability, six had moderate applicability, and one had high applicability to other settings. All cost-utility studies reported incremental cost-effectiveness ratios that would be considered cost-effective under typical willingness-to-pay thresholds.

CONCLUSIONS

If the outcomes of the trials underpinning the evidence of clinical effectiveness can be replicated, then mechanical thrombectomy is likely to be cost-effective by typical willingness-to-pay thresholds. This finding holds under the assumption that no investment is required to develop stroke centres to the standard required to provide a safe emergency endovascular service and that additional expenditure on timely patient transport is not required.