How do I deal with the axilla in patients with a positive sentinel lymph node?

Quercetin as a Novel Therapeutic Approach for Lymphoma

Lymphoma is a name for malignant diseases of the lymphatic system including Hodgkin's lymphoma and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. Although several approaches are used for the treatment of these diseases, some of them are not successful and have serious adverse effects. Therefore, other effective treatment methods might be interesting. Studies have indicated that plant ingredients play a key role in treating several diseases. Some plants have already shown a potential therapeutic effect on many malignant diseases. Quercetin is a flavonoid found in different plants and could be useful in the treatment of different malignant diseases. Quercetin has its antimalignant effects through targeting main survival pathways activated in tumor cells. In vitro/in vivo experimental studies have demonstrated that quercetin possesses a cytotoxic effect on lymphoid cancer cells. Regardless of the optimum results that have been obtained from both in vitro/in vivo studies, few clinical studies have analyzed the antitumor effects of quercetin in lymphoid cancers. Thus, it seems that more clinical studies should introduce quercetin as a therapeutic, alone or in combination with other chemotherapy agents. Here, in this study, we reviewed the anticancer effects of quercetin and highlighted the potential therapeutic effects of quercetin in various types of lymphoma.

The Lymphatic System in Disease Processes and Cancer Progression

Advances in our understanding of the structure and function of the lymphatic system have made it possible to identify its role in a variety of disease processes. Because it is involved not only in fluid homeostasis but also in immune cell trafficking, the lymphatic system can mediate and ultimately alter immune responses. Our rapidly increasing knowledge of the molecular control of the lymphatic system will inevitably lead to new and effective therapies for patients with lymphatic dysfunction. In this review, we discuss the molecular and physiological control of lymphatic vessel function and explore how the lymphatic system contributes to many disease processes, including cancer and lymphedema.

Risk Factors for Arm Lymphedema in a Cohort of Breast Cancer Patients Followed up for 10 Years

BACKGROUND

The etiology of lymphedema is multifactorial, and definition criteria of lymphedema, its limitation, and follow-up must be considered in studies related to risk factors. The aim of this study is to evaluate risk factors related to arm lymphedema in a cohort study with a long follow-up.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The study was performed in 622 breast cancer patients. The main endpoint reported was the presence of clinical lymphedema reported in medical records. Univariate and multivariate regression analyses were performed to identify factors related to lymphedema.

RESULTS

66.4% of the patients were submitted to mastectomy, 88.4% to level III axillary lymphadenectomy, 34.9% to radiotherapy in the supraclavicular fossa, and 4.3% to axillary radiotherapy. The mean follow-up was 96.7 months. 45 patients (7.2%) developed lymphedema, of which 82.2% had developed lymphedema at 60 months. Univariate regression analysis showed that supraclavicular radiotherapy, adjuvant/palliative chemotherapy, ≥ 15 lymph nodes dissected, and axillary surgery increase the lymphedema rate by 1.87, 2.28, 2.03, and 6.17, respectively. Adjusted multivariate regression analysis showed that the combination of axillary dissection and number of lymph nodes dissected was the main factor related to lymphedema (p = 0.017).

CONCLUSION

In the pre-sentinel era, axillary dissection and the number of lymph nodes resected are related to 10-year lymphedema.

A case of synchronous breast and bilateral lung cancers: literature review and considerations for radiation treatment planning

Limited literature is available regarding treatment strategies for three concurrent potentially curable malignancies, and only one case of primary breast cancer with bilateral primary lung cancers has been reported. There is no literature available on approaches to radiation treatment planning and delivery in this challenging scenario. We report a case of a 66-year-old female who underwent partial mastectomy and sentinel node biopsy for left-sided breast cancer, pT1cN1(mic). Metastatic work-up revealed bilateral primary lung cancers, biopsy-proven, each Stage cT1N0. Distinguishing synchronous primary tumours from metastatic disease can be challenging. The histological examination suggested three distinct primaries and each was potentially curable. Devising a treatment strategy required balancing the incremental benefits with the toxicity of combining each of the treatments. Stereotactic ablative radiotherapy was the treatment of choice for the patient's lung primaries, as she was deemed a high-risk surgical candidate. Tangential whole breast radiotherapy with regional nodal irradiation was deemed appropriate for her breast cancer. Treatment for all three sites was planned concurrently, taking into account any potential overlap of dose in the composite plan. Each lung lesion was treated with 48 Gy in 4 fractions with stereotactic ablative radiotherapy using volumetric modulated arc therapy technique. The breast and supraclavicular regions were treated with 50 Gy in 25 daily fractions using a field-in-field technique. Optimal clinical outcomes for patients with multiple primary cancers require optimal definitive management. In this unique case of triple primaries, curative-intent radiotherapy to both lungs, the left breast and regional nodes was planned to be given concurrently and treatment was successfully delivered without significant toxicity.