Coexistence of uterine adenomyosis is not associated with a better prognosis in endometrioid-type endometrial cancer

Effect of coexisting adenomyosis on tumour characteristics and prognosis of endometrial cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis

To compare clinicopathological features and survival outcomes in patients with endometrial cancer, with and without associated adenomyosis. PubMed, Embase and Scopus databases were systematically searched for relevant observational studies. The pooled effect sizes were reported as either hazards ratio (HR) for survival-related outcomes or as odds ratio (OR) for other categorical outcomes. Weighted mean difference (WMD) was reported for continuous outcomes. All the analyses used the random effects model. A total of 21 studies (N = 46,420) were included. Compared to endometrial cancer patients without adenomyosis, patients with associated adenomyosis had improved overall 5-year survival (OS) (HR 0.62, 95% CI: 0.50, 0.79) and disease-free survival (DFS) (HR 0.60, 95% CI: 0.44, 0.82). Disease-specific survival was statistically similar in patients with and without adenomyosis (HR 0.60, 95% CI: 0.35, 1.05). Among patients with adenomyosis, the risk of having an advanced tumour grade (Grade 2 or 3) was lower (OR 0.51, 95% CI: 0.42, 0.62) and a risk of having International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage I or II was higher (OR 2.23, 95% CI: 1.65, 3.01). Patients with adenomyosis had lower risk of tumour invasion of adnexa, cervical stromal invasion, deep myometrial involvement (DMI), lympho-vascular space invasion (LVSI) and peritoneal invasion. Presence of adenomyosis in patients with endometrial cancer is associated with favourable tumour characteristics and may improve the survival.

Endometrial cancer prognosis in women with endometriosis and adenomyosis: A retrospective nationwide cohort study of 40 840 women

We aim to compare endometrial cancer survival in women with or without histological proven endometriosis or adenomyosis. We identified all women with endometrial cancer between 1990 and 2015 from the Netherlands Cancer Registry (NCR). Data were linked to the Dutch pathology database (PALGA) to select all women with histological proven endometriosis/adenomyosis. Overall survival was compared between women with endometrial cancer with or without endometriosis/adenomyosis. We used multivariable Cox proportional hazard analysis to estimate hazard ratios (HRs). We included 1701 women with endometrial cancer and endometriosis/adenomyosis, of whom 1236 (72.7%) women had adenomyosis, 320 (18.8%) had endometriosis and 145 (8.5%) had both. We compared these women to 39 139 women with endometrial cancer without endometriosis/adenomyosis. Women in the combined endometriosis/adenomyosis cohort were younger at endometrial cancer diagnosis, had earlier disease stage, more often had endometrioid endometrial cancer and low grade tumors. The 5-year survival rate in the combined endometriosis/adenomyosis cohort was 84.8% (95% CI 84.6-88.1) and 71.6% (95% CI 71.1-72.0) in the nonendometriosis/adenomyosis cohort. Univariable analysis resulted in a crude HR of 0.63 (95% CI 0.59-0.69). Significant confounding factors were age, stage, cancer subtype, histological grading, surgery and chemotherapy rate. Correction for these confounders resulted in a HR of 0.98 (95% CI 0.90-1.06). Including endometriosis/adenomyosis status as a categorical factor resulted in similar HRs. In conclusion, women with endometrial cancer and histologically proven endometriosis/adenomyosis have a better overall survival when compared to women with endometrial cancer without endometriosis/adenomyosis. This better survival was correlated to stage, grade, age and histological subtype, but not to the presence of endometriosis/adenomyosis.

The impact of uterine adenomyosis on the histopathological risk factors and survival in patients with endometrial adenocarcinoma

A retrospective cohort study was performed on patients diagnosed with endometrial adenocarcinoma (EC) during a 9-year period to investigate the impact of co-existing adenomyosis on patients with EC. Group A included women with EC and adenomyosis and Group B EC cases without the presence of adenomyosis. Group A was more likely to have early-stage disease, tumours without deep myometrial invasion, low-grade tumours and tumours with negative lymphovascular space invasion when compared to Group B (p = 0.012, p = 0.004, p < 0.001, p = 0.02). There were no statistically significant difference between Group A and Group B for lymph node metastasis (p = 0.064). There was no significant relation between the adenomyosis and survival outcomes in the multivariant analysis (p = 0.437). As a conclusion, patients with adenomyosis were more likely to accompany good histopathologic prognostic factors. Multivariate analysis showed no significant effect of adenomyosis on recurrence and survival parameters.IMPACT STATEMENTWhat is already known on this subject? Adenomyosis is one of the most common accompanying benign histopathological findings of type 1 endometrial carcinomas (EC). Adenomyosis comprises some characteristics similar to malignant tumours, such as invasion, abnormal tissue growth and angiogenesis. Despite concerns have arisen due to both their high incidence and similar molecular links, the possible relation between EC and adenomyosis is still not well grounded.What the results of this study add? We presented a 9-year period retrospective cohort of a tertiary referring single centre and evaluated the prognostic effect of adenomyosis in patients with EC as well as the survival outcomes of these patients. The co-occurrence of adenomyosis was more likely to accompany early-stage (stages 1-2) disease, low-grade tumours (grades 1-2) and tumours with negative LVSI in patients with EC. However, multivariate and survival analysis showed no significant effect of adenomyosis on recurrence and survival parameters.What the implications are of these findings for clinical practice and/or further research? Based on these findings, we suggest that the presence of adenomyosis should not be considered as a prognostic factor in EC. Our results support the overriding opinion about the prognostic value of co-occurrence of adenomyosis and EC. However, further studies exploring the molecular and genomic markers in these two groups are needed to uncover the exact relation of adenomyosis on the prognosis of EC.

The effect of adenomyosis on endometrial cancer: a university hospital-based cohort study

Endometrial cancer (EC) can coexist with gynaecological diseases including adenomyosis which can be defined as the location of endometrial cells within the myometrium. Our aim was to clarify the impact of adenomyosis on the clinical and survival outcomes of EC. We included the patients who underwent an operation for EC and had concurrent adenomyosis in this retrospective cohort study. All clinicodemographical and tumour characteristics with survival outcomes of the patients were analysed comparatively. A total of 763 patients who met the eligibility criteria were included. Of those, 591 patients in the non-adenomyosis group and 172 patients in the adenomyosis group were examined. Disease-specific survival (DSS) was significantly prolonged while progression-free survival (PFS) was not affected by the presence of adenomyosis (p = .004 vs. p = .161). However, adenomyosis did not remain as an independent prognostic factor for EC in multivariate analysis (p = .341). These patients with coexistent adenomyosis and EC have better clinicopathological characteristics and less advanced tumour. Although adenomyosis is associated with prolonged DSS, it has no prognostic importance for survival outcomes of the patients with EC.IMPACT STATEMENTWhat is already known on this subject? Endometrial cancer (EC) can coexist with other gynaecological diseases including uterine adenomyosis. Adenomyosis is typically diagnosed by the pathological evaluation of the uterus following hysterectomy, although diagnosis is possible with imaging methods However, the coexistence of adenomyosis and EC is controversial in the literature.What do the results of this study add? To the best of our knowledge, our study is the largest study performed at a single university hospital. All potential confounding factors including clinicodemographical characteristics of the patients, examination of histopathology slides by the experienced gynaecological pathologists, evaluation of all included factors that may affect the survival outcomes of EC by multivariate analysis were examined. Although adenomyosis is associated with prolonged disease-specific survival (DSS), it has no prognostic importance for survival outcomes of the patients with EC.What are the implications of these findings for clinical practice and/or further research? Women having coexistent adenomyosis and EC should be informed about the impact of adenomyosis on the survival outcomes of EC.