1
|
Kuan EC, Wang EW, Adappa ND, Beswick DM, London NR, Su SY, Wang MB, Abuzeid WM, Alexiev B, Alt JA, Antognoni P, Alonso-Basanta M, Batra PS, Bhayani M, Bell D, Bernal-Sprekelsen M, Betz CS, Blay JY, Bleier BS, Bonilla-Velez J, Callejas C, Carrau RL, Casiano RR, Castelnuovo P, Chandra RK, Chatzinakis V, Chen SB, Chiu AG, Choby G, Chowdhury NI, Citardi MJ, Cohen MA, Dagan R, Dalfino G, Dallan I, Dassi CS, de Almeida J, Dei Tos AP, DelGaudio JM, Ebert CS, El-Sayed IH, Eloy JA, Evans JJ, Fang CH, Farrell NF, Ferrari M, Fischbein N, Folbe A, Fokkens WJ, Fox MG, Lund VJ, Gallia GL, Gardner PA, Geltzeiler M, Georgalas C, Getz AE, Govindaraj S, Gray ST, Grayson JW, Gross BA, Grube JG, Guo R, Ha PK, Halderman AA, Hanna EY, Harvey RJ, Hernandez SC, Holtzman AL, Hopkins C, Huang Z, Huang Z, Humphreys IM, Hwang PH, Iloreta AM, Ishii M, Ivan ME, Jafari A, Kennedy DW, Khan M, Kimple AJ, Kingdom TT, Knisely A, Kuo YJ, Lal D, Lamarre ED, Lan MY, Le H, Lechner M, Lee NY, Lee JK, Lee VH, Levine CG, Lin JC, Lin DT, Lobo BC, Locke T, Luong AU, Magliocca KR, Markovic SN, Matnjani G, McKean EL, Meço C, Mendenhall WM, Michel L, Na'ara S, Nicolai P, Nuss DW, Nyquist GG, Oakley GM, Omura K, Orlandi RR, Otori N, Papagiannopoulos P, Patel ZM, Pfister DG, Phan J, Psaltis AJ, Rabinowitz MR, Ramanathan M, Rimmer R, Rosen MR, Sanusi O, Sargi ZB, Schafhausen P, Schlosser RJ, Sedaghat AR, Senior BA, Shrivastava R, Sindwani R, Smith TL, Smith KA, Snyderman CH, Solares CA, Sreenath SB, Stamm A, Stölzel K, Sumer B, Surda P, Tajudeen BA, Thompson LDR, Thorp BD, Tong CCL, Tsang RK, Turner JH, Turri-Zanoni M, Udager AM, van Zele T, VanKoevering K, Welch KC, Wise SK, Witterick IJ, Won TB, Wong SN, Woodworth BA, Wormald PJ, Yao WC, Yeh CF, Zhou B, Palmer JN. International Consensus Statement on Allergy and Rhinology: Sinonasal Tumors. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol 2024; 14:149-608. [PMID: 37658764 DOI: 10.1002/alr.23262] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 23.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/21/2023] [Accepted: 08/24/2023] [Indexed: 09/05/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Sinonasal neoplasms, whether benign and malignant, pose a significant challenge to clinicians and represent a model area for multidisciplinary collaboration in order to optimize patient care. The International Consensus Statement on Allergy and Rhinology: Sinonasal Tumors (ICSNT) aims to summarize the best available evidence and presents 48 thematic and histopathology-based topics spanning the field. METHODS In accordance with prior International Consensus Statement on Allergy and Rhinology documents, ICSNT assigned each topic as an Evidence-Based Review with Recommendations, Evidence-Based Review, and Literature Review based on the level of evidence. An international group of multidisciplinary author teams were assembled for the topic reviews using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses format, and completed sections underwent a thorough and iterative consensus-building process. The final document underwent rigorous synthesis and review prior to publication. RESULTS The ICSNT document consists of four major sections: general principles, benign neoplasms and lesions, malignant neoplasms, and quality of life and surveillance. It covers 48 conceptual and/or histopathology-based topics relevant to sinonasal neoplasms and masses. Topics with a high level of evidence provided specific recommendations, while other areas summarized the current state of evidence. A final section highlights research opportunities and future directions, contributing to advancing knowledge and community intervention. CONCLUSION As an embodiment of the multidisciplinary and collaborative model of care in sinonasal neoplasms and masses, ICSNT was designed as a comprehensive, international, and multidisciplinary collaborative endeavor. Its primary objective is to summarize the existing evidence in the field of sinonasal neoplasms and masses.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Edward C Kuan
- Departments of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery and Neurological Surgery, University of California, Irvine, Orange, California, USA
| | - Eric W Wang
- Department of Otolaryngology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Nithin D Adappa
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Daniel M Beswick
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Nyall R London
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
- Sinonasal and Skull Base Tumor Program, Surgical Oncology Program, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | - Shirley Y Su
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Marilene B Wang
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Waleed M Abuzeid
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Borislav Alexiev
- Department of Pathology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern Memorial Hospital, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Jeremiah A Alt
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| | - Paolo Antognoni
- Division of Radiation Oncology, University of Insubria, ASST Sette Laghi Hospital, Varese, Italy
| | - Michelle Alonso-Basanta
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Pete S Batra
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Mihir Bhayani
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Diana Bell
- Department of Pathology, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte, California, USA
| | - Manuel Bernal-Sprekelsen
- Otorhinolaryngology Department, Surgery and Medical-Surgical Specialties Department, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Christian S Betz
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Jean-Yves Blay
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Léon Bérard, UNICANCER, Université Claude Bernard Lyon I, Lyon, France
| | - Benjamin S Bleier
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Juliana Bonilla-Velez
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Claudio Callejas
- Department of Otolaryngology, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA
| | - Ricardo L Carrau
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA
| | - Roy R Casiano
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida, USA
| | - Paolo Castelnuovo
- Division of Otorhinolaryngology, Department of Biotechnology and Life Sciences, University of Insubria, ASST Sette Laghi Hospital, Varese, Italy
| | - Rakesh K Chandra
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | | | - Simon B Chen
- Department of Pathology, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Alexander G Chiu
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas, USA
| | - Garret Choby
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Naweed I Chowdhury
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Martin J Citardi
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, McGovern Medical School, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Marc A Cohen
- Department of Surgery, Head and Neck Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Roi Dagan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Jacksonville, Florida, USA
| | - Gianluca Dalfino
- Division of Otorhinolaryngology, Department of Biotechnology and Life Sciences, University of Insubria, ASST Sette Laghi Hospital, Varese, Italy
| | - Iacopo Dallan
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Pisa University Hospital, Pisa, Italy
| | | | - John de Almeida
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Angelo P Dei Tos
- Section of Pathology, Department of Medicine, University of Padua, Padua, Italy
| | - John M DelGaudio
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Charles S Ebert
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Ivan H El-Sayed
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Jean Anderson Eloy
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, Newark, New Jersey, USA
| | - James J Evans
- Department of Neurological Surgery and Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Christina H Fang
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Montefiore Medical Center, The University Hospital for Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York, USA
| | - Nyssa F Farrell
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
| | - Marco Ferrari
- Section of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Department of Neurosciences, University of Padua, Padua, Italy
| | - Nancy Fischbein
- Department of Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Adam Folbe
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Oakland University William Beaumont School of Medicine, Royal Oak, Michigan, USA
| | - Wytske J Fokkens
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Meha G Fox
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA
| | | | - Gary L Gallia
- Department of Neurosurgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Paul A Gardner
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Mathew Geltzeiler
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | - Christos Georgalas
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Nicosia Medical School, Nicosia, Cyprus
| | - Anne E Getz
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Colorado, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| | - Satish Govindaraj
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA
| | - Stacey T Gray
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Jessica W Grayson
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA
| | - Bradley A Gross
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Jordon G Grube
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Albany Medical Center, Albany, New York, USA
| | - Ruifeng Guo
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Patrick K Ha
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Ashleigh A Halderman
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA
| | - Ehab Y Hanna
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Richard J Harvey
- Rhinology and Skull Base Research Group, Applied Medical Research Centre, University of South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Stephen C Hernandez
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, LSU Health Sciences Center, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA
| | - Adam L Holtzman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic Florida, Jacksonville, Florida, USA
| | - Claire Hopkins
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Guys and St Thomas' Hospital, London, UK
| | - Zhigang Huang
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University, Key Laboratory of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Ministry of Education, Beijing, China
| | - Zhenxiao Huang
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University, Key Laboratory of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Ministry of Education, Beijing, China
| | - Ian M Humphreys
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Peter H Hwang
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Alfred M Iloreta
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA
| | - Masaru Ishii
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Michael E Ivan
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida, USA
| | - Aria Jafari
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - David W Kennedy
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Mohemmed Khan
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA
| | - Adam J Kimple
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Todd T Kingdom
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Colorado, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| | - Anna Knisely
- Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Swedish Medical Center, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Ying-Ju Kuo
- Department of Pathology, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Devyani Lal
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Eric D Lamarre
- Head and Neck Institute, Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Ming-Ying Lan
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Hien Le
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Matt Lechner
- UCL Division of Surgery and Interventional Science and UCL Cancer Institute, University College London, London, UK
| | - Nancy Y Lee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Jivianne K Lee
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, University of California, Los Angeles David Geffen School of Medicine, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Victor H Lee
- Department of Clinical Oncology, School of Clinical Medicine, LKS Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - Corinna G Levine
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida, USA
| | - Jin-Ching Lin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Changhua Christian Hospital, Changhua, Taiwan
| | - Derrick T Lin
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Brian C Lobo
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA
| | - Tran Locke
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Amber U Luong
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, McGovern Medical School, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Kelly R Magliocca
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Svetomir N Markovic
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Gesa Matnjani
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Erin L McKean
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - Cem Meço
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Ankara University Medical School, Ankara, Turkey
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Salzburg Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria
| | - William M Mendenhall
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Jacksonville, Florida, USA
| | - Loren Michel
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Shorook Na'ara
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Piero Nicolai
- Section of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Department of Neurosciences, University of Padua, Padua, Italy
| | - Daniel W Nuss
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, LSU Health Sciences Center, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA
| | - Gurston G Nyquist
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Gretchen M Oakley
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| | - Kazuhiro Omura
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Richard R Orlandi
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| | - Nobuyoshi Otori
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Peter Papagiannopoulos
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Zara M Patel
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA
| | - David G Pfister
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Jack Phan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Alkis J Psaltis
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Mindy R Rabinowitz
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Murugappan Ramanathan
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Ryan Rimmer
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - Marc R Rosen
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Olabisi Sanusi
- Department of Neurosurgery, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | - Zoukaa B Sargi
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida, USA
| | - Philippe Schafhausen
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Rodney J Schlosser
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA
| | - Ahmad R Sedaghat
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
| | - Brent A Senior
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Raj Shrivastava
- Department of Neurosurgery and Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA
| | - Raj Sindwani
- Head and Neck Institute, Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Timothy L Smith
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | - Kristine A Smith
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
| | - Carl H Snyderman
- Departments of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery and Neurological Surgery, University of California, Irvine, Orange, California, USA
| | - C Arturo Solares
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Satyan B Sreenath
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Indiana University, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
| | - Aldo Stamm
- São Paulo ENT Center (COF), Edmundo Vasconcelos Complex, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Katharina Stölzel
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Baran Sumer
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA
| | - Pavol Surda
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Guys and St Thomas' Hospital, London, UK
| | - Bobby A Tajudeen
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | | | - Brian D Thorp
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Charles C L Tong
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Raymond K Tsang
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Justin H Turner
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Mario Turri-Zanoni
- Division of Otorhinolaryngology, Department of Biotechnology and Life Sciences, University of Insubria, ASST Sette Laghi Hospital, Varese, Italy
| | - Aaron M Udager
- Department of Pathology, Michigan Center for Translational Pathology, Rogel Cancer Center, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - Thibaut van Zele
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Kyle VanKoevering
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA
| | - Kevin C Welch
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Sarah K Wise
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Ian J Witterick
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Tae-Bin Won
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Stephanie N Wong
- Division of Otorhinolaryngology, Department of Surgery, School of Clinical Medicine, LKS Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - Bradford A Woodworth
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA
| | - Peter-John Wormald
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - William C Yao
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, McGovern Medical School, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Chien-Fu Yeh
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Bing Zhou
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University, Key Laboratory of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Ministry of Education, Beijing, China
| | - James N Palmer
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Tang H, Wang L, Xu W, Xu Y, Li X, Guo D. Secondary Sinonasal Collision Tumor of Papillary Squamous Cell Carcinoma and Small Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma After Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Radiotherapy: A Case Report and Literature Review of Sinonasal Collision Carcinomas. Onco Targets Ther 2023; 16:91-97. [PMID: 36817507 PMCID: PMC9930577 DOI: 10.2147/ott.s396703] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/09/2022] [Accepted: 01/25/2023] [Indexed: 02/12/2023] Open
Abstract
In the head and neck region, small cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (SmNEC) is extraordinary infrequent. Collision malignancy is also a rare entity in the nasal cavity, with merely sporadic 6 case reports on primary collision tumor associated with neuroendocrine carcinoma. The development of a secondary SmNEC within the previous radiation field had uncommonly been described, and there was no report on secondary sinonasal collision carcinoma with SmNEC component as a side reaction of nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) radiotherapy. In light of the rarity of these neoplasms, we presented a case of a sinonasal collision carcinoma of papillary squamous cell carcinoma (PSCC) and SmNEC after NPC radiotherapy. To our knowledge, it may be the first case of a secondary coexistence of two malignancies synchronously in the nasal cavity after NPC treatment. Recognizing this peculiar kind of collision tumor associated SmNEC could promote our understanding of this entity and hence propose optimal treatment strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hao Tang
- Department of Pathology, Guiqian International General Hospital, Guiyang, Guizhou, People’s Republic of China
| | - Lina Wang
- Department of Pathology, Guiqian International General Hospital, Guiyang, Guizhou, People’s Republic of China
| | - Wenfeng Xu
- Department of Pathology, Guiqian International General Hospital, Guiyang, Guizhou, People’s Republic of China
| | - Yujuan Xu
- Department of Pathology, Guiqian International General Hospital, Guiyang, Guizhou, People’s Republic of China
| | - Xianyun Li
- Department of Pathology, Guiqian International General Hospital, Guiyang, Guizhou, People’s Republic of China
| | - Deyu Guo
- Department of Pathology, Guiqian International General Hospital, Guiyang, Guizhou, People’s Republic of China,Correspondence: Deyu Guo, Department of Pathology, Guiqian International General Hospital, Guiyang, Guizhou, People’s Republic of China, Email
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Bi S, Li J, Wang T, Man F, Zhang P, Hou F, Wang H, Hao D. Multi-parametric MRI-based radiomics signature for preoperative prediction of Ki-67 proliferation status in sinonasal malignancies: a two-centre study. Eur Radiol 2022; 32:6933-6942. [PMID: 35687135 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-022-08780-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/04/2021] [Revised: 03/18/2022] [Accepted: 03/26/2022] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To assess the predictive ability of a multi-parametric MRI-based radiomics signature (RS) for the preoperative evaluation of Ki-67 proliferation status in sinonasal malignancies. METHODS A total of 128 patients with sinonasal malignancies that underwent multi-parametric MRIs at two medical centres were retrospectively analysed. Data from one medical centre (n = 77) were used to develop the predictive models and data from the other medical centre (n = 51) constitute the test dataset. Clinical data and conventional MRI findings were reviewed to identify significant predictors. Radiomics features were determined using maximum relevance minimum redundancy and least absolute shrinkage and selection operator algorithms. Subsequently, RSs were established using a logistic regression (LR) algorithm. The predictive performance of RSs was assessed using calibration, decision curve analysis (DCA), accuracy, and AUC. RESULTS No independent predictors of high Ki-67 proliferation were observed based on clinical data and conventional MRI findings. RS-T1, RS-T2, and RS-T1c (contrast enhancement T1WI) were established based on a single-parametric MRI. RS-Combined (combining T1WI, FS-T2WI, and T1c features) was developed based on multi-parametric MRI and achieved an AUC and accuracy of 0.852 (0.733-0.971) and 86.3%, respectively, on the test dataset. The calibration curve and DCA demonstrated an improved fitness and benefits in clinical practice. CONCLUSIONS A multi-parametric MRI-based RS may be used as a non-invasive, dependable, and accurate tool for preoperative evaluation of the Ki-67 proliferation status to overcome the sampling bias in sinonasal malignancies. KEY POINTS • Multi-parametric MRI-based radiomics signatures (RSs) are used to preoperatively evaluate the proliferation status of Ki-67 in sinonasal malignancies. • Radiomics features are determined using maximum relevance minimum redundancy (mRMR) and least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) algorithms. • RSs are established using a logistic regression (LR) algorithm.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shucheng Bi
- The Department of Radiology, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, 16, Jiangsu Road, Qingdao, 266003, China
| | - Jie Li
- The Department of Radiology, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, 16, Jiangsu Road, Qingdao, 266003, China
| | - Tongyu Wang
- The Department of Radiology, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, 16, Jiangsu Road, Qingdao, 266003, China
| | - Fengyuan Man
- The Department of Radiology, The PLA Rocket Force Characteristic Medical Center, Beijing, 100088, China
| | - Peng Zhang
- The Department of Radiology, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100050, China
| | - Feng Hou
- The Department of Pathology, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, 266003, China
| | - Hexiang Wang
- The Department of Radiology, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, 16, Jiangsu Road, Qingdao, 266003, China.
| | - Dapeng Hao
- The Department of Radiology, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, 16, Jiangsu Road, Qingdao, 266003, China.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Sugianto I, Yanagi Y, Hisatomi M, Okada S, Takeshita Y, Bamgbose B, Asaumi J. Collision tumor of small cell carcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma of the maxillary sinus: Case report. Mol Clin Oncol 2022; 16:96. [PMID: 35400122 PMCID: PMC8985071 DOI: 10.3892/mco.2022.2529] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/22/2021] [Accepted: 01/27/2022] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
A collision tumor refers to the coexistence of two diagnostically distinct tumors in a common anatomic space. Collision tumors are rare in the oral and maxillofacial region. The present study reported on the case of an 82-year-old female with a collision tumor in the maxillary sinus consisting of small cell carcinoma (SmCC) and squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). Computed tomography (CT) imaging revealed a mass in the right maxillary sinus. The lesion exhibited heterogeneous low signal intensity (SI) on T1-weighted imaging (T1WI), high SI on short T1 inversion recovery and heterogeneous solid enhancement on contrast-enhanced T1WI. The histopathology result of a biopsy specimen confirmed SmCC. After the patient received a course of chemoradiotherapy, follow-up CT revealed a residual tumor. In a second surgery, a remaining tumor and histopathology revealed SCC with no evidence of SmCC. The final diagnosis was a collision tumor made up of SCC and SmCC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Irfan Sugianto
- Department of Oral Radiology Faculty of Dentistry Hasanuddin University, Makassar, Sulawesi 90245, Indonesia
| | - Yoshinobu Yanagi
- Department of Dental Informatics, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Science, Okayama 700‑8558, Japan
| | - Miki Hisatomi
- Department of Oral Diagnosis and Dentomaxillofacial Radiology, Okayama University Hospital, Okayama 700‑8558, Japan
| | - Shunsuke Okada
- Department of Oral Diagnosis and Dentomaxillofacial Radiology, Okayama University Hospital, Okayama 700‑8558, Japan
| | - Yohei Takeshita
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Science, Okayama 700‑8558, Japan
| | - Babatunde Bamgbose
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Science, Okayama 700‑8558, Japan
| | - Junichi Asaumi
- Department of Oral Diagnosis and Dentomaxillofacial Radiology, Okayama University Hospital, Okayama 700‑8558, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Thariat J, Moya Plana A, Vérillaud B, Vergez S, Régis-Ferrand F, Digue L, Even C, Costes V, Baujat B, de Gabory L, Baglin AC, Janot F. [Diagnosis, prognosis and treatment of sinonasal carcinomas (excluding melanomas, sarcomas and lymphomas)]. Bull Cancer 2020; 107:601-611. [PMID: 32305127 DOI: 10.1016/j.bulcan.2020.02.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/05/2020] [Revised: 02/08/2020] [Accepted: 02/28/2020] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
Sinonasal carcinomas account for 3% of ENT cancers. They are subdivided into squamous cell carcinomas (50%), adenocarcinomas [20%, mostly of intestinal type (ITAC)], and more rarely, adenoid cystic carcinomas, olfactory neuroblastomas (=esthesioneuroblastomas), neuroendocrine carcinomas or undifferentiated sinonasal carcinomas (SNUC). The 5-year survival rates are, in descending order, 72% for neuroblastomas, 63% for adenocarcinomas, 50-60% for large-cell neuroendocrine carcinomas, 53% for squamous cell carcinomas, 25-50% for adenoid cystic, 35% for small-cell neuroendocrine carcinomas and 35% for SNUC and newly discovered histologies. Surgery is the main treatment; endoscopic approaches reduce the morbidity with equivalent tumour control. Intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) is almost systematic. Nodal involvement is rare in ethmoidal adenocarcinomas and adenoid cystic carcinomas; it is intermediate and may justify prophylactic radiotherapy for N0 necks in SNUC, neuroblastoma, squamous cell carcinomas and sinonasal neuroendocrine carcinomas. IMRT or proton therapy is the mainstay of treatment of unresectable disease. Radiotherapy optimization by carbon ion therapy for adenoid cystic carcinomas, or by chemotherapy for all carcinomas with IMRT or proton therapy, is investigated within clinical trials in France. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy is reserved for rapidly progressive disease or histologies with a high metastatic potential such as neuroendocrine carcinomas or SNUC. Given their histologic and molecular specificities and different relapse patterns, an expertise of the REFCOR network, with REFCORpath review, is likely to correct diagnoses, rectify treatments, with an impact on survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Juliette Thariat
- Baclesse Cancer Center, Radiation Oncology Department, Caen, France.
| | - Antoine Moya Plana
- Gustave-Roussy Cancer Campus, Head and Neck Surgery Department, Villejuif, France
| | | | - Sébastien Vergez
- Toulouse University Hospital Center, Head and Neck Surgery Department, Toulouse, France
| | - François Régis-Ferrand
- Gustave-Roussy Cancer Campus, Head and Neck Oncology Department, Villejuif, France; HIA Begin, Medical Oncology Department, Saint-Mandé, France
| | - Laurence Digue
- Pellegrin Hospital, Centre Michelet, Head and Neck Oncology Department, Bordeaux, France
| | - Caroline Even
- Gustave-Roussy Cancer Campus, Head and Neck Oncology Department, Villejuif, France
| | - Valérie Costes
- Montpellier Hospital, Department of Pathology, Montpellier, France
| | - Bertrand Baujat
- Tenon Hospital, Head and Neck Surgery Department, Paris, France
| | | | - Anne-Catherine Baglin
- Pellegrin Hospital, Centre Michelet, Head and Neck Surgery Department, Bordeaux, France
| | - François Janot
- Gustave-Roussy Cancer Campus, Head and Neck Surgery Department, Villejuif, France
| | -
- French Rare Head and Neck Cancer Expert Network, France
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Mody MD, Saba NF. Multimodal Therapy for Sinonasal Malignancies: Updates and Review of Current Treatment. Curr Treat Options Oncol 2020; 21:4. [PMID: 31950286 DOI: 10.1007/s11864-019-0696-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/06/2023]
Abstract
OPINION STATEMENT Sinonasal malignancies pose a significant challenge in management due to their low incidence, biologic diversity, and significant symptom burden. Even though surgery remains the primary therapeutic modality, a multi-modality approach has been shown to benefit a significant proportion of patients and its success depends largely on stage and histologic type. Non-surgical approaches such as novel radiation approaches as well as intensification with systemic therapy hold promise in altering the organ preservation rate as well as overall survival for patients. Practice changing randomized trials to test these novel modalities are overdue and desperately needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mayur D Mody
- Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.,Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Nabil F Saba
- Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA. .,Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Biau J, Lapeyre M, Troussier I, Budach W, Giralt J, Grau C, Kazmierska J, Langendijk JA, Ozsahin M, O'Sullivan B, Bourhis J, Grégoire V. Selection of lymph node target volumes for definitive head and neck radiation therapy: a 2019 Update. Radiother Oncol 2019; 134:1-9. [DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2019.01.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 60] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/05/2018] [Revised: 11/15/2018] [Accepted: 01/13/2019] [Indexed: 10/27/2022]
|
8
|
Ono T, Sakata K, Tanaka N, Hashiguchi S, Migita H, Kiyokawa K, Morioka M, Kurita T, Sato K, Takeshige N, Umeno H. Salvage surgery for a locally persistent or recurrent tumour in maxillary cancer patients who have undergone radiotherapy and concomitant intra-arterial cisplatin: implications for surgical margin assessment. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2019; 48:567-575. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ijom.2018.10.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/02/2018] [Revised: 09/07/2018] [Accepted: 10/25/2018] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
|
9
|
Ziai H, Yu E, Fu T, Muhanna N, Monteiro E, Vescan A, Zadeh G, Witterick IJ, Goldstein DP, Gentili F, de Almeida JR. Impact of Dural Resection on Sinonasal Malignancies with Skull Base Encroachment or Erosion. J Neurol Surg B Skull Base 2018; 79:419-426. [PMID: 30210968 PMCID: PMC6133664 DOI: 10.1055/s-0037-1612617] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/07/2017] [Accepted: 11/13/2017] [Indexed: 02/03/2023] Open
Abstract
Objectives (1) To determine the occult rate of dural invasion in patients with tumors extending to and/or eroding the bony anterior skull base but without evidence of dural invasion on preoperative imaging. (2) To determine the impact of dural resection and of skull base erosion on survival outcomes in this group of patients (without evidence of dural invasion upon preoperative imaging). Study Design Retrospective study. Setting Tertiary care academic center. Participants Patients with sinonasal malignancies with anterior skull base encroachment/erosion without dural invasion on preoperative imaging treated surgically. Main Outcome Measures (1) Histopathologic disease in the dura in patients who had dural resection and (2) Oncologic outcomes (5-year local recurrence, dural recurrence, disease-specific survival, and overall survival) in patients with and without dural resection, and patients with and without skull base erosion. Results Thirty-seven patients were included. The occult rate of dural invasion was 54%. Patients with dural resection had improved margin control versus those without dural resection (90% vs 56%, p = 0.02). Dural resection improved 5-year overall survival only in patients with esthesioneuroblastoma compared with bony skull base resection alone (100% vs 75%, p = 0.03). Patients with skull base erosion had reduced local control versus those without erosion (63% vs 93%, p = 0.047). Conclusion This study suggests a substantial rate of occult dural invasion despite no overt imaging findings. Dural resection may be associated with improved margin control, but no oncologic benefit except for esthesioneuroblastomas, although treatment heterogeneity and small sample size may limit conclusions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hedyeh Ziai
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Eugene Yu
- Department of Medical Imaging, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Terence Fu
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Nidal Muhanna
- Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Eric Monteiro
- Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Allan Vescan
- Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Gelareh Zadeh
- Division of Neurosurgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Ian J. Witterick
- Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - David P. Goldstein
- Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Fred Gentili
- Division of Neurosurgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - John R. de Almeida
- Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
López F, Lund VJ, Suárez C, Snyderman CH, Saba NF, Robbins KT, Vander Poorten V, Strojan P, Mendenhall WM, Rinaldo A, Ferlito A. The Impact of Histologic Phenotype in the Treatment of Sinonasal Cancer. Adv Ther 2017; 34:2181-2198. [PMID: 28871554 DOI: 10.1007/s12325-017-0605-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/25/2017] [Indexed: 01/04/2023]
Abstract
The management of sinonasal cancer is a challenge due to its low occurrence and anatomical and significant diversity of histological types. The therapeutic modality used should be tailored individually according to the histology, tumour stage, molecular profile and previous treatments. The clinical management of sinonasal cancer has improved greatly owing to developments in endoscopic surgery and precision radiotherapy. Complete surgical resection is the mainstay of sinonasal malignancies' management but multimodality therapy is associated with improved outcomes in certain histologies. The recognition of various histological types with biological behaviours more suitable for non-surgical modalities has allowed treatment protocols to become more tailored to the disease. In this review we aim to describe and to summarise the current data guiding the management of sinonasal cancer with emphasis on phenotypic variation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fernando López
- Department of Otolaryngology, Hospital Universitario Central de Asturias, Oviedo, Spain.
- Instituto Universitario de Oncología del Principado de Asturias, University of Oviedo, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria del Principado de Asturias and CIBERONC, ISCIII, Oviedo, Spain.
| | - Valerie J Lund
- Professorial Unit, Ear Institute, University College London, London, UK
| | - Carlos Suárez
- Instituto Universitario de Oncología del Principado de Asturias, University of Oviedo, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria del Principado de Asturias and CIBERONC, ISCIII, Oviedo, Spain
| | - Carl H Snyderman
- Department of Otolaryngology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Nabil F Saba
- Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology, The Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - K Thomas Robbins
- Division of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Southern Illinois University School of Medicine, Springfield, ILL, USA
| | - Vincent Vander Poorten
- Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery and Department of Oncology, Section Head and Neck Oncology, University Hospitals Leuven, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Primož Strojan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institute of Oncology, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - William M Mendenhall
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | | | - Alfio Ferlito
- Coordinator of the International Head and Neck Scientific Group, Padua, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Gangl K, Nemec S, Altorjai G, Pammer J, Grasl MC, Erovic BM. Prognostic survival value of retropharyngeal lymph node involvement in sinonasal tumors: A retrospective, descriptive, and exploratory study. Head Neck 2017; 39:1421-1427. [PMID: 28452184 DOI: 10.1002/hed.24782] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/30/2016] [Revised: 10/26/2016] [Accepted: 02/10/2017] [Indexed: 02/03/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Sinonasal carcinomas are rare. The purpose of this study was for us to present our assessment of the effects of retropharyngeal lymph node involvement at diagnosis on patient outcomes. METHODS Retropharyngeal lymph node involvement in 36 patients with sinonasal carcinoma was determined by radiology at initial presentation. Clinical outcome, in particular, overall survival (OS) and locoregional control, was assessed by Kaplan-Meier analysis and log-rank testing. RESULTS Retropharyngeal lymph node involvement was associated with statistically significant decreased OS (P = .0066) in the patient collective. In the squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) subgroup (n = 23), decreased OS (P = .0046) and worse locoregional control (P = .0065) were observed. In these patients, decreased OS (P = .0423) and worse locoregional control (P = .0315) were also seen in the advanced tumor subgroup. CONCLUSION Retropharyngeal lymph node involvement at diagnosis is a significant prognostic factor for decreased OS and locoregional control in sinonasal carcinoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katharina Gangl
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Stefan Nemec
- Department of Radiology, Division of Neuroradiology and Musculoskeletal Radiology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Gabriela Altorjai
- Department of Radiotherapy, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Johannes Pammer
- Department of Clinical Pathology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Matthaeus Ch Grasl
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Boban M Erovic
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Scangas GA, Eloy JA, Lin DT. The Role of Chemotherapy in the Management of Sinonasal and Ventral Skull Base Malignancies. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 2017; 50:433-441. [PMID: 28160997 DOI: 10.1016/j.otc.2016.12.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
In most cases of advanced sinonasal and ventral skull base cancer, a multimodal treatment approach provides the best chance for improved outcomes. Depending on the tumor type and extent of disease, systemic chemotherapy has been shown to play an important role in neoadjuvant, concomitant, and adjuvant settings. The lack of randomized trials continues to limit its indications. Further high-quality studies are needed to understand ideal chemotherapeutic regimens and their role and sequential timing in sinonasal and ventral skull base cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- George A Scangas
- Department of Otolaryngology, Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary, Harvard Medical School, 243 Charles Street, Boston, MA 02114, USA.
| | - Jean Anderson Eloy
- Endoscopic Skull Base Surgery Program, Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Rhinology and Sinus Surgery, Otolaryngology Research, Neurological Institute of New Jersey, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, 185 South Orange Avenue, Newark, NJ 07103, USA
| | - Derrick T Lin
- Division of Head and Neck Oncology, Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 243 Charles Street, Boston, MA 02114, USA
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Malignant Primary Neoplasms of the Nasal Cavity and Paranasal Sinus. CURRENT OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY REPORTS 2016. [DOI: 10.1007/s40136-016-0134-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
|
14
|
Grayson JW, Khichi SS, Cho DY, Riley KO, Woodworth BA. Management Strategies for Skull Base Inverted Papilloma. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2016; 155:179-83. [DOI: 10.1177/0194599816639019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/19/2015] [Accepted: 02/24/2016] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
Objective Inverted papilloma attached to the ventral skull base presents a surgical dilemma because surgical removal of the bony pedicle is critical to decrease risk of recurrence. The objective of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of endoscopic management of skull base inverted papilloma. Study Design Case series with planned data collection. Setting Tertiary medical center. Subjects Patients with skull base inverted papilloma. Methods Over 7 years, 49 patients with skull base inverted papilloma were referred for surgical resection. Demographics, operative technique, pathology, complications, recurrence, and postoperative follow-up were evaluated. Results Average age at presentation was 57 years. Twenty-six patients (53%) had prior attempts at resection elsewhere, and 5 had squamous cell carcinoma (SCCA) arising in an inverted papilloma. Six patients (12%) suffered major complications, including skull base osteomyelitis in 2 previously irradiated patients, cerebrospinal fluid leak with pneumocephalus (n = 1), meningitis (n = 1), invasive fungal sinusitis (n = 1), and cerebrovascular accident (n = 1). The mean disease-free interval was 29 months (range, 10-78 months). One patient with SCCA recurred in the nasopharynx (overall 2% recurrence rate). He is disease-free 3 years following endoscopic nasopharyngectomy. Three patients with SCCA had endoscopic resection of the skull base, while 1 subject with inverted papilloma pedicled on the superior orbital roof had an osteoplastic flap in conjunction with a Draf III procedure. All others received endoscopic resection. Conclusions Removal of the bony pedicle resulted in excellent local control of skull base inverted papillomas. Our experience demonstrates that disease eradication with limited morbidity is attainable with this approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jessica W. Grayson
- Department of Otolaryngology, University of Alabama–Birmingham Medical Center, Birmingham, Alabama, USA
| | - Sunny S. Khichi
- Department of Otolaryngology, University of Alabama–Birmingham Medical Center, Birmingham, Alabama, USA
| | - Do-Yeon Cho
- Department of Otolaryngology, University of Alabama–Birmingham Medical Center, Birmingham, Alabama, USA
| | - Kristen O. Riley
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Alabama–Birmingham Medical Center, Birmingham, Alabama, USA
| | - Bradford A. Woodworth
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Alabama–Birmingham Medical Center, Birmingham, Alabama, USA
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Kaplan DJ, Kim JH, Wang E, Snyderman C. Prognostic Indicators for Salvage Surgery of Recurrent Sinonasal Malignancy. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2015; 154:104-12. [PMID: 26424747 DOI: 10.1177/0194599815606699] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/05/2015] [Accepted: 08/27/2015] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Identify prognostic factors after salvage surgery for recurrent sinonasal malignancy (SNM). STUDY DESIGN Case series with chart review. SETTING University of Pittsburgh Medical Center. SUBJECTS Forty-two patients who underwent curative surgery for locally recurrent SNM ± adjuvant therapy from June 5, 2000, to December 19, 2012. Patients without follow-up were excluded. METHODS Chart review with established prognostic indicators for primary malignancies. Statistical analysis included Kaplan-Meier log-rank test, Fisher's exact test, Student's t test, and Cox regression. RESULTS Forty-two patients met inclusion criteria: 38.5% developed a second recurrence, and 21.4% had metastases following treatment. The average disease-free interval (DFI) was 26.9 months (range, 2-90 months). DFI was significantly affected by ethmoid versus nonethmoid site (P = .049), histology (P = .012), carotid artery involvement (P = .008), perineural extension (P = .006), and clival invasion (P = .015). The overall survival rates at 6 months, 12 months, and 5 years following surgery were 83.3%, 69%, and 47.6%, respectively. Survival was affected by histology (P = .014), stratified grade (P = .042), tumor extension into the orbit (P = .019), carotid artery (P = .001), perineural space (P = .028), and clivus (P = .022). Complications occurred in 28.6% of patients and were associated with histology (P = .04). Length of hospital stay related to treatment was affected by histology (P = .009), grade (P = .013), and postoperative complication (P < .001). The median percentage of time hospitalized was 8%, and 43% of patients who died within 12 months spent >10% of their remaining days in the hospital. CONCLUSION High-risk histologic subtype (melanoma, sinonasal undifferentiated carcinoma, adenocarcinoma, neuroendocrine cancer, sarcoma, and squamous cell carcinoma), grade, and orbital and skull base involvement negatively affect survival and/or DFI for patients with local recurrence of SNM. Improved stratification of patients can be used to guide decision making for patients with recurrent SNM and to avoid inappropriate surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Jee Hong Kim
- University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Eric Wang
- Department of Otolaryngology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Carl Snyderman
- Department of Otolaryngology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Dean NR, Illing EA, Woodworth BA. Endoscopic resection of anterolateral maxillary sinus inverted papillomas. Laryngoscope 2014; 125:807-12. [PMID: 25418039 DOI: 10.1002/lary.25033] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 10/21/2014] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS Endoscopic medial maxillectomy (EMM) has become the surgical procedure of choice for resection of maxillary sinus inverted papillomas (IPs). Traditionally, IPs pedicled on the anterior and/or lateral walls of the maxillary sinus have required an adjuvant Caldwell-Luc approach due to decreased visualization with transnasal endoscopy in these locations. The objective of the current study is to evaluate outcomes following endoscopic resection of anterolateral maxillary sinus IPs. STUDY DESIGN Prospective case series. SUBJECTS AND METHODS Over 6 years, a total of 35 patients underwent EMM for maxillary sinus IPs located on the anterolateral maxillary wall. Demographics, operative technique, pathology, complications, recurrence, and postoperative follow-up were evaluated. RESULTS The majority of patients were male (71%) with a mean age of 56 years (range 27-83). Most patients (71%) were referred for recurrence after previous attempts at surgical resection. Adequate visualization was obtained following EMM in the majority of patients with use of a 70-degree endoscope and angled instrumentation. The addition of transseptal surgical access was critical to the removal of IPs in 16 patients. No Caldwell-Luc approaches were required. Pathologic dysplasia was identified in nine patients, and three had carcinoma. There were no recurrences with a mean disease-free interval of 29 months (10-72 months). CONCLUSION In the present study, EMM provided excellent surgical access to anterolateral maxillary sinus IPs. The transseptal approach allowed enhanced visualization to this challenging location, previously considered accessible only with external procedures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nichole R Dean
- Departments of Surgery/Division of Otolaryngology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, U.S.A
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
17
|
Devaraja K, Sikka K, Kumar R, Thakar A. Sinonasal malignancies: long term follow up after surgical management-an analysis of outcomes. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2014; 67:28-33. [PMID: 25621228 DOI: 10.1007/s12070-014-0742-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/09/2014] [Accepted: 06/10/2014] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
UNLABELLED Sinonasal malignancies are rare and survival analysis in affected patients is arduous and perplexing due to various factors. In this review article, attempt has been made to overcome some of those factors while analysing survival outcomes. AIMS AND OBJECTIVES The aim of this study was to share the experience of a tertiary care centre in the surgical management of sinonasal malignancies over 12 years. MATERIALS AND METHODS This study is a retrospective chart review, and in this study, hospital records of 58 patients with biopsy proven sinonasal malignancies were studied. Only the patients undergoing primary or salvage surgery at our institution from May-2000 to April-2012 with a minimum follow up of 2 years were included. Statistical analyses such as means, proportions, Kaplan-Meier analysis and Cox's regression model were done. RESULTS Majority of the patients were males (n = 43) belonging to fourth and fifth decades. Squamous cell carcinoma was the most common (n = 17) histopathological type, followed by adenoid cystic carcinoma (n = 14). Majority presented with stage IV disease (n = 42). 17 patients were operated for recurrent disease. Over all 5 year survival was 72 % and disease free survival was 44 %. Separate analysis for epithelial and matched non-epithelial group showed poorer prognosis with epithelial group (p = 0.0120). Multivariate analysis showed histopathological type (epithelial) and presence of pathological risk factors (positive margins and/or perineural invasion) affecting survival. CONCLUSIONS Advanced stage presentation is the norm for sinonasal malignancies. This study noted a 5 year overall survival of 72 % and disease free survival of 44 %. Epithelial histopathology carries poorer prognosis then other counterparts and incomplete removal is shown to add to poor prognosis independently.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- K Devaraja
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery,, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Room No. 4057, 4th Floor, Teaching Block, Ansari Nagar, New Delhi, 110029 India
| | - Kapil Sikka
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery,, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Room No. 4057, 4th Floor, Teaching Block, Ansari Nagar, New Delhi, 110029 India
| | - Rajeev Kumar
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery,, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Room No. 4057, 4th Floor, Teaching Block, Ansari Nagar, New Delhi, 110029 India
| | - Alok Thakar
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery,, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Room No. 4057, 4th Floor, Teaching Block, Ansari Nagar, New Delhi, 110029 India ; Department of ENT, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Room No. 4067, 4th Floor, Teaching Block, Ansari Nagar, New Delhi, 110029 India
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Hosokawa S, Okamura J, Takizawa Y, Mineta H. Long-term survival of a patient with primary small cell neuroendocrine carcinoma of the maxillary sinus: a case report. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2013; 71:e248-52. [PMID: 23866955 DOI: 10.1016/j.joms.2013.04.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/08/2013] [Revised: 03/08/2013] [Accepted: 04/16/2013] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
Abstract
Small cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (SNEC) of the paranasal sinuses is an extremely rare and distinctive tumor with aggressive clinical behavior. Moreover, SNECs originating in the head and neck region have been reported to be highly aggressive and to have a poor prognosis. This report describes a patient with a maxillary sinus SNEC who was successfully treated with induction chemotherapy using cisplatin and etoposide followed by concurrent chemoradiation therapy with cisplatin and etoposide as radiosensitizers. The patient has remained free of recurrence during 7 years of follow-up. To the authors' knowledge, this is the first case report describing long-term survival in a patient with a resolved primary SNEC of the maxilla that was successfully treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy and concurrent chemoradiotherapy. The clinical and pathologic features of the tumor and the optimal treatment of this patient are discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Seiji Hosokawa
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology/Head and Neck Surgery, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, Hamamatsu, Japan.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
19
|
Aggarwal SK, Keshri A, Rajkumar. Sinonasal undifferentiated carcinoma presenting as recurrent fronto-ethmoidal pyomucocele. Natl J Maxillofac Surg 2013; 3:55-8. [PMID: 23251060 PMCID: PMC3513811 DOI: 10.4103/0975-5950.102162] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
We describe a case of a 53-year-old man presented to our ENT OPD with chief complaints of recurrent right supraorbital swelling for last 6 months, which was associated with bilateral periorbital edema. Contrast-enhanced computerized tomographic scan showed a large frontoethmoidal mucocele with expansion of the bone but there was no erosion. Endoscopic marsupialization along with external frontoethmoidectomy was done to treat the patient and the collected pus, fluid and necrotic tissue was sent for HPE. Biopsy came out to be sinonasal carcinoma, which is a rare occurrence in frontal sinus. Moreover, sinonasal carcinoma presenting as recurrent frontoethmoidal mucocele has not been reported till date in the literature to the best of our knowledge. This case is being reported to make aware among all ENT surgeons and to be cautious about such presentation.
Collapse
|
20
|
Abstract
Sinonasal malignant neoplasms comprise only 3% of all head and neck malignancies. Synchronous and metachronous tumors of the head and neck have been described, but rarely have there been reports of a single tumor with two distinct histologies. Here, we describe a case of a sinonasal malignant neoplasm with two distinct histologies. A case report and literature review was performed. We present a case of paranasal sinus neoplasm involving two malignant cell types. An 83-year-old woman presented with a 2-year history of symptoms suggestive of chronic sinusitis, which included nasal congestion and intermittent midface pressure. More recently, her symptoms progressed with the development of left-side epistaxis and she was found to have a mass in the left maxillary and ethmoid regions. A biopsy of the maxillary sinus mass revealed a moderately differentiated squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). She underwent complete resection of the lesion through an extended endoscopic approach. Final pathological analysis showed a malignant neoplasm with two distinct malignant morphologies; a moderately differentiated SCC and small cell neuroendocrine carcinoma. Appropriate diagnosis and treatment of head and neck malignancy depends on accurate tumor classification and staging. We present a case of a sinonasal tumor with two distinct malignant entities and review the available literature on the subject. Additionally, we discuss the etiologic theories and challenges in planning the optimal approach to management in this scenario.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Henry P Barham
- Department of Otolaryngology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
21
|
[Cancers of the nasal cavity and paranasal sinuses: clinicopathological, etiological and therapeutic aspects]. Bull Cancer 2013; 99:963-77. [PMID: 23041309 DOI: 10.1684/bdc.2012.1646] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/01/2023]
Abstract
Sinonasal cancers are rare and are often associated with occupational exposure that should be researched. Their diagnosis is often delayed. Carcinomas are the most common histological variety. The aim of the present report is to review the main scientific literature about sinonasal cancer to identify their clinicopathological features, and their main causes and treatment modalities. The treatment of these tumors is surgical, usually followed by radiotherapy.
Collapse
|
22
|
Hosokawa S, Okamura J, Sakai N, Mineta H. Primary Spindle Cell Carcinoma of the Frontal Sinus. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2012; 70:e674-8. [DOI: 10.1016/j.joms.2012.07.025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/05/2012] [Revised: 07/10/2012] [Accepted: 07/13/2012] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
|
23
|
Goel R, Ramalingam K, Ramani P, Chandrasekar T. Sino nasal undifferentiated carcinoma: A rare entity. J Nat Sci Biol Med 2012; 3:101-4. [PMID: 22690063 PMCID: PMC3361768 DOI: 10.4103/0976-9668.95986] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Malignant neoplasms of the paranasal sinuses and nasal cavity are rare, comprising only 3% of all head and neck malignancies. This includes both primary sinonasal neoplasms and metastatic disease. We present the case of a patient with a maxillary soft tissue swelling, which proved to be a rare malignant tumor of maxillary sinus origin, a sinonasal undifferentiated carcinoma
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Richa Goel
- Department of Oral Pathology, Saveetha Dental College, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
24
|
Lymph node metastasis in sinonasal squamous cell carcinoma treated with IMRT/3D-CRT. Oral Oncol 2012; 49:60-5. [PMID: 22884302 DOI: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2012.07.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/29/2012] [Revised: 07/09/2012] [Accepted: 07/11/2012] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To analyze the patterns of neck and retropharyngeal lymph nodes (RPLNs) metastases with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in patients with sinonasal squamous cell carcinoma (SCC), and to explore the patterns of treatment failure treated with intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) or three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT). We also attempt to discuss the role of elective neck irradiation (ENI) in the treatment of cervical negative patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS Between July 2004 and February 2011, 59 patients with histopathologically proven sinonasal SCC were treated with curative intent at our hospital. Among them, 18 (30.5%) patients had neck or RPLN lymph node involvement at diagnosis. RPLN, level Ib, and level IIa were the most common sites of initial nodal involvement. All patients received IMRT or 3D-CRT, while 19 patients further received surgical resection, and other 40 patients received cisplatin based chemotherapy. Median follow-up durations were 28 months (range, 6-81 months) for the entire patient population and 40 months (range, 7-81 months) among the surviving patients, respectively. RESULTS The estimated 3-year local-regional control rate, distant-metastasis free survival rate, disease-free survival rate, and overall survival rate were 63.3%, 81.9%, 60.1%, and 68.9%, respectively. On multivariate analysis, old age (>60 years) significantly influenced the overall survival rate(HR=9.428, p=0.000). As for the pattern of treatment failures developed in 26 patients in the follow-up time, local failure, neck recurrence, and distant metastases were seen in 18, 7, and 9 patients, respectively. Level Ib and level IIa were the most common sites of cervical nodal recurrence. None of the 11 patients who received ENI developed failure in the neck. CONCLUSION For sinonasal SCC patients treated with IMRT or 3D-CRT, our results were generally consistent with findings of other studies, local failure still remain the predominant pattern of treatment failure. However, RPLN metastasis occurred more frequently than previously recognized through detection by MRI in our study. ENI seems to have effectively prevented regional relapse. We recommend ipsilateral level Ib and level IIa neck irradiation for T3-4 sinonasal SCC patients.
Collapse
|
25
|
Blount A, Riley K, Cure J, Woodworth BA. Cerebrospinal fluid volume replacement following large endoscopic anterior cranial base resection. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol 2012; 2:217-21. [DOI: 10.1002/alr.21025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/15/2011] [Revised: 09/27/2011] [Accepted: 10/21/2011] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
|
26
|
Blount A, Riley KO, Woodworth BA. Juvenile nasopharyngeal angiofibroma. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 2012; 44:989-1004, ix. [PMID: 21819885 DOI: 10.1016/j.otc.2011.06.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
Juvenile nasopharyngeal angiofibromas (JNAs) are rare, benign, highly vascular, locally aggressive tumors that primarily affect male adolescents. Historical treatment of these neoplasms has been primarily surgical. In the past decade, endoscopic resection of JNAs has become a viable and promising surgical treatment option. Endoscopic resection has many advantages over traditional open techniques, including better cosmesis, decreased blood loss, shortened hospital stays, and equivalent or improved recurrence rates. Emerging endoscopic technology continues to push the boundaries of resection of skull base tumors and will no doubt become the surgical treatment of choice for most JNAs in the near future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Angela Blount
- Division of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham, 563 Boshell Building, 1530 3rd Avenue South, Birmingham, AL 35294-0012, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
27
|
Conger BT, Riley K, Woodworth BA. The Draf III Mucosal Grafting Technique. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2012; 146:664-8. [DOI: 10.1177/0194599811432423] [Citation(s) in RCA: 42] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Objective. The Draf III procedure is an advanced surgical option for frontal sinus disease refractory to endoscopic frontal sinusotomy and is used to expose the anterior limit of resection of the skull base during endoscopic management of anterior skull base tumors. Our objective was to evaluate outcomes of a strategy using mucosal grafts to decrease postoperative closure. Study Design. Prospective cohort. Setting. Tertiary care facility. Subjects and Methods. Patients requiring a Draf III procedure were prospectively enrolled in the study. Demographics, reason for the procedure, percentage graft viability, and complications were recorded. The primary outcome measure was anterior-posterior (AP) diameter at 3 months. Results. Mucosal grafting was performed during 29 Draf III procedures from 2008 to 2011. Twenty-seven patients (average age, 58 years) were available for measurement at 3 months (average postoperative follow-up, 15.4 months; range, 3–30 months). Reasons for the procedure included tumor (n = 14), chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) with frontal ostium stenosis (n = 12), and trauma (n = 1). Average intraoperative AP diameter was 11.7 mm. All patients met the definition of success (<50% reduction in diameter), maintaining a patent combined frontal sinus ostium for the duration of follow-up (average diameter 10.8 mm at 3 months). Nine patients with CRS and frontal ostium stenosis had openings similar to the entire cohort (>1-year follow-up; average, 19.3 months) with significant symptom reduction (SNOT-22 preop 62.3 ± 20.8 vs 3 months 27.8 ± 14.8 and 1 year 21.4 ± 13.6; P < .0001). Conclusion. Cicatricial stenosis and osteoneogenesis are common following the Draf III procedure. This study indicates that the use of mucosal grafts may assist with postoperative stenosis and should be considered a routine strategy for preventing closure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bryant T. Conger
- Department of Surgery/Division of Otolaryngology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA
| | - Kristen Riley
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA
| | - Bradford A. Woodworth
- Department of Surgery/Division of Otolaryngology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Abstract
The sinonasal tract (SNT) includes the nasal cavity and paranasal sinuses (maxillary, ethmoid, frontal, and sphenoid) and may give rise to a variety of nonneoplastic and neoplastic proliferations, including benign and malignant neoplasms. The benign neoplasms of the SNT include epithelial neoplasms of surface epithelial origin, minor salivary gland origin, and mesenchymal origin. The spectrum of malignant neoplasms of the SNT includes epithelial malignancies, sinonasal undifferentiated carcinoma, malignant salivary gland neoplasms, neuroectodermal neoplasms, neuroendocrine neoplasms, melanocytic neoplasm, and sarcomas. This article concentrates on some of the more common types of benign and malignant neoplasms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joaquín J García
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, 200 First Street Southwest, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
| | - Bruce M Wenig
- Department of Diagnostic Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Beth Israel Medical Center, St. Luke's-Roosevelt Hospitals, Room 34, Silver Building 11th Floor, First Avenue at 16th Street, New York, NY 10003, USA
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Koivunen P, Mäkitie AA, Bäck L, Pukkila M, Laranne J, Kinnunen I, Aitasalo K, Grénman R. A national series of 244 sinonasal cancers in Finland in 1990-2004. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2011; 269:615-21. [PMID: 21590483 DOI: 10.1007/s00405-011-1615-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/11/2011] [Accepted: 04/14/2011] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
Sinonasal cancer is still a somewhat controversial entity because most series are single-center studies. The aim of this study was to give more accurate and generalisable information about treatment of the neck and prognosis of sinonasal cancer. Retrospective, population-based, multicentre study. Altogether 244 patients diagnosed in 1990-2004 were evaluated. The 3- and 5-year disease-specific survival (DSS) rates after treatment with curative intent were 68 and 57%, respectively. Regional status at the time of the diagnosis (P < 0.001, log rank) and local recurrence (P = 0.02, log rank) during the follow-up had a statistically significant effect on DSS. Initially 13% of the patients were diagnosed with neck metastasis. The proportion of regional recurrences during the follow-up was 9%, but it did not have a statistically significant impact on DSS (P = 0.68, log rank). Histopathology had no statistically significant impact on survival in this material of 244 patients. In conclusion, routine elective neck treatment of all sinonasal cancer patients is not recommended, but the importance of the treatment of the primary location is emphasised.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Petri Koivunen
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Oulu University Hospital, Oulu, Finland
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
30
|
Zyłka S, Zawadzki M, Postuła S, Bień S. [Recurrence of cancer of the paranasal sinuses after primary treatment--analysis of conditions and results of salvage treatment]. Otolaryngol Pol 2011; 64:44-9. [PMID: 21171311 DOI: 10.1016/s0030-6657(10)70009-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
THE AIM OF THIS STUDY is to demonstrate epidemiological and clinical parameters of the group of patients with sinonasal malignancies and to analyze its impact on development of recurrences after primary surgical treatment conducted in Head and Neck Surgery Department of Holly Cross Cancer Center Kielce during 7-years period 2001-2007. The retrospective analysis of the group of 42 patients with sinonasal malignancies was made, based on medical record and outpatient follow-up, considering: age, sex, primary focus, histological outcome, local and clinical stage and methods of the therapy. In the group of patients with at least 3-years period of follow-up (n=42) the dependence the rate of oncological failures such as local recurrence, nodal metastases, distant metastases or the second primary focus on clinical and epidemiological factors was analyzed. The probability of survival rate was also estimated. The studied group consists of 42 patients (27M, 15K, M:K = 1.8:1). Age ranged from 28 to 87. The most common localization was maxillary sinus--59.5%. Patients with high local (T3, T4) and clinical (III, IV) stage constitute 77.5% of the studied group. In 66.7% cases the radiation therapy had to follow the surgery. In the group of 42 patients with at least 3-years period of follow-up the oncological failure appeared in 17 cases (40.5%): local recurrence (8), nodal metastases (7), distant metastases (1) and all of them in 1 case. The treatment was performed through: local recurrence (surgery in 2 cases, CHTH--3, symptomatic treatment--3), nodal metastases (RND--3, SND--4, supplementary radiotherapy--7), distant metastases--CHTH--2 cases. Thanks to these procedures the 5-year survival rate is 23.1% and the 3-year survival rate is 29.4%. CONCLUSIONS (1) The oncological failure after primary surgical treatment in the group of patients with sinonasal malignancies developed in 40.5% cases, mainly as local recurrence or nodal metastases. (2) Primary localization and sex have no impact on the rate of the recurrence. (3) The oncological failures significantly more often relate to young patients with high local, clinical stage and low grade of malignancies. (4) The recurrence after primary surgical treatment in the group of patients with sinonasal malignancies substantially reduces 3- and 5-year survival rate (29.4%; 23.1%) compared with the entire studied group--54.8%; 40.0%.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stanisław Zyłka
- Dzial ORL, Chirurgii Glowy i Szyi Swietokrzyskiego Centrum Onkologii w Kielcach.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
31
|
Yanagi Y, Murakami J, Hisatomi M, Katase N, Nagatsuka H, Asaumi JI. A case of malignant fibrous histiocytoma of the maxillary sinus. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2010; 109:e99-e104. [DOI: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2009.11.032] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/15/2009] [Accepted: 11/17/2009] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
|
32
|
Luong A, Citardi MJ, Batra PS. Management of Sinonasal Malignant Neoplasms: Defining the Role of Endoscopy. Am J Rhinol Allergy 2010; 24:150-5. [DOI: 10.2500/ajra.2010.24.3451] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Abstract
Background Preliminary reports support the role of endoscopic techniques in the management of selected sinonasal malignancies. The objectives of this review are (1) to assess outcomes for patients undergoing definitive endoscopic tumor extirpation and (2) to elucidate the role of endoscopy in the management of sinonasal malignancies. Methods Retrospective review of patients with sinonasal malignancy managed via endoscopic techniques from September 1998 to December 2007 was conducted. Results Sixty-one patients were identified (38 men and 23 women) with a mean age of 59 years. The five most common pathologies were squamous cell carcinoma (21), melanoma (10), esthesioneuroblastoma (8), adenocarcinoma (7), and sinonasal undifferentiated carcinoma (3). Sixty-nine endoscopic procedures were performed and categorized according to surgical intent: 57 curative resections (82.6%), 8 palliative resections (11.6%), and 4 tumor mappings (5.8%). Adjuvant chemotherapy and/or radiation therapy was used in 29 of the 50 patients (58%). For those patients undergoing definitive treatment, the disease-free and overall survival rates were 69.2 and 84.6% at mean of 34.5 and 42.7 months, respectively. The local and regional recurrence rates were 17 and 10%, respectively. Conclusion The endoscope is a versatile tool for management of sinonasal malignant neoplasms. Although the role was once just limited to biopsy, endoscopic approaches allow for definitive resection for curative intent and palliative resection for patient comfort with acceptable survival. Moreover, endoscopy facilitates three-dimensional tumor mapping and posttreatment surveillance in patients undergoing definitive chemoradiation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amber Luong
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, University of Texas Medical School at Houston, and Texas Skull Base Institute, Houston, Texas
| | - Martin J. Citardi
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, University of Texas Medical School at Houston, and Texas Skull Base Institute, Houston, Texas
| | - Pete S. Batra
- Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery and Comprehensive Skull Base Program, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas Presented at the fall meeting of the American Rhinologic Society, Chicago, Illinois, September 20–21, 2008
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
ICHINOSE T, GOTO T, MOTOMURA H, TERAKAWA Y, OHATA K. Primary Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Frontal Sinus Treated With En Bloc Resection -Case Report-. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo) 2009; 49:481-3. [DOI: 10.2176/nmc.49.481] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Tsutomu ICHINOSE
- Department of Neurosurgery, Osaka City University Graduate School of Medicine
| | - Takeo GOTO
- Department of Neurosurgery, Osaka City University Graduate School of Medicine
| | - Hisashi MOTOMURA
- Department of Plastic Surgery, Osaka City University Graduate School of Medicine
| | - Yuzo TERAKAWA
- Department of Neurosurgery, Osaka City University Graduate School of Medicine
| | - Kenji OHATA
- Department of Neurosurgery, Osaka City University Graduate School of Medicine
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Wang CP, Chang YL, Ting LL, Yang TL, Ko JY, Lou PJ. Malignant fibrous histiocytoma of the sinonasal tract. Head Neck 2009; 31:85-93. [DOI: 10.1002/hed.20936] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
|
35
|
Zyłka S, Bień S, Kamiński B, Postuła S, Ziołkowska M. [Epidemiology and clinical characteristics of the sinonasal malignancies]. Otolaryngol Pol 2008; 62:436-41. [PMID: 18837219 DOI: 10.1016/s0030-6657(08)70287-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Sinonasal malignances (SNM) usually present as a difficult diagnostic and therapeutic problem. In the paper presented, the epidemiological and clinical characteristics of SNM, diagnosed in Holy Cross Cancer Center in Kielce (Dept. of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery), from 2001 to 2007, as well as a calculated survival rates are discussed. MATERIAL AND METHODS From the hospital data and current clinical observations of 87 patients with SNM the age, sex, localization, stage of the disease, pathology and treatment applied, was taken for analysis. In cases with at least 3 year observation, the Kaplan-Meier survival curves were calculated. Results. In the analyzed group of 87 cases, ranging from 8 to 82 years of age (average 62.3 years), there was 48 male, and 39 female patients (M:F = 1.2:1). 59.8% of all group was in the age above 60 years, with the most common age group 71-80 years (33.3%). The most common defined localization was a maxillary sinus (33.3%), but due to very advanced stage at time of diagnosis in 37.9% of cases, the precise localization within the region was not possible to define. The primary epithelial tumors were diagnosed in 52.9% (n=46), of all SNM, the non epithelial malignant tumors in 42.5% (n=37), and metastatic tumors to the nose and paranasal sinuses in 4.6% (n=4). In the group of epithelial SNM the Squamous cell carcinoma dominated (26/46-56.5%), and in the non epithelial SNM the most common group was a malignant lymphoma (10/37-27.0%). At time of diagnosis the majority of patients with epithelial SNM (80.4%) presented with advanced local stage of the disease (T3+T4a+T4b). The combined modality treatment was applied in the most of patients in the analyzed group (79.3%). The probability of 3 years disease free survival, calculated with Kaplan-Meier method was 64.0%, and 5-years survival--45.0%. CONCLUSIONS (1) The SNM present as a very heterogeneous group of tumors. (2) The most common SNM are a Squamous cell carcinoma, and malignant lymphoma. (3) The majority of SNM are diagnosed at then advanced stage of local disease. (4) The calculated probability of 3-years survival was 64.0%, and 5-years survival 45.0%. (5) The diagnostic, as well as therapeutic approach to SNM requires a multidisciplinary cooperation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stanisław Zyłka
- Dział Otolaryngologii, Chirurgii Głowy i Szyi Swietokrzyskiego Centrum Onkologii w Kielcach
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
36
|
Guntinas-Lichius O, Kreppel MP, Stuetzer H, Semrau R, Eckel HE, Mueller RP. Single modality and multimodality treatment of nasal and paranasal sinuses cancer: a single institution experience of 229 patients. Eur J Surg Oncol 2006; 33:222-8. [PMID: 17127030 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2006.10.033] [Citation(s) in RCA: 73] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/11/2006] [Accepted: 10/20/2006] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
AIMS To assess the single and multimodal treatment results and prognostic factors for sinonasal carcinoma. METHODS Overall survival (OS), disease-specific survival (DSS), local control (LC), and disease-free survival (DFS) in 229 patients with sinonasal carcinoma treated from 1967 to 2003 were calculated. Prognostic factors were univariately and multivariately analyzed. The median follow-up period for survivors was 126 months. RESULTS 32% of the patients were operated only, 47% underwent multimodal therapy, and 20% were treated without operation. The 5-year OS rate was 41%, and the DSS rate was 51%. The LC rate was 64%, and the DFS rate was 34%. Prognostic for DSS were M status (p<0.001), UICC stage (p<0.001), T classification (p=0.001), N status (p=0.002), intracranial tumor infiltration (p=0.008), infiltration of the pterygopalatine fossa (p=0.02), infiltration of the skull base (p=0.021), infiltration of the orbita (p=0.041), and the type of therapy (p<0.001): The 5-year DSS rate was 63% for patients operated only, 56% for all operated patients, 46% for patients undergoing surgery and radiotherapy, but only 21% for patients treated with radiotherapy+/-chemotherapy. Multivariate analysis revealed that T classification (p=0.042), N classification (p=0.035), M classification (p=0.007), UICC stage (p=0.038), and type of therapy (p=0.038) were independent prognostic factors for DSS. CONCLUSIONS Radical surgery is recommended for stage I/II sinonasal carcinomas. Stage III/IV carcinomas still have a poor prognosis, but multimodal treatment seems to favor the outcome.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- O Guntinas-Lichius
- Clinic of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University of Cologne, D-50924 Koeln, Germany.
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
37
|
Rhee CS, Won TB, Lee CH, Min YG, Sung MW, Kim KH, Shim WS, Kim YM, Kim JW. Adenoid cystic carcinoma of the sinonasal tract: treatment results. Laryngoscope 2006; 116:982-6. [PMID: 16735899 DOI: 10.1097/01.mlg.0000216900.03188.48] [Citation(s) in RCA: 55] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Malignancies arising from the sinonasal tract, which includes the nose, paranasal sinuses, and nasopharynx, are uncommon. Although adenoid cystic carcinoma (ACC) is the second most common cancer occurring in the sinonasal tract, only few studies have been reported. This retrospective review was performed to identify the clinical features and treatment outcomes of sinonasal ACC. METHODS Thirty-five patients diagnosed and treated for ACC of the sinonasal tract were included in this study. Medical records, radiographs, and pathologic slides were retrospectively reviewed. RESULTS In two thirds of the patients, the maxillary sinus was the site of origin and cribriform was the most common histologic subtype (61%). Seventy-one percent of the patients had advanced disease (T3, T4) at the time of diagnosis. Five-year overall survival rate was 86% and treatment failure occurred in 18 patients (51%). Five-year local recurrence rate and distant metastasis rate were 30% and 25%, respectively. Adjunctive radiotherapy appeared to reduce local recurrence. Presence of distant metastasis correlated with decreased 5-year survival (P = .001). Five-year survival rate after development of distant metastasis or local recurrence were 17% and 58%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS Based on our findings, we suggest that sinonasal ACC be treated by a combined modality of radical surgery followed by postoperative radiation. The prognosis of sinonasal ACC seems to be determined by the presence of distant metastasis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chae-Seo Rhee
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Seoul National University, Seongnam, Korea
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|