A multidisciplinary approach to reproductive healthcare in women with rheumatic disease

Promoting awareness of terminology related to unmet medical needs in context of rheumatic diseases in Japan: a systematic review for evaluating unmet medical needs

To optimize patient prognosis, patient needs, including unmet needs, should be adequately assessed. However, such needs are more challenging to report and, consequently, more likely to go unmet compared with the needs reported by physicians. We aimed to determine the appropriate direction of future research on unmet medical needs in rheumatic diseases in Japan by conducting a literature review. We searched PubMed and Web of Science using 23 terms linked to unmet medical needs for major rheumatic diseases in Japan. Further, we collected articles on health-related quality of life and investigated the scales used for assessment, as well as whether the terms "unmet needs" or "unmet medical needs" were used. We identified 949 papers on 10 diseases, including systemic lupus erythematosus, systemic sclerosis, dermatomyositis, juvenile idiopathic arthritis, adult-onset Still's disease, antiphospholipid syndrome, mixed connective tissue disease, Takayasu arteritis, Sjögren's syndrome, and Behçet's disease; 25 of the 949 papers were selected for full-text review. Fifteen articles on five diseases were related to health-related quality of life. The term "unmet needs" was used in only one article. Six out of 15 studies used the 36-item short form survey, whereas the scales used in other studies differed. The optimal treatment plan determined by a physician may not necessarily align with the best interests of the patient. In clinical research, cross sectional and standardized indicators of health-related quality of life should be employed along with highly discretionary questionnaires to assess and optimize resource allocation in healthcare and simultaneously achieve patient-desired outcomes.

Knowledge of disease, diagnosis, adherence and impact of research in an Irish cohort of patients with inflammatory arthritis

Background: Patient engagement with clinicians results in shared decision making and increased adherence to medication. However, in order for strong patient: clinician partnerships to be achieved, communication barriers need to be identified. Therefore, the aim of this study was to examine the level of understanding of inflammatory arthritis patients and the need for strong patient-partnership in research. Methods: An online anonymous survey was distributed to patients living with inflammatory arthritis which addressed questions about diagnosis, routine tests, medications and how they work, medication adherence, disease flare, heredity, pregnancy, and patient involvement in research. Results: There were 1,873 respondents, 1416 of which had inflammatory arthritis (IA)- rheumatoid arthritis (RA) (65.8%) and psoriatic arthritis (PsA) (34.2%). They were predominantly female (RA 86%, PsA 85 %), aged 55±13 and 50±12 years. Less than 35% of patients had an understanding of diagnostic tests, what was measured and the implication for disease, with 75.5% also concerned about heredity. There was a high level of understanding of how specific medications treat inflammatory arthritis (72.9%). Adherence was also very high (>87%), with the main reasons for stopping medication without the advice of their clinician,  'feeling better' and 'side effects' however  a significant proportion of patients (69.9%) reported a disease-flare following cessation of medication. Patients (31%) were also concerned that inflammatory arthritis reduced their chances of getting pregnant, with only 8% believing arthritis medications were safe to take during pregnancy. Finally, only 9% of patients had ever been asked to participate in a research study. Conclusions: This study demonstrates a need for the development of stronger patient-partnerships with clinicians and researchers in relation to patient education and engagement with research, to create a platform where patients can have meaningful input and involvement in future research studies.

Nursing interventions for patients with rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases on biological therapies: a systematic literature review

Investigating unmet needs and identifying the necessary interventions for patients affected by rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases (RMDs) may help significantly to ensure the continuity and quality of the chronic care pathway. To this aim, the contribution of rheumatology nurses requires further evidence. The aim of our systematic literature review (SLR) was to identify the nursing interventions directed towards patients with RMDs undergoing biological therapy. To retrieve data, a search was carried out in the MEDLINE database, the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL database), the APA PsycINFO database and the Excerpta Medica Database (EMBASE) from 1990 to 2022. The systematic review was carried out in accordance with the relevant PRISMA guidelines. Inclusion criteria were as follows: (I) adult patients with RMDs, (II) undergoing therapy with Biological Disease-Modifying Anti-Rheumatic Drugs (bDMARDs), (III) original and quantitative research papers in English with available abstract, (IV) specific to nursing interventions and/or outcomes. Two independent reviewers screened the identified records for eligibility according to their title and abstract, full texts were subsequently assessed and, finally, data was extracted. Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP) tools were used to evaluate the quality of the studies included. Among the 2348 records retrieved, 13 articles met the inclusion criteria. These consisted of six randomised controlled trials (RCTs), one pilot study and six observational studies on RMDs. In a total population of 2004 patients, 43% (862/2004) of the cases concerned rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and 56% (1122/2004) of the cases concerned spondyloarthritis (SpA). Three major nursing interventions were identified, namely education, patient-centred care and data collection/nurse monitoring, which were correlated with high satisfaction rates regarding care, increased self-care capacity and treatment adherence among patients. All interventions followed a protocol defined in collaboration with rheumatologists. The large degree of heterogeneity in the interventions did not allow the performance of a meta-analysis. Rheumatology nurses are part of a multidisciplinary team caring for patients with RMDs. Following an accurate initial nursing evaluation, rheumatology nurses can plan and standardise their interventions focusing primarily on patient education and personalised care based on actual needs, such as psychological well-being and disease control. However, the training for rheumatology nurses should define and standardise, as much as possible, the competencies required for the detection of disease parameters. Key Points • This SLR provides an overview of nursing interventions for patients with RMDs. • This SLR considers the specific population of patients on biological therapies. • Training for rheumatology nurses should standardise, as much as possible, the knowledge and methods required for detecting disease parameters. • This SLR highlights the various competencies of rheumatology nurses.

Reproductive Healthcare in Women with Rheumatoid Arthritis and Psoriatic Diseases in Routine Clinical Practice: Survey Results of Rheumatologists and Dermatologists

Introduction

The proportion of women being treated with biologics is growing. However, data on treatment recommendation awareness among treating physicians and women who are considering pregnancy and family planning are limited. In this study, we used a questionnaire survey to learn how rheumatologists and dermatologists address women’s needs for family planning, pregnancy, and breastfeeding, as well as their possible concerns with concurrent inflammatory rheumatic disease or psoriasis.

Methods

A 55-question (in English) survey aimed at identifying surveyed physicians' current practices regarding the reproductive health needs of women with rheumatoid arthritis, psoriasis, or psoriatic arthritis. This survey included 82 rheumatologists and 38 dermatologists from the Czech Republic, Hungary, and Slovakia.

Results

The proportion of female patients of reproductive age with the moderate-to-severe disease was 10–30% of all patients treated by the respondents. At the time of diagnosis, approximately two-thirds of the respondents discussed family planning with their patients. Rheumatologists collaborated with other specialists more frequently than dermatologists and gynecologist–obstetricians. Half of the rheumatologists revised systemic treatment 6 months before the patient planned to become pregnant, whereas dermatologists appear to act much sooner. Rheumatologists chose systemic glucocorticoids as the first-line treatment for pregnancy flares, whereas dermatologists chose topical corticosteroids. Congresses and interdisciplinary forums were rated the most valuable sources of information by physicians.

Conclusions

There is a need for more holistic, multidisciplinary, collaborative, and integrated communication between clinicians and women of childbearing age. Physicians should consider the implications of these conditions and medical treatment for women of childbearing age and family planning for those with rheumatoid arthritis and psoriatic disease. Patient-centered care that includes patients’ reproductive choices should be a routine clinical practice.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40744-022-00488-z.

A Scoping Review of Breastfeeding in Women with Chronic Diseases

Background: Approximately 10-20% of mothers have a chronic disease. Studies on breastfeeding in women with chronic disease span multiple disciplines, and these have not been collated to synthesize knowledge and identify gaps. The objective of this review was to summarize published literature on breastfeeding in women with chronic disease. Methods: We conducted a scoping review of original research and systematic reviews identified in Medline, EMBASE, and CINAHL (1990-2019) and by hand searching on women with chronic diseases reporting on at least one breastfeeding-related topic. Conference abstracts, case-studies, and studies on pregnancy-induced conditions or lactation pharmacology were excluded. Content analysis and narrative synthesis were used to analyze findings. Results: We identified 128 articles that were predominantly quantitative (80.5%), conducted in Europe or North America (65.6%), analyzed sample sizes of <200 (57.0%), and published from 2010 onward (68.8%). Diabetes (42.2%), multiple sclerosis (MS; 19.5%), and epilepsy (13.3%) were the most common diseases studied. Breastfeeding was a primary focus in approximately half (53.1%) of the articles, though definitions were infrequently reported (32.8%). The most-studied topics were breastfeeding duration/exclusivity (55.7%), reasons for feeding behavior (19.1%), and knowledge and attitudes about breastfeeding (18.3%). Less studied topics (<10% of articles each) included milk expression behaviors, breastfeeding difficulties, and feeding supports. Conclusions: Existing literature focuses primarily on diabetes or MS, and breastfeeding behaviors and outcomes. Further research examining a broader range of chronic diseases, with large sample sizes, and sufficient breastfeeding measurement detail can improve our understanding of breastfeeding disparities in this population.

Rheumatologic Medication Use During Pregnancy

Chronic rheumatic diseases often occur in women of reproductive age, and the effect rheumatic disease has on pregnancy varies depending on the condition. Medical management of rheumatic diseases during pregnancy may prevent joint or organ damage and minimize the adverse effects of the disease itself on pregnancy outcomes. Each patient requires individual assessment to control disease activity while minimizing or avoiding medications with potential maternal or fetal toxicity. An open discussion with shared decision making between patients, obstetricians, rheumatologists, and pharmacists is imperative to create an individualized treatment plan that meets patients' goals. This article will review the current literature for use of disease modifying antirheumatic drugs and biologics during pregnancy and lactation, providing health care professionals with the most up-to-date information available.