The test-retest reliability and concurrent validity of the 3-m backward walk test and 50-ft walk test in community-dwelling older adults

The test-retest reliability and concurrent validity of 360° turn test in patients with knee osteoarthritis

PURPOSE

The aim of this study is to determine whether the 360° turn test is a reliable and valid evaluator that can be used to assess dynamic balance in patients with early (radiographic grades I and II) and advanced (radiographic grades III and IV) knee osteoarthritis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This study is a methodological research. For the test time and step count of 360° turn test; test-retest reliability were determined by calculating the intraclass correlation coefficient and concurrent validity in patients with knee osteoarthritis was investigated by correlation with the timed up and go test time.

RESULTS

The final analysis was made on 117 participants. The intraclass correlation coefficient values for the test time and step count of 360° turn test in patients with early knee osteoarthritis are 0.931 and 0.902, respectively, while they are 0.923 and 0.943 in patients with advanced knee osteoarthritis. The Pearson correlation coefficients between the time and step count of 360° turn test and the test time of the timed up and go test in patients with early knee osteoarthritis, respectively; while they are 0.547 and 0.388, the correlation in patients with advanced knee osteoarthritis are 0.697 and 0.700, respectively (p < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

The 360° turn test is a evaluator that has excellent test-retest reliability and moderate to strong concurrent validity in patients with both early and advanced knee osteoarthritis and can be used in the assessment of dynamic balance in this population.

A systematic review of the psychometric properties of physical performance tests for sarcopenia in community-dwelling older adults

BACKGROUND

This review provides an overview of the psychometric properties of the short physical performance battery (SPPB), timed up and go test (TUG), 4 m gait speed test (4 m GST) and the 400 m walk test (400 m WT) in community-dwelling older adults.

METHODS

A systematic search was conducted in MEDLINE, CINAHL and EMBASE, resulting in the inclusion of 50 studies with data from in total 19,266 participants (mean age 63.2-84.3). Data were extracted and properties were given a sufficient or insufficient overall rating following the COSMIN guideline for systematic reviews of patient-reported outcome measures. Quality of evidence (QoE) was rated using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach.

RESULTS

The SPPB was evaluated in 12 studies, TUG in 30, 4 m GST in 12 and 400 m WT in 2. Reliability of the SPPB, TUG and 4 m GST was rated sufficient (moderate to good QoE). The measurement error of the SPPB was rated insufficient (low QoE). Criterion validity for the SPPB was insufficient in indicating sarcopenia (moderate QoE), while the TUG was sufficient and insufficient for determining mobility limitations (low QoE) and activities of daily living disability (low QoE), respectively. Construct validity of the SPPB, TUG, 4 m GST and 400 m WT was rated insufficient in many constructs (moderate to high QoE). Responsiveness was rated as insufficient for SPPB (high QoE) and TUG (very low QoE), while 4 m GST was rated as sufficient (high QoE).

CONCLUSION

Overall, the psychometric quality of commonly used physical performance tests in community-dwelling older adults was generally rated insufficient, except for reliability. These tests are widely used in daily practice and recommended in guidelines; however, users should be cautious when drawing conclusions such as sarcopenia severity and change in physical performance due to limited psychometric quality of the recommended measurement instruments. There is a need for a disease-specific physical performance test for people with sarcopenia.This research received no specific grant from any funding agency and was registered a priori using the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) (CRD42022359725).

Psychometric properties of 3-meter backward walk test (3MBWT) in people with Parkinson disease

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to investigate the 3-meter backward walk test (3MBWT) in individuals with Parkinson Disease (PD) to determine the following: (1) concurrent validity with other gait velocity measures and (2) interrater and intrarater reliability of in-person and video assessment.

METHODS

A convenience sample of 25 people with PD participated. Forward gait velocity was measured using a computerized walkway (Zeno Walkway System), the 10-meter walk test (10MWT), and 4-meter walk test (4MWT). Backward gait velocity was measured using the 3MBWT. Concurrent validity was assessed using Pearson's correlations. Reliability was assessed using intra-class correlation coefficients (ICC(2,1)).

RESULTS

All relationships between the 3MBWT and gait outcome measures were significant. The 3MBWT demonstrated strong correlations with the 4MWT dual task (r = .795, p=<.001) and moderate correlations with 4MWT comfortable walking speed (r = .658, p < .001), 4MWT fast walking speed (r = .601,p=.002), 10MWT comfortable walking speed (r = .512, p = .009), and 10MWT dual task (r = .535, p = .006). A low yet significant correlation was noted with the 10MWT fast walking speed (r = .398, p = .049). Association between the 3MBWT and the Zeno Walkway System revealed moderate correlations. All reliability tests were significant at p < .001. Interrater reliability ICC(2,1) values were very high for 3MBWT (ICC(2,1) = 0.93, [0.83-0.91]). Intrarater reliability was also very high (ICC(2,1) = 0.96 [0.90-0.98]).

CONCLUSION

The 3MBWT demonstrates validity and reliability as a tool for assessing gait speed in the posterior direction in people with PD.

Walking speeds are lower for short distance and turning locomotion: Experiments and modeling in low-cost prosthesis users

Preferred walking speed is a widely-used performance measure for people with mobility issues, but is usually measured in straight line walking for fixed distances or durations, and without explicitly accounting for turning. However, daily walking involves walking for bouts of different distances and walking with turning, with prior studies showing that short bouts with at most 10 steps could be 40% of all bouts and turning steps could be 8-50% of all steps. Here, we studied walking in a straight line for short distances (4 m to 23 m) and walking in circles (1 m to 3 m turning radii) in people with transtibial amputation or transfemoral amputation using a passive ankle-foot prosthesis (Jaipur Foot). We found that the study participants' preferred walking speeds are lower for shorter straight-line walking distances and lower for circles of smaller radii, which is analogous to earlier results in subjects without amputation. Using inverse optimization, we estimated the cost of changing speeds and turning such that the observed preferred walking speeds in our experiments minimizes the total cost of walking. The inferred costs of changing speeds and turning were larger for subjects with amputation compared to subjects without amputation in a previous study, specifically, being 4x to 8x larger for the turning cost and being highest for subjects with transfemoral amputation. Such high costs inferred by inverse optimization could potentially include non-energetic costs such as due to joint or interfacial stress or stability concerns, as inverse optimization cannot distinguish such terms from true metabolic cost. These experimental findings and models capturing the experimental trends could inform prosthesis design and rehabilitation therapy to better assist changing speeds and turning tasks. Further, measuring the preferred speed for a range of distances and radii could be a more comprehensive subject-specific measure of walking performance than commonly used straight line walking metrics.

The reliability and validity of the 3-m backward walk test in people with Parkinson's disease

BACKGROUND

People with Parkinson's disease (PwPD) lose the ability in backward walking which is an important part of mobility in daily life. The 3-m backward walk test (3MBWT) evaluates backward walking; however, its reliability and validity have not been examined in PwPD yet.

AIMS

To examine (1) the test-retest reliability of the 3MBWT in PwPD; (2) the minimum detectable change in the 3MBWT times; (3) the concurrent and known-groups validity of the 3MBWT; and (4) the optimum cutoff time which best discriminates fallers from non-fallers with Parkinson's disease (PD).

METHODS

This cross-sectional study included 36 PwPD and 33 healthy people. The 3MBWT was conducted with the 10-m walk test, timed up and go test, Berg Balance Scale, four square step test, activity-specific balance confidence scale, Movement Disorders Society Sponsored Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale, and Hoehn and Yahr Scale.

RESULTS

The 3MBWT demonstrated excellent test-retest reliability (ICC = 0.965). The MDC of 2.13 s was determined. The 3MBWT had moderate to high correlations with the other outcome measures (correlation coefficient ranged from -0.592 to 0.858). On the 3MBWT times, there were significant differences between PwPD and healthy people, and between fallers and non-fallers with PD (p < 0.001 and p < 0.001, respectively). A 3MBWT time of 10.31 s was found to best discriminate fallers from non-fallers with PD.

CONCLUSIONS

The 3MBWT is a reliable, valid, and easy to administer outcome measure to assess backward walking performance in PwPD, indicating it to be used in practice and research.

The reliability and validity of the 30-second chair stand test and modified four square step test in persons with multiple sclerosis

BACKGROUND

The 30-second Chair Stand Test (30s-CST) and Modified Four Square Step Test (mFSST) are used to determine the functional status of individuals with multiple sclerosis (MS). No other studies have demonstrated the reliability and validity of the 30s-CST and mFSST.

PURPOSE

To identify the test-retest reliability, concurrent validity and the known-group validity of the 30s-CST and mFSST in persons with MS.

METHODS

A total of 64 persons with MS were enrolled. 30s-CST, mFSST, Timed Up and Go Test (TUG) and Five Times Sit to Stand (FTST) tests were performed. 30s-CST and mFSST were conducted again one-hour later.

RESULTS

The mean age of the persons with MS were 37.9±11.3 years. The test-retest reliability of the 30s-CST and mFSST were excellent (ICC30s-CST = 0.974, 95%CI: 0.95-0.98; ICCmFSST = 0.992, 95%CI: 0.98-0.99). The 30s-CST was strongly correlated with FTST and TUG (r1 = -0.871, p1 = 0.0001; r2 = -0.741,p2 = 0.0001). There was a strong relationship between mFSST with TUG and FTST (r1 = 0.781,p1 = 0.0001;r2 = 0.788,p2 = 0.0001). The SEM95 and MDC95 values of the 30s-CST and mFSST were 0.41/1.13 and 0.34/0.94, respectively. Besides, there were significant differences between the persons with or without fall history in 30s-CST (MD: 1.66, CI: 0.27 to 3.05, p = .019) and mFSST CST (MD:-2.70, CI: -4.73 to -0.67, p = .010) performances.

CONCLUSION

The 30s-CST and mFSST are both valid and reliable in mildly-disabled individuals with MS.

Investigation of Motor Activity, Movement Kinematics and Forward-Backwards Gait in Children with Cerebral Palsy

Our aim in this study was to examine relationships between the motor activity ability, sensor-based kinematics and forward-backwards gait characteristics of children with cerebral palsy (CP). In this prospective cross-sectional study we studied 40 children with CP. We used the Pediatric Motor Activity Log Revised (PMAL-R) to assess motor activity, evaluated motion kinematics (acceleration and angular velocity) with a sensor-based application, applied the Edinburgh Visual Gait Score (EVGS) and the Timed Up and Go Test (TUG) to observe gait performance, and used the Three Meter Backward Walk Test (3MBWT) to assess backward gait. We found moderately positive significant correlations (r1 = 0.416, r2 = 0.418, p < 0.05) between the chilidren's minimum angular velocity on PMAL-R motor activity frequency (how often) and quality (how well) scores, respectively. We also found moderately negative significant correlations (r1 = -0.529, r2 = -0.521, p < 0.05) between PMAL-R frequency (how often) and quality (how well) scores with TUG, respectively. There were moderately high positive correlations (r1 = 0.415, r2 = 0.726, p < 0.05) between EVGS scores and 3MBWT and TUG scores, respectively. We concluded that angular velocity ability was moderately related to children's motor activity and showed that physical performance tests (TUG and 3MBWT) could monitor gait function and upper extremity motor activity level, including both forward and backward walking tasks, in children with CP.

The test-retest reliability and concurrent validity of performance-based task tests in patients with knee osteoarthritis

BACKGROUND

The measurement tool used for an accurate balance assessment should produce valid and reliable results in the population in which it is used.

OBJECTIVES

To examine whether two performance-based task tests are a reliable and valid measurement test to assess balance in patients with early and advanced knee osteoarthritis (KO).

DESIGN

Reliability and concurrent validity research.

METHOD

Test-retest reliability by calculating the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) between the first and second trial periods of performance-based task tests (Alternate Step Test & Pen Pick up Test); their correlations with the Timed Up and Go Test (TUGT) were calculated and their concurrent validity in balance assessment were examined.

RESULTS

A total of 100 patients (75% women, 25% men, mean 59 ± 10 years) with KO, 50 early (54 ± 7 years, 34 women, 16 men) and 50 advanced (64 ± 9 years, 41 women, 9 men), participated in the study. The ICC values for the Alternate Step Test (AST) and Pen Pick up Test (PPT) in patients with early KO are 0.881 (0.747-0.939, 95% confidence intervals) and 0.815 (0.689-0.892, 95% confidence intervals), respectively, while it is 0.852 (0.752-0.913, 95% confidence intervals) and 0.861 (0.756-0.922, 95% confidence intervals) in patients with advanced KO. Pearson correlation coefficient between AST & PPT times and TUGT time in patients with early and advanced KO was in the range of 0.535-0.746 (p < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Both task tests are reliable and valid clinical measurement tests that can be used to assess balance in patients with both early and advanced KO.

The 3-m backward walk test: reliability and validity in ambulant people with multiple sclerosis

To investigate: (a) the interrater and test-retest reliability of the 3-m backward walk test (3MBW) in ambulant people with multiple sclerosis (PwMS); (b) minimal detectable change (MDC); (c) concurrent and known-groups validity; and (d) the cutoff time to best discriminate fallers from nonfallers with multiple sclerosis (MS). Forty-nine PwMS and 36 healthy people were included in this cross-sectional study. The 3MBW was administered with the timed up and go test, Berg Balance Scale, four square step test, Falls Efficacy Scale-International, and Expanded Disability Status Scale. The 3MBW was simultaneously performed by two independent raters to examine the interrater reliability while was repeated after 7-10 days to examine the test-retest reliability. The 3MBW showed good interrater reliability [intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) = 0.987-0.989] and excellent test-retest reliability (ICC = 0.854-0.889). The MDC was found to be 1.69 s. The 3MBW had moderate-to-strong correlations with the other measures. For the 3MBW, PwMS had worse performance than healthy people (P < 0.001), whereas fallers with MS had worse performance than nonfallers with MS (P < 0.001). The 3MBW time of 7.86 s was determined to best discriminate fallers from nonfallers with MS. The 3MBW is a reliable, simple, and easy-to-administer tool for assessing backward walking among ambulant PwMS.

Evaluation of an articulated passive ankle-foot prosthesis

Background

Current ankle prostheses for people with unilateral transtibial amputation (TTA) or transfemoral amputation (TFA) are unable to mimic able-bodied performance during daily activities. A new mechanical ankle–foot prosthesis was developed to further optimise the gait of people with a lower-limb amputation. This study aimed to evaluate the Talaris Demonstrator (TD) during daily activities by means of performance-related, physiological and subjective outcome measures.

Materials and methods

Forty-two participants completed a protocol assessing performance and functional mobility with their current prosthesis and the TD. The protocol comprised the L-test, 2 min of stair climbing, 2 min of inclined treadmill walking, 6 min of treadmill walking at 3 different speeds in consecutive blocks of 2 min, and a 3-m Backward Walk test (3mBWT). Heart rate was measured during each task, and oxygen uptake was collected during all tasks except for the L-test and 3mBWT. Time of execution was recorded on the L-test and 3mBWT, and the rate of perceived exertion (score = 6–20), fatigue and comfort (score = 0–100) were assessed after each task. Paired sample t-tests and Wilcoxon Signed-rank tests were performed to compare outcomes between prosthetic devices. Benjamini–Hochberg corrections were applied to control for multiple comparisons with a level of significance set at α = 0.05.

Results

Subjects with a TTA (N = 28) were faster with their current prosthesis compared to the TD on the L-test and 3mBWT (p = 0.005). In participants with a TFA (N = 14), we observed a tendency towards a higher heart rate during the L-test and towards increased comfort during inclined walking, with the TD compared to the participants’ current prosthetic device (0.05 < p < 0.10). Further, no significant results were observed.

Conclusion

The Talaris Demonstrator is a novel state-of-the-art passive ankle–foot prosthesis for both people with a TTA and TFA. Subjective measures indicate the added value of this device, while overall task performance and intensity of effort do not differ between the Talaris Demonstrator and the current prosthesis. Further investigations unravelling both acute and more prolonged adaptations will be conducted to evaluate the TD more thoroughly.

Validity and reliability of the 3-meter backward walk test in mildly disabled persons with multiple sclerosis

BACKGROUND

One of the biggest problems for persons with Multiple Sclerosis (PwMS) is dizziness, poor posture, and balance problems that cause injury-causing falls. The aim of our study was to reveal the test-retest reliability and validity of the 3-Meter Backward Walk Test (3MBWT) in mildly disabled PwMS.

METHODS

This study included a total of 93 mildly disabled PwMS with mean EDSS of 1.89. 3MBWT, Functional Access Test (FRT), Dynamic Gait Index (DGI), Timed 25-Foot Walk (T25FW), and Timed-Up and Go (TUG) were applied to the patients. To measure test-retest reliability, a second evaluation was performed three days after the first evaluation.

RESULTS

Cronbach's alpha coefficient was found to be 0.998 (excellent). For intra-rater agreement, the ICC values in the individual test were 0.998. The SEM value was 0.18, the MDC value was found to be 0.50. A very strong correlation was revealed between the 3MBWT and FRT (r: -0.931, p: 0.001), TUG (r: 0.968, p: 0.001), T25FW (r: 0.879, p: 0.001), DGI (r: -0.871, p: 0.001) and falling history (r: 0.932, p: 0.001).

CONCLUSION

The 3MBWT was observed to be valid and reliable in mildly disabled PwMS. 3MBWT is an effective and reliable tool for measuring ability to walk backward in mildly disabled PwMS.