Hand hygiene practices for prevention of health care-associated infections associated with admitted infectious patients in the emergency department: a systematic review

Missed infection prevention and control activities and their predictors: insights from a pre- and post-pandemic study

AIM

The primary aim of this study was to compare differences, if any, in missed infection prevention and control (IPC) activities before and after the pandemic, along with the related predictors. The secondary aim was to identify relationships between missed IPC activities and unfinished nursing care.

METHODS

A repeated cross-sectional design was conducted in 2019 (pre-pandemic, 184 nurses) and 2024 (post-pandemic, 240 nurses) in a large academic hospital following the Checklist for Reporting of Survey Studies guidelines. The Missed Nursing Care in Infection Prevention and Control Survey (MNC-IPC) (Part A: missed activities, Part B: reasons), the Unfinished Nursing Care Survey (UNCS), and professional data were collected homogeneously across both periods.

FINDINGS

Self-reported missed IPC activities decreased from 2.15 out of 5 (95% confidence interval (CI), 2.05-2.25) to 1.51 (95% CI, 1.45-1.58) (P<0.0005), as did the related reasons, which decreased from 2.35 out of 4 (95% CI, 2.24-2.46) to 2.20 (95% CI, 2.11-2.30) (P=0.046). The total variance in the MNC-IPC overall scores was explained by 22.8% (pre-) and 20.7% (post-pandemic) by different predictors: system-level issues (estimated value 0.409, P=0.008) and nurses' intention to leave (0.107, P=0.023) in the pre-pandemic and by the number of patients admitted in the last shift (0.015, P=0.053), organizational issues (0.186, P<0.0005) and priority-setting issues (0.092, P=0.053) in the post-pandemic period. MNC-IPC and UNCS scores have reported significant correlations in both periods.

CONCLUSIONS

Missed IPC activities were less likely in the post-pandemic period possibly due to system efforts and lessons learned during the pandemic, which may have routinized IPC practices among nurses. Overall, predictors of missed IPC care changed after the pandemic, suggesting new patterns and the need for innovative interventions, particularly at the unit level and targeting younger nurses. The correlations between UNCS and MNC-IPC suggest that targeted improvements in one area are likely to yield positive outcomes in the other. However, despite their commonalities, these represent two distinct phenomena.

Indication-based and patient-based hand hygiene performance among nurses working at a university hospital

The traditional method of monitoring hand hygiene (HH) based on specific indications does not ensure that HH is performed for all required indications during patient care. This study aimed to compare HH performance rates (HHPRs) based on specific indications versus overall patient care among nurses at a university hospital. The study retrospectively analyzed HH monitoring data for 1398 indications from 543 patients and 190 nurses. Observations were conducted continuously, tracking a single healthcare worker from before patient contact until the end of the contact within a 30-min period. The indication-based HHPR was found to be 89.1%, while the patient-based HHPR was 78.1%. In the context of patient-based HHPR, the lowest rates were observed among nurses in the emergency room (48.3%) and those with less than 1 year of work experience (66.7%). Moreover, the largest discrepancy between indication-based and patient-based HHPR was noted among emergency room nurses with less than 1 year of experience. This significant difference underscores the need for patient-based HH monitoring, particularly for nurses in emergency settings and those with limited experience.

Effectiveness of a hand hygiene training intervention in improving knowledge and compliance rate among healthcare workers in a respiratory disease hospital

Background

Practicing hand hygiene (HH) is a crucial element of infection control, with healthcare workers (HCWs) playing a vital role in preventing the spread of infection. However, inadequate knowledge and non-compliance to HH protocols pose significant challenges in healthcare settings. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of an HH training intervention in enhancing knowledge and staff compliance within a respiratory disease hospital.

Method

A pre-and post-training study was conducted among the healthcare workers in a respiratory disease treatment facility. The intervention comprised a series of 3-hour training sessions conducted over five days, focusing on the World Health Organization's (WHO) recommended guideline "Your Five Moments For Hand Hygiene." These sessions covered proper HH techniques and underscored the repercussions of inadequate compliance. Educational materials related to HH were displayed in prominent locations throughout the facility. The knowledge levels and compliance rate were assessed before and after the intervention.

Result

The intervention significantly improved HH knowledge levels and compliance rates among the participants. Marking a significant improvement, the compliance rate of HH protocols increased from 66.0% to 88.3% during the pre-to post-training period, with a concurrent increase in the mean knowledge score from 68.6% to 78.9%.

Conclusion

This study underscores the potential of training and education in elevating HH compliance and knowledge among healthcare workers. The findings advocate that healthcare facilities routinely incorporate such interventions into their infection control programs, ultimately improving patient and healthcare worker safety.